- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Thoracolumbar Spine Fracture and Dislocation
⸻
Basics
Thoracolumbar fractures are among the most common:
Spinal fractures.
The region most frequently injured is the:
Thoracolumbar junction
particularly:
T11–L1.
This area is vulnerable because it represents a transition between the relatively rigid:
Thoracic spine
and the more mobile:
Lumbar spine.
⸻
Associated Spinal Injuries
Additional spinal injuries may occur in up to approximately:
15% of patients.
These may be:
Contiguous
or
Noncontiguous.
For this reason, the:
Entire spinal column
should be considered during trauma assessment.
⸻
Associated Abdominal Injuries
Abdominal injuries occur in approximately:
20% of patients
with significant thoracolumbar trauma.
Potential associated injuries include:
Splenic rupture
Liver laceration
Renal injury
and
Bowel injury.
⸻
Denis Three-Column Classification
The classic:
Denis three-column system
divides the thoracolumbar spine into:
Anterior
Middle
and
Posterior columns.
Although modern treatment also relies on newer concepts such as mechanical stability and posterior ligamentous complex integrity, this classification remains useful for understanding:
Fracture morphology.
⸻
Anterior Column
The anterior column consists of approximately the:
Anterior two-thirds of the vertebral body and intervertebral disc
together with the associated anterior supporting structures.
⸻
Middle Column
The middle column includes the:
Posterior one-third of the vertebral body and disc
and the:
Posterior longitudinal ligament.
Disruption of the middle column historically has been considered an important marker of:
Potential instability.
⸻
Posterior Column
The posterior column includes the:
Pedicles
Facet joints
Laminae
Transverse processes
and
Spinous processes
together with the posterior ligamentous structures.
⸻
Minor Injuries
Minor thoracolumbar injuries include isolated fractures involving structures such as:
Spinous processes
Transverse processes
Pars interarticularis
and
Facets.
These injuries may still be clinically important depending on their:
Mechanism
and associated injuries.
⸻
Major Injuries
Major thoracolumbar injuries include:
Compression fractures
Burst fractures
Flexion-distraction injuries
Fracture-dislocations
and
Distraction-extension injuries.
⸻
Epidemiology
High-energy thoracolumbar trauma occurs most frequently in:
Young adults
particularly:
Males between approximately 15 and 30 years of age.
⸻
Older Adults
Elderly patients with:
Osteopenia
or
Osteoporosis
may sustain vertebral fractures after relatively:
Low-energy trauma.
⸻
Risk Factors
Important risk factors include:
Motor vehicle collisions
Falls from height
High-energy trauma
and
Osteoporotic bone.
⸻
Associated Conditions
Thoracolumbar fractures may be accompanied by:
Neurologic injury
Spinal shock
Other spinal fractures
and significant:
Abdominal trauma.
⸻
Spinal Shock
Following major spinal cord injury, patients may temporarily develop:
Flaccid paralysis
Loss of reflexes
and reduced:
Autonomic function
below the level of injury.
This transient state is known as:
Spinal shock.
⸻
Diagnosis
Diagnosis requires careful assessment of:
Mechanism of injury
Spinal tenderness
Neurologic status
and
Imaging.
⸻
History
For high-energy trauma, information should be obtained from:
The patient
and
Prehospital personnel
when available.
⸻
Mechanism of Injury
Important mechanisms include:
Motor vehicle collision
Fall from height
Crush injury
and
Direct high-energy trauma.
⸻
Relevant Medical History
Ask about conditions that may alter spinal biomechanics or bone quality, including:
Ankylosing spondylitis
Osteoporosis
Previous spinal surgery
Diabetes mellitus
and known:
Malignancy.
⸻
Physical Examination
Repeated neurologic examination is essential.
Any deterioration may provide the earliest sign of:
Progressive neural compromise
or instability requiring:
Urgent intervention.
⸻
Documentation
The initial examination should be documented carefully and compared with:
Prehospital findings
and subsequent:
Serial examinations.
⸻
Inspection
Inspect the back and trunk for:
Ecchymosis
Seat-belt marks
Visible deformity
Step-off
or evidence of:
Open injury.
⸻
Palpation
Palpate the:
Entire spinal column
for:
Tenderness
Gap
Step-off
or deformity.
⸻
Motor Examination
Motor power should be graded using the:
Medical Research Council 0–5 scale.
⸻
Grade 0
No visible or palpable muscle contraction.
⸻
Grade 1
Flicker or trace contraction without joint movement.
⸻
Grade 2
Full joint motion with gravity eliminated.
⸻
Grade 3
Full joint motion against gravity.
⸻
Grade 4
Movement against gravity and some external resistance.
⸻
Grade 5
Normal strength against full resistance.
⸻
Sensory Examination
A sensory level should be documented using reproducible:
Dermatomal landmarks.
⸻
Thoracic Landmarks
Important landmarks include:
T4 – nipple line
T7 – xiphoid region
T10 – umbilicus
and
T12 – inguinal region.
⸻
Lumbar and Sacral Landmarks
Additional landmarks include:
L1 – proximal anterior thigh
L2 – middle anterior thigh
L3 – region above the patella
L4 – medial malleolus
L5 – dorsum of the foot, classically near the third toe
and
S1 – lateral foot or small-toe region.
⸻
Reflexes
Important lower-extremity reflexes include:
L4 – patellar reflex
and
S1 – Achilles reflex.
