Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture and Dislocation


⸻


Basics


Thoracolumbar fractures are among the most common:


Spinal fractures.


The region most frequently injured is the:


Thoracolumbar junction


particularly:


T11–L1.


This area is vulnerable because it represents a transition between the relatively rigid:


Thoracic spine


and the more mobile:


Lumbar spine.


⸻


Associated Spinal Injuries


Additional spinal injuries may occur in up to approximately:


15% of patients.


These may be:


Contiguous


or


Noncontiguous.


For this reason, the:


Entire spinal column


should be considered during trauma assessment.


⸻


Associated Abdominal Injuries


Abdominal injuries occur in approximately:


20% of patients


with significant thoracolumbar trauma.


Potential associated injuries include:


Splenic rupture


Liver laceration


Renal injury


and


Bowel injury.


⸻


Denis Three-Column Classification


The classic:


Denis three-column system


divides the thoracolumbar spine into:


Anterior


Middle


and


Posterior columns.


Although modern treatment also relies on newer concepts such as mechanical stability and posterior ligamentous complex integrity, this classification remains useful for understanding:


Fracture morphology.


⸻


Anterior Column


The anterior column consists of approximately the:


Anterior two-thirds of the vertebral body and intervertebral disc


together with the associated anterior supporting structures.


⸻


Middle Column


The middle column includes the:


Posterior one-third of the vertebral body and disc


and the:


Posterior longitudinal ligament.


Disruption of the middle column historically has been considered an important marker of:


Potential instability.


⸻


Posterior Column


The posterior column includes the:


Pedicles


Facet joints


Laminae


Transverse processes


and


Spinous processes


together with the posterior ligamentous structures.


⸻


Minor Injuries


Minor thoracolumbar injuries include isolated fractures involving structures such as:


Spinous processes


Transverse processes


Pars interarticularis


and


Facets.


These injuries may still be clinically important depending on their:


Mechanism


and associated injuries.


⸻


Major Injuries


Major thoracolumbar injuries include:


Compression fractures


Burst fractures


Flexion-distraction injuries


Fracture-dislocations


and


Distraction-extension injuries.


⸻


Epidemiology


High-energy thoracolumbar trauma occurs most frequently in:


Young adults


particularly:


Males between approximately 15 and 30 years of age.


⸻


Older Adults


Elderly patients with:


Osteopenia


or


Osteoporosis


may sustain vertebral fractures after relatively:


Low-energy trauma.


⸻


Risk Factors


Important risk factors include:


Motor vehicle collisions


Falls from height


High-energy trauma


and


Osteoporotic bone.


⸻


Associated Conditions


Thoracolumbar fractures may be accompanied by:


Neurologic injury


Spinal shock


Other spinal fractures


and significant:


Abdominal trauma.


⸻


Spinal Shock


Following major spinal cord injury, patients may temporarily develop:


Flaccid paralysis


Loss of reflexes


and reduced:


Autonomic function


below the level of injury.


This transient state is known as:


Spinal shock.


⸻


Diagnosis


Diagnosis requires careful assessment of:


Mechanism of injury


Spinal tenderness


Neurologic status


and


Imaging.


⸻


History


For high-energy trauma, information should be obtained from:


The patient


and


Prehospital personnel


when available.


⸻


Mechanism of Injury


Important mechanisms include:


Motor vehicle collision


Fall from height


Crush injury


and


Direct high-energy trauma.


⸻


Relevant Medical History


Ask about conditions that may alter spinal biomechanics or bone quality, including:


Ankylosing spondylitis


Osteoporosis


Previous spinal surgery


Diabetes mellitus


and known:


Malignancy.


⸻


Physical Examination


Repeated neurologic examination is essential.


Any deterioration may provide the earliest sign of:


Progressive neural compromise


or instability requiring:


Urgent intervention.


⸻


Documentation


The initial examination should be documented carefully and compared with:


Prehospital findings


and subsequent:


Serial examinations.


⸻


Inspection


Inspect the back and trunk for:


Ecchymosis


Seat-belt marks


Visible deformity


Step-off


or evidence of:


Open injury.


⸻


Palpation


Palpate the:


Entire spinal column


for:


Tenderness


Gap


Step-off


or deformity.


⸻


Motor Examination


Motor power should be graded using the:


Medical Research Council 0–5 scale.


⸻


Grade 0


No visible or palpable muscle contraction.


⸻


Grade 1


Flicker or trace contraction without joint movement.


⸻


Grade 2


Full joint motion with gravity eliminated.


⸻


Grade 3


Full joint motion against gravity.


⸻


Grade 4


Movement against gravity and some external resistance.


⸻


Grade 5


Normal strength against full resistance.


⸻


Sensory Examination


A sensory level should be documented using reproducible:


Dermatomal landmarks.


⸻


Thoracic Landmarks


Important landmarks include:


T4 – nipple line


T7 – xiphoid region


T10 – umbilicus


and


T12 – inguinal region.


⸻


Lumbar and Sacral Landmarks


Additional landmarks include:


L1 – proximal anterior thigh


L2 – middle anterior thigh


L3 – region above the patella


L4 – medial malleolus


L5 – dorsum of the foot, classically near the third toe


and


S1 – lateral foot or small-toe region.


⸻


Reflexes


Important lower-extremity reflexes include:


L4 – patellar reflex


and


S1 – Achilles reflex.


There is no routinely useful isolated:


L5 deep-tendon reflex.


⸻


Sacral Examination


When neurologic injury is suspected, evaluate sacral function, including:


Perianal sensation


Voluntary anal contraction


and relevant:


Sacral reflexes.


⸻


Rectal Examination


Assessment may include:


Anal tone


Voluntary contraction


and


Perianal light touch or pinprick sensation


in approximately the:


S2–S5 distribution.


⸻


Bulbocavernosus Reflex


The:


Bulbocavernosus reflex


may help assess sacral reflex activity and can be useful during evaluation of:


Spinal shock.


⸻


Anal Wink


The:


Anal wink reflex


may also provide information about:


Sacral neurologic integrity.


⸻


Imaging


⸻


Initial Trauma Imaging


In modern trauma care, imaging selection depends on:


Mechanism


Clinical examination


and trauma-system protocols.


CT is frequently used as the primary imaging modality in significant:


Thoracolumbar trauma.


⸻


Plain Radiographs


AP and lateral spinal radiographs may demonstrate:


Compression


Loss of vertebral height


Kyphosis


Translation


or


Fracture-dislocation.


They may still be useful in selected:


Lower-energy injuries.


⸻


CT


CT provides excellent visualization of:


Fracture morphology


Canal compromise


Posterior element injury


and


Bony retropulsion.


It is also extremely valuable for:


Preoperative planning.


⸻


Entire-Spine Assessment


Because noncontiguous fractures can occur, imaging of the entire spine should be considered in patients with:


Major trauma


or one confirmed:


Spinal fracture.


⸻


MRI


MRI is particularly useful when there is concern for:


Spinal cord injury


Disc herniation


Epidural hematoma


or


Posterior ligamentous complex injury.


These soft-tissue abnormalities may not be adequately demonstrated by:


CT.


⸻


Differential Diagnosis


Not every vertebral deformity represents an:


Acute fracture.


⸻


Developmental Wedging


Conditions such as:


Scheuermann kyphosis


or congenital:


Vertebral wedging


may mimic:


Compression fracture.


⸻


Osteoporotic and Pathologic Fracture


Patients older than approximately:


50 years


who sustain fractures after relatively minor trauma should be evaluated for:


Osteoporosis.


A:


Pathologic fracture


from malignancy or other bone disease should also be considered when clinically appropriate.


⸻


Treatment


Treatment depends on:


Fracture morphology


Mechanical stability


Neurologic status


Posterior ligamentous complex integrity


and overall:


Patient condition.


⸻


Initial Stabilization


Patients with suspected unstable spinal injury should be handled with:


Spinal precautions


until the injury has been adequately:


Evaluated and stabilized.


⸻


Stable Fractures


Stable injuries may be treated with:


Early mobilization


with or without a:


Thoracolumbosacral orthosis, or TLSO.


⸻


Brace Selection


A TLSO may be modified depending on the:


Fracture level


and specific:


Biomechanical needs.


⸻


Unstable Fractures


Patients awaiting operative stabilization may require:


Restricted mobilization


until definitive fixation is performed.


⸻


Compression Fractures


Simple compression fractures generally involve primarily the:


Anterior column.


⸻


Mild Compression Fractures


Neurologically intact patients with mild stable fractures may be treated with:


Analgesia


Early mobilization


and often:


No brace.


⸻


TLSO for Compression Fracture


A TLSO may be used when it improves:


Comfort


or provides additional:


External support.


⸻


Osteoporotic Compression Fractures


Management should include evaluation and treatment of the underlying:


Osteoporosis


to reduce the risk of:


Future fractures.


⸻


Vertebral Augmentation


Procedures such as:


Kyphoplasty


or


Vertebroplasty


may be considered in carefully selected patients with painful:


Osteoporotic


or


Osteolytic vertebral compression fractures.


They are not required for most uncomplicated:


Compression fractures.


⸻


Burst Fractures


Burst fractures result from:


Axial compression


and commonly involve the:


Anterior and middle columns.


⸻


Retropulsion


Fragments of the posterior vertebral body may be driven into the:


Spinal canal.


The presence of canal compromise alone does not automatically mandate:


Surgery.


⸻


Nonoperative Burst-Fracture Treatment


Neurologically intact patients with stable alignment may be treated with:


Early mobilization


with or without a:


TLSO.


⸻


Surgical Considerations for Burst Fractures


Surgery is more strongly considered when there is:


Neurologic injury


Progressive deformity


Mechanical instability


or major disruption of the:


Posterior ligamentous complex.


⸻


Historical Radiographic Thresholds


Historical factors associated with operative treatment include:


Kyphosis greater than approximately 20°


Facet subluxation


Increased interspinous distance


More than 50% loss of vertebral body height


and


More than 50% canal compromise.


These thresholds should not be interpreted in isolation.


The overall:


Clinical and mechanical context


is more important than any single measurement.


⸻


Flexion-Distraction Injury


Flexion-distraction injuries are often called:


Chance fractures


or


Seat-belt injuries.


⸻


Mechanism


These injuries involve distraction of the:


Posterior spinal structures


with compression or fracture of the:


Anterior column.


⸻


Ligamentous Injury


When the injury is primarily ligamentous, healing may be less reliable and the injury is generally:


Unstable.


⸻


Abdominal Injury Association


Flexion-distraction injuries have a strong association with:


Intra-abdominal trauma


particularly:


Bowel injury.


A careful abdominal assessment is therefore essential.


⸻


Nonoperative Management


Selected purely bony Chance fractures in neurologically intact patients may occasionally be treated:


Nonoperatively.


However, injuries with substantial:


Ligamentous disruption


more commonly require:


Surgical stabilization.


⸻


Fracture-Dislocation


Fracture-dislocations may demonstrate:


Facet fracture-dislocation


Rotation


and


Translation.


These injuries are generally:


Highly unstable.


⸻


Neurologic Risk


Because of major displacement, fracture-dislocations carry a high risk of:


Spinal cord


or


Cauda equina injury.


⸻


Treatment of Fracture-Dislocation


Nonoperative treatment is rarely appropriate.


Surgery usually begins with:


Reduction


and


Posterior stabilization.


⸻


Distraction-Extension Injury


Distraction-extension injuries are:


Uncommon


and often occur in patients with an unusually rigid spine, such as those with:


Ankylosing spondylitis


Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis


or other disorders affecting:


Spinal biomechanics.


⸻


Stability


These injuries are typically:


Highly unstable


and usually require:


Operative fixation.


⸻


Surgical Strategy


Treatment commonly involves:


Posterior instrumentation and fusion


with additional anterior reconstruction when required by:


Fracture morphology.


⸻


Activity


Patients treated with stable fixation or a suitable brace may advance toward:


Progressive mobilization and weight bearing


as allowed by:


Fracture stability


and


Neurologic status.


⸻


Neurologic Injury


Patients with neurologic deficits require individualized:


Rehabilitation


based on the level and completeness of:


Spinal cord or cauda equina injury.


⸻


Nursing Care


Serial assessment should include:


Vital signs


and repeated:


Neurologic examinations.


⸻


Change in Neurologic Status


Any deterioration in:


Strength


Sensation


or


Sacral function


requires prompt:


Reassessment.


⸻


Counseling


Patients with spinal cord injury may require:


Psychological support


and counseling regarding:


Mobility


Employment


Independence


and long-term:


Lifestyle adaptation.


⸻


Physical Therapy


Physical therapy plays an essential role in:


Mobilization


and


Functional recovery.


⸻


Benefits of Early Rehabilitation


Appropriate rehabilitation may reduce complications such as:


Pressure injury


Pneumonia


Venous thromboembolism


Contractures


and


Disuse osteoporosis.


⸻


Occupational Therapy


Occupational therapy is particularly important for patients with neurologic injury who require adaptation for:


Transfers


Self-care


Mobility


and


Activities of daily living.


⸻


Medication


Pain control should be individualized.


There is generally no role for routine:


Long-term maintenance opioid therapy.


⸻


First-Line Analgesia


Options may include:


Acetaminophen


and


NSAIDs


when medically appropriate.


⸻


NSAIDs


Anti-inflammatory medications should be used cautiously in patients with:


Renal disease


Gastrointestinal risk


or other relevant:


Contraindications.


⸻


Opioids


Short-term opioid therapy may be appropriate for:


Severe acute fracture pain


particularly during the early:


Post-traumatic period.


⸻


Radiotherapy


Radiotherapy may have a role in selected patients with:


Radiosensitive tumors


causing pathological thoracolumbar:


Fractures.


Its purpose is primarily to reduce:


Tumor burden


and improve:


Local disease control.


⸻


Surgery


The goals of surgery are to:


Restore alignment


Stabilize the spinal column


and, when necessary,


Decompress neural structures.


⸻


Surgical Approach


The optimal approach depends on:


Fracture morphology


Neurologic compression


Bone quality


and surgeon:


Experience.


⸻


Posterior Instrumentation


Posterior instrumentation is commonly favored because it provides effective:


Reduction


Fixation


and


Correction of alignment


without the additional morbidity of a major:


Anterior approach.


⸻


Neural Decompression


Decompression is indicated when there is clinically significant compression of the:


Spinal cord


Conus medullaris


or


Cauda equina


and when decompression is expected to improve:


Neurologic outcome or mechanical stability.


⸻


Anterior Approach


An anterior approach may be useful when substantial:


Vertebral body destruction


or


Anterior canal compression


requires direct:


Decompression and reconstruction.


⸻


Retropulsed Fragments


Anterior surgery may be particularly useful for selected cases involving significant:


Retropulsed vertebral-body fragments


compressing the:


Anterior spinal canal.


⸻


Fusion


Fusion may accompany fixation when:


Instability


Major ligamentous disruption


or extensive bony injury prevents reliable healing without:


Arthrodesis.


⸻


Follow-Up


Patients with major injuries often benefit from coordinated follow-up involving:


Spine surgery


Rehabilitation medicine


Physical therapy


and


Occupational therapy.


⸻


Rehabilitation Facility


Patients with severe neurologic injury may recover best initially in a specialized:


Inpatient rehabilitation facility.


⸻


Pain Specialist Referral


Persistent chronic pain may warrant referral to:


Pain medicine.


⸻


Rehabilitation Medicine


Patients with spinal cord or cauda equina injury should be followed by:


Physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists.


⸻


Neurology Consultation


Neurologic consultation may be useful when the pattern of deficit does not correlate with the identified:


Spinal injury.


⸻


Prognosis


Outcome depends strongly on:


Fracture severity


and particularly on:


Neurologic status.


⸻


Neurologically Intact Patients


Patients with stable low-energy injuries and preserved neurologic function usually have an:


Excellent prognosis.


⸻


Neurologic Injury


Patients with significant neurologic deficits may experience long-term effects on:


Mobility


Bladder and bowel function


Employment


and


Independence.


⸻


Complications


Potential complications include:


Infection


Neurologic deterioration


Pseudarthrosis


Spinal deformity


Junctional degeneration


Spinal stenosis


Chronic pain


and


Disability.


⸻


Brace-Related Complications


TLSO braces can cause:


Skin irritation


Pressure injury


and discomfort over:


Bony prominences.


Regular skin checks are important.


⸻


Pseudarthrosis


Failure of an intended fusion to heal may cause:


Persistent pain


Implant failure


or progressive:


Deformity.


⸻


Junctional Degeneration


Long spinal fusion constructs may increase mechanical stress at adjacent levels, contributing to:


Junctional degeneration


or


Stenosis.


⸻


Chronic Pain


Persistent pain may arise from:


Residual deformity


Neurologic injury


Degenerative change


or


Postoperative complications.


⸻


Patient Monitoring


Patients should be monitored for:


Pain resolution


Neurologic recovery


Maintenance of alignment


and


Fracture healing.


⸻


Fusion Monitoring


If arthrodesis has been performed, follow-up should also evaluate for:


Solid fusion


and


Implant stability.


⸻


Red-Flag Findings


Urgent reassessment is required for:


New or progressive weakness


New sensory loss


Loss of bowel or bladder control


Increasing saddle anesthesia


or


Worsening spinal deformity.


⸻


Key Principle


Thoracolumbar spine fractures most commonly involve the:


T11–L1 junction, where the rigid thoracic spine transitions to the more mobile lumbar spine.


Evaluation must include careful assessment for:


Noncontiguous spinal injury, neurologic compromise, and associated abdominal trauma.


CT is the principal imaging study for defining:


Fracture morphology, while MRI is especially useful for evaluating:


Spinal cord, disc, epidural, and posterior ligamentous complex injury.


Stable fractures may often be treated with:


Early mobilization with or without a TLSO, whereas unstable injuries such as:


Fracture-dislocations, major ligamentous flexion-distraction injuries, and distraction-extension injuries


usually require:


Operative stabilization.


The major goals of treatment are to preserve or restore:


Neurologic function, spinal alignment, mechanical stability, and early safe mobilization.

Image description
Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Thoracic Outlet Syndrome


Basics

Thoracic outlet syndrome, or:

TOS

is a clinical disorder caused by compression of:

Neural

or

Vascular structures

supplying the upper extremity as they pass through the:

Thoracic outlet

and adjacent:

Supraclavicular region.


Structures Involved

The principal structures at risk are the:

Brachial plexus

Subclavian artery

and

Subclavian vein.


