- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Negative Resolution
A negative resolution is a parliamentary procedure used in relation to delegated legislation.
Under this process, a statutory instrument automatically becomes law unless Parliament formally objects within a specified period.
The procedure allows delegated legislation to take effect without requiring active parliamentary approval beforehand.
However, either House of Parliament may annul the instrument if sufficient objection is raised.
Negative resolution procedures are commonly used for less controversial or routine regulations.
A negative resolution is a parliamentary procedure used in relation to delegated legislation.
Under this process, a statutory instrument automatically becomes law unless Parliament formally objects within a specified period.
The procedure allows delegated legislation to take effect without requiring active parliamentary approval beforehand.
However, either House of Parliament may annul the instrument if sufficient objection is raised.
Negative resolution procedures are commonly used for less controversial or routine regulations.
- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Negative Clearance
Negative clearance was a former procedure under European competition law.
Under this system, the European Commission could confirm that an agreement did not breach the competition rules of the Treaty of Rome.
Businesses previously notified their agreements to the Commission in order to obtain legal certainty that the arrangements were exempt.
The procedure was abolished in 2004 when businesses were given responsibility for assessing their own compliance with competition law.
This reform shifted much of the responsibility for competition assessment from regulators to companies themselves.
Negative clearance was a former procedure under European competition law.
Under this system, the European Commission could confirm that an agreement did not breach the competition rules of the Treaty of Rome.
Businesses previously notified their agreements to the Commission in order to obtain legal certainty that the arrangements were exempt.
The procedure was abolished in 2004 when businesses were given responsibility for assessing their own compliance with competition law.
This reform shifted much of the responsibility for competition assessment from regulators to companies themselves.
- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Negligent Misstatement
A negligent misstatement is a false statement made honestly but carelessly by one person to another.
The statement may concern facts, opinions, or information that causes another person to rely on it and suffer loss. An opinion can amount to a factual representation if it implies that reasonable grounds exist for holding that opinion.
Courts determine whether a statement is false by considering what a reasonable person would understand from the words and surrounding conduct of the person making the statement.
A negligent misstatement only gives rise to liability where a duty of care existed between the parties and it was reasonable for the claimant to rely on the statement.
This area of law developed through important cases such as Hedley Byrne v Heller and may also overlap with contract law and statutory remedies for misrepresentation.
A negligent misstatement is a false statement made honestly but carelessly by one person to another.
The statement may concern facts, opinions, or information that causes another person to rely on it and suffer loss. An opinion can amount to a factual representation if it implies that reasonable grounds exist for holding that opinion.
Courts determine whether a statement is false by considering what a reasonable person would understand from the words and surrounding conduct of the person making the statement.
A negligent misstatement only gives rise to liability where a duty of care existed between the parties and it was reasonable for the claimant to rely on the statement.
This area of law developed through important cases such as Hedley Byrne v Heller and may also overlap with contract law and statutory remedies for misrepresentation.
- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Negligence
Negligence refers to carelessness that amounts to a breach of a legal duty. It occurs when a person fails to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances.
In professional situations, the law expects individuals with special skills, such as doctors or lawyers, to meet the standard of a reasonably competent member of that profession. Failure to do so may amount to professional negligence.
Negligence may also form part of criminal liability in certain offences, including careless driving, some sexual offences, and forms of manslaughter involving gross negligence.
In civil law, negligence is a tort arising from breach of a duty of care that causes damage to another person. A claimant must prove that the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused loss or injury.
Actions in negligence are especially important where no contract exists between the parties. Although damages may sometimes be more limited than in contract claims, limitation rules in negligence actions can occasionally be more favourable.
Negligence refers to carelessness that amounts to a breach of a legal duty. It occurs when a person fails to act with the level of care that a reasonable person would exercise in similar circumstances.
In professional situations, the law expects individuals with special skills, such as doctors or lawyers, to meet the standard of a reasonably competent member of that profession. Failure to do so may amount to professional negligence.
Negligence may also form part of criminal liability in certain offences, including careless driving, some sexual offences, and forms of manslaughter involving gross negligence.
In civil law, negligence is a tort arising from breach of a duty of care that causes damage to another person. A claimant must prove that the defendant owed a duty of care, breached that duty, and caused loss or injury.
Actions in negligence are especially important where no contract exists between the parties. Although damages may sometimes be more limited than in contract claims, limitation rules in negligence actions can occasionally be more favourable.
- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Negotiable Instrument
A negotiable instrument is a written document containing an obligation to pay a specific sum of money and capable of being transferred from one person to another.
The holder of the instrument may enforce payment in their own name, even if there were defects in the previous holder’s title, provided the instrument was obtained honestly and for value.
Transferability is a key feature of negotiable instruments because rights pass with possession of the document.
Common examples include bills of exchange, cheques, and promissory notes.
Negotiable instruments play an important role in commercial transactions by facilitating trade and financial dealings.
A negotiable instrument is a written document containing an obligation to pay a specific sum of money and capable of being transferred from one person to another.
The holder of the instrument may enforce payment in their own name, even if there were defects in the previous holder’s title, provided the instrument was obtained honestly and for value.