There is no routinely useful isolated:
L5 deep-tendon reflex.
⸻
Sacral Examination
When neurologic injury is suspected, evaluate sacral function, including:
Perianal sensation
Voluntary anal contraction
and relevant:
Sacral reflexes.
⸻
Rectal Examination
Assessment may include:
Anal tone
Voluntary contraction
and
Perianal light touch or pinprick sensation
in approximately the:
S2–S5 distribution.
⸻
Bulbocavernosus Reflex
The:
Bulbocavernosus reflex
may help assess sacral reflex activity and can be useful during evaluation of:
Spinal shock.
⸻
Anal Wink
The:
Anal wink reflex
may also provide information about:
Sacral neurologic integrity.
⸻
Imaging
⸻
Initial Trauma Imaging
In modern trauma care, imaging selection depends on:
Mechanism
Clinical examination
and trauma-system protocols.
CT is frequently used as the primary imaging modality in significant:
Thoracolumbar trauma.
⸻
Plain Radiographs
AP and lateral spinal radiographs may demonstrate:
Compression
Loss of vertebral height
Kyphosis
Translation
or
Fracture-dislocation.
They may still be useful in selected:
Lower-energy injuries.
⸻
CT
CT provides excellent visualization of:
Fracture morphology
Canal compromise
Posterior element injury
and
Bony retropulsion.
It is also extremely valuable for:
Preoperative planning.
⸻
Entire-Spine Assessment
Because noncontiguous fractures can occur, imaging of the entire spine should be considered in patients with:
Major trauma
or one confirmed:
Spinal fracture.
⸻
MRI
MRI is particularly useful when there is concern for:
Spinal cord injury
Disc herniation
Epidural hematoma
or
Posterior ligamentous complex injury.
These soft-tissue abnormalities may not be adequately demonstrated by:
CT.
⸻
Differential Diagnosis
Not every vertebral deformity represents an:
Acute fracture.
⸻
Developmental Wedging
Conditions such as:
Scheuermann kyphosis
or congenital:
Vertebral wedging
may mimic:
Compression fracture.
⸻
Osteoporotic and Pathologic Fracture
Patients older than approximately:
50 years
who sustain fractures after relatively minor trauma should be evaluated for:
Osteoporosis.
A:
Pathologic fracture
from malignancy or other bone disease should also be considered when clinically appropriate.
⸻
Treatment
Treatment depends on:
Fracture morphology
Mechanical stability
Neurologic status
Posterior ligamentous complex integrity
and overall:
Patient condition.
⸻
Initial Stabilization
Patients with suspected unstable spinal injury should be handled with:
Spinal precautions
until the injury has been adequately:
Evaluated and stabilized.
⸻
Stable Fractures
Stable injuries may be treated with:
Early mobilization
with or without a:
Thoracolumbosacral orthosis, or TLSO.
⸻
Brace Selection
A TLSO may be modified depending on the:
Fracture level
and specific:
Biomechanical needs.
⸻
Unstable Fractures
Patients awaiting operative stabilization may require:
Restricted mobilization
until definitive fixation is performed.
⸻
Compression Fractures
Simple compression fractures generally involve primarily the:
Anterior column.
⸻
Mild Compression Fractures
Neurologically intact patients with mild stable fractures may be treated with:
Analgesia
Early mobilization
and often:
No brace.
⸻
TLSO for Compression Fracture
A TLSO may be used when it improves:
Comfort
or provides additional:
External support.
⸻
Osteoporotic Compression Fractures
Management should include evaluation and treatment of the underlying:
Osteoporosis
to reduce the risk of:
Future fractures.
⸻
Vertebral Augmentation
Procedures such as:
Kyphoplasty
or
Vertebroplasty
may be considered in carefully selected patients with painful:
Osteoporotic
or
Osteolytic vertebral compression fractures.
They are not required for most uncomplicated:
Compression fractures.
⸻
Burst Fractures
Burst fractures result from:
Axial compression
and commonly involve the:
Anterior and middle columns.
⸻
Retropulsion
Fragments of the posterior vertebral body may be driven into the:
Spinal canal.
The presence of canal compromise alone does not automatically mandate:
Surgery.
⸻
Nonoperative Burst-Fracture Treatment
Neurologically intact patients with stable alignment may be treated with:
Early mobilization
with or without a:
TLSO.
⸻
Surgical Considerations for Burst Fractures
Surgery is more strongly considered when there is:
Neurologic injury
Progressive deformity
Mechanical instability
or major disruption of the:
Posterior ligamentous complex.
⸻
Historical Radiographic Thresholds
Historical factors associated with operative treatment include:
Kyphosis greater than approximately 20°
Facet subluxation
Increased interspinous distance
More than 50% loss of vertebral body height
and
More than 50% canal compromise.
These thresholds should not be interpreted in isolation.
The overall:
Clinical and mechanical context
is more important than any single measurement.
⸻
Flexion-Distraction Injury
Flexion-distraction injuries are often called:
Chance fractures
or
Seat-belt injuries.
⸻
Mechanism
These injuries involve distraction of the:
Posterior spinal structures
with compression or fracture of the:
Anterior column.
⸻
Ligamentous Injury
When the injury is primarily ligamentous, healing may be less reliable and the injury is generally:
Unstable.
