- Published on
Legal Terms - Eviction
n. The expulsion of a renter or any other occupant from a property. According to the Protection from removal Act 1977, the removal of a home occupier, except through legal proceedings, constitutes a criminal offense. Harassing a residential occupant to convince them to vacate is also an offense.
A mortgagee may take possession peacefully without a court order (Ropaigealach v Barclay’s Bank plc [2000] QB 263). Numerous renters possess statutory protection, necessitating the landlord to demonstrate valid grounds for possession to a court. According to the Housing Act 1988, a tenant is entitled to seek damages for illegal eviction.
n. The expulsion of a renter or any other occupant from a property. According to the Protection from removal Act 1977, the removal of a home occupier, except through legal proceedings, constitutes a criminal offense. Harassing a residential occupant to convince them to vacate is also an offense.
A mortgagee may take possession peacefully without a court order (Ropaigealach v Barclay’s Bank plc [2000] QB 263). Numerous renters possess statutory protection, necessitating the landlord to demonstrate valid grounds for possession to a court. According to the Housing Act 1988, a tenant is entitled to seek damages for illegal eviction.
- Published on
Legal Terms – Eviction
The expulsion of a renter or any other occupant from a property. According to the Protection from removal Act 1977, the removal of a home occupier, except through legal proceedings, constitutes a criminal offense. Harassing a residential occupant to convince them to vacate is also an offense (see to harassment of occupant). A mortgagee may take possession peacefully without a court order (Ropaigealach v Barclay’s Bank plc [2000] QB 263). Numerous renters possess statutory protection, necessitating the landlord to demonstrate valid grounds for possession to a court. According to the Housing Act 1988, a tenant is entitled to seek damages for illegal eviction.
The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 permits the court to issue a restraining order against a renter who is harassing a neighbor, potentially necessitating the eviction of the harasser.
The expulsion of a renter or any other occupant from a property. According to the Protection from removal Act 1977, the removal of a home occupier, except through legal proceedings, constitutes a criminal offense. Harassing a residential occupant to convince them to vacate is also an offense (see to harassment of occupant). A mortgagee may take possession peacefully without a court order (Ropaigealach v Barclay’s Bank plc [2000] QB 263). Numerous renters possess statutory protection, necessitating the landlord to demonstrate valid grounds for possession to a court. According to the Housing Act 1988, a tenant is entitled to seek damages for illegal eviction.
The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 permits the court to issue a restraining order against a renter who is harassing a neighbor, potentially necessitating the eviction of the harasser.
- Published on
Legal Terms – Evidence
That which serves to establish the existence or nonexistence of a particular fact. It may comprise *testimony, *documentary evidence, *real evidence, and, where permissible, *hearsay evidence. The law of evidence encompasses all regulations that dictate the presentation of facts and proof in court proceedings, specifically focusing on the rules regarding the *admissibility of evidence and the *exclusionary norms.
That which serves to establish the existence or nonexistence of a particular fact. It may comprise *testimony, *documentary evidence, *real evidence, and, where permissible, *hearsay evidence. The law of evidence encompasses all regulations that dictate the presentation of facts and proof in court proceedings, specifically focusing on the rules regarding the *admissibility of evidence and the *exclusionary norms.
- Published on
Legal Terms – Evidence in Chief
In judicial proceedings, the testimony provided by a witness for the side that summoned him. Part 32 of the *Civil Procedure Rules stipulates that when a witness is summoned to testify at trial, their witness statement shall serve as their evidence-in-chief until the court directs otherwise. He may be subjected to cross-examination about his witness statement, regardless of whether the statement or any portion thereof was referenced during his examination-in-chief. In criminal prosecutions, evidence-in-chief will almost invariably consist of live testimony in court.
In judicial proceedings, the testimony provided by a witness for the side that summoned him. Part 32 of the *Civil Procedure Rules stipulates that when a witness is summoned to testify at trial, their witness statement shall serve as their evidence-in-chief until the court directs otherwise. He may be subjected to cross-examination about his witness statement, regardless of whether the statement or any portion thereof was referenced during his examination-in-chief. In criminal prosecutions, evidence-in-chief will almost invariably consist of live testimony in court.
