LAW

Published on
Islamic Contract Law – Express vs Implied Contracts (Comparison with English & Malaysian Law)


1. Recognition of Contracts
  • Islamic Contract Law
    • Recognises:
      • Express contracts
      • Implied contracts (by conduct and custom – ʿurf)


  • English Law
    • Recognises:
      • Express contracts
      • Implied contracts (by conduct, facts, or law)


  • Malaysian Law
    • Based on Contracts Act 1950
    • Also recognises:
      • Express contracts
      • Implied contracts (similar to English law)


2. Express Contracts
Definition
  • Terms are clearly stated


Examples (All Systems)
  • Oral:
    • “I sell you this for RM500”
  • Written:
    • Signing a lease agreement


Key Point
  • All three systems:
    • ✅ Fully recognise express contracts


3. Implied Contracts
Islamic Contract Law
  • Based on:
    • Conduct (actions)
    • Custom (ʿurf)
  • Example:
    • Taking goods in a shop → paying at counter


English Law
  • Implied through:
    • Conduct
    • Circumstances
    • Court implication
  • Example:
    • Boarding a bus → obligation to pay fare


Malaysian Law
  • Follows English law approach
  • Implied from:
    • Conduct and surrounding facts


4. Formation (Offer & Acceptance)
  • Islamic Contract Law
    • Can be:
      • Oral
      • Written
      • By conduct


  • English Law
    • Same:
      • Offer + acceptance may be implied


  • Malaysian Law
    • Same principle applies


5. Key Requirement for Validity
  • Islamic Contract Law
    • Requires:
      • Legal capacity (ahliyyah)
      • Consent


  • English Law
    • Requires:
      • Capacity
      • Consideration
      • Intention


  • Malaysian Law
    • Requires:
      • Capacity
      • Consideration
      • Intention


6. Role of Custom (Important Difference)
  • Islamic Contract Law
    • Custom (ʿurf) plays a major role
    • Can determine:
      • Terms of contract


  • English Law
    • Custom plays:
      • Limited role


  • Malaysian Law
    • Custom recognised but:
      • Less central than Islamic law


7. Freedom of Contract
  • Islamic Contract Law
    • Allows freedom:
      • BUT limited by Shariah


  • English Law
    • Strong freedom of contract


  • Malaysian Law
    • Similar to English law


Final Summary
  • All three systems recognise:
    • Express contracts
    • Implied contracts
  • Key differences:
    • Islamic law emphasises:
      • Custom (ʿurf) and moral framework
    • English & Malaysian law emphasise:
      • Consideration and legal structure


One-Line Comparison
  • Islamic law = flexible (words, conduct, custom)
  • English & Malaysian law = similar structure, but more legal-technical





Picture
Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Judicial Comity
Judicial comity is the principle by which courts show mutual respect for the decisions and laws of other courts, whether within the same jurisdiction or in different jurisdictions. It is based on courtesy and practical cooperation rather than strict legal obligation.
Within a judicial system, courts of equal standing are not bound by each other’s decisions. However, judicial comity encourages judges to follow earlier decisions unless they believe them to be clearly wrong. This promotes consistency and stability in the law.
In international or cross-jurisdictional contexts, judicial comity helps facilitate cooperation between legal systems, particularly in recognizing and enforcing foreign judgments or applying foreign l

Picture
Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Judicial Deference
Judicial deference refers to the principle that courts may show respect for the decisions of legislative or executive bodies, particularly when reviewing laws for compliance with human rights standards.
This concept recognizes that elected bodies are democratically accountable and may be better placed to make policy decisions affecting the public interest. As a result, courts may exercise restraint and avoid interfering unless clearly necessary.
Judicial deference is especially relevant in cases involving the interpretation of rights under instruments such as the European Convention on Human Rights. It reflects a balance between protecting individual rights and respecting democratic decision-making processes.

Picture
Published on
Islamic Contract Law – Express and Implied Contracts (Notes with Examples)


1. Recognition in Islamic Law
  • Islamic law recognises:
    • Express contracts
    • Implied contracts
  • Similar to:
    • Common law (contracts by conduct also recognised)


2. Express Contract (ʿAqd Ṣarīḥ)
Meaning
  • A contract where:
    • Terms are clearly stated
  • Can be made:
    • Orally
    • In writing


Examples
  • Oral:
    • A says: “I sell you this phone for RM500”
    • B says: “I accept”
  • Written:
    • Signing a tenancy agreement
    • Written sale contract
👉 Clear offer + acceptance = express contract