⸻
Abdominal Injury Association
Flexion-distraction injuries have a strong association with:
Intra-abdominal trauma
particularly:
Bowel injury.
A careful abdominal assessment is therefore essential.
⸻
Nonoperative Management
Selected purely bony Chance fractures in neurologically intact patients may occasionally be treated:
Nonoperatively.
However, injuries with substantial:
Ligamentous disruption
more commonly require:
Surgical stabilization.
⸻
Fracture-Dislocation
Fracture-dislocations may demonstrate:
Facet fracture-dislocation
Rotation
and
Translation.
These injuries are generally:
Highly unstable.
⸻
Neurologic Risk
Because of major displacement, fracture-dislocations carry a high risk of:
Spinal cord
or
Cauda equina injury.
⸻
Treatment of Fracture-Dislocation
Nonoperative treatment is rarely appropriate.
Surgery usually begins with:
Reduction
and
Posterior stabilization.
⸻
Distraction-Extension Injury
Distraction-extension injuries are:
Uncommon
and often occur in patients with an unusually rigid spine, such as those with:
Ankylosing spondylitis
Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis
or other disorders affecting:
Spinal biomechanics.
⸻
Stability
These injuries are typically:
Highly unstable
and usually require:
Operative fixation.
⸻
Surgical Strategy
Treatment commonly involves:
Posterior instrumentation and fusion
with additional anterior reconstruction when required by:
Fracture morphology.
⸻
Activity
Patients treated with stable fixation or a suitable brace may advance toward:
Progressive mobilization and weight bearing
as allowed by:
Fracture stability
and
Neurologic status.
⸻
Neurologic Injury
Patients with neurologic deficits require individualized:
Rehabilitation
based on the level and completeness of:
Spinal cord or cauda equina injury.
⸻
Nursing Care
Serial assessment should include:
Vital signs
and repeated:
Neurologic examinations.
⸻
Change in Neurologic Status
Any deterioration in:
Strength
Sensation
or
Sacral function
requires prompt:
Reassessment.
⸻
Counseling
Patients with spinal cord injury may require:
Psychological support
and counseling regarding:
Mobility
Employment
Independence
and long-term:
Lifestyle adaptation.
⸻
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy plays an essential role in:
Mobilization
and
Functional recovery.
⸻
Benefits of Early Rehabilitation
Appropriate rehabilitation may reduce complications such as:
Pressure injury
Pneumonia
Venous thromboembolism
Contractures
and
Disuse osteoporosis.
⸻
Occupational Therapy
Occupational therapy is particularly important for patients with neurologic injury who require adaptation for:
Transfers
Self-care
Mobility
and
Activities of daily living.
⸻
Medication
Pain control should be individualized.
There is generally no role for routine:
Long-term maintenance opioid therapy.
⸻
First-Line Analgesia
Options may include:
Acetaminophen
and
NSAIDs
when medically appropriate.
⸻
NSAIDs
Anti-inflammatory medications should be used cautiously in patients with:
Renal disease
Gastrointestinal risk
or other relevant:
Contraindications.
⸻
Opioids
Short-term opioid therapy may be appropriate for:
Severe acute fracture pain
particularly during the early:
Post-traumatic period.
⸻
Radiotherapy
Radiotherapy may have a role in selected patients with:
Radiosensitive tumors
causing pathological thoracolumbar:
Fractures.
Its purpose is primarily to reduce:
Tumor burden
and improve:
Local disease control.
⸻
Surgery
The goals of surgery are to:
Restore alignment
Stabilize the spinal column
and, when necessary,
Decompress neural structures.
⸻
Surgical Approach
The optimal approach depends on:
Fracture morphology
Neurologic compression
Bone quality
and surgeon:
Experience.
⸻
Posterior Instrumentation
Posterior instrumentation is commonly favored because it provides effective:
Reduction
Fixation
and
Correction of alignment
without the additional morbidity of a major:
Anterior approach.
⸻
Neural Decompression
Decompression is indicated when there is clinically significant compression of the:
Spinal cord
Conus medullaris
or
Cauda equina
and when decompression is expected to improve:
Neurologic outcome or mechanical stability.
⸻
Anterior Approach
An anterior approach may be useful when substantial:
Vertebral body destruction
or
Anterior canal compression
requires direct:
Decompression and reconstruction.
⸻
Retropulsed Fragments
Anterior surgery may be particularly useful for selected cases involving significant:
Retropulsed vertebral-body fragments
compressing the:
Anterior spinal canal.
⸻
Fusion
Fusion may accompany fixation when:
Instability
Major ligamentous disruption
or extensive bony injury prevents reliable healing without:
Arthrodesis.
⸻
Follow-Up
Patients with major injuries often benefit from coordinated follow-up involving:
Spine surgery
Rehabilitation medicine
Physical therapy
and
Occupational therapy.
⸻
Rehabilitation Facility
Patients with severe neurologic injury may recover best initially in a specialized:
Inpatient rehabilitation facility.
⸻
Pain Specialist Referral
Persistent chronic pain may warrant referral to:
Pain medicine.
⸻
Rehabilitation Medicine
Patients with spinal cord or cauda equina injury should be followed by:
Physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists.
⸻
Neurology Consultation
Neurologic consultation may be useful when the pattern of deficit does not correlate with the identified:
Spinal injury.
⸻
Prognosis
Outcome depends strongly on:
Fracture severity
and particularly on:
Neurologic status.