Synonyms

Historical terms include:

Scalenus anticus syndrome

Costoclavicular syndrome

and

Cervical rib syndrome.


Major Clinical Types

Thoracic outlet syndrome is generally divided into:

Neurogenic TOS

Venous TOS

and

Arterial TOS.

Neurogenic disease is by far the most common form.


Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Neurogenic TOS results from compression or irritation of the:

Brachial plexus.

Symptoms commonly include:

Pain

Paresthesia

Numbness

and occasionally:

Weakness.


Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Venous TOS results from compression or thrombosis involving the:

Subclavian or axillary vein.

It may produce:

Arm swelling

Cyanosis

and

Venous congestion.


Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Arterial TOS results from compression or injury of the:

Subclavian artery.

It may produce:

Coolness

Fatigue

Ischemic pain

or distal:

Embolic symptoms.


Epidemiology

Thoracic outlet syndrome is relatively:

Uncommon.


Incidence

Historical estimates vary widely, approximately between:

0.03% and 0.8%.

The fully developed syndrome is considerably less common than nonspecific:

Upper-extremity pain or paresthesia.


Age

Thoracic outlet syndrome occurs most commonly in:

Young to middle-aged adults.


Sex

It is reported more frequently in:

Women

than in men.


Risk Factors

Potential predisposing factors include:

Cervical ribs

Congenital fibrous bands

Abnormal first-rib anatomy

and disorders that increase susceptibility to:

Peripheral nerve dysfunction.


Systemic Conditions

Associated systemic conditions include:

Diabetes mellitus

Thyroid disease

and

Alcohol-related neuropathy.

These disorders may make peripheral nerves more vulnerable to:

Compression.


Aggravating Factors

Symptoms may be worsened by:

Obesity

Postural abnormalities

Repetitive overhead activity

and prolonged positions that narrow the:

Thoracic outlet.


Shoulder-Girdle Position

A chronically depressed or forward-positioned shoulder girdle may decrease available space for the:

Brachial plexus

and

Subclavian vessels.


Etiology

Thoracic outlet syndrome is often:

Multifactorial.

Potential contributors include:

Trauma

Repetitive occupational activity

Congenital anatomy

Postural abnormalities

and systemic:

Neuropathic disease.


Overhead Activity

Occupations requiring prolonged:

Overhead arm use

such as ceiling painting may provoke symptoms over a relatively:

Short period.


Repetitive Lower-Elevation Activity

Occupations involving repetitive upper-extremity motion without extreme elevation may also contribute over:

Many years.

Examples include prolonged:

Keyboard use

or

Driving.


Double-Crush Phenomenon

Thoracic outlet syndrome may coexist with more distal nerve-compression disorders such as:

Carpal tunnel syndrome

or

Cubital tunnel syndrome.


Concept of Double Crush

The double-crush concept proposes that a nerve compromised proximally may become more susceptible to compression at another point along its:

Course.

This theory remains clinically relevant but does not explain every patient with multiple:

Entrapment neuropathies.


Associated Conditions

Patients with:

Diabetes mellitus

Thyroid disease

Alcohol-related neuropathy

and systemic arthritis may have increased susceptibility to:

Multiple nerve-compression syndromes.


Diagnosis

The diagnosis is primarily:

Clinical.

No single provocative maneuver or diagnostic test can reliably confirm or exclude:

Thoracic outlet syndrome.


Signs and Symptoms

Symptoms depend on whether the primary compression is:

Neural

Arterial

or

Venous.


Neurogenic Symptoms

Patients may report:

Neck pain

Shoulder pain

Arm pain

Paresthesia

or

Numbness.


Distribution

Symptoms may involve the entire:

Upper extremity

but commonly predominate along the:

Ulnar side of the forearm

and the:

Ring and small fingers.

The middle finger may occasionally also be involved.


Sensory Findings

Objective sensory abnormalities are often:

Subtle.

They may involve the:

Ulnar aspect of the hand

and sometimes the:

Medial forearm.


Nocturnal Symptoms

Night pain and paresthesia may occur.

These symptoms should be distinguished from:

Carpal tunnel syndrome

which more often affects the:

Thumb

Index finger

Middle finger

and radial half of the:

Ring finger.


Overhead Intolerance

A common complaint is difficulty using the arm in an:

Elevated or overhead position.

Symptoms may increase during:

Hair washing

Overhead work

or carrying the arm in prolonged:

Abduction.


Weakness and Dexterity

Some patients report reduced:

Grip strength

or

Hand dexterity

even when obvious muscle atrophy is:

Absent.


Additional Pain

Associated discomfort may occur in the:

Head

Neck

Chest

Shoulder

and

Arm.


Arterial Symptoms

Arterial compression is less common and may produce:

Coolness

Arm fatigue

Diffuse aching

and occasionally:

Raynaud-like symptoms.


Venous Symptoms

Venous compression may be:

Intermittent

or

Persistent.

Typical findings include:

Arm swelling

Heaviness

and varying degrees of:

Cyanosis.


Physical Examination

A complete examination should assess:

Neck

Supraclavicular region

Shoulder girdle

and both:

Upper extremities.


Posture

The affected scapula may sit:

Lower

and

More anteriorly

than the opposite side.


Clavicular Position

The clavicle may appear relatively:

Horizontal

or depressed.


Supraclavicular Examination

Palpate the:

Brachial plexus region

for:

Tenderness

or a palpable:

Mass.


Tinel Sign

Percussion over the brachial plexus may reproduce:

Distal paresthesia

often along the:

Ulnar side of the hand.


Shoulder Examination

Evaluate for:

Glenohumeral instability

Rotator cuff disease

and

Scapular dyskinesis

because these can mimic or contribute to:

Thoracic outlet symptoms.


Neurologic Examination

Perform a bilateral examination of:

Motor strength

Sensation

and

Reflexes.


Intrinsic Hand Strength

Assess:

Finger abduction

Finger adduction

Grip strength

and other intrinsic:

Hand-muscle functions.


Vascular Examination

Document:

Radial pulses

Skin temperature

Color

and

Arm swelling.


Provocative Maneuvers

Several stress tests have historically been used to provoke symptoms.

These tests should be interpreted:

Cautiously.


Important Limitation

Loss of the radial pulse alone during arm positioning is:

Not diagnostic.

Pulse reduction can occur in many:

Asymptomatic individuals.

A maneuver is more meaningful when it reproduces the patient’s:

Typical symptoms.


Adson Maneuver

The Adson maneuver is performed with the arm near the:

Side

while the neck is:

Extended

and the head turned toward the:

Affected side.


Wright Maneuver

The Wright maneuver places the shoulder in:

Abduction

and

External rotation.

The patient may also be asked to take a:

Deep breath.


Elbow Position

Keeping the elbow extended during provocative testing may reduce confounding from:

Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.


Additional Provocative Testing

Other commonly used maneuvers may include:

Elevated arm stress testing

and

Costoclavicular positioning.

No single test has sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity to establish the diagnosis by itself.


Imaging


Cervical Spine Radiographs

AP and lateral radiographs of the cervical spine may identify:

Cervical ribs

Elongated transverse processes

and

Degenerative cervical disease.


Chest Radiograph

A chest radiograph may help identify:

Cervical rib anatomy

and important alternative diagnoses such as:

Apical lung tumor.

This is particularly relevant in patients with:

Smoking history

or unexplained:

Constitutional symptoms.


MRI

MRI is useful when there is concern for:

Cervical disc disease

or another structural lesion causing:

Neural compression.


Electrodiagnostic Studies

Electrodiagnostic testing may help evaluate for:

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Cubital tunnel syndrome

Cervical radiculopathy

or other:

Peripheral neuropathies.


Role in Neurogenic TOS

Electrodiagnostic studies may be normal in many patients with:

Nonspecific neurogenic symptoms.

They are most useful when an objective neuropathy or alternative diagnosis is:

Suspected.


Vascular Studies

When arterial or venous TOS is suspected, evaluation may include:

Duplex ultrasonography

CT angiography

MR angiography

or other:

Vascular imaging.


Pathological Findings

Thoracic outlet syndrome involves compression of:

Neural

or

Vascular structures

as they pass through the:

Scalene triangle

Costoclavicular space

or

Subcoracoid/pectoralis minor region.


Common Sites of Compression

Important anatomical compression zones include the:

Interscalene triangle

Costoclavicular space

and

Pectoralis minor space.


Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis is broad.


Cervical Spine Disorders

Important cervical causes include:

Cervical spondylosis

Disc herniation

and

Cervical radiculopathy.


Brachial Plexus Lesions

Tumors or other masses involving the:

Brachial plexus

or

Apex of the lung

may produce similar symptoms.


Trauma

Previous trauma involving the:

Neck

Clavicle

First rib

or

Shoulder girdle

may cause chronic pain or neurologic symptoms that resemble:

TOS.


Peripheral Nerve Entrapment

Important alternatives include:

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Cubital tunnel syndrome

Radial nerve compression

and

Suprascapular nerve compression.


Systemic Neuropathy

Neuropathies related to:

Diabetes

Alcohol use

Vitamin deficiency

or

Heavy-metal toxicity

may mimic thoracic outlet syndrome.


Complex Regional Pain Syndrome

Complex regional pain syndrome may cause:

Pain

Swelling

Color change

and

Autonomic abnormalities.


Arterial Differential Diagnosis

Potential arterial disorders include:

Atherosclerotic disease

Aneurysm

Arterial occlusion

Embolism

Raynaud disease

and

Vasculitis.


Venous Differential Diagnosis

Venous alternatives include:

Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis

Effort thrombosis

and

Thrombophlebitis.


Treatment

Initial management is generally:

Nonoperative

for patients with uncomplicated neurogenic:

Thoracic outlet syndrome.


General Measures

Treatment focuses on:

Postural correction

Muscle strengthening

Activity modification

and elimination of:

Contributing mechanical factors.


Patient Education

Explaining the mechanical basis of symptoms can help patients understand why:

Posture

Work position

and

Repetitive overhead activity

may aggravate the condition.


Occupational Modification

Activities involving prolonged:

Arm elevation

or repetitive shoulder-girdle loading should be modified when possible.


Weight Management

When obesity contributes to postural or mechanical loading, appropriate:

Weight reduction

may improve symptoms.


Physical and Occupational Therapy

A structured rehabilitation program is the cornerstone of treatment for:

Neurogenic TOS.


Postural Reeducation

Therapy should emphasize:

Scapular positioning

Thoracic posture

and avoidance of chronic:

Shoulder depression or protraction.


Muscle Strengthening

Important muscles include:

Trapezius

Rhomboids

Levator scapulae

and other:

Scapular stabilizers.


Resistance Exercises

Strengthening may be performed using:

Elastic bands

or

Light free weights

with the shoulder generally maintained below approximately:

90° of elevation

during early rehabilitation.


Pectoral and Scalene Flexibility

Stretching may address tight:

Pectoralis minor

Scalene

and other anterior shoulder-girdle:

Soft tissues.


Time to Improvement

Symptomatic improvement may require approximately:

Several weeks to 2 months

or longer.


Long-Term Exercise

Exercises should be continued until:

Posture improves

Scapular control is restored

and weakness or deconditioning has been:

Corrected.


Medication

Medication plays a secondary role.

Treatment may include:

NSAIDs

Acetaminophen

or selected medications for:

Neuropathic pain.


Vascular Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Patients with arterial or venous TOS require:

Specialist vascular evaluation.

Treatment may differ substantially from management of:

Neurogenic TOS.


Venous Thrombosis

Acute venous thrombosis may require:

Anticoagulation

Thrombolysis

and eventual:

Thoracic outlet decompression

depending on severity and timing.


Arterial Disease

Arterial TOS with aneurysm, thrombosis, or embolization may require:

Arterial reconstruction

in addition to:

Surgical decompression.


Surgery

Surgery is considered when:

A carefully supervised conservative program fails

and symptoms remain sufficiently severe to cause:

Major functional limitation.


Surgical Decision-Making

Patients should understand that outcomes are variable and that surgery is generally reserved for those with:

Persistent significant symptoms

or objective:

Neurovascular compromise.


Common Surgical Procedures

Typical operations include:

First-rib resection

Scalenectomy

or a combination of:

Both.


Fibrous Band Release

Congenital or acquired:

Fibrous bands

may also be divided when they contribute to:

Compression.


Vascular Reconstruction

Patients with arterial or venous injury may additionally require:

Vessel repair

Patch angioplasty

Thrombectomy

or

Grafting.


Follow-Up

Patients undergoing nonoperative treatment should be followed for:

Postural improvement

Strength

Symptom reduction

and tolerance of:

Work or activity.


Postoperative Follow-Up

After surgery, monitoring should assess:

Neurologic function

Vascular status

Wound healing

and recurrence of:

Symptoms.


Prognosis

Most patients with uncomplicated neurogenic TOS improve with:

Nonoperative management.


Surgical Prognosis

With appropriate patient selection, many patients undergoing surgery experience:

Symptomatic improvement.

Results are generally more predictable when there is a clearly defined:

Anatomic or vascular lesion.


Complications

Potential surgical complications include:

Pneumothorax

Infection

Vascular injury

Brachial plexus injury

and

Shoulder-girdle dysfunction.


Pneumothorax

Pleural injury during first-rib resection may produce:

Pneumothorax.


Vascular Injury

The proximity of the:

Subclavian vessels

creates a risk of significant:

Hemorrhage.


Brachial Plexus Injury

Manipulation or traction may result in:

Neurologic injury

with postoperative:

Pain

Weakness

or

Sensory loss.


Recurrence

Symptoms may recur after surgery because of:

Scar formation

Persistent muscle weakness

Scapular depression

or

Incomplete decompression.


Patient Monitoring

Long-term monitoring should focus on:

Pain

Paresthesia

Hand strength

Arm swelling

Vascular symptoms

and progression through:

Physical therapy.


Key Principle

Thoracic outlet syndrome is a clinical disorder caused by compression of the brachial plexus or subclavian vessels as they pass from the neck into the upper extremity.

The disorder may be:

Neurogenic, venous, or arterial, with neurogenic disease being the most common.

Diagnosis is primarily:

Clinical, and provocative maneuvers should be interpreted cautiously because pulse changes alone are not:

Diagnostic.

The differential diagnosis includes:

Cervical radiculopathy, carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes, systemic neuropathy, brachial plexus lesions, and vascular disease.

Initial management of uncomplicated neurogenic TOS centers on:

Postural correction, scapular strengthening, activity modification, and occupational rehabilitation.

Surgery, typically involving:

First-rib resection and/or scalenectomy, is reserved for selected patients with persistent disabling symptoms or significant vascular or neurologic compromise.



Image description
Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Thoracic Disc Herniation


Basics

Thoracic disc herniation is protrusion or extrusion of an intervertebral disc within the:

Thoracic spine

that may compress the:

Spinal cord

or

Thoracic nerve roots.

The condition can be difficult to diagnose because symptoms are often:

Nonspecific

and may resemble disorders involving the:

Chest

Abdomen

Spine

or

Peripheral nervous system.


Incidental Disc Abnormalities

A major diagnostic challenge is the high prevalence of:

Asymptomatic thoracic disc abnormalities.

Disc degeneration or herniation on imaging does not necessarily indicate that the abnormality is responsible for the patient’s:

Symptoms.

Clinical findings must therefore correlate carefully with the:

Anatomic level

and degree of:

Neural compression.


Epidemiology

Symptomatic thoracic disc disease most commonly presents during approximately the:

Fifth decade of life.


Sex

A slight predominance in:

Males

has been reported historically.


Trauma

Up to approximately:

50% of symptomatic patients

report some preceding:

Traumatic event

before symptoms begin.


Incidence

Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation is uncommon, with an estimated incidence of approximately:

1 per 100,000 persons per year.


Prevalence on MRI

Thoracic disc abnormalities are much more common than clinically symptomatic disease.

MRI studies have reported abnormalities in up to approximately:

73% of individuals.


Asymptomatic Herniation

Approximately:

37%

of individuals in some imaging series have demonstrated:

Asymptomatic thoracic disc herniation.


Genetics

There is no recognized specific:

Genetic association

with thoracic disc herniation.


Pathophysiology

Symptoms develop when the herniated disc compresses the:

Spinal cord

or

Thoracic nerve root.


Spinal Cord Compression

Because the thoracic spinal canal contains the:

Spinal cord

rather than the cauda equina, central disc herniation may produce:

Myelopathy.


Thoracic Myelopathy

Thoracic cord compression may cause:

Lower-extremity weakness

Spasticity

Hyperreflexia

Sensory disturbance

Gait dysfunction

and

Bowel or bladder abnormalities.

Unlike cervical myelopathy, upper-extremity findings are generally:

Absent.


Radiculopathy

A lateral or foraminal herniation may compress a:

Thoracic nerve root

and produce band-like pain along the:

Chest wall

or

Abdominal wall.


Associated Conditions

Thoracic disc herniation may occasionally occur in adolescents with:

Scheuermann disease.


Diagnosis

Diagnosis requires careful assessment because of the broad:

Differential diagnosis

and the high frequency of incidental:

Thoracic MRI abnormalities.


Signs and Symptoms

Patients may present with:

Axial thoracic pain

Radicular pain

or

Myelopathy.


Axial Pain

Pain may be localized to the:

Mid-thoracic

or

Lower thoracic spine.

It can be:

Aching

Deep

or

Mechanical.


Radicular Pain

Thoracic radiculopathy often produces:

Band-like pain

around the trunk.

The:

T10 dermatome

is a commonly reported symptomatic distribution.


Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction

Bowel or bladder dysfunction has historically been reported in up to approximately:

20% of symptomatic patients.

These findings suggest significant:

Spinal cord involvement.


Clinical Patterns

Two broad clinical presentations are often described.


Younger Patients

Patients younger than approximately:

40 years

more commonly have:

Soft disc herniations.


Acute Soft Disc Herniation

These cases may follow:

Trauma

and may produce relatively acute:

Cord compression

or

Radiculopathy.

They often respond favorably to appropriately selected:

Nonoperative or operative treatment.


Older Patients

Patients older than approximately:

40 years

more commonly have:

Degenerative

or

Calcified disc herniations.


Chronic Calcified Herniation

These patients may have:

Longstanding symptoms

without a clear history of trauma.

Compression of the cord or nerve root tends to be more:

Chronic.


Physical Examination

A complete neurologic examination should be performed with careful assessment for:

Myelopathy.