3. Implied Contract (ʿAqd Ḍimnī)
Meaning
  • A contract formed through:
    • Conduct (actions)
    • Customary practice (ʿurf)
  • No explicit words needed


Examples
  • By Conduct
    • Taking goods from a shop and paying at the counter
    • Boarding a bus and paying fare
👉 No words spoken, but agreement is understood


  • By Custom (ʿUrf)
    • Hiring a taxi:
      • Fare is understood based on normal practice
    • Restaurant service:
      • Customer eats → expected to pay
👉 Based on social/customary understanding


4. Forms of Offer and Acceptance in Islamic Law
  • Can be expressed through:
    • Oral communication
    • Written agreement
    • Conduct/actions
👉 All are valid as long as:
  • Consent is present


5. Key Requirement for Valid Contract
  • Legal Capacity (Ahliyyah)
    • Parties must:
      • Be legally competent
      • Understand the transaction


Examples
  • Valid:
    • Adult entering a sale contract
  • Invalid:
    • Minor without capacity entering a complex contract


6. Principle of Freedom of Contract
  • Islamic law recognises:
    • Party autonomy
  • Parties are free to:
    • Enter contracts
    • Choose terms
👉 BUT:
  • Subject to:
    • Shariah limitations (no riba, no gharar, etc.)


7. Key Insight
  • Islamic contract law is:
    • Flexible in form (oral, written, conduct)
  • But strict on:
    • Consent and capacity


Final Summary
  • Express contract
    • Clear terms (oral or written)
  • Implied contract
    • Based on conduct or custom
  • Both are valid if:
    • Parties have legal capacity
    • There is consent


One-Line Understanding
  • Islamic law recognises contracts:
    • “By words, by writing, or by actions—so long as parties understand and consent.”




Picture
Published on
Islamic Contract Law – Development of a “Law of Contracts” 

1. Emergence of a “Law of Contracts”
  • Early Muslim jurists did not create a single unified theory of contract
  • Instead, they developed:
    • Specific rules for different types of contracts
  • This approach is referred to as:
    • A “law of contracts” (as described by Hussein Hassan)
👉 Meaning:
  • Each contract type has its own rules and structure


2. Classification of Contracts
A. Nominate Contracts (ʿUqūd Muʿayyana)
  • Contracts with:
    • Specific names and established rules
  • Examples:
    • Sale (bayʿ)
    • Lease (ijārah)
    • Partnership (mushārakah)
👉 These are:
  • Clearly defined and widely recognised


B. Innominate Contracts (Ghayr al-Muʿayyana)
  • Contracts that:
    • Do not fall under specific classical categories
  • More flexible:
    • Developed based on needs and circumstances
👉 Allowed as long as:
  • They comply with Islamic principles


3. Result of This Classification
  • Led to the development of:
    • A structured body of contract rules
  • Even without a formal theory:
    • Islamic law effectively created a functional contract system


4. Debate Among Scholars
  • Some scholars argue:
    • Islamic law has a general theory of contract
  • Others argue:
    • No formal theory exists because:
      • Classical jurists did not systematise it


5. Four Core Principles as a “General Theory”
Even without a formal theory, Islamic contract law can be understood through four key principles:


1. الأصل في المعاملات الإباحة (Permissibility Principle)
  • الأصل:
    • All commercial transactions are permissible by default
  • Unless:
    • Specifically prohibited


2. Prohibition of Certain Elements
  • Contracts must avoid:
    • Ribā (interest)
    • Gharar (excessive uncertainty)
👉 Ensures:
  • Fairness and transparency


3. Obligation to Fulfil Contracts
  • Parties must:
    • Honour their agreements
  • Based on:
    • Qurʾānic command


4. Prohibition of Unjust Enrichment
  • Cannot:
    • Consume others’ property unjustly
  • Prevents:
    • Exploitation and fraud


6. Key Insight
  • Islamic contract law:
    • Developed practically, not theoretically
  • But these principles:
    • Function like a general framework


Final Summary
  • Classical jurists:
    • Focused on individual contract types, not abstract theory
  • However:
    • A general theory can be inferred from:
      • Permissibility
      • Prohibitions (ribā, gharar)
      • Obligation to fulfil
      • Protection of property


One-Line Understanding
  • Islamic contract law =
    “A practical system of specific contracts guided by overarching principles rather than a formal theory.”