⸻
Neurologically Intact Patients
Patients with stable low-energy injuries and preserved neurologic function usually have an:
Excellent prognosis.
⸻
Neurologic Injury
Patients with significant neurologic deficits may experience long-term effects on:
Mobility
Bladder and bowel function
Employment
and
Independence.
⸻
Complications
Potential complications include:
Infection
Neurologic deterioration
Pseudarthrosis
Spinal deformity
Junctional degeneration
Spinal stenosis
Chronic pain
and
Disability.
⸻
Brace-Related Complications
TLSO braces can cause:
Skin irritation
Pressure injury
and discomfort over:
Bony prominences.
Regular skin checks are important.
⸻
Pseudarthrosis
Failure of an intended fusion to heal may cause:
Persistent pain
Implant failure
or progressive:
Deformity.
⸻
Junctional Degeneration
Long spinal fusion constructs may increase mechanical stress at adjacent levels, contributing to:
Junctional degeneration
or
Stenosis.
⸻
Chronic Pain
Persistent pain may arise from:
Residual deformity
Neurologic injury
Degenerative change
or
Postoperative complications.
⸻
Patient Monitoring
Patients should be monitored for:
Pain resolution
Neurologic recovery
Maintenance of alignment
and
Fracture healing.
⸻
Fusion Monitoring
If arthrodesis has been performed, follow-up should also evaluate for:
Solid fusion
and
Implant stability.
⸻
Red-Flag Findings
Urgent reassessment is required for:
New or progressive weakness
New sensory loss
Loss of bowel or bladder control
Increasing saddle anesthesia
or
Worsening spinal deformity.
⸻
Key Principle
Thoracolumbar spine fractures most commonly involve the:
T11–L1 junction, where the rigid thoracic spine transitions to the more mobile lumbar spine.
Evaluation must include careful assessment for:
Noncontiguous spinal injury, neurologic compromise, and associated abdominal trauma.
CT is the principal imaging study for defining:
Fracture morphology, while MRI is especially useful for evaluating:
Spinal cord, disc, epidural, and posterior ligamentous complex injury.
Stable fractures may often be treated with:
Early mobilization with or without a TLSO, whereas unstable injuries such as:
Fracture-dislocations, major ligamentous flexion-distraction injuries, and distraction-extension injuries
usually require:
Operative stabilization.
The major goals of treatment are to preserve or restore:
Neurologic function, spinal alignment, mechanical stability, and early safe mobilization.
- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
Basics
Thoracic outlet syndrome, or:
TOS
is a clinical disorder caused by compression of:
Neural
or
Vascular structures
supplying the upper extremity as they pass through the:
Thoracic outlet
and adjacent:
Supraclavicular region.
Structures Involved
The principal structures at risk are the:
Brachial plexus
Subclavian artery
and
Subclavian vein.
Synonyms
Historical terms include:
Scalenus anticus syndrome
Costoclavicular syndrome
and
Cervical rib syndrome.
Major Clinical Types
Thoracic outlet syndrome is generally divided into:
Neurogenic TOS
Venous TOS
and
Arterial TOS.
Neurogenic disease is by far the most common form.
Neurogenic Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
Neurogenic TOS results from compression or irritation of the:
Brachial plexus.
Symptoms commonly include:
Pain
Paresthesia
Numbness
and occasionally:
Weakness.
Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
Venous TOS results from compression or thrombosis involving the:
Subclavian or axillary vein.
It may produce:
Arm swelling
Cyanosis
and
Venous congestion.
Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
Arterial TOS results from compression or injury of the:
Subclavian artery.
It may produce:
Coolness
Fatigue
Ischemic pain
or distal:
Embolic symptoms.
Epidemiology
Thoracic outlet syndrome is relatively:
Uncommon.
Incidence
Historical estimates vary widely, approximately between:
0.03% and 0.8%.
The fully developed syndrome is considerably less common than nonspecific:
Upper-extremity pain or paresthesia.
Age
Thoracic outlet syndrome occurs most commonly in:
Young to middle-aged adults.
Sex
It is reported more frequently in:
Women
than in men.
Risk Factors
Potential predisposing factors include:
Cervical ribs
Congenital fibrous bands
Abnormal first-rib anatomy
and disorders that increase susceptibility to:
Peripheral nerve dysfunction.
Systemic Conditions
Associated systemic conditions include:
Diabetes mellitus
Thyroid disease
and
Alcohol-related neuropathy.
These disorders may make peripheral nerves more vulnerable to:
Compression.
Aggravating Factors
Symptoms may be worsened by:
Obesity
Postural abnormalities
Repetitive overhead activity
and prolonged positions that narrow the:
Thoracic outlet.
Shoulder-Girdle Position
A chronically depressed or forward-positioned shoulder girdle may decrease available space for the:
Brachial plexus
and
Subclavian vessels.
Etiology
Thoracic outlet syndrome is often:
Multifactorial.
Potential contributors include:
Trauma
Repetitive occupational activity
Congenital anatomy
Postural abnormalities
and systemic:
Neuropathic disease.
Overhead Activity
Occupations requiring prolonged:
Overhead arm use
such as ceiling painting may provoke symptoms over a relatively:
Short period.
Repetitive Lower-Elevation Activity
Occupations involving repetitive upper-extremity motion without extreme elevation may also contribute over:
Many years.