Gait

Observe for:

Spastic gait

Balance disturbance

Shortened stride

or difficulty with:

Tandem walking.


Motor Examination

Assess lower-extremity:

Strength

and look for signs of:

Upper motor neuron dysfunction.


Reflexes

Evaluate:

Patellar reflexes

Achilles reflexes

and look for:

Hyperreflexia

Clonus

or abnormal:

Plantar responses.


Sensory Level

A sensory level may help localize the lesion.

Useful landmarks include:

T4 – nipple line

T7 – xiphoid process

T10 – umbilicus

and

T12 – inguinal crease.


Abdominal Muscle Examination

Asymmetric contraction of the:

Rectus abdominis

during a sit-up may suggest segmental:

Thoracic neurologic dysfunction.


Superficial Reflexes

The examination may include:

Superficial abdominal reflexes

and, when appropriate,

Cremasteric reflexes.


Range of Motion

Thoracic and lumbar:

Range of motion

should be assessed, although abnormalities are usually:

Nonspecific.


Laboratory Tests

Routine laboratory tests are not required for straightforward:

Disc herniation.


Infection or Malignancy

If infection or tumor is part of the differential diagnosis, testing may include:

Complete blood count

ESR

and

C-reactive protein.


Imaging


Plain Radiographs

AP and lateral thoracic spine radiographs may demonstrate:

Degenerative changes

Disc-space narrowing

Calcification

Deformity

or

Spondylolisthesis.


Excluding Other Disorders

Radiographs may also identify:

Fracture

Tumor

Infection

or other structural abnormalities.


Level Localization

Precise localization of the involved vertebral level is essential.

Imaging should include adequate landmarks to permit reliable:

Vertebral counting.

Historically, radiographs were obtained to include the:

First rib

Twelfth rib

and

Sacrum

when possible.


MRI

MRI is the preferred imaging study for suspected:

Thoracic disc herniation.


MRI Sequences

Evaluation should include:

Sagittal

and

Axial

T1- and T2-weighted sequences.


MRI Findings

MRI can demonstrate:

Disc morphology

Spinal cord compression

Nerve-root compression

and possible:

Cord signal abnormality.


Correct-Level Confirmation

Because wrong-level surgery is a major concern in the thoracic spine, the abnormal disc level must be:

Confirmed carefully.

A sagittal localizer may be used to count:

Downward from C2

and

Upward from the sacrum.

Correlation with:

Plain radiographs

or

CT

is useful.


CT

CT is particularly useful for identifying:

Calcification

and defining:

Bony anatomy.


CT Myelography

CT myelography can demonstrate:

Neural compression

and may be used when MRI is:

Contraindicated

or limited by:

Artifact.


Limitations of CT Myelography

Because it requires:

Intrathecal contrast injection

CT myelography is invasive.

Potential complications include:

Post-dural puncture headache.


Discography

Discography has historically been used to investigate:

Axial thoracic pain

when multiple disc levels are abnormal or severe pain persists despite relatively limited:

Imaging findings.

Its diagnostic value remains:

Controversial.


Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis is extensive.


Intrathoracic Causes

Potential causes include:

Pulmonary

Pleural

or other:

Thoracic abnormalities.


Intra-Abdominal Causes

Abdominal pathology can occasionally mimic:

Thoracic radicular pain.


Infectious Causes

Important possibilities include:

Discitis

Vertebral osteomyelitis

and

Epidural abscess.


Neoplastic Causes

Primary or metastatic tumors may cause:

Thoracic pain

Radiculopathy

or

Myelopathy.


Degenerative Causes

Other spinal causes include:

Facet arthropathy

Thoracic stenosis

and other forms of:

Degenerative spondylosis.


Metabolic and Deformity Causes

Consider:

Metabolic bone disease

Compression fracture

and spinal:

Deformity.


Neurogenic Causes

Neurologic alternatives include:

Peripheral neuropathy

Herpes zoster

Spinal cord tumor

and other causes of:

Thoracic neuralgia or myelopathy.


Treatment

Treatment depends primarily on the presence or absence of:

Neurologic compromise.


General Measures

Acute thoracic disc herniation without significant neurologic deficit can often be treated initially:

Nonoperatively.


Natural History

Soft acute thoracic disc herniations may behave similarly to:

Lumbar disc herniations

and may improve with:

Time

and

Conservative management.


Activity

Activity may continue:

As tolerated

provided there is no associated:

Fracture

Gross instability

or other structural contraindication.


Relative Rest

Short-term reduction of provoking activities may help control:

Acute pain.

Prolonged bed rest is generally avoided.


Physical Therapy

Physical therapy may be useful for:

Pain control

Mobility

Flexibility

and

Strengthening.


Acute Phase

Passive modalities may include:

Heat

Ice

and selected therapeutic:

Modalities.


Rehabilitation Phase

As symptoms improve, treatment may progress to:

Range-of-motion exercises

Flexibility exercises

and

Strengthening.


Extension Exercises

Some programs include:

Thoracic extension exercises.

These should be individualized and discontinued if they increase:

Radicular pain

or

Myelopathic symptoms.


Medication


First-Line Treatment

Medication may include:

Acetaminophen

or

NSAIDs

when medically appropriate.


NSAIDs

Anti-inflammatory medication may help reduce:

Pain

provided the patient does not have important:

Gastrointestinal

Renal

or other contraindications.


Aspirin

Enteric-coated aspirin has historically been used for:

Pain and inflammation

although other NSAIDs are now more commonly selected.


Chronic Opioids

There is no routine role for:

Long-term maintenance opioid therapy

in uncomplicated thoracic disc disease.


COX-2 Inhibitors

Selected patients may receive:

COX-2 selective anti-inflammatory medication

after considering:

Cardiovascular

Renal

and

Gastrointestinal risks.


Injections

Selected patients with persistent radicular pain may benefit from:

Thoracic epidural steroid injection

or

Intercostal injection.

These treatments may reduce pain but do not correct:

Mechanical spinal cord compression.


Surgery

Surgery is indicated when:

Neurologic compromise progresses

or nonoperative management fails to provide an acceptable:

Quality of life.


Major Surgical Indications

Common indications include:

Progressive myelopathy

Significant motor deficit

Severe spinal cord compression

or persistent disabling:

Pain.


Preoperative Assessment

Because thoracic surgical approaches may involve the chest and carry substantial physiologic stress, selected patients may require preoperative evaluation by:

Internal medicine

Cardiology

or

Anesthesiology.


Surgical Level Confirmation

Intraoperative imaging should be used to verify the:

Correct vertebral level

before disc removal.


Anterior Transthoracic Approach

The:

Anterior transthoracic approach

has traditionally been used for many central thoracic disc herniations because it permits direct access to the:

Anterior spinal canal.


Posterior Approaches

Direct posterior laminectomy alone is generally:

Not recommended

for central thoracic disc removal because manipulation of the spinal cord carries a high risk of:

Neurologic injury.


Pediculofacetectomy

A posterior:

Transpedicular or pediculofacetectomy approach

may be appropriate for selected:

Lateral lesions.


Lateral Approaches

Other options include:

Costotransversectomy

and

Lateral extracavitary approaches.


Thoracoscopic Surgery

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides a:

Minimally invasive anterior approach

for selected patients.


Fusion

Whether spinal fusion is required remains dependent on:

Extent of bone removal

Pre-existing deformity

and resultant:

Stability.


Rib-Cage Stability

The thoracic spine has inherent stability from the:

Rib cage.

However, substantial resection of:

Facets

Pedicles

or vertebral body structures may produce:

Iatrogenic instability.


Follow-Up

Follow-up should assess:

Pain

Neurologic status

and progression of:

Recovery.


Historical Follow-Up Schedule

A traditional postoperative schedule may include visits at approximately:

6 weeks

3 months

6 months

1 year

and

2 years

with subsequent long-term review as indicated.


Referral

Patients may require evaluation by other specialists when alternative diagnoses remain possible, including:

Thoracic surgeons

General surgeons

Rheumatologists

or other relevant:

Specialists.


Prognosis

Most appropriately selected patients undergoing thoracic disc excision achieve:

Good or excellent long-term outcomes.


Prognostic Factors

Recovery depends on:

Duration of symptoms

Severity of myelopathy

Extent of spinal cord compression

Disc calcification

and

Preoperative neurologic status.


Acute Soft Disc Prognosis

Younger patients with:

Soft acute herniations

and shorter symptom duration generally have greater potential for:

Neurologic recovery.


Chronic Calcified Disc Prognosis

Longstanding compression from:

Calcified disc material

may produce irreversible:

Spinal cord injury.


Complications


Surgical Complication Rate

Historical series have reported an overall complication rate of approximately:

14–15%

after thoracic disc excision.


Neurologic Injury

The most serious complication is:

Spinal cord injury

with:

Paraparesis

or

Paralysis.


Dural Injury

Possible complications include:

Dural tear

and

Cerebrospinal fluid leak.


Pulmonary Complications

Anterior thoracic approaches may be associated with:

Pneumothorax

Hemothorax

Pleural effusion

or other:

Pulmonary problems.


Infection

Potential infectious complications include:

Wound infection

and deeper:

Spinal infection.


Instability and Deformity

Extensive surgical resection may lead to:

Segmental instability

or

Postoperative kyphosis.


Nonoperative Neurologic Progression

Patients treated nonoperatively must be monitored for progression of:

Myelopathy

or other:

Neurologic compromise.


Patient Monitoring

Monitoring should include assessment of:

Pain

Gait

Motor function

Sensation

and

Bowel and bladder function.


After Fusion

If arthrodesis is performed, follow-up should also evaluate:

Fusion maturation

and

Spinal alignment.


Red-Flag Findings

Urgent reassessment is warranted for:

Progressive leg weakness

Increasing gait difficulty

New sensory level

Worsening spasticity

or

New bowel or bladder dysfunction.


Key Principle

Thoracic disc herniation is an uncommon symptomatic disorder despite the frequent finding of incidental thoracic disc abnormalities on MRI.

Clinical presentation may consist of:

Axial thoracic pain, radiculopathy, or spinal cord compression with myelopathy.

MRI is the preferred imaging study for assessing:

Neural compression, while CT is particularly valuable for evaluating:

Calcified disc material and bony anatomy.

Patients without significant neurologic compromise may initially be treated with:

Activity modification, analgesia, and physical therapy.

Surgery is reserved for:

Progressive myelopathy, substantial neurologic deficit, severe cord compression, or persistent disabling symptoms despite appropriate nonoperative care.

Simple posterior laminectomy for central disc excision is generally avoided because of the risk of:

Spinal cord injury.



Image description
Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Thoracic Disc Herniation


Basics

Thoracic disc herniation is protrusion or extrusion of an intervertebral disc within the:

Thoracic spine

that may compress the:

Spinal cord

or

Thoracic nerve roots.

The condition can be difficult to diagnose because symptoms are often:

Nonspecific

and may resemble disorders involving the:

Chest

Abdomen

Spine

or

Peripheral nervous system.


Incidental Disc Abnormalities

A major diagnostic challenge is the high prevalence of:

Asymptomatic thoracic disc abnormalities.

Disc degeneration or herniation on imaging does not necessarily indicate that the abnormality is responsible for the patient’s:

Symptoms.

Clinical findings must therefore correlate carefully with the:

Anatomic level

and degree of:

Neural compression.


Epidemiology

Symptomatic thoracic disc disease most commonly presents during approximately the:

Fifth decade of life.


Sex

A slight predominance in:

Males

has been reported historically.


Trauma

Up to approximately:

50% of symptomatic patients

report some preceding:

Traumatic event

before symptoms begin.


Incidence

Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation is uncommon, with an estimated incidence of approximately:

1 per 100,000 persons per year.


Prevalence on MRI

Thoracic disc abnormalities are much more common than clinically symptomatic disease.

MRI studies have reported abnormalities in up to approximately:

73% of individuals.


Asymptomatic Herniation

Approximately:

37%

of individuals in some imaging series have demonstrated:

Asymptomatic thoracic disc herniation.


Genetics

There is no recognized specific:

Genetic association

with thoracic disc herniation.


Pathophysiology

Symptoms develop when the herniated disc compresses the:

Spinal cord

or

Thoracic nerve root.


Spinal Cord Compression

Because the thoracic spinal canal contains the:

Spinal cord

rather than the cauda equina, central disc herniation may produce:

Myelopathy.


Thoracic Myelopathy

Thoracic cord compression may cause:

Lower-extremity weakness

Spasticity

Hyperreflexia

Sensory disturbance

Gait dysfunction

and

Bowel or bladder abnormalities.

Unlike cervical myelopathy, upper-extremity findings are generally:

Absent.


Radiculopathy

A lateral or foraminal herniation may compress a:

Thoracic nerve root

and produce band-like pain along the:

Chest wall

or

Abdominal wall.


Associated Conditions

Thoracic disc herniation may occasionally occur in adolescents with:

Scheuermann disease.


Diagnosis

Diagnosis requires careful assessment because of the broad:

Differential diagnosis

and the high frequency of incidental:

Thoracic MRI abnormalities.


Signs and Symptoms

Patients may present with:

Axial thoracic pain

Radicular pain

or

Myelopathy.


Axial Pain

Pain may be localized to the:

Mid-thoracic

or

Lower thoracic spine.

It can be:

Aching

Deep

or

Mechanical.


Radicular Pain

Thoracic radiculopathy often produces:

Band-like pain

around the trunk.

The:

T10 dermatome

is a commonly reported symptomatic distribution.


Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction

Bowel or bladder dysfunction has historically been reported in up to approximately:

20% of symptomatic patients.

These findings suggest significant:

Spinal cord involvement.


Clinical Patterns

Two broad clinical presentations are often described.


Younger Patients

Patients younger than approximately:

40 years

more commonly have:

Soft disc herniations.


Acute Soft Disc Herniation

These cases may follow:

Trauma

and may produce relatively acute:

Cord compression

or

Radiculopathy.

They often respond favorably to appropriately selected:

Nonoperative or operative treatment.


Older Patients

Patients older than approximately:

40 years

more commonly have:

Degenerative

or

Calcified disc herniations.


Chronic Calcified Herniation

These patients may have:

Longstanding symptoms

without a clear history of trauma.

Compression of the cord or nerve root tends to be more:

Chronic.


Physical Examination

A complete neurologic examination should be performed with careful assessment for:

Myelopathy.


Gait

Observe for:

Spastic gait

Balance disturbance

Shortened stride

or difficulty with:

Tandem walking.


Motor Examination

Assess lower-extremity:

Strength

and look for signs of:

Upper motor neuron dysfunction.


Reflexes

Evaluate:

Patellar reflexes

Achilles reflexes

and look for:

Hyperreflexia

Clonus

or abnormal:

Plantar responses.


Sensory Level

A sensory level may help localize the lesion.

Useful landmarks include:

T4 – nipple line

T7 – xiphoid process

T10 – umbilicus

and

T12 – inguinal crease.


Abdominal Muscle Examination

Asymmetric contraction of the:

Rectus abdominis

during a sit-up may suggest segmental:

Thoracic neurologic dysfunction.


Superficial Reflexes

The examination may include:

Superficial abdominal reflexes

and, when appropriate,

Cremasteric reflexes.


Range of Motion

Thoracic and lumbar:

Range of motion

should be assessed, although abnormalities are usually:

Nonspecific.


Laboratory Tests

Routine laboratory tests are not required for straightforward:

Disc herniation.


Infection or Malignancy

If infection or tumor is part of the differential diagnosis, testing may include:

Complete blood count

ESR

and

C-reactive protein.


Imaging


Plain Radiographs

AP and lateral thoracic spine radiographs may demonstrate:

Degenerative changes

Disc-space narrowing

Calcification

Deformity

or

Spondylolisthesis.


Excluding Other Disorders

Radiographs may also identify:

Fracture

Tumor

Infection

or other structural abnormalities.


Level Localization

Precise localization of the involved vertebral level is essential.

Imaging should include adequate landmarks to permit reliable:

Vertebral counting.

Historically, radiographs were obtained to include the:

First rib

Twelfth rib

and

Sacrum

when possible.


MRI

MRI is the preferred imaging study for suspected:

Thoracic disc herniation.


MRI Sequences

Evaluation should include:

Sagittal

and

Axial

T1- and T2-weighted sequences.


MRI Findings

MRI can demonstrate:

Disc morphology

Spinal cord compression

Nerve-root compression

and possible:

Cord signal abnormality.


Correct-Level Confirmation

Because wrong-level surgery is a major concern in the thoracic spine, the abnormal disc level must be:

Confirmed carefully.

A sagittal localizer may be used to count:

Downward from C2

and

Upward from the sacrum.

Correlation with:

Plain radiographs

or

CT

is useful.


CT

CT is particularly useful for identifying:

Calcification

and defining:

Bony anatomy.


CT Myelography

CT myelography can demonstrate:

Neural compression

and may be used when MRI is:

Contraindicated

or limited by:

Artifact.


Limitations of CT Myelography

Because it requires:

Intrathecal contrast injection

CT myelography is invasive.

Potential complications include:

Post-dural puncture headache.


Discography

Discography has historically been used to investigate:

Axial thoracic pain

when multiple disc levels are abnormal or severe pain persists despite relatively limited:

Imaging findings.

Its diagnostic value remains:

Controversial.


Differential Diagnosis

The differential diagnosis is extensive.


Intrathoracic Causes

Potential causes include:

Pulmonary

Pleural

or other:

Thoracic abnormalities.


Intra-Abdominal Causes

Abdominal pathology can occasionally mimic:

Thoracic radicular pain.


Infectious Causes

Important possibilities include:

Discitis

Vertebral osteomyelitis

and

Epidural abscess.


Neoplastic Causes

Primary or metastatic tumors may cause:

Thoracic pain

Radiculopathy

or

Myelopathy.


Degenerative Causes

Other spinal causes include:

Facet arthropathy

Thoracic stenosis

and other forms of:

Degenerative spondylosis.


Metabolic and Deformity Causes

Consider:

Metabolic bone disease

Compression fracture

and spinal:

Deformity.


Neurogenic Causes

Neurologic alternatives include:

Peripheral neuropathy

Herpes zoster

Spinal cord tumor

and other causes of:

Thoracic neuralgia or myelopathy.


Treatment

Treatment depends primarily on the presence or absence of:

Neurologic compromise.


General Measures

Acute thoracic disc herniation without significant neurologic deficit can often be treated initially:

Nonoperatively.