Transferability is a key feature of negotiable instruments because rights pass with possession of the document.
Common examples include bills of exchange, cheques, and promissory notes.
Negotiable instruments play an important role in commercial transactions by facilitating trade and financial dealings.
- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Negotiation of a Bill
The negotiation of a bill refers to the transfer of a bill of exchange from one person to another so that the new holder gains legal rights over it.
A bill payable to bearer is transferred simply by delivery, while a bill payable to order requires endorsement together with delivery.
Once properly negotiated, the transferee becomes the lawful holder and may enforce payment under the bill.
The original issue of the bill to the payee does not itself count as negotiation.
This process is essential in commercial law because it allows negotiable instruments to circulate as substitutes for money.
The negotiation of a bill refers to the transfer of a bill of exchange from one person to another so that the new holder gains legal rights over it.
A bill payable to bearer is transferred simply by delivery, while a bill payable to order requires endorsement together with delivery.
Once properly negotiated, the transferee becomes the lawful holder and may enforce payment under the bill.
The original issue of the bill to the payee does not itself count as negotiation.
This process is essential in commercial law because it allows negotiable instruments to circulate as substitutes for money.
- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Negotiation
In international law, negotiation refers to the diplomatic process through which states discuss issues of mutual concern in order to resolve disputes.
Negotiations may occur through direct meetings, diplomatic communication, or written correspondence between representatives of states.
The process is considered one of the most peaceful and common methods of settling international disagreements.
Negotiation allows parties to reach voluntary agreements without resorting to litigation, arbitration, or armed conflict.
Successful negotiation often depends on compromise, diplomacy, and mutual understanding between the states involved.
In international law, negotiation refers to the diplomatic process through which states discuss issues of mutual concern in order to resolve disputes.
Negotiations may occur through direct meetings, diplomatic communication, or written correspondence between representatives of states.
The process is considered one of the most peaceful and common methods of settling international disagreements.
Negotiation allows parties to reach voluntary agreements without resorting to litigation, arbitration, or armed conflict.
Successful negotiation often depends on compromise, diplomacy, and mutual understanding between the states involved.
- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Necessity
Necessity is a general defence in criminal law where a person commits an unlawful act because circumstances forced them to choose between two harmful alternatives.
Unlike duress, the pressure does not come from another person but from external conditions or emergencies.
An example would be a fire engine driver ignoring a red traffic light in order to respond to an emergency.
English law recognizes the defence only in limited situations, and its exact scope remains uncertain.
Necessity is generally not accepted as a defence to serious crimes such as murder or theft, although it may apply in some medical emergencies or situations involving the protection of life and property.
Necessity is a general defence in criminal law where a person commits an unlawful act because circumstances forced them to choose between two harmful alternatives.
Unlike duress, the pressure does not come from another person but from external conditions or emergencies.
An example would be a fire engine driver ignoring a red traffic light in order to respond to an emergency.
English law recognizes the defence only in limited situations, and its exact scope remains uncertain.
Necessity is generally not accepted as a defence to serious crimes such as murder or theft, although it may apply in some medical emergencies or situations involving the protection of life and property.
- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Neighbour Principle
The neighbour principle is a legal rule developed in the landmark case of Donoghue v Stevenson.
It states that individuals must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that could foreseeably harm their neighbours.
In this context, a neighbour means a person who is closely and directly affected by one’s actions and should reasonably be considered when acting.
The principle became the foundation for the modern law of negligence and the concept of duty of care.
It significantly expanded liability in tort law by recognizing obligations beyond contractual relationships.
The neighbour principle is a legal rule developed in the landmark case of Donoghue v Stevenson.
It states that individuals must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that could foreseeably harm their neighbours.
In this context, a neighbour means a person who is closely and directly affected by one’s actions and should reasonably be considered when acting.
The principle became the foundation for the modern law of negligence and the concept of duty of care.
It significantly expanded liability in tort law by recognizing obligations beyond contractual relationships.
- Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – New International Economic Order
The New International Economic Order (NIEO) was a set of proposals adopted during a special session of the United Nations General Assembly in 1974.
The initiative was introduced through a declaration and programme of action aimed at restructuring global economic relations to create greater fairness between developed and developing countries.
The NIEO emphasized principles such as equity, sovereign equality, cooperation, common interest, and interdependence among states.
One of its major objectives was to challenge traditional international rules relating to compensation for nationalization of foreign-owned property.
Under the NIEO approach, the law of the state carrying out nationalization would govern compensation issues rather than customary international law requiring effective compensation to foreign owners.
The New International Economic Order (NIEO) was a set of proposals adopted during a special session of the United Nations General Assembly in 1974.
The initiative was introduced through a declaration and programme of action aimed at restructuring global economic relations to create greater fairness between developed and developing countries.
The NIEO emphasized principles such as equity, sovereign equality, cooperation, common interest, and interdependence among states.
One of its major objectives was to challenge traditional international rules relating to compensation for nationalization of foreign-owned property.
Under the NIEO approach, the law of the state carrying out nationalization would govern compensation issues rather than customary international law requiring effective compensation to foreign owners.