Examples include prolonged:
Keyboard use
or
Driving.
Double-Crush Phenomenon
Thoracic outlet syndrome may coexist with more distal nerve-compression disorders such as:
Carpal tunnel syndrome
or
Cubital tunnel syndrome.
Concept of Double Crush
The double-crush concept proposes that a nerve compromised proximally may become more susceptible to compression at another point along its:
Course.
This theory remains clinically relevant but does not explain every patient with multiple:
Entrapment neuropathies.
Associated Conditions
Patients with:
Diabetes mellitus
Thyroid disease
Alcohol-related neuropathy
and systemic arthritis may have increased susceptibility to:
Multiple nerve-compression syndromes.
Diagnosis
The diagnosis is primarily:
Clinical.
No single provocative maneuver or diagnostic test can reliably confirm or exclude:
Thoracic outlet syndrome.
Signs and Symptoms
Symptoms depend on whether the primary compression is:
Neural
Arterial
or
Venous.
Neurogenic Symptoms
Patients may report:
Neck pain
Shoulder pain
Arm pain
Paresthesia
or
Numbness.
Distribution
Symptoms may involve the entire:
Upper extremity
but commonly predominate along the:
Ulnar side of the forearm
and the:
Ring and small fingers.
The middle finger may occasionally also be involved.
Sensory Findings
Objective sensory abnormalities are often:
Subtle.
They may involve the:
Ulnar aspect of the hand
and sometimes the:
Medial forearm.
Nocturnal Symptoms
Night pain and paresthesia may occur.
These symptoms should be distinguished from:
Carpal tunnel syndrome
which more often affects the:
Thumb
Index finger
Middle finger
and radial half of the:
Ring finger.
Overhead Intolerance
A common complaint is difficulty using the arm in an:
Elevated or overhead position.
Symptoms may increase during:
Hair washing
Overhead work
or carrying the arm in prolonged:
Abduction.
Weakness and Dexterity
Some patients report reduced:
Grip strength
or
Hand dexterity
even when obvious muscle atrophy is:
Absent.
Additional Pain
Associated discomfort may occur in the:
Head
Neck
Chest
Shoulder
and
Arm.
Arterial Symptoms
Arterial compression is less common and may produce:
Coolness
Arm fatigue
Diffuse aching
and occasionally:
Raynaud-like symptoms.
Venous Symptoms
Venous compression may be:
Intermittent
or
Persistent.
Typical findings include:
Arm swelling
Heaviness
and varying degrees of:
Cyanosis.
Physical Examination
A complete examination should assess:
Neck
Supraclavicular region
Shoulder girdle
and both:
Upper extremities.
Posture
The affected scapula may sit:
Lower
and
More anteriorly
than the opposite side.
Clavicular Position
The clavicle may appear relatively:
Horizontal
or depressed.
Supraclavicular Examination
Palpate the:
Brachial plexus region
for:
Tenderness
or a palpable:
Mass.
Tinel Sign
Percussion over the brachial plexus may reproduce:
Distal paresthesia
often along the:
Ulnar side of the hand.
Shoulder Examination
Evaluate for:
Glenohumeral instability
Rotator cuff disease
and
Scapular dyskinesis
because these can mimic or contribute to:
Thoracic outlet symptoms.
Neurologic Examination
Perform a bilateral examination of:
Motor strength
Sensation
and
Reflexes.
Intrinsic Hand Strength
Assess:
Finger abduction
Finger adduction
Grip strength
and other intrinsic:
Hand-muscle functions.
Vascular Examination
Document:
Radial pulses
Skin temperature
Color
and
Arm swelling.
Provocative Maneuvers
Several stress tests have historically been used to provoke symptoms.
These tests should be interpreted:
Cautiously.
Important Limitation
Loss of the radial pulse alone during arm positioning is:
Not diagnostic.
Pulse reduction can occur in many:
Asymptomatic individuals.
A maneuver is more meaningful when it reproduces the patient’s:
Typical symptoms.
Adson Maneuver
The Adson maneuver is performed with the arm near the:
Side
while the neck is:
Extended
and the head turned toward the:
Affected side.
Wright Maneuver
The Wright maneuver places the shoulder in:
Abduction
and
External rotation.
The patient may also be asked to take a:
Deep breath.
Elbow Position
Keeping the elbow extended during provocative testing may reduce confounding from:
Ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.
Additional Provocative Testing
Other commonly used maneuvers may include:
Elevated arm stress testing
and
Costoclavicular positioning.
No single test has sufficiently high sensitivity and specificity to establish the diagnosis by itself.
Imaging
Cervical Spine Radiographs
AP and lateral radiographs of the cervical spine may identify:
Cervical ribs
Elongated transverse processes
and
Degenerative cervical disease.
Chest Radiograph
A chest radiograph may help identify:
Cervical rib anatomy
and important alternative diagnoses such as:
Apical lung tumor.
This is particularly relevant in patients with:
Smoking history
or unexplained:
Constitutional symptoms.
MRI
MRI is useful when there is concern for:
Cervical disc disease
or another structural lesion causing:
Neural compression.
Electrodiagnostic Studies
Electrodiagnostic testing may help evaluate for:
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Cubital tunnel syndrome
Cervical radiculopathy
or other:
Peripheral neuropathies.
Role in Neurogenic TOS
Electrodiagnostic studies may be normal in many patients with:
Nonspecific neurogenic symptoms.