Natural History

Soft acute thoracic disc herniations may behave similarly to:

Lumbar disc herniations

and may improve with:

Time

and

Conservative management.


Activity

Activity may continue:

As tolerated

provided there is no associated:

Fracture

Gross instability

or other structural contraindication.


Relative Rest

Short-term reduction of provoking activities may help control:

Acute pain.

Prolonged bed rest is generally avoided.


Physical Therapy

Physical therapy may be useful for:

Pain control

Mobility

Flexibility

and

Strengthening.


Acute Phase

Passive modalities may include:

Heat

Ice

and selected therapeutic:

Modalities.


Rehabilitation Phase

As symptoms improve, treatment may progress to:

Range-of-motion exercises

Flexibility exercises

and

Strengthening.


Extension Exercises

Some programs include:

Thoracic extension exercises.

These should be individualized and discontinued if they increase:

Radicular pain

or

Myelopathic symptoms.


Medication


First-Line Treatment

Medication may include:

Acetaminophen

or

NSAIDs

when medically appropriate.


NSAIDs

Anti-inflammatory medication may help reduce:

Pain

provided the patient does not have important:

Gastrointestinal

Renal

or other contraindications.


Aspirin

Enteric-coated aspirin has historically been used for:

Pain and inflammation

although other NSAIDs are now more commonly selected.


Chronic Opioids

There is no routine role for:

Long-term maintenance opioid therapy

in uncomplicated thoracic disc disease.


COX-2 Inhibitors

Selected patients may receive:

COX-2 selective anti-inflammatory medication

after considering:

Cardiovascular

Renal

and

Gastrointestinal risks.


Injections

Selected patients with persistent radicular pain may benefit from:

Thoracic epidural steroid injection

or

Intercostal injection.

These treatments may reduce pain but do not correct:

Mechanical spinal cord compression.


Surgery

Surgery is indicated when:

Neurologic compromise progresses

or nonoperative management fails to provide an acceptable:

Quality of life.


Major Surgical Indications

Common indications include:

Progressive myelopathy

Significant motor deficit

Severe spinal cord compression

or persistent disabling:

Pain.


Preoperative Assessment

Because thoracic surgical approaches may involve the chest and carry substantial physiologic stress, selected patients may require preoperative evaluation by:

Internal medicine

Cardiology

or

Anesthesiology.


Surgical Level Confirmation

Intraoperative imaging should be used to verify the:

Correct vertebral level

before disc removal.


Anterior Transthoracic Approach

The:

Anterior transthoracic approach

has traditionally been used for many central thoracic disc herniations because it permits direct access to the:

Anterior spinal canal.


Posterior Approaches

Direct posterior laminectomy alone is generally:

Not recommended

for central thoracic disc removal because manipulation of the spinal cord carries a high risk of:

Neurologic injury.


Pediculofacetectomy

A posterior:

Transpedicular or pediculofacetectomy approach

may be appropriate for selected:

Lateral lesions.


Lateral Approaches

Other options include:

Costotransversectomy

and

Lateral extracavitary approaches.


Thoracoscopic Surgery

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides a:

Minimally invasive anterior approach

for selected patients.


Fusion

Whether spinal fusion is required remains dependent on:

Extent of bone removal

Pre-existing deformity

and resultant:

Stability.


Rib-Cage Stability

The thoracic spine has inherent stability from the:

Rib cage.

However, substantial resection of:

Facets

Pedicles

or vertebral body structures may produce:

Iatrogenic instability.


Follow-Up

Follow-up should assess:

Pain

Neurologic status

and progression of:

Recovery.


Historical Follow-Up Schedule

A traditional postoperative schedule may include visits at approximately:

6 weeks

3 months

6 months

1 year

and

2 years

with subsequent long-term review as indicated.


Referral

Patients may require evaluation by other specialists when alternative diagnoses remain possible, including:

Thoracic surgeons

General surgeons

Rheumatologists

or other relevant:

Specialists.


Prognosis

Most appropriately selected patients undergoing thoracic disc excision achieve:

Good or excellent long-term outcomes.


Prognostic Factors

Recovery depends on:

Duration of symptoms

Severity of myelopathy

Extent of spinal cord compression

Disc calcification

and

Preoperative neurologic status.


Acute Soft Disc Prognosis

Younger patients with:

Soft acute herniations

and shorter symptom duration generally have greater potential for:

Neurologic recovery.


Chronic Calcified Disc Prognosis

Longstanding compression from:

Calcified disc material

may produce irreversible:

Spinal cord injury.


Complications


Surgical Complication Rate

Historical series have reported an overall complication rate of approximately:

14–15%

after thoracic disc excision.


Neurologic Injury

The most serious complication is:

Spinal cord injury

with:

Paraparesis

or

Paralysis.


Dural Injury

Possible complications include:

Dural tear

and

Cerebrospinal fluid leak.


Pulmonary Complications

Anterior thoracic approaches may be associated with:

Pneumothorax

Hemothorax

Pleural effusion

or other:

Pulmonary problems.


Infection

Potential infectious complications include:

Wound infection

and deeper:

Spinal infection.


Instability and Deformity

Extensive surgical resection may lead to:

Segmental instability

or

Postoperative kyphosis.


Nonoperative Neurologic Progression

Patients treated nonoperatively must be monitored for progression of:

Myelopathy

or other:

Neurologic compromise.


Patient Monitoring

Monitoring should include assessment of:

Pain

Gait

Motor function

Sensation

and

Bowel and bladder function.


After Fusion

If arthrodesis is performed, follow-up should also evaluate:

Fusion maturation

and

Spinal alignment.


Red-Flag Findings

Urgent reassessment is warranted for:

Progressive leg weakness

Increasing gait difficulty

New sensory level

Worsening spasticity

or

New bowel or bladder dysfunction.


Key Principle

Thoracic disc herniation is an uncommon symptomatic disorder despite the frequent finding of incidental thoracic disc abnormalities on MRI.

Clinical presentation may consist of:

Axial thoracic pain, radiculopathy, or spinal cord compression with myelopathy.

MRI is the preferred imaging study for assessing:

Neural compression, while CT is particularly valuable for evaluating:

Calcified disc material and bony anatomy.

Patients without significant neurologic compromise may initially be treated with:

Activity modification, analgesia, and physical therapy.

Surgery is reserved for:

Progressive myelopathy, substantial neurologic deficit, severe cord compression, or persistent disabling symptoms despite appropriate nonoperative care.

Simple posterior laminectomy for central disc excision is generally avoided because of the risk of:

Spinal cord injury.



Image description
Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Tenosynovitis


Basics

Tenosynovitis is a painful disorder involving:

Inflammation or irritation of a tendon and its surrounding synovial sheath.

It most often affects long tendons in the:

Fingers

Wrist

or

Ankle.


Causes

Tenosynovitis may result from:

Acute injury

Repetitive mechanical loading

Systemic inflammatory disease

Infection

or, in some patients,

No identifiable cause.


Age

The condition is uncommon in:

Children

and is seen most frequently during:

Early to middle adulthood.


Classification by Duration

Tenosynovitis may be described as:

Acute

or

Chronic.


Acute Tenosynovitis

Acute tenosynovitis generally produces symptoms lasting only:

Several days.

Noninfectious acute cases may improve relatively quickly with:

Activity modification

Rest

and

Anti-inflammatory treatment.


Chronic Tenosynovitis

Symptoms persisting longer than approximately:

2–3 weeks

may be considered chronic.

Chronic disease may be accompanied by greater:

Sheath thickening

Fibrosis

and

Tendon degeneration.

These cases may be more difficult to:

Resolve completely.


Common Locations

Frequent clinical forms include:

Posterior tibial tenosynovitis

Flexor tendon tenosynovitis of the hand

Biceps tenosynovitis

and

de Quervain tenosynovitis.


de Quervain Tenosynovitis

de Quervain disease affects the first dorsal extensor compartment, principally the:

Abductor pollicis longus

and

Extensor pollicis brevis tendons.


Synonym

The term:

Tendinitis

is sometimes used interchangeably, although tendinitis refers primarily to the:

Tendon itself

whereas tenosynovitis specifically involves the:

Synovial tendon sheath.


Prevention

Because many cases arise unpredictably, there is no reliable method for preventing all forms of:

Tenosynovitis.


Activity Modification

In patients whose symptoms are related to repetitive loading, prevention of recurrence may involve:

Ergonomic adjustment

Technique modification

and avoidance of abrupt increases in:

Repetitive activity.


Epidemiology

Tenosynovial disorders are among the more common:

Musculoskeletal complaints.

Many individuals experience at least one episode of tendon or tendon-sheath irritation during:

Their lifetime.


Sex

Women appear to be affected slightly more frequently than:

Men.


Risk Factors

Potential risk factors include:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Other inflammatory arthropathies

Previous tenosynovitis

Pregnancy

and selected repetitive:

Occupational or recreational activities.


Repetitive Motion

The relationship between repetitive motion and every form of tenosynovitis is not absolute.

However, repetitive loading may contribute in susceptible patients, especially when activity is:

New

Unusually intense

or associated with poor:

Biomechanics.


Etiology

Repeated use or mechanical constriction may irritate the:

Tendon sheath

causing thickening and impaired:

Tendon gliding.


Noninfectious Tenosynovitis

Many noninfectious cases occur in adults between approximately:

30 and 50 years of age

who perform repetitive:

Hand

Wrist

or

Lower-extremity activities.


Systemic Inflammatory Disease

Tenosynovitis may be a manifestation of:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Systemic lupus erythematosus

or other:

Inflammatory arthritides.


Infectious Tenosynovitis

Infection usually develops when bacteria gain access to the:

Tendon sheath

through:

Penetrating trauma

Laceration

Puncture wound

or, less commonly,

Hematogenous spread.


Flexor Tendon Sheath Infection

Infectious flexor tenosynovitis of the hand is particularly important because infection can spread rapidly within the:

Closed tendon sheath.

It represents an:

Urgent surgical condition.


Pregnancy Considerations

Pregnancy may precipitate or worsen:

Tenosynovitis

particularly:

de Quervain tenosynovitis.

Fluid retention and hormonal changes may contribute to:

Tendon-sheath swelling.


Associated Conditions

Important associated disorders include:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Lupus

and other:

Inflammatory arthropathies.


Diagnosis

Diagnosis is usually based on:

History

Physical examination

and, when necessary,

Laboratory or imaging studies.


Signs and Symptoms

The most common symptom is:

Pain along the course of the affected tendon.


Onset

Pain may develop:

Suddenly

or

Gradually.

It frequently follows a period of:

New or unusually strenuous activity.


Activity-Related Pain

Symptoms generally worsen with:

Use of the involved tendon

and improve with:

Rest.


Swelling

There may be localized:

Swelling

or fullness along the:

Tendon sheath.


Crepitus

Some patients develop palpable or audible:

Crepitus

as the tendon moves within an inflamed or thickened:

Sheath.


de Quervain Symptoms

de Quervain tenosynovitis typically causes:

Radial-sided wrist pain

near the:

Radial styloid.

Symptoms worsen with:

Thumb motion

Gripping

and

Ulnar deviation of the wrist.


Trigger Finger

Tenosynovial thickening around the flexor tendons may produce:

Trigger finger.


Triggering Mechanism

The tendon catches as it passes through a constricted:

Flexor pulley system.

This may produce:

Clicking

Snapping

or

Locking

during finger flexion or extension.


Physical Examination

The examination should identify the specific:

Tendon or tendon sheath

responsible for symptoms.


Tenderness

Tenderness is typically distributed:

Longitudinally

along the course of the:

Affected tendon.


Severity

Tenderness may be:

Mild

Moderate

or

Severe

depending on the underlying:

Cause and duration.


Swelling

Visible or palpable swelling may follow the:

Tendon sheath.


Crepitus With Motion

Moving the affected tendon may reproduce:

Pain

and occasionally:

Crepitus.


Range of Motion

Assess:

Active

and

Passive range of motion.

Restriction may result from:

Pain

Swelling

or mechanical:

Tendon constriction.


Infectious Flexor Tenosynovitis

When infection is suspected in a finger, look for the classic:

Kanavel signs.

These include:

Fusiform swelling of the digit

Tenderness along the flexor tendon sheath

Finger held in slight flexion

and

Pain with passive extension.

The presence of these findings should prompt:

Urgent surgical evaluation.


Laboratory Tests

Laboratory studies are not always required for uncomplicated noninfectious:

Tenosynovitis.


Suspected Infection

When infection is possible, useful studies may include:

Complete blood count

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

and

C-reactive protein.


Systemic Disease Evaluation

Additional testing may be appropriate when symptoms suggest:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Lupus

Gout

or another systemic:

Inflammatory disorder.


Imaging


Plain Radiographs

Radiographs may be useful when there is:

Penetrating trauma

Suspected fracture

Adjacent arthritis

or another potential:

Bony cause of symptoms.


Radiographic Role

Plain films generally do not demonstrate the tendon-sheath inflammation directly.

They are primarily used to identify:

Alternative diagnoses

and associated:

Skeletal abnormalities.


Ultrasound

Ultrasound can demonstrate:

Tendon-sheath fluid

Synovial thickening

Tendon abnormalities

and dynamic:

Tendon motion.


MRI

MRI may show:

Fluid surrounding the tendon

Synovial thickening

Tendon degeneration

or associated:

Soft-tissue pathology.


Role of Advanced Imaging

Ultrasound or MRI is most helpful when:

The diagnosis is uncertain

Symptoms persist despite treatment

or a mass, tear, or other structural lesion is:

Suspected.


Pathological Findings

The pathological appearance varies according to the:

Cause.


Acute Inflammatory Disease

Acute inflammatory tenosynovitis may show:

Synovial edema

Hyperemia

and infiltration by:

Inflammatory cells.


Chronic Disease

Chronic cases may demonstrate:

Synovial thickening

Fibrosis

and degenerative changes affecting the:

Tendon.


Infectious Disease

Septic tenosynovitis may contain:

Purulent fluid

with marked:

Synovial inflammation

and potentially:

Tendon damage.


Differential Diagnosis

Important alternatives include:

Tendon strain

Partial tendon tear

Complete tendon rupture

Tendon-sheath infection

Arthritis

and other causes of regional:

Soft-tissue pain.


Treatment

Treatment depends on whether the process is:

Mechanical

Inflammatory

or

Infectious.


General Measures

Most uncomplicated noninfectious cases are initially treated with:

Relative rest

Activity modification

and gentle:

Range-of-motion exercises.


Relative Rest

The provoking activity should be reduced sufficiently to allow symptoms to:

Settle.

Complete inactivity is generally avoided when painless movement is:

Possible.


Immobilization

Short-term use of a:

Splint

or

Brace

may be helpful when symptoms are severe.

Prolonged immobilization should generally be avoided because it may lead to:

Stiffness

and

Weakness.


Physical and Occupational Therapy

Physical and occupational therapists may assist with:

Splinting

Stretching

Strengthening

and

Work or activity modification.


Ergonomic Modification

When occupational activity contributes to symptoms, therapy may focus on:

Tool modification

Workstation adjustment

and changes in:

Repetitive movement patterns.


Stretching

Gentle stretching can help maintain:

Tendon excursion

and surrounding:

Joint mobility.


Strengthening

Once acute pain improves, progressive strengthening may restore:

Tendon capacity

and reduce recurrence.


Medication


NSAIDs

NSAIDs may provide short-term relief of:

Pain

and

Inflammatory symptoms.

They are commonly used in:

Noninfectious tenosynovitis.


Corticosteroid Injection

Corticosteroid injection may be effective for selected disorders, particularly:

de Quervain tenosynovitis

and

Trigger finger.


Injection Precautions

Injection should be performed carefully to avoid:

Direct intratendinous injection

which can increase the risk of:

Tendon weakening or rupture.


Systemic Inflammatory Disease

Tenosynovitis caused by rheumatoid arthritis or another inflammatory disease may improve with:

Disease-modifying antirheumatic therapy

and appropriate systemic:

Anti-inflammatory treatment.


Infectious Tenosynovitis

Septic tenosynovitis requires:

Urgent treatment.


Antibiotics

Treatment includes prompt:

Intravenous or appropriately targeted antibiotics

based on the suspected organism and:

Culture results.


Surgery

Surgery may be required when:

Nonoperative treatment fails

or when mechanical compression prevents normal:

Tendon gliding.


Surgical Release

Operative treatment may involve:

Opening or releasing the tendon sheath

to relieve:

Constriction.


Synovectomy

Diseased or hypertrophic synovium may be:

Excised

to improve tendon:

Gliding.


Tendon Débridement

Degenerated tendon tissue may require:

Débridement

in selected chronic cases.


de Quervain Surgery

Persistent de Quervain disease may require complete release of the:

First dorsal extensor compartment.

Both the:

Abductor pollicis longus

and any separate compartment containing the:

Extensor pollicis brevis

must be adequately decompressed.


Postoperative Splinting

Temporary splinting may be used after surgery depending on:

Procedure

and

Tendon condition.


Septic Tenosynovitis Surgery

Infectious tenosynovitis may require urgent:

Tendon-sheath irrigation and decompression

with removal of:

Purulent material

and

Infected synovium.


Timing in Infection

Delay in treatment can lead to:

Tendon necrosis

Adhesions

Loss of motion

or spread of:

Infection.


Referral

Patients with suspected systemic inflammatory disease should be referred for appropriate:

Rheumatologic evaluation.


Rheumatology

Patients with:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Lupus

or another inflammatory arthropathy may require:

Disease-modifying therapy

rather than isolated treatment of the:

Tendon sheath.


Follow-Up

Patients should be reassessed according to:

Severity

Location

and

Treatment response.


Typical Monitoring

Nonoperative cases may be reviewed at approximately:

4–6 week intervals.


Examination During Follow-Up

Follow-up should evaluate:

Pain

Swelling

Range of motion

Tendon function

and return to:

Normal activity.


Prognosis

Most uncomplicated cases respond successfully to:

Nonoperative treatment.


Recurrent Disease

Some tendon regions have a greater tendency toward recurrence, particularly the:

Posterior tibial tendon

and

Achilles tendon.


Chronic Tenosynovitis

Longstanding disease may be more difficult to resolve because of:

Fibrosis

Tendon degeneration

and persistent:

Mechanical irritation.


Infectious Prognosis

Outcome in septic tenosynovitis depends heavily on:

Early recognition

and

Prompt treatment.