Picture
Published on
Islamic Contract Law – Positive Law vs Normative Law vs Islamic Law 


1. Positive Law (Modern Legal Systems)
  • Meaning
    • Law created by:
      • State or sovereign authority
    • Example:
      • Statutes, legislation, regulations
  • Key Features
    • Based on:
      • Command of authority
    • Focus on:
      • Legal enforceability
    • Does NOT depend on:
      • Morality or ethics
  • Scholars
    • Influenced by Jeremy Bentham and John Austin
  • Example
    • A law requiring:
      • Contracts to have consideration
    • Binding because:
      • It is enacted by authority


2. Normative Law (Moral/Ethical System)
  • Meaning
    • Law based on:
      • Values, ethics, and moral standards
    • Focus on:
      • What ought to be done
  • Key Features
    • Appeals to:
      • Conscience
    • Encourages:
      • Good behaviour
    • Not always legally enforceable
  • Examples
    • Be honest in trade
    • Fulfil promises
    • Avoid harming others


3. Islamic Law (Combination of Both)
  • Meaning
    • Law derived from:
      • Qurʾān
      • Sunnah
  • Nature
    • Combines:
      • Normative (moral guidance)
      • Positive (binding legal rules)


4. Key Characteristics of Islamic Law
  • A. Moral Foundation
    • Appeals to:
      • Conscience
      • Faith
    • Example:
      • Encouragement to act fairly


  • B. Legal Binding Force
    • Some rules are:
      • Legally enforceable
    • Example:
      • Obligation to fulfil contracts


  • C. Use of Different Forms
    • Commands
    • Prohibitions
    • Warnings
    • Rewards and punishments


  • D. Integration of Law and Morality
    • No strict separation between:
      • Legal rules
      • Moral values


5. Key Differences (Note Form)
  • Positive Law
    • Source:
      • State authority
    • Focus:
      • Enforcement
    • Nature:
      • Technical and formal


  • Normative Law
    • Source:
      • Moral values
    • Focus:
      • Ethical behaviour
    • Nature:
      • Persuasive


  • Islamic Law
    • Source:
      • Divine revelation
    • Focus:
      • Both morality and legal obligation
    • Nature:
      • Integrated system


6. Application in Contract Law
  • Positive Law
    • Contract valid if:
      • Legal requirements met


  • Normative Law
    • Contract judged by:
      • Fairness and ethics


  • Islamic Contract Law
    • Contract must be:
      • Legally valid + morally acceptable


Final Summary
  • Positive law
    • “Follow the law because authority commands it”
  • Normative law
    • “Act rightly because it is morally good”
  • Islamic law
    • “Act rightly because it is morally right and legally required by God”


One-Line Comparison
  • Positive = Authority
  • Normative = Morality
  • Islamic law = Morality + Divine authority + Legal obligation

Picture
Published on
Islamic Contract Law – Real Clause Comparison (Islamic vs English Drafting)


1. Scenario: Financing a Property


A. English Law Clause (Conventional Loan)
The Lender agrees to lend RM1,000,000 to the Borrower.
The Borrower shall repay the Loan together with interest at the rate of 5% per annum.
Repayment shall be made in monthly instalments over a period of 10 years.
Key Features
  • Based on:
    • Loan + interest (consideration)
  • Focus:
    • Repayment obligation
  • No requirement for:
    • Asset involvement
  • Purely financial transaction


2. Islamic Contract Clause (Shariah-Compliant Structure – Ijārah Example)
The Financier shall acquire the Property and lease it to the Customer for a fixed term.
The Customer agrees to pay rental in agreed instalments for the use of the Property.
Ownership of the Property shall remain with the Financier during the lease period.
Key Features
  • Based on:
    • Asset (property)
  • Structure:
    • Lease (ijārah), not loan
  • Return:
    • Rental (not interest)
  • Reflects:
    • Real economic activity


3. Additional Islamic Clause (Shariah Compliance)
The Parties agree that this Agreement shall comply with Shariah principles.
Any provision found to be non-compliant shall be amended to ensure conformity with Shariah requirements.
Key Features
  • Ensures:
    • Religious and legal compliance
  • Adds:
    • Moral + legal dimension


4. Risk Allocation Clause Comparison
English Law
The Borrower shall bear all risks associated with the Property, including damage or loss, and shall remain liable to repay the Loan in full.
  • Risk:
    • Placed entirely on borrower


Islamic Contract
The Financier, as owner of the Property, shall bear ownership-related risks.
The Customer shall be responsible for usage-related obligations during the lease period.
  • Risk:
    • Shared based on ownership and use


5. Key Differences from Clauses
  • English Law
    • Loan-based
    • Interest-driven
    • Risk can be one-sided
    • Focus on:
      • Legal enforceability


  • Islamic Contract Law
    • Asset-based
    • Profit/rent-driven
    • Risk-sharing
    • Includes:
      • Shariah compliance + ethical considerations


Final Insight
  • Even though both contracts may:
    • Achieve similar economic outcomes
👉 They are fundamentally different in:
  • Structure
  • Legal theory
  • Moral foundation


One-Line Comparison
  • English clause = “Repay money with interest”
  • Islamic clause = “Use asset and pay rent lawfully.  