They are most useful when an objective neuropathy or alternative diagnosis is:
Suspected.
Vascular Studies
When arterial or venous TOS is suspected, evaluation may include:
Duplex ultrasonography
CT angiography
MR angiography
or other:
Vascular imaging.
Pathological Findings
Thoracic outlet syndrome involves compression of:
Neural
or
Vascular structures
as they pass through the:
Scalene triangle
Costoclavicular space
or
Subcoracoid/pectoralis minor region.
Common Sites of Compression
Important anatomical compression zones include the:
Interscalene triangle
Costoclavicular space
and
Pectoralis minor space.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis is broad.
Cervical Spine Disorders
Important cervical causes include:
Cervical spondylosis
Disc herniation
and
Cervical radiculopathy.
Brachial Plexus Lesions
Tumors or other masses involving the:
Brachial plexus
or
Apex of the lung
may produce similar symptoms.
Trauma
Previous trauma involving the:
Neck
Clavicle
First rib
or
Shoulder girdle
may cause chronic pain or neurologic symptoms that resemble:
TOS.
Peripheral Nerve Entrapment
Important alternatives include:
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Cubital tunnel syndrome
Radial nerve compression
and
Suprascapular nerve compression.
Systemic Neuropathy
Neuropathies related to:
Diabetes
Alcohol use
Vitamin deficiency
or
Heavy-metal toxicity
may mimic thoracic outlet syndrome.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
Complex regional pain syndrome may cause:
Pain
Swelling
Color change
and
Autonomic abnormalities.
Arterial Differential Diagnosis
Potential arterial disorders include:
Atherosclerotic disease
Aneurysm
Arterial occlusion
Embolism
Raynaud disease
and
Vasculitis.
Venous Differential Diagnosis
Venous alternatives include:
Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis
Effort thrombosis
and
Thrombophlebitis.
Treatment
Initial management is generally:
Nonoperative
for patients with uncomplicated neurogenic:
Thoracic outlet syndrome.
General Measures
Treatment focuses on:
Postural correction
Muscle strengthening
Activity modification
and elimination of:
Contributing mechanical factors.
Patient Education
Explaining the mechanical basis of symptoms can help patients understand why:
Posture
Work position
and
Repetitive overhead activity
may aggravate the condition.
Occupational Modification
Activities involving prolonged:
Arm elevation
or repetitive shoulder-girdle loading should be modified when possible.
Weight Management
When obesity contributes to postural or mechanical loading, appropriate:
Weight reduction
may improve symptoms.
Physical and Occupational Therapy
A structured rehabilitation program is the cornerstone of treatment for:
Neurogenic TOS.
Postural Reeducation
Therapy should emphasize:
Scapular positioning
Thoracic posture
and avoidance of chronic:
Shoulder depression or protraction.
Muscle Strengthening
Important muscles include:
Trapezius
Rhomboids
Levator scapulae
and other:
Scapular stabilizers.
Resistance Exercises
Strengthening may be performed using:
Elastic bands
or
Light free weights
with the shoulder generally maintained below approximately:
90° of elevation
during early rehabilitation.
Pectoral and Scalene Flexibility
Stretching may address tight:
Pectoralis minor
Scalene
and other anterior shoulder-girdle:
Soft tissues.
Time to Improvement
Symptomatic improvement may require approximately:
Several weeks to 2 months
or longer.
Long-Term Exercise
Exercises should be continued until:
Posture improves
Scapular control is restored
and weakness or deconditioning has been:
Corrected.
Medication
Medication plays a secondary role.
Treatment may include:
NSAIDs
Acetaminophen
or selected medications for:
Neuropathic pain.
Vascular Thoracic Outlet Syndrome
Patients with arterial or venous TOS require:
Specialist vascular evaluation.
Treatment may differ substantially from management of:
Neurogenic TOS.
Venous Thrombosis
Acute venous thrombosis may require:
Anticoagulation
Thrombolysis
and eventual:
Thoracic outlet decompression
depending on severity and timing.
Arterial Disease
Arterial TOS with aneurysm, thrombosis, or embolization may require:
Arterial reconstruction
in addition to:
Surgical decompression.
Surgery
Surgery is considered when:
A carefully supervised conservative program fails
and symptoms remain sufficiently severe to cause:
Major functional limitation.
Surgical Decision-Making
Patients should understand that outcomes are variable and that surgery is generally reserved for those with:
Persistent significant symptoms
or objective:
Neurovascular compromise.
Common Surgical Procedures
Typical operations include:
First-rib resection
Scalenectomy
or a combination of:
Both.
Fibrous Band Release
Congenital or acquired:
Fibrous bands
may also be divided when they contribute to:
Compression.
Vascular Reconstruction
Patients with arterial or venous injury may additionally require:
Vessel repair
Patch angioplasty
Thrombectomy
or
Grafting.
Follow-Up
Patients undergoing nonoperative treatment should be followed for:
Postural improvement
Strength
Symptom reduction
and tolerance of:
Work or activity.
Postoperative Follow-Up
After surgery, monitoring should assess:
Neurologic function
Vascular status
Wound healing
and recurrence of:
Symptoms.
Prognosis
Most patients with uncomplicated neurogenic TOS improve with:
Nonoperative management.
Surgical Prognosis
With appropriate patient selection, many patients undergoing surgery experience:
Symptomatic improvement.