Delayed care increases the risk of permanent:

Tendon and joint dysfunction.


Complications

The principal complication of noninfectious disease is:

Persistence or recurrence of symptoms.


Tendon Degeneration

Chronic tenosynovitis may contribute to:

Tendon weakening

and occasionally:

Tendon rupture.


Adhesions

Inflammation or surgery can lead to:

Tendon adhesions

and impaired:

Tendon gliding.


Stiffness

Pain and prolonged immobilization can result in:

Joint stiffness

and reduced:

Range of motion.


Infection Complications

Untreated septic tenosynovitis may cause:

Abscess formation

Tendon necrosis

Joint infection

Osteomyelitis

or permanent:

Functional loss.


Patient Monitoring

Patients should be monitored for:

Resolution of pain

Improved tendon excursion

Restoration of range of motion

and recurrence of:

Swelling or triggering.


Key Principle

Tenosynovitis is a disorder of the synovial tendon sheath that may result from mechanical overuse, systemic inflammatory disease, infection, or an idiopathic process.

Typical findings include:

Pain and tenderness along the tendon, swelling, crepitus, and pain with use.

Most noninfectious cases improve with:

Relative rest, temporary splinting, NSAIDs, activity modification, and therapy.

Selected conditions such as:

de Quervain tenosynovitis and trigger finger

may respond to:

Corticosteroid injection.

Persistent mechanical disease may require:

Surgical sheath release or synovectomy, whereas:

Septic flexor tenosynovitis is an urgent condition requiring antibiotics and often operative irrigation and decompression.



Image description
Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Tennis Elbow


Basics

Tennis elbow, also called:

Lateral epicondylitis

is a degenerative tendinopathy involving the origin of the:

Extensor carpi radialis brevis

at the:

Lateral epicondyle of the humerus.

Despite the traditional term “epicondylitis,” the disorder is predominantly:

Degenerative rather than inflammatory.


Synonyms

Other terms include:

Lateral epicondylosis

Lateral epicondylalgia

Wrist extensor tendinosis

and

Tennis elbow.


Anatomy

The lateral epicondyle provides attachment for the:

Common extensor tendon.

Important contributing muscles include:

Extensor carpi radialis longus

Extensor carpi radialis brevis

Extensor digitorum communis

and

Extensor carpi ulnaris.


Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis

The:

Extensor carpi radialis brevis, or ECRB

is the tendon most commonly involved.

It lies deep to the:

Extensor carpi radialis longus.


Function

The wrist extensors stabilize the wrist during:

Gripping

Lifting

and repetitive:

Forearm and hand activity.

They are also highly active during the:

Backhand stroke in tennis.


Clinical Setting

Although strongly associated with racket sports by name, lateral epicondylosis is actually more commonly encountered in patients performing repetitive:

Occupational

or

Daily-living activities.

It affects both:

Athletes

and

Nonathletes.


Typical Patient

The classic presentation is an adult in the:

Fourth or fifth decade

with overuse of the:

Dominant upper extremity.


Natural History

Lateral epicondylosis is generally:

Self-limited.

Symptoms may nevertheless persist for:

Many months

and occasionally longer before resolving.


Prevention

Prevention focuses on reducing excessive repetitive loading of the:

Wrist extensor origin.


Ergonomics

Patients performing repetitive occupational activity may benefit from:

Ergonomic assessment

and modification of their:

Workstation or tools.

This is particularly relevant for patients with prolonged:

Computer

Manual

or

Repetitive hand use.


Athletic Technique

Tennis players should be assessed for:

Racket grip size

Backhand technique

Racket weight

String tension

and training:

Volume.


Epidemiology

Lateral epicondylosis affects:

Men and women approximately equally.


Incidence

Peak incidence occurs during approximately the:

Fifth decade of life.


Lifetime Occurrence

Approximately:

1–3% of the population

develop lateral epicondylosis at some point.


Risk Factors

The condition is associated with activities involving repetitive:

Forearm pronation

Supination

Wrist extension

and

Gripping.


Elbow Position

Repetitive forearm rotation performed with the elbow near:

Full extension

may increase loading at the:

Common extensor origin.


Sports

Associated athletic activities include:

Tennis

Other racket sports

and

Fencing.


Occupational Activities

Occupations and activities associated with repetitive upper-extremity use include:

Plumbing

Painting

Knitting

Dentistry

and prolonged:

Computer work.


Tennis-Specific Factors

Potential contributing factors include:

Poor stroke mechanics

Incorrect racket grip size

Excessive racket weight

and inappropriate:

String tension.


Playing Surface

Harder court surfaces may increase force transmission through the:

Racket

and upper extremity, potentially increasing stress at the:

Lateral epicondyle.


Etiology

The disorder usually begins as repetitive microscopic injury to the:

ECRB origin.


Microtrauma

Repeated loading may produce:

Microscopic tendon tearing

that exceeds the tendon’s ability to:

Repair itself.


Other Involved Tendons

The:

Extensor carpi radialis longus

and

Extensor digitorum communis

may occasionally also demonstrate:

Degenerative involvement.


Failed Tendon Healing

An inadequate healing response leaves the tendon susceptible to repeated:

Microtrauma

and progressive:

Tendinosis.


Pathophysiology

The process is characterized more by:

Collagen degeneration

than by acute:

Inflammation.

This explains why the term:

Lateral epicondylosis

is often considered more pathologically accurate than “epicondylitis.”


Diagnosis

Diagnosis is usually:

Clinical.

The combination of characteristic:

Lateral elbow tenderness

and pain with resisted:

Wrist extension

is strongly suggestive.


Signs and Symptoms

Patients typically report a history of:

Repetitive upper-extremity activity.


Pain Location

Pain is centered around the:

Lateral epicondyle

and may radiate a short distance distally along the:

Proximal extensor muscle mass.


Activity-Related Pain

Symptoms generally worsen with:

Activity

and improve with:

Rest.


Gripping Pain

Patients commonly report pain while:

Gripping objects

Lifting a cup

Shaking hands

or

Carrying objects.


Resisted Wrist Extension

Pain is reproduced when the patient extends the wrist against:

Resistance.

Symptoms are often more pronounced when the elbow is:

Extended.


Range of Motion

Elbow range of motion is generally:

Preserved.

Loss of motion should raise concern for:

Alternative or additional pathology.


Physical Examination

The most characteristic finding is localized tenderness over the:

Common extensor origin

at or just distal to the:

Lateral epicondyle.


Distal Tenderness

Tenderness may extend several centimeters distally over the:

ECRB region.


Resisted Wrist Extension Test

The examiner stabilizes the forearm while the patient attempts:

Wrist extension against resistance.

Reproduction of lateral elbow pain supports the diagnosis.


Passive Wrist Flexion

Passive flexion of the wrist with the elbow:

Extended

stretches the common extensor origin and may reproduce:

Pain.


Grip Testing

Painful or reduced:

Grip strength

may be present because gripping requires stabilization by the:

Wrist extensors.


Radial Tunnel Examination

The clinician should evaluate for:

Radial tunnel syndrome.


Resisted Middle-Finger Extension

Pain reproduced with resisted:

Middle-finger extension

may suggest involvement of the:

Radial tunnel or posterior interosseous nerve region.

This finding should be interpreted with the remainder of the:

Clinical examination.


Cervical Spine Examination

A cervical spine examination is appropriate, especially when symptoms are:

Bilateral

Atypical

or accompanied by:

Neck pain or neurologic findings.


Imaging


Plain Radiographs

AP and lateral radiographs of the elbow may be obtained to exclude:

Fracture

Arthritis

Loose body

or other:

Bony pathology.


Typical Radiographic Findings

Plain radiographs are usually:

Normal.


Calcification

Historical studies report local soft-tissue calcification near the lateral epicondyle in approximately:

23% of patients.


Cervical Spine Imaging

Cervical radiographs may be considered when symptoms could originate from:

Cervical radiculopathy.


CT

CT is rarely needed for isolated tennis elbow.

It may be useful when evaluating:

Loose bodies

Arthritis

or other complex:

Intra-articular pathology.


MRI

MRI is not routinely required for the diagnosis.


Indications for MRI

MRI may be useful when symptoms are:

Persistent

Atypical

or when there is concern for:

Partial tendon tearing

or another:

Elbow disorder.


MRI Findings

Possible findings include:

Tendon thickening

Increased T1 and T2 signal

and

Partial tearing

at the common extensor origin.


Electrodiagnostic Testing

Electromyography and nerve-conduction studies are not usually required for isolated:

Lateral epicondylosis.

They may help when distinguishing it from:

Radial tunnel syndrome

or another:

Neuropathic disorder.


Pathological Findings

Microscopic examination demonstrates:

Degenerative tearing

within the substance of the:

ECRB tendon.


Histology

Characteristic changes include replacement of normal tendon collagen with:

Fibroblastic tissue

Abnormal vascular proliferation

and disorganized:

Collagen.

This has historically been termed:

Angiofibroblastic or angioblastic proliferation.


Inflammation

Importantly, significant acute inflammatory-cell infiltration is usually:

Absent.

The process therefore represents:

Tendinosis

rather than classic:

Tendinitis.


Differential Diagnosis

Important alternatives include:

Cervical radiculopathy

Radial tunnel syndrome

Olecranon bursitis

Medial epicondylitis

Ulnar collateral ligament injury

and

Intra-articular elbow disease.


Radial Tunnel Syndrome

Radial tunnel syndrome involves compression of the:

Posterior interosseous nerve

or radial nerve around the:

Supinator.


Coexisting Radial Tunnel Syndrome

Historical reports suggest that radial tunnel syndrome may coexist with lateral epicondylosis in approximately:

5% of patients.


Intra-Articular Disorders

Conditions such as:

Elbow arthritis

Capitellar osteochondritis dissecans

or a:

Loose body

may produce lateral elbow pain.


Treatment

Most patients are initially treated:

Nonoperatively.


General Measures

Treatment may include:

Activity modification

Relative rest

Ice or cryotherapy

NSAIDs

Physical therapy

Counterforce bracing

and occasionally:

Wrist splinting.


Activity Modification

Activities that reproduce pain should be:

Reduced or modified.

Complete inactivity is generally unnecessary.


Return to Activity

Normal activity can be resumed:

Gradually

as pain and strength:

Improve.


Ergonomic Correction

Work-related factors should be addressed through:

Tool modification

Workstation adjustment

and reduction of repetitive:

Grip or wrist-extension loading.


Athletic Modification

Athletes should optimize:

Stroke mechanics

Equipment

and

Training volume.


Counterforce Brace

A:

Counterforce strap

placed around the proximal forearm may reduce load transferred to the:

Common extensor origin.


Wrist Splint

Short-term use of a wrist splint, particularly at:

Night

or during aggravating activities, may reduce tension on the:

Extensor tendons.


Physical Therapy

Physical therapy is useful when symptoms persist.


Eccentric Exercise

A major component of rehabilitation is:

Eccentric strengthening of the wrist extensors.


Progressive Loading

Rehabilitation may gradually progress from:

Isometric exercises

to

Eccentric and concentric strengthening

as tolerated.


Stretching

Gentle stretching of the:

Wrist extensor musculature

may be incorporated into the program.


Soft-Tissue Treatment

Adjunctive techniques may include:

Friction massage

Soft-tissue mobilization

and other manual:

Therapies.


Therapeutic Modalities

Historically used modalities include:

Ultrasound

and

Iontophoresis.

Evidence for substantial additional benefit is:

Limited.


NSAIDs

NSAIDs may provide short-term:

Pain relief.

Because the underlying process is largely degenerative rather than inflammatory, they do not directly reverse:

Tendon degeneration.


Corticosteroid Injection

Corticosteroid injection may provide:

Short-term pain relief

in selected patients.


Limitations of Corticosteroid Injection

Benefits often diminish over time, and repeated injections may increase the risk of:

Tendon degeneration

or

Tendon rupture.

Therefore, repeated injections should be used:

Cautiously.


Nitroglycerin

Topical:

Nitroglycerin patches

have been studied as an adjunct to rehabilitation and may improve pain in some patients with:

Chronic tendinopathy.

Their role remains:

Selective rather than routine.


Shock-Wave Therapy

Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy has been investigated for:

Lateral epicondylosis.

Results across studies have been:

Variable

and it has not consistently demonstrated a large advantage over:

Placebo or standard rehabilitation.


Low-Level Laser Therapy

Low-level laser treatment has also been investigated, but evidence for a substantial clinically important benefit remains:

Limited.


Biologic Therapy

Autologous blood and:

Platelet-rich plasma

have been proposed to stimulate tendon healing by increasing local:

Growth factors.


PRP

PRP has shown benefit in some studies, particularly for:

Chronic symptoms.

However, results are inconsistent, and it has not consistently demonstrated superiority over:

Structured exercise-based treatment.


Nonoperative Success

Most patients improve without surgery.

Historical series report successful nonoperative treatment in approximately:

90–95% of patients.


Surgery

Surgery is rarely required.


Indications

Operative treatment may be considered after approximately:

6–12 months

of persistent symptoms despite appropriate:

Nonoperative management.


Surgical Principle

Traditional surgery involves removal of:

Degenerated ECRB tissue

from the:

Lateral epicondyle.


Open Débridement

Open surgery may include:

Débridement of the diseased ECRB origin

with repair or reattachment of:

Healthy tendon.


Radial Tunnel Release

If clinically significant coexisting:

Radial tunnel syndrome

is present, decompression may be considered during the same:

Procedure.


Arthroscopic Treatment

Arthroscopic treatment allows:

Débridement of the ECRB origin

while simultaneously evaluating:

Intra-articular pathology.


Open Versus Arthroscopic Surgery

Both open and arthroscopic procedures can provide:

Good outcomes.

Arthroscopy may allow somewhat faster:

Early recovery

in selected patients.


Follow-Up After Surgery

Postoperative rehabilitation is:

Progressive.


Early Period

A splint may be removed at approximately:

1 week

depending on the:

Procedure and wound.


Range of Motion

Gentle:

Elbow

and

Wrist range-of-motion exercises

are then initiated.


Strengthening

Once the wound has healed and motion is comfortable, progressive:

Strengthening

is added.


Activity

Pain-limited activities may be resumed as healing:

Progresses.


Full Activity

Return to unrestricted activity is often possible by approximately:

3 months

although timing varies according to:

Procedure

Occupation

and

Sport demands.


Prognosis

Lateral epicondylosis generally has a:

Good prognosis.


Chronic Course

Symptoms may fluctuate with periods of:

Exacerbation

and

Improvement.


Natural Resolution

Even without invasive treatment, many cases gradually improve because the disorder is often:

Self-limiting.


Nonoperative Outcome

Approximately:

90–95%

of patients can be managed successfully without:

Surgery.


Complications

Complications from conservative treatment are generally:

Uncommon.


Injection Complications

Potential complications of corticosteroid injection include:

Skin depigmentation

Subcutaneous fat atrophy

and

Tendon weakening or rupture.


Surgical Complications

Potential complications include:

Infection

Persistent pain

Recurrent tendon degeneration

Elbow stiffness

and reduced:

Range of motion.


Tendon Retear

The repaired or débrided extensor origin may rarely develop:

Recurrent tearing.


Patient Monitoring

Patients should be followed according to:

Symptoms

and response to:

Treatment.


Persistent Pain

If pain remains unexplained or persistent after several months, reassessment should consider:

Radial tunnel syndrome

Cervical radiculopathy

Arthritis

Loose body

or another:

Elbow diagnosis.


Repeat Imaging

Repeat radiographs or advanced imaging may be appropriate if symptoms remain persistent after approximately:

Several months

or if the clinical picture changes.


Key Principle

Tennis elbow is primarily a degenerative tendinopathy of the ECRB origin at the lateral epicondyle rather than a true inflammatory disorder.

Patients characteristically develop:

Lateral elbow pain with gripping and resisted wrist extension, while elbow range of motion is usually:

Normal.

Diagnosis is primarily:

Clinical, with imaging reserved for atypical, persistent, or diagnostically uncertain cases.

Most patients improve with:

Activity modification, ergonomic or technique correction, eccentric extensor strengthening, counterforce bracing, and time.

Injections may provide selective symptomatic relief, but repeated corticosteroid exposure should be used cautiously because of potential:

Tendon weakening.

Surgery is reserved for a small minority of patients with:

Persistent symptoms despite prolonged appropriate nonoperative treatment.



Image description
Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome


Basics

Tarsal tunnel syndrome is an entrapment neuropathy involving the:

Tibial nerve

or one of its distal branches as the nerve passes through the:

Tarsal tunnel.

The neuropathy may result from:

Compression

or

Traction.


Anatomy

The proximal tarsal tunnel is a:

Fibro-osseous canal

located along the posteromedial aspect of the:

Ankle.

It represents a distal continuation of the:

Deep posterior compartment of the leg.


Contents of the Tarsal Tunnel

From anterior to posterior, the tunnel contains the:

Posterior tibial tendon

Flexor digitorum longus tendon

Posterior tibial artery and vein

Tibial nerve

and

Flexor hallucis longus tendon.


Floor of the Tunnel

The floor is formed by:

The medial talus

The sustentaculum tali

and

The medial wall of the calcaneus.


Roof of the Tunnel

The roof is formed by the:

Flexor retinaculum.

This structure may begin as far as approximately:

10 cm proximal to the medial malleolus.


Fibro-Osseous Compartments

The tendons and neurovascular bundle travel in relatively constrained:

Fibro-osseous compartments

connected to the:

Flexor retinaculum.

Because the tunnel is not easily expandable, even a modest increase in local volume can produce:

Nerve compression.


Tibial Nerve Branches

Within or near the tarsal tunnel, the tibial nerve gives rise to:

Medial calcaneal nerve

Medial plantar nerve

and

Lateral plantar nerve.

The exact branching anatomy is:

Variable.


Medial Calcaneal Nerve

The:

Medial calcaneal nerve

arises directly from the tibial nerve in approximately:

69–90% of individuals.

It may also originate from the:

Lateral plantar nerve.


Number of Calcaneal Branches

A single medial calcaneal branch is present in approximately:

79%

although multiple branches may occur.


Sensory Distribution

The medial calcaneal nerve supplies sensation to the:

Medial heel.

Because it may branch proximal to the site of compression, heel sensation can occasionally be:

Preserved

despite tarsal tunnel syndrome.


Medial and Lateral Plantar Nerves

The tibial nerve terminates as the:

Medial plantar nerve

and

Lateral plantar nerve.