- Published on
Legal Terms - evidence in rebuttal
Evidence presented to refute opposing evidence in a case. According to the legal Evidence Act 1995, a prior statement made by a witness may be presented in legal proceedings to counter any implication that their testimony has been contrived. According to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, a prior statement made by a witness, which is accepted in criminal proceedings to counter the claim that their oral testimony has been manufactured, is permissible as evidence for any matter mentioned that would also be admissible as oral testimony from that witness.
Evidence presented to refute opposing evidence in a case. According to the legal Evidence Act 1995, a prior statement made by a witness may be presented in legal proceedings to counter any implication that their testimony has been contrived. According to the Criminal Justice Act 2003, a prior statement made by a witness, which is accepted in criminal proceedings to counter the claim that their oral testimony has been manufactured, is permissible as evidence for any matter mentioned that would also be admissible as oral testimony from that witness.
- Published on
Legal Terms – Evidence Obtained Ilegally
Evidence acquired using unlawful methods. Under common law, evidence collected unlawfully (e.g., through a warrantless search of premises) was not inherently inadmissible; nonetheless, the court could use discretion to reject it if its adverse impact surpassed its probative worth. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 maintains this common law discretion and stipulates that the court may exclude evidence proposed by the prosecution if, considering all circumstances, including how the evidence was obtained, its admission would significantly compromise the fairness of the proceedings. In instances of unlawfully acquired evidence, the court will additionally consider the stipulations of the *European Convention on Human Rights and the *Human Rights Act 1998.
Evidence acquired using unlawful methods. Under common law, evidence collected unlawfully (e.g., through a warrantless search of premises) was not inherently inadmissible; nonetheless, the court could use discretion to reject it if its adverse impact surpassed its probative worth. The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 maintains this common law discretion and stipulates that the court may exclude evidence proposed by the prosecution if, considering all circumstances, including how the evidence was obtained, its admission would significantly compromise the fairness of the proceedings. In instances of unlawfully acquired evidence, the court will additionally consider the stipulations of the *European Convention on Human Rights and the *Human Rights Act 1998.
- Published on
Legal Terms - evidence of user
Indications of the conduct exhibited by the parties involved in a contract. Under some conditions, user evidence is permissible to aid the court in determining the exact obligations of the parties involved in a dispute. It may, for instance, elucidate an ambiguity in the contract's language or an assertion that the written provisions have been modified by verbal agreement.
Indications of the conduct exhibited by the parties involved in a contract. Under some conditions, user evidence is permissible to aid the court in determining the exact obligations of the parties involved in a dispute. It may, for instance, elucidate an ambiguity in the contract's language or an assertion that the written provisions have been modified by verbal agreement.
- Published on
Legal Terms - The European Public Prosecutor (EPPO)
It is an autonomous entity, as proposed by the European Commission in 2000, endowed with the power to investigate and prosecute fraud and other offenses that impact the financial interests of the EU. The Lisbon Treaty has a provision permitting the creation of such a prosecutor.
It is an autonomous entity, as proposed by the European Commission in 2000, endowed with the power to investigate and prosecute fraud and other offenses that impact the financial interests of the EU. The Lisbon Treaty has a provision permitting the creation of such a prosecutor.
- Published on
Legal Terms -European Social Charter
A Charter ratified by the member states of the Council of Europe in 1961, designed to safeguard social and economic rights, including safe working conditions, medical assistance, vocational training, the right to employment, equitable working conditions, safe and healthy work environments, and social welfare services. The 46 European nations that have ratified the Social Charter are required to submit reports biennially, assessing the efficacy of the Charter's implementation within their jurisdictions. Membership is limited to democratic nations.
A Charter ratified by the member states of the Council of Europe in 1961, designed to safeguard social and economic rights, including safe working conditions, medical assistance, vocational training, the right to employment, equitable working conditions, safe and healthy work environments, and social welfare services. The 46 European nations that have ratified the Social Charter are required to submit reports biennially, assessing the efficacy of the Charter's implementation within their jurisdictions. Membership is limited to democratic nations.