Picture
Published on
Islamic Contract Law – How These Theories Affect Contract Drafting (Islamic vs English Law)


1. Starting Point of Drafting
  • Islamic Contract Law
    • Starts with:
      • Shariah principles (what is lawful/ethical)
    • Then:
      • Legal structure is built around it
 
  • English Law
    • Starts with:
      • Legal requirements (offer, acceptance, consideration)
    • Focus:
      • Enforceability in court


2. Role of Language in Contracts
  • Islamic Contracts
    • Emphasise:
      • Clarity (no ambiguity / gharar)
      • Fairness
    • Avoid:
      • Uncertainty
      • Exploitation
 
  • English Contracts
    • Emphasise:
      • Precision and technical wording
    • Often include:
      • Detailed clauses to cover all risks


3. Structure of Obligations
  • Islamic Contracts
    • Must ensure:
      • Real economic activity
      • Asset-backed transactions
    • Prohibit:
      • Interest (riba)
      • Excessive uncertainty
 
  • English Contracts
    • More flexible:
      • Parties can agree to almost anything
    • As long as:
      • It is legal and meets formal requirements


4. Moral vs Legal Emphasis
  • Islamic Contracts
    • Combine:
      • Legal obligation
      • Moral and religious responsibility
  • Example:
    • A party should not exploit loopholes even if legally possible
 
  • English Contracts
    • Focus on:
      • Legal enforceability only
  • Example:
    • If a clause allows advantage, party may rely on it


5. Risk Allocation
  • Islamic Contracts
    • Risk must be:
      • Shared fairly
    • Profit must be linked to:
      • Risk and effort
 
  • English Contracts
    • Risk can be:
      • Allocated freely
    • One party may bear most risk


6. Example (Very Clear Comparison)
Scenario: Financing a Building Project
  • Islamic Contract
    • Structure:
      • Based on asset (e.g., lease or partnership)
    • Return:
      • Rent or profit
    • Requirement:
      • Must comply with Shariah
 
  • English Contract
    • Structure:
      • Loan agreement
    • Return:
      • Interest
    • Requirement:
      • Legal validity only


7. Practical Reality (Very Important)
  • Modern Islamic finance contracts often:
    • Use English legal drafting style
    • But incorporate:
      • Shariah-compliant structures
👉 Result:
  • Hybrid contracts


8. Key Insight
  • Difference in theory leads to difference in drafting:
    • Islamic law → ethical + legal drafting
    • English law → technical legal drafting


Final Summary
  • Islamic contract drafting:
    • Focus = lawfulness + fairness + moral responsibility
  • English contract drafting:
    • Focus = enforceability + precision + risk allocation


One-Line Understanding
  • Islamic contracts = “Must be lawful, fair, and fulfilled”
  • English contracts = “Must be clear, valid, and enforceable”

Picture
Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Judicial Notice
Judicial notice, also known as judicial cognizance, is a rule that allows courts to accept certain facts as proven without requiring formal evidence. This applies to facts that are widely known or easily verifiable and not subject to reasonable dispute.
For example, courts may take judicial notice of commonly known facts such as historical events, geographical locations, or basic scientific truths. In such cases, requiring evidence would be unnecessary and inefficient.
In other situations, courts may take judicial notice after limited inquiry, particularly where facts can be confirmed through reliable sources. This doctrine helps streamline proceedings by avoiding the need to prove facts that are already clearly established and widely accepted.

Picture
Published on
KembaraXtra – Legal Terms – Judicial Committee of the Privy Council
The Judicial Committee of the Privy Council is a court established to hear appeals from certain Commonwealth countries, overseas territories, and other specified jurisdictions. It serves as a final appellate tribunal for those regions that retain its jurisdiction.
The Committee is composed of senior judges, including members of the UK Supreme Court and other distinguished legal figures. Its decisions are technically issued as advice to the Crown rather than formal judgments, and they become binding only when adopted through an Order in Council.
Although its rulings are not binding on English courts, they carry strong persuasive authority. Historically, the Committee has played a significant role in shaping legal principles across multiple jurisdictions.

Picture