In approximately:

93–96%

of individuals, this bifurcation occurs within the:

Tarsal tunnel.

In the remainder, the division occurs more proximally in the:

Leg.


Medial Plantar Nerve

The medial plantar nerve provides sensation to:

The plantar medial foot

Great toe

Second toe

Third toe

and the:

Medial side of the fourth toe.


Medial Plantar Motor Supply

It provides motor innervation to:

Abductor hallucis

Flexor digitorum brevis

Flexor hallucis brevis

and the:

First lumbrical.


Lateral Plantar Nerve

The lateral plantar nerve supplies sensation to:

The lateral side of the fourth toe

and

The fifth toe.


Lateral Plantar Motor Supply

It provides motor innervation to:

Quadratus plantae

Abductor digiti minimi

Flexor digiti minimi brevis

The lateral three lumbricals

Adductor hallucis

and

The interossei.


Most Commonly Involved Branch

The:

Lateral plantar nerve

is frequently involved in tarsal tunnel syndrome.


Distal Tarsal Tunnel

Distally, the medial and lateral plantar nerves pass through separate:

Fibrous tunnels

deep to the:

Abductor hallucis muscle.

These sites can also become points of:

Entrapment.


Medial Plantar Nerve Entrapment

The medial plantar nerve can become compressed between the:

Navicular

and

Abductor hallucis

or near the:

Knot of Henry.


First Branch of the Lateral Plantar Nerve

The first branch of the lateral plantar nerve may be compressed within the fascia of:

Abductor hallucis

as it courses toward the:

Abductor digiti minimi.

This may produce:

Chronic heel pain.


Pregnancy Considerations

Tarsal tunnel symptoms may develop during:

Pregnancy

because of:

Fluid retention

and increased local:

Tissue volume.

Management is usually:

Supportive

because symptoms often improve after:

Delivery.


Epidemiology

Tarsal tunnel syndrome can occur over a wide:

Age range.

Historical series have reported affected patients between approximately:

14 and 80 years.


Sex

It appears to be slightly more common in:

Women

than in men.

One historical review reported approximately:

56% female patients.


Incidence

The true incidence is:

Unknown.


Risk Factors

No single risk factor has been conclusively established.

Several occupations and repetitive activities have nevertheless been associated with:

Tibial nerve traction or compression.


Jogger’s Foot

Excessive:

Hindfoot valgus

may place traction on the tibial nerve during repetitive:

Running.

This presentation has sometimes been termed:

Jogger’s foot.


Repetitive Squatting

Activities requiring repeated:

Squatting

or

Crouching

may increase pressure within the tarsal tunnel.

Historical examples include:

Race jockeys.


Pathophysiology

Tarsal tunnel syndrome develops when the tibial nerve or one of its branches is subjected to:

Compression

Traction

or both.


Restricted Tunnel Volume

Because the tarsal tunnel has relatively rigid boundaries, increases in local tissue volume may raise:

Intratunnel pressure.


Sensory Dysfunction

Sensory symptoms are thought to result partly from:

Nerve ischemia

and impaired:

Axonal conduction.


Motor Dysfunction

Late motor deficits may result from more prolonged:

Direct nerve compression

and axonal injury.


Chronic Traction

Repetitive traction can lead to:

Epineurial fibrosis

and decreased:

Nerve mobility.

This may make the nerve more susceptible to additional:

Compression or injury.


Etiology

A specific cause can be identified in approximately:

60–80% of patients.

Causes can broadly be grouped into:

Trauma

Space-occupying lesions

and

Foot or hindfoot deformity.


Common Causes

Historical series have reported approximate frequencies of:

Trauma – 17%

Varicosities – 13%

Hindfoot varus – 11%

Fibrosis – 9%

and

Hindfoot valgus – 8%.


Space-Occupying Lesions

Other causes include:

Ganglion cyst

Lipoma

Neurilemmoma

Inflammatory synovitis

Pigmented villonodular synovitis

Tarsal coalition

and

Accessory musculature.


Diagnosis

Tarsal tunnel syndrome is commonly:

Missed or misdiagnosed

because symptoms can be:

Variable

and

Poorly localized.


Signs and Symptoms

The typical presentation is an:

Insidious or intermittent onset

of neuropathic:

Pain

Burning

Paresthesia

or

Numbness.


Distribution of Symptoms

Symptoms depend on which branch of the tibial nerve is:

Affected.

They may involve the:

Plantar foot

Heel

or

Toes.


Valleix Phenomenon

Pain or paresthesia may radiate proximally up the:

Medial leg

along the course of the tibial nerve.

This is known as the:

Valleix phenomenon.

Historical series have reported it in approximately:

One-third of patients with severe compression.


Distal Radiation

Symptoms may also radiate distally along the distribution of the:

Medial or lateral plantar nerves.


Activity-Related Symptoms

Pain typically worsens with:

Prolonged standing

Walking

or

Activity.


Night Pain

Some patients report substantial:

Night pain.

Venous congestion or prolonged nerve irritation may contribute.


Factors That Relieve Symptoms

Symptoms may improve with:

Rest

Loose footwear

and

Elevation.


Physical Examination

A complete examination of the:

Foot and ankle

should be performed.


Foot Alignment

Assess the patient for:

Hindfoot valgus

or

Hindfoot varus.

Alignment abnormalities may increase:

Traction

or

Compression

on the tibial nerve.


Provocative Positioning

Forced:

Dorsiflexion

Inversion

or

Eversion

may reproduce symptoms by stretching or narrowing the:

Tarsal tunnel.


Palpation

Palpate the tarsal tunnel and the course of the tibial nerve for:

Tenderness

Swelling

or evidence of a:

Mass.


Tinel Sign

Percussion over the:

Tibial nerve

may reproduce distal:

Paresthesia.

A positive Tinel sign supports a diagnosis of:

Tibial nerve irritation.


Cuff Test

A pneumatic cuff may be used to produce temporary:

Venous congestion.

Engorgement of varicosities can reproduce symptoms when venous structures are contributing to:

Compression.

This test is used infrequently in modern practice.


Compression Test

Direct pressure over the:

Tarsal tunnel

for approximately:

60 seconds

may reproduce the patient’s:

Neuropathic symptoms.


Sensory Examination

Examine sensation over the territories of the:

Medial calcaneal

Medial plantar

and

Lateral plantar nerves.


Heel Sensation

The medial calcaneal nerve is often:

Spared

because it may branch proximal to the site of:

Compression.


Two-Point Discrimination

Reduced:

Two-point discrimination

may be an early finding of:

Sensory dysfunction.


Motor Examination

Motor deficits are usually:

Late findings.


Intrinsic Weakness

Weakness of the intrinsic muscles can be difficult to:

Detect clinically.


Toe Plantarflexion

Rarely, weakness of:

Toe plantarflexion

may be evident.


Muscle Atrophy

Late disease may produce atrophy of:

Abductor hallucis

or

Abductor digiti minimi.


Laboratory Tests

Routine laboratory tests do not diagnose:

Tarsal tunnel syndrome.

They may help identify systemic causes of:

Peripheral neuropathy.


Diabetes and Systemic Disease

Testing may be appropriate when evaluating for:

Diabetes mellitus

Vitamin deficiency

Thyroid disease

or other systemic:

Neuropathies.


Imaging


Weight-Bearing Radiographs

Routine weight-bearing foot and ankle radiographs help assess:

Alignment

Bony deformity

Exostosis

and

Tarsal coalition.


MRI

MRI is useful when evaluating for:

Space-occupying lesions

or other structural causes of:

Nerve compression.


MRI Findings

MRI can identify:

Ganglion cysts

Tumors

Varicosities

Accessory muscles

and inflammatory:

Soft-tissue abnormalities.


Diagnostic Yield

One historical study identified a potential causative abnormality on MRI in approximately:

88% of symptomatic feet.


Pediatric Considerations

In children, MRI is especially valuable because nerve compression may occasionally result from:

Neoplastic or other mass lesions.


Electrodiagnostic Studies

Electrodiagnostic testing may help evaluate:

Tibial nerve dysfunction

and identify more generalized:

Peripheral neuropathy.


Motor Latency

Isolated motor latency testing has relatively:

Low sensitivity.


Sensory Action Potentials

Sensory action potentials are among the more sensitive:

Electrodiagnostic measurements.

Historical data have reported sensitivity around:

90.5%

but with a modest:

False-positive rate.


Mixed Nerve Conduction Studies

Mixed motor-sensory conduction studies may demonstrate abnormalities with relatively good:

Specificity.

Historical series have reported abnormalities in approximately:

85.7% of cases.


Limitations of Electrodiagnostic Testing

Normal electrodiagnostic studies do not completely exclude:

Tarsal tunnel syndrome.

Findings must be interpreted together with:

History

Physical examination

and

Imaging.


Proximal Nerve Compression

Evaluation should also consider more proximal causes such as:

Lumbar radiculopathy

or a:

Double-crush phenomenon.


Pathological Findings

Surgical exploration may reveal:

Focal nerve swelling

Fibrosis

Scarring

or an identifiable:

Compressive lesion.


Differential Diagnosis

Important differential diagnoses include:

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Peripheral neuritis

Peripheral vascular disease

Morton neuroma

Metatarsalgia

Subtalar arthritis

Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction

Plantar fasciitis

Complex regional pain syndrome

Proximal tibial nerve or sciatic nerve compression

and

Lumbar radiculopathy.


Plantar Fasciitis

Plantar fasciitis usually produces:

Mechanical plantar heel pain

rather than burning or paresthetic:

Neuropathic symptoms.


Lumbar Radiculopathy

Lumbar nerve-root compression may mimic distal tibial nerve symptoms.

A complete neurologic examination should therefore include assessment for:

Proximal neurologic disease.


Treatment

Initial treatment is generally:

Nonoperative.

Exceptions include:

Acute severe nerve compression

or an identified:

Space-occupying lesion

that requires removal.


General Measures

Conservative treatment may include:

Activity modification

Rest

Temporary immobilization

Orthotics

Anti-inflammatory medication

Neuropathic pain medication

Physical therapy

Compression stockings

and

Weight reduction when appropriate.


Immobilization

A boot or brace may temporarily decrease:

Nerve irritation

by reducing repetitive:

Ankle and hindfoot motion.


Orthotics

Orthotic devices may help correct:

Hindfoot valgus

or other alignment abnormalities that increase:

Tibial nerve tension.


NSAIDs

NSAIDs may reduce:

Associated inflammatory pain

although they do not directly reverse:

Nerve compression.


Corticosteroid Injection

A carefully placed corticosteroid injection may sometimes reduce local:

Inflammation

or

Synovitis.

Injections should be performed cautiously because of the proximity of the:

Tibial nerve and vascular structures.


Neuropathic Pain Medication

Medications used for neuropathic symptoms may include selected:

Tricyclic antidepressants

or

Antiepileptic agents.


Nerve Blocks

Diagnostic or therapeutic:

Nerve blocks

may occasionally be used in selected patients.


Physical Therapy

Therapy may include:

Neural mobilization

Desensitization

Stretching

and correction of:

Biomechanical abnormalities.


Compression Stockings

When symptoms are related to:

Venous congestion

or

Varicosities

compression stockings may help reduce:

Local swelling.


Weight Management

Weight reduction may decrease repetitive:

Mechanical loading

and pressure around the:

Tarsal tunnel.


Surgery

Surgical decompression may be considered when:

Conservative treatment fails

or when a clear structural cause is identified.


Indications for Surgery

Typical indications include:

Persistent symptoms after approximately 3–6 months of nonoperative treatment

Acute tarsal tunnel syndrome

or

Space-occupying lesion.


Surgical Approach

A curved:

Posteromedial incision

is made along the course of the:

Tibial nerve.


Flexor Retinaculum Release

The entire:

Flexor retinaculum

should be released to decompress the proximal:

Tarsal tunnel.


Distal Decompression

The:

Medial plantar

and

Lateral plantar nerves

should also be released distally as they pass beneath the:

Abductor hallucis.


Space-Occupying Lesions

Any responsible lesion such as a:

Ganglion

Tumor

or other mass should be:

Excised or treated.


Associated Pathology

Underlying abnormalities such as:

Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction

or

Tarsal coalition

may also require treatment.


Scar Prevention

Surgical dissection should be minimized when possible because excessive tissue disruption may increase:

Postoperative scar formation

around the:

Nerve.


Follow-Up

Postoperative care usually begins with:

Protected non-weight-bearing.


Initial Immobilization

A splint is maintained until the incision heals, generally for approximately:

2–3 weeks.


Weight-Bearing Progression

After wound healing, patients gradually begin:

Weight bearing

and

Range-of-motion exercises.


Swelling Control

Elevation, compression, and other swelling-control measures may help reduce postoperative:

Edema.


Prognosis

Outcomes are generally more favorable when:

The patient is younger

Symptoms have been present for a shorter duration

and a specific:

Compressive lesion

can be identified.


Timing of Surgery

Results tend to be better when decompression is performed before development of:

Motor weakness

or

Muscle atrophy.


Surgical Outcomes

Historical reviews have reported improvement or resolution of symptoms in approximately:

90% of selected patients.

However, longer-term studies using stricter outcome criteria have reported:

Less predictable results

and deterioration of benefit in some:

Patients.


Complications

The principal adverse outcome is:

Persistent or recurrent symptoms after decompression.


Failed Tarsal Tunnel Release

Important causes of failed surgery include:

Incorrect initial diagnosis

Incomplete surgical release

Adhesive neuritis

Intraneural damage

and

Untreated proximal or additional nerve compression.


Incorrect Diagnosis

Symptoms may persist when the true problem is:

Lumbar radiculopathy

Peripheral neuropathy

or another:

Foot disorder.


Incomplete Release

Failure to release the full length of the:

Flexor retinaculum

or distal plantar nerve tunnels may leave residual:

Compression.


Adhesive Neuritis

Postoperative scar formation around the nerve may produce:

Adhesive neuritis

with recurrent:

Pain and paresthesia.


Intraneural Damage

Chronic systemic neuropathy or direct nerve injury may produce irreversible:

Intraneural damage.


Double-Crush Phenomenon

Symptoms may persist if both:

Distal tibial nerve compression

and a more proximal lesion such as:

Lumbar radiculopathy

are present.


Evaluation After Failed Release

The surgical scar and extent of the previous incision should be examined carefully because an incision that is too short may suggest:

Incomplete decompression.


Electrodiagnostic Testing After Failed Surgery

Electrodiagnostic studies are generally less useful for determining the cause of:

Failed tarsal tunnel release.


Revision Surgery

Revision decompression may be considered in selected patients with:

Incomplete release

or

Adhesive neuritis.


Barrier Procedures

In cases of extensive scar formation, the nerve may be wrapped with:

Vein

or

Synthetic biologic material

to reduce recurrent:

Adhesion formation.


Revision Prognosis

Outcomes after:

Revision surgery

are generally less favorable than after successful:

Primary decompression.


Patient Monitoring

Patients should be followed for changes in:

Pain

Paresthesia

Sensation

Intrinsic muscle strength

and

Functional walking tolerance.


Key Principle

Tarsal tunnel syndrome is an entrapment neuropathy of the tibial nerve or its distal branches within the fibro-osseous tunnel along the medial ankle.

Symptoms typically include:

Burning pain, paresthesia, numbness, and activity-related plantar foot discomfort, sometimes with a positive:

Tinel sign.

Evaluation should identify potential causes such as:

Trauma, varicosities, hindfoot deformity, fibrosis, ganglion cyst, tumor, tarsal coalition, or accessory muscle.

Initial treatment is usually:

Nonoperative, using activity modification, orthotics, medication, physical therapy, and treatment of contributing deformity or swelling.

Surgical decompression is considered for:

Persistent symptoms, acute compression, or a defined space-occupying lesion, and should include release of the:

Flexor retinaculum and distal medial and lateral plantar nerve tunnels.



Image description
Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Talus Fracture


Basics

The talus is a critical bone of the:

Hindfoot

that transmits body weight from the tibia to the:

Foot.

It articulates with the:

Tibia

Fibula

Calcaneus

and

Navicular.


Functional Importance

The talus plays an essential role in:

Ankle motion

Subtalar motion

and distribution of:

Weight-bearing forces.

Because of its importance to both the ankle and hindfoot, even relatively small abnormalities in talar alignment may substantially affect:

Foot function.


Articular Cartilage

Approximately:

60% of the talar surface

is covered with:

Articular cartilage.

This leaves relatively little surface area available for entry of:

Blood vessels.


Blood Supply

The talar blood supply enters through a limited number of:

Soft-tissue attachments

particularly around the:

Talar neck.

As a result, displaced fractures can interrupt vascular inflow and predispose the talus to:

Osteonecrosis.


Clinical Importance

Talus fractures can be difficult to:

Diagnose

and may have serious complications even when treated appropriately.

A high index of suspicion is important because delayed diagnosis can increase the risk of:

Malunion

Arthritis

and

Osteonecrosis.


Anatomical Types

Fractures may involve the:

Talar neck

Talar body

Posterior process

or

Lateral process.

Osteochondral injuries of the talar dome represent another important group of:

Talar injuries.


Talar Neck Classification

Talar neck fractures are commonly classified using the:

Modified Hawkins classification.


Hawkins Type I

Type I is a:

Nondisplaced talar neck fracture

with preserved alignment of the:

Subtalar

and

Tibiotalar joints.


Hawkins Type II

Type II consists of a displaced talar neck fracture with:

Subluxation or dislocation of the subtalar joint

while the:

Tibiotalar joint remains reduced.


Hawkins Type III

Type III involves a displaced talar neck fracture with dislocation of both the:

Subtalar joint

and

Tibiotalar joint.

This pattern carries a substantially greater risk of:

Osteonecrosis.


Hawkins Type IV

Type IV represents the most severe pattern, with displacement involving the talus and disruption of additional:

Peritalar articulations, classically including the talonavicular joint.

Severe cases may approach:

Talar extrusion.


Talar Body Fractures

Talar body fractures may be described according to the orientation of the:

Fracture plane.


Type I Talar Body Fracture

Type I fractures are primarily:

Coronal

or

Sagittal.


Type II Talar Body Fracture

Type II fractures are primarily:

Horizontal.


Talar Process Fractures

Process fractures include:

Posterior process fractures

and

Lateral process fractures.


Pediatric Considerations

Children have a relatively greater:

Cartilage-to-bone ratio

than adults.