- Published on
Legal Terms - European Community (EC)
A political and economic alliance of European nations that began as the European Economic Community (EEC). The Treaty of Rome, established in 1957, aimed to promote economic development within the Community through the creation of a Common Market and the alignment of member states' economic policies. The more specific objectives encompassed the abolition of internal customs duties and the implementation of a unified external customs tariff, the establishment of common agricultural and transport policies by member states, the facilitation of free movement of labor and capital among member states, and the prohibition of all practices that distort competition within the Community (refer to Article 101).
Two of its institutions, the *European Parliament and the *European Court of Justice, were jointly utilized by the *European Coal and Steel Community (established in 1951) and the *European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom; established in 1957); the distinct executive and legislative bodies of these three European Communities were consolidated in 1967 (refer to European Commission; Council of the European Union). The Single European Act 1986, implemented in the UK by the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1986, includes provisions aimed at achieving "concrete progress" towards European unity, such as measures to create a Single Market facilitating the free movement of goods, services, capital, and individuals within the Community; the Single Market commenced on 1 January 1993. In February 1992, the member states ratified the Treaty on European Union (refer to the Maastricht Treaty). This revised the foundational treaties of the Communities by instituting a European Union (EU) grounded in the three Communities; rebranded the EEC as the European Community; and introduced new policy domains to foster enhanced economic, political, and monetary integration among member states. The Treaty became effective on 1 November 1993 and was modified by the Amsterdam Treaty.
The European Community was ultimately disbanded as a separate entity from the European Union with the passage of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009. The amendments to UK legislation required due to accession to the EEC were enacted by the European Communities Act 1972. This Act was repealed on 31 January 2020 as part of the Brexit process by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, however its effects were preserved for a specified implementation period under the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020. Be aware that not all EU legislation that has influenced the UK was enacted via the European Communities Act. The European Arrest Warrant would remain unaffected by the repeal of the 1972 Act, as it is implemented through a separate statute, the Extradition Act 2003. The pertinent section of the 2003 Act was modified by the European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020.
A political and economic alliance of European nations that began as the European Economic Community (EEC). The Treaty of Rome, established in 1957, aimed to promote economic development within the Community through the creation of a Common Market and the alignment of member states' economic policies. The more specific objectives encompassed the abolition of internal customs duties and the implementation of a unified external customs tariff, the establishment of common agricultural and transport policies by member states, the facilitation of free movement of labor and capital among member states, and the prohibition of all practices that distort competition within the Community (refer to Article 101).
Two of its institutions, the *European Parliament and the *European Court of Justice, were jointly utilized by the *European Coal and Steel Community (established in 1951) and the *European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom; established in 1957); the distinct executive and legislative bodies of these three European Communities were consolidated in 1967 (refer to European Commission; Council of the European Union). The Single European Act 1986, implemented in the UK by the European Communities (Amendment) Act 1986, includes provisions aimed at achieving "concrete progress" towards European unity, such as measures to create a Single Market facilitating the free movement of goods, services, capital, and individuals within the Community; the Single Market commenced on 1 January 1993. In February 1992, the member states ratified the Treaty on European Union (refer to the Maastricht Treaty). This revised the foundational treaties of the Communities by instituting a European Union (EU) grounded in the three Communities; rebranded the EEC as the European Community; and introduced new policy domains to foster enhanced economic, political, and monetary integration among member states. The Treaty became effective on 1 November 1993 and was modified by the Amsterdam Treaty.
The European Community was ultimately disbanded as a separate entity from the European Union with the passage of the Lisbon Treaty in 2009. The amendments to UK legislation required due to accession to the EEC were enacted by the European Communities Act 1972. This Act was repealed on 31 January 2020 as part of the Brexit process by the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, however its effects were preserved for a specified implementation period under the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Act 2020. Be aware that not all EU legislation that has influenced the UK was enacted via the European Communities Act. The European Arrest Warrant would remain unaffected by the repeal of the 1972 Act, as it is implemented through a separate statute, the Extradition Act 2003. The pertinent section of the 2003 Act was modified by the European Union (Future Relationship) Act 2020.