Results are generally more predictable when there is a clearly defined:
Anatomic or vascular lesion.
Complications
Potential surgical complications include:
Pneumothorax
Infection
Vascular injury
Brachial plexus injury
and
Shoulder-girdle dysfunction.
Pneumothorax
Pleural injury during first-rib resection may produce:
Pneumothorax.
Vascular Injury
The proximity of the:
Subclavian vessels
creates a risk of significant:
Hemorrhage.
Brachial Plexus Injury
Manipulation or traction may result in:
Neurologic injury
with postoperative:
Pain
Weakness
or
Sensory loss.
Recurrence
Symptoms may recur after surgery because of:
Scar formation
Persistent muscle weakness
Scapular depression
or
Incomplete decompression.
Patient Monitoring
Long-term monitoring should focus on:
Pain
Paresthesia
Hand strength
Arm swelling
Vascular symptoms
and progression through:
Physical therapy.
Key Principle
Thoracic outlet syndrome is a clinical disorder caused by compression of the brachial plexus or subclavian vessels as they pass from the neck into the upper extremity.
The disorder may be:
Neurogenic, venous, or arterial, with neurogenic disease being the most common.
Diagnosis is primarily:
Clinical, and provocative maneuvers should be interpreted cautiously because pulse changes alone are not:
Diagnostic.
The differential diagnosis includes:
Cervical radiculopathy, carpal and cubital tunnel syndromes, systemic neuropathy, brachial plexus lesions, and vascular disease.
Initial management of uncomplicated neurogenic TOS centers on:
Postural correction, scapular strengthening, activity modification, and occupational rehabilitation.
Surgery, typically involving:
First-rib resection and/or scalenectomy, is reserved for selected patients with persistent disabling symptoms or significant vascular or neurologic compromise.
- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Thoracic Disc Herniation
Basics
Thoracic disc herniation is protrusion or extrusion of an intervertebral disc within the:
Thoracic spine
that may compress the:
Spinal cord
or
Thoracic nerve roots.
The condition can be difficult to diagnose because symptoms are often:
Nonspecific
and may resemble disorders involving the:
Chest
Abdomen
Spine
or
Peripheral nervous system.
Incidental Disc Abnormalities
A major diagnostic challenge is the high prevalence of:
Asymptomatic thoracic disc abnormalities.
Disc degeneration or herniation on imaging does not necessarily indicate that the abnormality is responsible for the patient’s:
Symptoms.
Clinical findings must therefore correlate carefully with the:
Anatomic level
and degree of:
Neural compression.
Epidemiology
Symptomatic thoracic disc disease most commonly presents during approximately the:
Fifth decade of life.
Sex
A slight predominance in:
Males
has been reported historically.
Trauma
Up to approximately:
50% of symptomatic patients
report some preceding:
Traumatic event
before symptoms begin.
Incidence
Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation is uncommon, with an estimated incidence of approximately:
1 per 100,000 persons per year.
Prevalence on MRI
Thoracic disc abnormalities are much more common than clinically symptomatic disease.
MRI studies have reported abnormalities in up to approximately:
73% of individuals.
Asymptomatic Herniation
Approximately:
37%
of individuals in some imaging series have demonstrated:
Asymptomatic thoracic disc herniation.
Genetics
There is no recognized specific:
Genetic association
with thoracic disc herniation.
Pathophysiology
Symptoms develop when the herniated disc compresses the:
Spinal cord
or
Thoracic nerve root.
Spinal Cord Compression
Because the thoracic spinal canal contains the:
Spinal cord
rather than the cauda equina, central disc herniation may produce:
Myelopathy.
Thoracic Myelopathy
Thoracic cord compression may cause:
Lower-extremity weakness
Spasticity
Hyperreflexia
Sensory disturbance
Gait dysfunction
and
Bowel or bladder abnormalities.
Unlike cervical myelopathy, upper-extremity findings are generally:
Absent.
Radiculopathy
A lateral or foraminal herniation may compress a:
Thoracic nerve root
and produce band-like pain along the:
Chest wall
or
Abdominal wall.
Associated Conditions
Thoracic disc herniation may occasionally occur in adolescents with:
Scheuermann disease.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis requires careful assessment because of the broad:
Differential diagnosis
and the high frequency of incidental:
Thoracic MRI abnormalities.
Signs and Symptoms
Patients may present with:
Axial thoracic pain
Radicular pain
or
Myelopathy.
Axial Pain
Pain may be localized to the:
Mid-thoracic
or
Lower thoracic spine.
It can be:
Aching
Deep
or
Mechanical.
Radicular Pain
Thoracic radiculopathy often produces:
Band-like pain
around the trunk.
The:
T10 dermatome
is a commonly reported symptomatic distribution.
Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction
Bowel or bladder dysfunction has historically been reported in up to approximately:
20% of symptomatic patients.
These findings suggest significant:
Spinal cord involvement.
Clinical Patterns
Two broad clinical presentations are often described.
Younger Patients
Patients younger than approximately:
40 years
more commonly have:
Soft disc herniations.
Acute Soft Disc Herniation
These cases may follow:
Trauma
and may produce relatively acute:
Cord compression
or
Radiculopathy.
They often respond favorably to appropriately selected:
Nonoperative or operative treatment.
Older Patients
Patients older than approximately:
40 years
more commonly have:
Degenerative
or
Calcified disc herniations.