The pediatric talus is therefore somewhat more capable of:

Deformation

before developing a complete:

Fracture.


Epidemiology

Talus fractures are:

Uncommon.

There is no strong universal association with:

Age

or

Sex.


Incidence

Talus fractures account for approximately:

3% of foot fractures.

About:

Half

involve the:

Talar neck.


Talar Body Fractures

Talar body fractures are less common.

Historical reports have estimated that they account for approximately:

7–38% of tarsal fractures

depending on the definition and study population.


Risk Factors

Important mechanisms and activities associated with talus fracture include:

Motor vehicle collisions

Falls from height

and

Snowboarding.


Pathophysiology

The fracture pattern depends on the:

Direction and magnitude of force.


Talar Neck Mechanism

Talar neck fractures commonly occur when the foot is forced into:

Extreme dorsiflexion.

The talar neck becomes impacted against the:

Anterior distal tibia

and may fracture.


Lateral Process Fracture

Lateral process fractures are particularly associated with:

Snowboarding.

A common mechanism is:

External rotation

applied to a:

Dorsiflexed foot

inside a rigid:

Boot.


Talar Body Fracture

Talar body fractures typically result from:

Axial compression

of the talus between the:

Tibia

and

Calcaneus.


Etiology

Most major talus fractures result from:

High-energy trauma.

The classic mechanism includes forceful:

Dorsiflexion of the forefoot and ankle

often combined with:

Axial loading.


Associated Conditions

Talar neck fractures may occur with:

Medial malleolus fractures

and other injuries involving the:

Ankle

Calcaneus

or

Midfoot.


High-Energy Trauma

Because many talar fractures follow high-energy mechanisms, the patient should also be evaluated for additional:

Lower-extremity

Pelvic

Spinal

or systemic:

Traumatic injuries.


Diagnosis

Diagnosis requires:

Careful examination

and appropriate:

Imaging.

Some talar fractures, particularly small process fractures, are easily:

Missed.


Signs and Symptoms

Typical symptoms include:

Severe ankle or hindfoot pain

after substantial:

Trauma.


Swelling

Marked:

Swelling

may develop around the:

Ankle and hindfoot.


Ecchymosis

Bruising may occur over the:

Ankle

Hindfoot

or

Midfoot.


Deformity

Displaced fractures may produce visible:

Deformity

or abnormal prominence of:

Talar fragments.


History

Common injury mechanisms include:

Motor vehicle collision

and

Fall from height.


Aviator’s Astragalus

Historically, talar neck fractures were associated with pilots who sustained violent dorsiflexion injuries while bracing their feet against:

Aircraft rudder pedals.

This led to the historic term:

Aviator’s astragalus.


Physical Examination

Examine the:

Ankle

and

Hindfoot

carefully.


Tenderness

Assess for:

Focal talar tenderness

including around the:

Talar neck

Lateral process

and

Posterior process.


Deformity

Look for:

Abnormal contour

Skin tenting

or displacement suggesting:

Dislocation or fracture-dislocation.


Motion

Assess ankle and subtalar motion carefully when safe.

Pain with:

Ankle

or

Subtalar movement

may indicate significant:

Talar injury.


Skin Examination

Because there is very little protective soft tissue around portions of the talus, displaced fragments may threaten:

Skin viability.

Look for:

Tenting

Blanching

Open wounds

or impending:

Skin necrosis.


Neurovascular Examination

Document:

Sensation

Motor function

Pulses

and

Capillary refill.


Missed Process Fractures

Lateral and posterior process fractures are frequently mistaken for:

Ankle sprains.

Persistent focal pain after an apparently routine ankle injury should lower the threshold for:

CT imaging.


Imaging


Plain Radiographs

Initial imaging usually includes:

AP and lateral ankle radiographs

and appropriate:

Foot views.


Talar Neck View

A specialized oblique view of the talar neck may improve visualization.

This is commonly obtained with the foot in:

Plantarflexion

and approximately:

15° of pronation.

This is often referred to as the:

Canale view.


CT

CT is extremely useful for determining:

Fracture displacement

Comminution

Articular involvement

and presence of:

Associated fractures.


Role of CT

CT is particularly valuable for:

Talar neck

Talar body

and

Process fractures

that are incompletely defined on:

Plain radiographs.


MRI

MRI is not usually the first study for an acute displaced fracture.

It is more useful later when evaluating:

Osteonecrosis

or occult injury when radiographs and CT are:

Nondiagnostic.


Pathological Findings

Occasionally a talar fracture occurs through:

Abnormal bone.

Possible underlying lesions include:

Bone cysts

or

Bone tumors.


Differential Diagnosis

Important differential diagnoses include:

Ankle fracture

Ankle dislocation

Talar dislocation

Calcaneus fracture

and

Navicular fracture.


Treatment

Treatment depends on:

Fracture location

Displacement

Joint congruity

Soft-tissue condition

and

Vascular risk.


Initial Stabilization

Initial treatment includes:

Immobilization

Elevation

and

Cold therapy

for swelling and pain.


Urgent Reduction

A displaced talar fracture or fracture-dislocation with threatened skin should undergo:

Urgent reduction.

The immediate priority is restoration of:

Alignment

and relief of pressure on:

Skin and neurovascular structures.


Importance of Early Reduction

Prompt reduction decreases the risk of:

Skin necrosis

Soft-tissue compromise

and secondary:

Infection.


Nondisplaced Fractures

Selected nondisplaced fractures may be treated with:

Cast or boot immobilization

and strict:

Non-weight-bearing.


Historical Immobilization

Traditional treatment of nondisplaced talar neck fractures may involve below-knee immobilization for up to approximately:

12 weeks

with at least:

6 weeks of non-weight-bearing.

Duration should be individualized according to:

Radiographic healing.


Hawkins Type II

Type II talar neck fractures require:

Anatomic reduction.

Reduction may be achieved by:

Closed

or

Open methods.


Hawkins Type III

Type III injuries almost always require:

Operative reduction and fixation

because of substantial:

Displacement and instability.


Talar Body Fractures

Displaced talar body fractures usually require:

Operative fixation

to restore:

Articular congruity.


Osteonecrosis Risk

Talar body fractures have a particularly high risk of:

Posttraumatic osteonecrosis

and

Posttraumatic arthritis.


Irreducible Fracture

A displaced fracture that cannot be reduced closed requires:

Open reduction and internal fixation.


Soft-Tissue Risk

Displaced talar fragments may create severe pressure against the thin overlying:

Skin.

This can cause:

Skin necrosis

and subsequent:

Infection.


Process Fractures

Small minimally displaced process fractures may often be treated:

Nonoperatively.


Small Process Fracture

A talar process fracture measuring less than approximately:

1 cm

and displaced less than:

2 mm

may be treated with:

Non-weight-bearing immobilization

for approximately:

6 weeks.


Larger Process Fracture

Larger or more displaced fragments may require:

Open reduction and internal fixation

or, in selected small symptomatic fragments,

Excision.


Pediatric Treatment

Nondisplaced pediatric fractures may be treated with:

Immobilization

for approximately:

6–8 weeks.


Acceptable Pediatric Alignment

Because children have greater remodeling capacity, small residual deformity may be acceptable.

Historical thresholds include less than approximately:

5 mm of displacement

and

5° of angulation

after reduction.


Activity

Patients are generally kept:

Non-weight-bearing

for at least:

4–6 weeks

and often longer depending on:

Fracture severity and healing.


Physical Therapy

Range-of-motion exercises are typically started after adequate fracture:

Stability

and removal of:

Immobilization.


Rehabilitation Goals

Therapy focuses on restoring:

Ankle motion

Subtalar motion

Strength

and

Gait.


Medication

Acute pain may initially require:

Short-term opioid analgesia.

As symptoms improve, treatment can transition to:

Acetaminophen

or

NSAIDs

when medically appropriate.


Surgery

The principal surgical goal is:

Anatomic reduction of the articular surfaces

with stable:

Internal fixation.


Surgical Approaches

Talar neck fractures may be approached through:

Medial

and

Lateral incisions.


Dual-Incision Technique

Displaced fractures often benefit from:

Combined anteromedial and anterolateral approaches

because visualization from both sides improves:

Reduction accuracy.


Fluoroscopy

Reduction and implant placement are confirmed with:

Intraoperative fluoroscopy.


Screw Fixation

Cannulated screws may be placed in:

Antegrade

or

Retrograde orientation

depending on fracture geometry.


Plate Fixation

Comminuted talar neck fractures may not provide adequate purchase for screws alone.

In these cases:

Low-profile plate fixation

may help maintain:

Length

Alignment

and

Rotation.


Talar Body Exposure

Talar body fractures can be more difficult to expose because of the surrounding:

Articular surfaces

and

Malleoli.


Medial Malleolar Osteotomy

A:

Medial malleolar osteotomy

may be required to obtain adequate visualization of selected:

Talar body fractures.


Articular Screw Placement

When screws pass through an articular surface, the heads should be:

Countersunk

to avoid damage to opposing:

Cartilage.


Process Fracture Fixation

Large or displaced process fractures may be stabilized using:

Small screws

or

Kirschner wires.


Compartment Syndrome

Severe hindfoot injuries may be associated with:

Foot compartment syndrome.


Monitoring for Compartment Syndrome

Watch for:

Progressive pain

Tense swelling

Pain with passive toe motion

and neurologic:

Changes.


Pressure Measurement

If the diagnosis remains uncertain, intracompartmental pressures may be:

Measured.


Fasciotomy

Confirmed compartment syndrome requires urgent:

Fasciotomy.


Postoperative Immobilization

After fixation, the extremity is placed in a:

Well-padded splint

until swelling decreases.

It may then be converted to a:

Below-knee cast or boot.


Weight Bearing After Surgery

Weight bearing is generally restricted until there is sufficient:

Fracture healing

and stability.

The duration varies according to:

Fracture pattern

Fixation

and evidence of:

Osteonecrosis.


Follow-Up

Long-term radiographic follow-up is important.


Duration

Nondisplaced fractures may be followed radiographically for at least:

18–24 months.

Displaced fractures and fractures complicated by:

Osteonecrosis

may require even longer:

Surveillance.


Prognosis

Outcome is strongly related to the:

Severity of the original injury.

Even with accurate reduction and fixation, severe initial disruption can lead to:

Osteonecrosis

and

Arthritis.


Talar Body Prognosis

Talar body fractures generally have a:

Less favorable prognosis

because of extensive:

Articular injury

and

Vascular disruption.


Historical Outcomes

Some historical series report that as many as:

88%

of patients with talar body fractures developed:

Osteonecrosis

Posttraumatic arthritis

or both.


Complications

Major complications include:

Foot compartment syndrome

Osteonecrosis

Skin necrosis

Infection

Delayed union

Nonunion

Malunion

and

Posttraumatic arthritis.


Osteonecrosis

Osteonecrosis is one of the most feared complications because the talus has a relatively:

Tenuous vascular supply.

Risk increases with:

Fracture displacement

Dislocation

and greater:

Soft-tissue disruption.


Delayed Union

Delayed healing is relatively common because of the limited:

Blood supply

and high proportion of:

Articular cartilage.


Nonunion

Nonunion may cause:

Persistent pain

and chronic:

Disability.

Treatment may require:

Revision fixation

Bone grafting

or

Fusion.


Malunion

Malunion alters normal:

Hindfoot mechanics

and redistributes force across the:

Ankle and subtalar joints.

This may result in:

Chronic pain

and progressive:

Arthritis.


Posttraumatic Arthritis

Arthritis may develop in the:

Tibiotalar

Subtalar

or

Talonavicular joints.

It may occur with or without:

Osteonecrosis.


Salvage Procedures

Severe symptomatic arthritis or talar collapse may ultimately require:

Subtalar fusion

Tibiotalar fusion

or

Pantalar fusion.


Patient Monitoring

Follow-up should assess:

Fracture union

Alignment

Joint congruity

and evidence of:

Talar vascularity.


Hawkins Sign

The:

Hawkins sign

is a subchondral radiolucent band that may appear in the:

Talar dome

during follow-up.


Meaning of Hawkins Sign

It represents:

Subchondral bone resorption

and therefore indicates that at least some:

Talar blood supply is preserved.


Clinical Significance

The presence of a Hawkins sign is reassuring and makes:

Osteonecrosis less likely.

Its absence, however, does not by itself prove:

Osteonecrosis.


MRI for Osteonecrosis

MRI can help confirm or further assess suspected:

Talar osteonecrosis

when radiographic findings are:

Uncertain.


Key Principle

Talus fractures are uncommon but potentially severe hindfoot injuries because much of the talus is covered by articular cartilage and its vascular supply is relatively vulnerable.

Fractures may involve the:

Neck, body, lateral process, or posterior process, with talar neck injuries commonly classified by the:

Modified Hawkins system.

Displaced fractures require:

Urgent reduction to protect the skin, soft tissues, joints, and remaining vascular supply, followed by stable fixation when indicated.

CT is particularly valuable for defining:

Displacement, comminution, and articular involvement.

The most important long-term complications are:

Osteonecrosis, posttraumatic arthritis, malunion, nonunion, and hindfoot stiffness.

Long-term radiographic surveillance is essential, with the:

Hawkins sign serving as a reassuring indicator of preserved talar vascularity when present.


Image description
Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Syndactyly


Basics

Syndactyly is a congenital condition characterized by:

Webbing or fusion of adjacent fingers or toes.

It is usually evident:

At birth.


Synonym

Another term is:

Webbed digits.


Classification

Syndactyly can be classified according to:

The tissues involved

and

The extent of fusion.


Simple Syndactyly

Simple syndactyly involves fusion of:

Skin and soft tissue only

without underlying:

Bony fusion.


Complex Syndactyly

Complex syndactyly includes abnormalities involving:

Bone

Joint

or other deeper structures.

The adjacent bones may be partially or completely:

Fused.


Complete Syndactyly

Complete syndactyly extends along essentially the:

Entire length of the involved digits

to the:

Fingertips.


Incomplete Syndactyly

Incomplete syndactyly involves only a:

Portion of the digit length

with separation present distally or proximally.


Fenestrated Syndactyly

Fenestrated syndactyly describes digits that are:

Separated proximally

but remain joined:

Distally.


Epidemiology

Syndactyly is one of the more common congenital:

Hand abnormalities.


Incidence

It occurs in approximately:

1 in 2,000 live births.


Bilateral Involvement

Approximately:

50% of cases

involve both:

Hands or feet.


Sex and Population

Historical studies have reported syndactyly more frequently in:

Males

and in:

White populations.


Risk Factors

The presence of other congenital abnormalities may increase the likelihood that syndactyly is part of a:

Recognizable syndrome.


Genetics

Most cases are:

Sporadic.

Approximately:

10–40%

have been reported to show a:

Familial pattern.


Sporadic Cases

Historical series suggest that up to approximately:

80%

of cases occur without an obvious:

Family history.


Inheritance

Familial syndactyly can demonstrate:

Autosomal dominant inheritance

in some families, although inheritance depends on the specific:

Syndrome or genetic subtype.


Etiology

Syndactyly results from failure of normal:

Separation of adjacent digits

during embryologic development.


Embryology

Finger and toe separation normally occurs during approximately the:

Sixth to eighth weeks of gestation.

Failure of programmed tissue separation during this period produces:

Persistent webbing.


Cause

In most isolated cases, the precise cause is:

Unknown.


Isolated Versus Syndromic Disease

Syndactyly may occur:

As an isolated congenital abnormality

or as part of a:

Genetic or congenital syndrome.

Most cases are:

Isolated.


Associated Conditions

Conditions associated with syndactyly include:

Apert syndrome

Poland syndrome

Congenital constriction band syndrome

and selected other:

Genetic disorders.


Apert Syndrome

Apert syndrome is characterized by:

Craniosynostosis

and severe:

Complex syndactyly

of the hands and feet.

It has historically been termed:

Acrocephalosyndactyly.


Poland Syndrome

Poland syndrome may include:

Absence or hypoplasia of the pectoralis major muscle

with ipsilateral:

Upper-extremity abnormalities

including:

Syndactyly or brachydactyly.


Congenital Constriction Band Syndrome

Amniotic or congenital constriction bands may produce:

Syndactyly

Distal swelling

Digital deformity

or even:

Amputation.


Neurofibromatosis

Some historical reports describe a slightly increased occurrence of syndactyly with:

Neurofibromatosis

although this is not among its major defining features.


Diagnosis

Diagnosis is usually made by:

Physical examination at birth.

Imaging helps determine whether the condition is:

Simple or complex.


Signs and Symptoms

Syndactyly itself is generally:

Painless.

Functional limitation depends on:

Which digits are involved

and the degree of:

Soft-tissue or bony fusion.


Physical Examination

The examination should assess:

Extent of webbing

Digit length

Joint motion

Independent movement

Nail development

and associated:

Congenital abnormalities.


Joint Motion

Evaluate both:

Active

and

Passive range of motion

at each joint of the involved digits.


Independent Digital Movement

Ask the patient, when developmentally able, to move the two involved digits:

Separately.

Independent motion suggests that major:

Bony fusion

or extensive tendon interconnection is less likely.


Skin Availability

The amount of available skin between the digits is important for planning:

Surgical reconstruction.

A deficiency of local skin may increase the need for:

Skin grafting.


Nail Examination

Inspect the nails for:

Separate nail plates

or

Nail fusion.

Joined nails may suggest more extensive:

Distal skeletal involvement.


Rotational and Angular Deformity

The surgeon should assess for:

Rotation

Angular deformity

and unequal:

Digit length.

These findings may complicate:

Reconstruction.


Imaging


Plain Radiographs

Radiographs are useful for distinguishing:

Simple syndactyly

from

Complex syndactyly.


Radiographic Findings

Imaging can identify:

Bony fusion

Abnormal phalanges

Joint abnormalities

and differences in:

Digit length or alignment.


Vascular Imaging

In difficult complex cases, evaluation of the:

Digital vascular anatomy

may occasionally be required.


MRA or Angiography

MR angiography or conventional angiography may help define:

Neurovascular branching patterns

when standard anatomy is uncertain.


Distal Vascular Bifurcation

If the shared digital artery divides:

Very distally

separation may threaten the blood supply to one of the:

Digits.

This can limit how completely the digits can be:

Separated.


Pathological Findings

Syndactyly may be associated with:

Insufficient skin

between the involved digits.


Fascial Abnormalities

There may be abnormal connections between:

Fascial planes.


