kembara Xtra
  • GENERAL
  • Earth
  • Gemstones
  • Medicine
  • Finance
  • Law
  • Psychology
  • Technology
  • Travel The World
  • Who We Are
  • Get In Touch
  • Education
  • Table of Content
    • SPM SEJARAH
    • SPM TASAWWUR ISLAM
    • ISLAMIC CONTRACTS
  • GENERAL
  • Earth
  • Gemstones
  • Medicine
  • Finance
  • Law
  • Psychology
  • Technology
  • Travel The World
  • Who We Are
  • Get In Touch
  • Education
  • Table of Content
    • SPM SEJARAH
    • SPM TASAWWUR ISLAM
    • ISLAMIC CONTRACTS
THE ULTIMATE

Kembara XTRA 


Islamic Contract – Bay’ al-Istisnā‘: Avoidance of Sale and Buyback Transactions ( Bay‘ al-‘Īnah ) in Ordinary and Parallel Istisnā‘

5/8/2026

0 Comments

 
Islamic Contract – Bay’ al-Istisnā‘: Avoidance of Sale and Buyback Transactions (Bay‘ al-‘Īnah) in Ordinary and Parallel Istisnā‘
​

Q1: Why must istisnā‘ avoid bay‘ al-‘īnah?

Answer:
Islamic finance requires istisnā‘ transactions to involve:
  • genuine manufacturing;
  • real ownership transfer; and
  • actual commercial risk.
If the arrangement merely circulates assets between the same parties to obtain financing, it may resemble:
bay‘ al-‘īnah (sale and buyback transaction),
which many scholars prohibit because it may function similarly to an interest-based loan.
For this reason, AAOIFI imposes safeguards to prevent:
  • artificial transactions;
  • circular ownership structures; and
  • disguised financing arrangements.


AAOIFI Position
According to AAOIFI Shariah Standard (Para 2/2/4):
  • the manufacturer cannot be the ultimate purchaser; and
  • the ultimate purchaser cannot own more than one-third of the manufacturing facility.
This ensures:
  • independence between contracting parties;
  • genuine transfer of ownership and risk.


BNM Position
The BNM Policy Document on Istisnā‘ is:
silent on this specific restriction.
However:
  • transactions must still remain genuine and Shariah-compliant.


PART A — Ordinary Istisnā‘
1. Normal Ordinary Istisnā‘ (Permissible)
Structure
Only two parties:
  • purchaser (mustaṣni‘);
  • manufacturer (ṣāni‘).


Example
A hotel company orders customised furniture from an independent furniture manufacturer.
Contract Details
  • Furniture manufacturing price: RM500,000
  • Delivery period: 6 months
The manufacturer:
  • supplies materials;
  • manufactures furniture;
  • delivers completed furniture to hotel company.
Analysis
  • Independent parties.
  • Genuine manufacturing.
  • No buyback arrangement.
  • Real transfer of ownership and risk.
Result
✅ Valid ordinary istisnā‘.


2. Ordinary Istisnā‘ Involving Sale and Buyback (
Bay‘ al-‘Īnah)(Problematic)
Example
A company owns a furniture manufacturing factory.
The same company:
  1. asks its own factory to manufacture furniture under istisnā‘;
  2. then “purchases” the furniture from the factory through financing arrangement.
Ownership Structure
  • Customer owns 90% of manufacturing company.
Analysis
Although two legal entities appear to exist:
  • economically they are substantially the same party.
This creates concern that:
  • no genuine commercial transfer occurs;
  • transaction merely simulates financing.
Result Under AAOIFI
❌ Generally prohibited due to resemblance to bay‘ al-‘īnah.


PART B — Parallel Istisnā‘
1. Normal Parallel Istisnā‘ (Permissible)
Structure
Two separate independent contracts.


First Istisnā‘ Contract
Between:
  • customer;
  • Islamic bank.
Contract Price
RM20,000,000
The bank promises to deliver:
  • 100 buses.


Second Istisnā‘ Contract
Between:
  • Islamic bank;
  • independent manufacturer.
Manufacturing Cost
RM17,000,000
The manufacturer constructs buses for bank.


Profit Calculation
RM20,000,000 - RM17,000,000 = RM3,000,000
20,000,000 - 17,000,000 = 3,000,000
Analysis
  • Contracts are separate.
  • Manufacturer independent from customer.
  • Genuine manufacturing occurs.
  • No circular ownership.
Result
✅ Valid parallel istisnā‘.


2. Parallel Istisnā‘ Involving Sale and Buyback (
Bay‘ al-‘Īnah
) (Problematic)
Example
An Islamic bank enters into parallel istisnā‘ for aircraft manufacturing.


First Contract
Bank agrees to deliver aircraft to Airline A.
Contract Price
RM200,000,000


Second Contract
Bank appoints Manufacturer B to construct aircraft.
Manufacturing Cost
RM180,000,000


Problematic Ownership Structure
Airline A owns:
  • 80% shares in Manufacturer B.
Analysis
Although formally:
  • two separate contracts exist,
in substance:
  • customer substantially controls manufacturer.
This creates risk that:
  • the arrangement becomes a circular financing structure;
  • rather than genuine independent manufacturing.
Concern
The aircraft effectively moves:
  • from customer-controlled manufacturer;
  • back to customer.
This resembles:
sale and buyback arrangement (bay‘ al-‘īnah).
Result Under AAOIFI
❌ Generally impermissible.


Simplified Comparison
Normal Ordinary Istisnā‘
✅ Independent manufacturer and purchaser.


Ordinary Istisnā‘ with
Bay‘ al-‘Īnah
❌ Purchaser substantially controls manufacturer.


Normal Parallel Istisnā‘
✅ Independent customer, bank, and manufacturer.


Parallel Istisnā‘ with
Bay‘ al-‘Īnah
❌ Customer substantially controls manufacturer used in second contract.


Important Principle
Islamic finance requires:
  • genuine commercial activity;
  • real manufacturing risk;
  • independent contracting parties.
Transactions should not merely:
  • circulate ownership artificially;
  • disguise financing;
  • or replicate conventional interest-based lending through formal legal structures.











Picture
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.


    Author

    A writer who is passionate about knowledge 

    Author

    Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.

    Archives

    May 2026
    June 2023

    Categories

    All
    1. Types Of Islamic Contract
    Bay Al Inah
    Bay Al Istijrar
    Bay Al Istisna
    Bay Al Murabahah
    Bay Al Salam
    Tawarruq

    RSS Feed

    Archives

    May 2026
    June 2023

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.