Tendon Interconnections

The:

Flexor

and

Extensor tendons

may have abnormal cross-connections between:

Adjacent digits.


Bone and Joint Abnormalities

Complex cases may demonstrate:

Fused phalanges

Abnormal joints

Delta phalanx

or other congenital:

Skeletal abnormalities.


Differential Diagnosis

The major diagnostic distinction is between:

Simple

and

Complex syndactyly.

Other congenital conditions that may resemble or accompany digital fusion include:

Constriction band syndrome

Symbrachydactyly

and syndromic:

Hand malformations.


Treatment

Treatment depends on:

Digits involved

Severity

Functional limitation

Growth asymmetry

and whether the syndactyly is:

Simple or complex.


General Measures

Not every syndactyly requires:

Surgery.


Mild Webbing

Minor incomplete webbing that causes little functional or cosmetic concern may be managed with:

Observation.


Goals of Release

Surgical separation may improve:

Finger independence

Grasp

Pinch

Digit growth

and

Cosmetic appearance.


Border Digits

Syndactyly involving digits of substantially different lengths can lead to:

Growth tethering

and secondary:

Angular deformity.

This is particularly important for:

Thumb-index

and

Ring-small finger syndactyly.


Timing of Surgery

Timing depends on which digits are involved and the complexity of:

The deformity.


Border-Digit Syndactyly

For border digits, release is often performed after approximately:

6 months of age

because unequal digit lengths may produce progressive:

Growth distortion.


Central-Digit Syndactyly

For central digits, surgery is commonly delayed until approximately:

12 months of age

or later when there is less urgency related to:

Growth imbalance.


Complex Cases

Complex syndactyly may require earlier or staged treatment depending on:

Bone fusion

Nail abnormalities

Digit length discrepancy

and

Vascular anatomy.


Physical Therapy

Formal therapy is usually:

Not required before surgery.


Postoperative Therapy

Hand therapy may be useful for:

Scar management

Web-space splinting

and

Range-of-motion exercises.


Surgery

The operative technique depends on:

Extent of webbing

Skin availability

Bony involvement

and

Vascular anatomy.


Web-Space Reconstruction

A properly shaped commissure or web space must be created to reproduce the normal:

Interdigital cleft.


Dorsal Flap

For simple syndactyly, a broad:

Dorsal commissural flap

is commonly used.

The flap is designed with a wider:

Proximal base

to preserve:

Blood supply.


Zigzag Incisions

Interdigitating:

Z-plasty or zigzag skin incisions

are frequently used along the digits.

These reduce the risk of:

Linear scar contracture.


Skin Grafting

After separation, there is often insufficient local skin to cover both digits completely.

Therefore:

Full-thickness skin grafting

may be necessary.


Graft Donor Sites

Potential donor sites include:

Groin

Wrist crease

or other areas providing suitable:

Full-thickness skin.


Graft-Free Techniques

Some modern techniques use local flaps designed to minimize or eliminate the need for:

Skin grafts

in selected simple cases.


Complex Syndactyly

When bones are fused, surgical treatment may require:

Bony separation

in addition to:

Soft-tissue reconstruction.


Tendon and Ligament Reconstruction

Abnormal:

Tendon

Ligament

or

Joint structures

may also need to be:

Reconstructed.


Neurovascular Considerations

Each separated digit must retain an adequate:

Digital artery

and intact:

Digital nerve supply.


Staged Release

When three adjacent digits are joined, separation is often performed in:

Stages.

This helps preserve at least one intact:

Neurovascular bundle

on each side of a digit during healing.


Postoperative Dressing

Postoperative dressing is a critical part of:

Treatment.


Immobilization

The hand and arm may be immobilized in a:

Bulky protective dressing

with or without an:

Above-elbow cast.


Duration of Dressing

The initial protective dressing is commonly maintained for approximately:

2–3 weeks

depending on:

Wound healing

and surgeon preference.


Follow-Up

Patients require follow-up to assess:

Wound healing

Skin graft survival

Digit perfusion

and

Web-space shape.


Long-Term Follow-Up

As the child grows, monitoring should continue for:

Scar contracture

Web creep

Angular deformity

and recurrent:

Syndactyly appearance.


Prognosis

The prognosis after appropriate treatment is generally:

Good.


Cosmetic Outcome

Minor differences in:

Finger width

Nail shape

Skin appearance

or

Web depth

may remain after reconstruction.


Functional Outcome

Most children achieve useful:

Independent finger motion

and improved:

Hand function.


Complications

Potential complications include:

Stiffness

Wound dehiscence

Scar contracture

Partial web recurrence

and rare:

Vascular compromise.


Web Creep

One of the more common long-term complications is:

Web creep.

This refers to gradual distal migration of the reconstructed:

Web space

as the child grows.


Scar Contracture

Linear or hypertrophic scars can produce:

Contracture

and restrict:

Finger motion.


Wound Dehiscence

Separation of the surgical wound can occur, particularly when:

Skin tension

is excessive.


Digital Stiffness

Complex reconstruction may occasionally result in loss of:

Joint motion.


Circulatory Compromise

Damage to shared digital vessels can cause:

Ischemia

and in severe cases:

Loss of the digit.

This complication is:

Rare.


Prevention of Vascular Injury

Risk can be reduced by carefully preserving at least one:

Collateral digital vascular supply

and avoiding simultaneous release on both sides of a digit when this would endanger:

Perfusion.


Patient Monitoring

Children should be monitored throughout growth for:

Web creep

Scar contracture

Joint stiffness

Digit angulation

and evolving:

Functional limitation.


Key Principle

Syndactyly is a congenital failure of separation of adjacent digits during approximately the sixth to eighth weeks of embryonic development.

It may be:

Simple or complex

and

Complete or incomplete.

Most cases are isolated, although syndactyly may occur with conditions such as:

Apert syndrome, Poland syndrome, or congenital constriction band syndrome.

Surgical release is performed when the deformity affects:

Function, growth, or appearance, with earlier treatment often preferred for border digits because unequal digit lengths may cause progressive:

Angular deformity.

Successful reconstruction requires careful management of:

Skin coverage, neurovascular anatomy, web-space formation, and postoperative scar control.



Image description
Published on

Orthopaedic Surgery - Swan Neck Deformity


Basics

Swan neck deformity is a characteristic digital deformity consisting of:

Hyperextension of the proximal interphalangeal joint

combined with:

Flexion of the distal interphalangeal joint.

There may also be compensatory:

Flexion at the metacarpophalangeal joint.


Characteristic Posture

The classic deformity therefore consists of:

MCP flexion

PIP hyperextension

and

DIP flexion.

Not every patient demonstrates abnormalities at all three joints.


Mechanism

The deformity develops when the balance between:

Flexion

and

Extension forces

across the finger becomes abnormal.

The essential biomechanical feature is excessive:

Extension force across the PIP joint

relative to available:

Flexion restraint.


Traumatic Causes

Traumatic causes include:

Mallet finger

Flexor digitorum superficialis laceration

and injuries involving the:

Extensor mechanism around the PIP joint.


Other Causes

Swan neck deformity may also result from:

Intrinsic muscle contracture

Volar plate laxity

or

Volar subluxation of the MCP joint.

These mechanisms are particularly important in:

Rheumatoid arthritis.


Epidemiology

Swan neck deformity can occur after:

Trauma

or as part of chronic:

Inflammatory joint disease.


Rheumatoid Arthritis

Among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the deformity is reported more commonly in:

Women

than in men.

This partly reflects the greater overall prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in:

Women.


Incidence

Rheumatoid arthritis affects approximately:

0.5–1% of the general population.

Among patients with established rheumatoid arthritis, swan neck deformity may eventually develop in a substantial proportion.

Historical series have reported occurrence in up to:

Approximately half of patients

during the course of longstanding disease.


Short-Term Incidence

Some studies have reported an incidence of approximately:

8% over 2 years

among patients with rheumatoid disease.


Risk Factors

Important risk factors include:

Rheumatoid arthritis

Mallet finger

Digital laceration

Intrinsic muscle tightness

Neurologic spasticity

and

Volar plate laxity.


Sports Injury

Sports participation may predispose to:

Mallet finger

through closed avulsion injury of the:

Distal extensor tendon.

A chronic untreated mallet finger can subsequently lead to:

Swan neck deformity.


Digital Laceration

Dorsal or volar lacerations may disrupt:

Extensor

or

Flexor structures

and alter normal force balance across the:

PIP joint.


Neurologic Disorders

Intrinsic muscle tightness may occur with:

Traumatic brain injury

Stroke

or other conditions producing:

Spasticity.

This can contribute to excessive:

PIP extension.


Rheumatoid Disease

Rheumatoid arthritis may create multiple contributing abnormalities, including:

Intrinsic muscle contracture

Volar plate attenuation

MCP subluxation

and progressive destruction of:

Joint stabilizers.


Etiology

The deformity develops when the net forces acting across the:

PIP joint

favor excessive:

Extension.

This is accompanied by secondary alteration in the:

Distal extensor mechanism

producing:

DIP flexion.


Mallet Finger Mechanism

In chronic mallet finger, loss of terminal extensor function at the:

DIP joint

allows the extensor mechanism to redistribute proximally.

This can increase extension force across the:

PIP joint

and eventually produce:

Swan neck posture.


FDS Injury

Injury or loss of function of the:

Flexor digitorum superficialis

removes an important flexion restraint at the:

PIP joint.

This predisposes the joint to:

Hyperextension.


Volar Plate Laxity

The:

Volar plate

normally resists excessive PIP:

Hyperextension.

Attenuation or laxity permits the PIP joint to move beyond its normal:

Extension limit.


Intrinsic Tightness

Tight intrinsic muscles can increase:

PIP extension

and alter the balance of:

Digital tendon forces.


Associated Conditions

The principal associated systemic disorder is:

Rheumatoid arthritis.

Other associated conditions may include:

Neurologic spasticity

and chronic post-traumatic:

Tendon imbalance.


Diagnosis

Diagnosis is usually made by:

Clinical examination.

The clinician should determine both:

The underlying cause

and whether the deformity remains:

Flexible or fixed.


Signs and Symptoms

The most obvious finding is:

PIP hyperextension

with

DIP flexion.


Functional Symptoms

Patients may report difficulty with:

Grasping objects

Making a fist

Pinch activities

or placing the hand into:

Pockets or gloves.


Pain

Pain may arise from:

Inflammatory arthritis

PIP joint degeneration

or associated:

Tendon pathology.

Some flexible deformities may produce relatively little:

Pain.


History

A detailed history should address:

Prior finger trauma

Mallet finger

Digital lacerations

and symptoms of:

Inflammatory arthritis.


Rheumatologic History

Ask about:

Joint swelling

Morning stiffness

Multiple-joint pain

and personal or family history of:

Rheumatoid arthritis or other inflammatory disease.


Physical Examination

Examine:

MCP

PIP

and

DIP joints

of the affected finger.

Both:

Active

and

Passive range of motion

should be documented.


Comparison Examination

The affected digit should be compared with:

Adjacent fingers

and the corresponding digit of the:

Contralateral hand.


Flexible Deformity

Early swan neck deformity may remain:

Passively correctable.

The patient may also retain nearly full:

Active motion.


Fixed Deformity

With chronic progression, the joints may develop:

Capsular contracture

Tendon shortening

and

Articular degeneration.

The deformity then becomes:

Stiff or fixed.


Finochietto–Bunnell Test

The:

Finochietto–Bunnell test

helps distinguish:

Intrinsic muscle tightness

from

PIP capsular restriction.


Test Technique

Passively flex the:

PIP joint

while comparing motion with the:

MCP joint extended

and then:

Flexed.


Capsular Restriction

If PIP flexion remains equally limited regardless of MCP position, the problem is more consistent with:

Capsular restriction.


Intrinsic Tightness

If PIP flexion improves when the MCP joint is:

Flexed

the limitation is more consistent with:

Intrinsic muscle tightness.


Joint Stability

The PIP joint should also be assessed for:

Volar plate laxity

and excessive:

Hyperextension.


Tendon Examination

Evaluate:

Terminal extensor function

at the DIP joint and function of the:

Flexor digitorum superficialis.

This helps identify the mechanical cause of the:

Deformity.


Imaging


Plain Radiographs

Standard radiographs should include:

PA

Lateral

and

Oblique views.


Radiographic Assessment

Imaging can identify:

Joint-space narrowing

Articular destruction

Subluxation

Fracture

and

Bony mallet injury.


Rheumatoid Disease

In rheumatoid arthritis, radiographs may demonstrate:

Erosions

Joint-space loss

MCP subluxation

and other features of:

Inflammatory arthropathy.


Differential Diagnosis

Important differential diagnoses include:

Boutonnière deformity

Mallet finger

PIP dislocation

and

Nonunion of proximal or middle phalanx fractures.


Boutonnière Deformity

Boutonnière deformity is essentially the opposite digital posture:

PIP flexion

with

DIP hyperextension.

This distinction is important because the underlying tendon imbalance and treatment are:

Different.


Mallet Finger

Mallet finger consists primarily of:

DIP flexion

due to loss of terminal extensor function.

A chronic mallet injury may progress to:

Swan neck deformity.


PIP Dislocation

Prior PIP dislocation may cause:

Volar plate injury

and chronic:

Hyperextension instability.


Treatment

Management depends on:

Cause

Flexibility of the deformity

Joint condition

Symptoms

and

Functional impairment.


General Measures

Flexible deformities can often be managed initially with:

Nonoperative treatment.


Ring Splints

A:

Double-ring splint

or other anti-hyperextension splint may prevent excessive:

PIP extension.

This can substantially improve:

Finger function.


Extension-Block Splint

An:

Extension-block splint

allows PIP flexion while preventing excessive:

Hyperextension.


DIP Splinting

Progressive splinting may also be used to address:

Persistent DIP flexion deformity

and improve:

Distal joint extension.


Hand Therapy

Hand therapy is useful for:

Passive stretching

Joint mobilization

Splint fabrication

and maintenance of:

Functional motion.


Flexible Versus Fixed Deformity

Nonoperative treatment is most effective when the deformity remains:

Flexible

and the articular surfaces are relatively:

Preserved.


Medication

Pain relief may include:

Acetaminophen

or

NSAIDs

when medically appropriate.


Acute Tendon Repair

If an acute extensor or flexor tendon injury requires repair, a:

Digital nerve block

or other suitable anesthesia may be used.


Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment

When the deformity is secondary to:

Rheumatoid arthritis

management of the systemic disease is essential.


DMARD Therapy

Treatment may require:

Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

under the care of a:

Rheumatologist.


Other Rheumatoid Medications

Depending on disease severity, treatment may also include:

Glucocorticoids

NSAIDs

and other:

Analgesics.

Controlling the underlying inflammatory disease may slow progression of:

Joint destruction and deformity.


Surgery

Surgery is considered when there is:

Persistent functional limitation

Pain

Failure of splinting

or progressive:

Fixed deformity.


Flexible Deformity Surgery

When passive motion is preserved, surgery focuses on restoring:

Tendon balance

and preventing excessive:

PIP hyperextension.


Volar Plate Advancement

The volar plate may be:

Advanced or tightened

to improve restraint against:

PIP hyperextension.


Central Slip Tenotomy

Selected deformities may be treated with:

Central slip tenotomy

to reduce excessive extension force across the:

PIP joint.


Intrinsic Release

When intrinsic muscle tightness is the major cause, an:

Intrinsic release

may improve:

PIP flexion.


FDS Tenodesis

The:

Flexor digitorum superficialis

may be used as a:

Tenodesis

to limit excessive:

PIP extension.


Volar Skin Procedure

A:

Volar skin ellipse

at the PIP joint may occasionally be used to restrict:

Hyperextension.


Late-Stage Disease

In advanced disease, chronic deformity may be accompanied by:

Joint arthrosis

and loss of:

Passive correctability.


Arthrodesis

A severely painful or destroyed PIP joint may require:

Fusion

in a functional position.


Arthroplasty

Joint replacement may be considered in selected patients with:

Advanced arthritic destruction

where preservation of some:

Motion

is desirable.


Follow-Up

Patients should be reassessed for:

Progression of deformity

Splint effectiveness

Range of motion

and

Functional improvement.


Rheumatology Follow-Up

Patients with inflammatory arthritis require continued:

Rheumatologic management

to control the underlying:

Systemic disease.


Hand Surgeon Referral

Referral to a:

Hand surgeon

is appropriate when the deformity is:

Progressive

Functionally limiting

Painful

or likely to require:

Operative reconstruction.


Prognosis

Both nonoperative and surgical treatment can produce:

Meaningful deformity correction

and improved:

Hand function.


Recurrence

Recurrence is relatively common because the deformity often results from persistent underlying:

Tendon imbalance

Joint laxity

or

Inflammatory disease.


Flexible Deformities

Flexible deformities generally have a better prognosis with:

Splinting

and

Soft-tissue reconstruction.


Fixed Deformities

Chronic fixed deformities are more difficult to correct because of:

Capsular contracture

Tendon shortening

and

Arthrosis.


Complications


Incomplete Correction

The deformity may not be completely corrected by either:

Splinting

or

Surgery.


Recurrence

Even after successful treatment, excessive PIP extension may:

Recur.


PIP Stiffness

Overcorrection or postoperative scarring may result in:

PIP stiffness.


Loss of DIP Extension

Excessive alteration of extensor balance may produce:

Loss of DIP extension.


Surgical Imbalance

Because correction requires redistribution of complex tendon forces, excessive correction in one direction may produce a new:

Digital imbalance.


Patient Monitoring

Monitoring should include:

Active and passive MCP motion

PIP motion

DIP motion

Joint stability

and progression of:

Functional limitation.


Key Principle

Swan neck deformity is characterized by:

PIP hyperextension with DIP flexion, sometimes accompanied by MCP flexion.

It results from an imbalance in digital tendon forces, commonly associated with:

Rheumatoid arthritis, chronic mallet finger, FDS injury, volar plate laxity, or intrinsic muscle tightness.

The:

Finochietto–Bunnell test

helps distinguish intrinsic tightness from capsular restriction.

Flexible deformities are commonly treated with:

Ring splints, extension-block splints, stretching, and hand therapy.

When deformity is persistent or advanced, surgery may involve:

Volar plate advancement, central slip tenotomy, intrinsic release, FDS tenodesis, arthrodesis, or arthroplasty, depending on the:

Stage of disease and condition of the joint.



Image description