Chronic Calcified Herniation
These patients may have:
Longstanding symptoms
without a clear history of trauma.
Compression of the cord or nerve root tends to be more:
Chronic.
Physical Examination
A complete neurologic examination should be performed with careful assessment for:
Myelopathy.
Gait
Observe for:
Spastic gait
Balance disturbance
Shortened stride
or difficulty with:
Tandem walking.
Motor Examination
Assess lower-extremity:
Strength
and look for signs of:
Upper motor neuron dysfunction.
Reflexes
Evaluate:
Patellar reflexes
Achilles reflexes
and look for:
Hyperreflexia
Clonus
or abnormal:
Plantar responses.
Sensory Level
A sensory level may help localize the lesion.
Useful landmarks include:
T4 – nipple line
T7 – xiphoid process
T10 – umbilicus
and
T12 – inguinal crease.
Abdominal Muscle Examination
Asymmetric contraction of the:
Rectus abdominis
during a sit-up may suggest segmental:
Thoracic neurologic dysfunction.
Superficial Reflexes
The examination may include:
Superficial abdominal reflexes
and, when appropriate,
Cremasteric reflexes.
Range of Motion
Thoracic and lumbar:
Range of motion
should be assessed, although abnormalities are usually:
Nonspecific.
Laboratory Tests
Routine laboratory tests are not required for straightforward:
Disc herniation.
Infection or Malignancy
If infection or tumor is part of the differential diagnosis, testing may include:
Complete blood count
ESR
and
C-reactive protein.
Imaging
Plain Radiographs
AP and lateral thoracic spine radiographs may demonstrate:
Degenerative changes
Disc-space narrowing
Calcification
Deformity
or
Spondylolisthesis.
Excluding Other Disorders
Radiographs may also identify:
Fracture
Tumor
Infection
or other structural abnormalities.
Level Localization
Precise localization of the involved vertebral level is essential.
Imaging should include adequate landmarks to permit reliable:
Vertebral counting.
Historically, radiographs were obtained to include the:
First rib
Twelfth rib
and
Sacrum
when possible.
MRI
MRI is the preferred imaging study for suspected:
Thoracic disc herniation.
MRI Sequences
Evaluation should include:
Sagittal
and
Axial
T1- and T2-weighted sequences.
MRI Findings
MRI can demonstrate:
Disc morphology
Spinal cord compression
Nerve-root compression
and possible:
Cord signal abnormality.
Correct-Level Confirmation
Because wrong-level surgery is a major concern in the thoracic spine, the abnormal disc level must be:
Confirmed carefully.
A sagittal localizer may be used to count:
Downward from C2
and
Upward from the sacrum.
Correlation with:
Plain radiographs
or
CT
is useful.
CT
CT is particularly useful for identifying:
Calcification
and defining:
Bony anatomy.
CT Myelography
CT myelography can demonstrate:
Neural compression
and may be used when MRI is:
Contraindicated
or limited by:
Artifact.
Limitations of CT Myelography
Because it requires:
Intrathecal contrast injection
CT myelography is invasive.
Potential complications include:
Post-dural puncture headache.
Discography
Discography has historically been used to investigate:
Axial thoracic pain
when multiple disc levels are abnormal or severe pain persists despite relatively limited:
Imaging findings.
Its diagnostic value remains:
Controversial.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis is extensive.
Intrathoracic Causes
Potential causes include:
Pulmonary
Pleural
or other:
Thoracic abnormalities.
Intra-Abdominal Causes
Abdominal pathology can occasionally mimic:
Thoracic radicular pain.
Infectious Causes
Important possibilities include:
Discitis
Vertebral osteomyelitis
and
Epidural abscess.
Neoplastic Causes
Primary or metastatic tumors may cause:
Thoracic pain
Radiculopathy
or
Myelopathy.
Degenerative Causes
Other spinal causes include:
Facet arthropathy
Thoracic stenosis
and other forms of:
Degenerative spondylosis.
Metabolic and Deformity Causes
Consider:
Metabolic bone disease
Compression fracture
and spinal:
Deformity.
Neurogenic Causes
Neurologic alternatives include:
Peripheral neuropathy
Herpes zoster
Spinal cord tumor
and other causes of:
Thoracic neuralgia or myelopathy.
Treatment
Treatment depends primarily on the presence or absence of:
Neurologic compromise.
General Measures
Acute thoracic disc herniation without significant neurologic deficit can often be treated initially:
Nonoperatively.
Natural History
Soft acute thoracic disc herniations may behave similarly to:
Lumbar disc herniations
and may improve with:
Time
and
Conservative management.
Activity
Activity may continue:
As tolerated
provided there is no associated:
Fracture
Gross instability
or other structural contraindication.
Relative Rest
Short-term reduction of provoking activities may help control:
Acute pain.
Prolonged bed rest is generally avoided.
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy may be useful for:
Pain control
Mobility
Flexibility
and
Strengthening.
Acute Phase
Passive modalities may include:
Heat
Ice
and selected therapeutic:
Modalities.
Rehabilitation Phase
As symptoms improve, treatment may progress to:
Range-of-motion exercises
Flexibility exercises
and
Strengthening.
Extension Exercises
Some programs include:
Thoracic extension exercises.
These should be individualized and discontinued if they increase:
Radicular pain
or
Myelopathic symptoms.
Medication
First-Line Treatment
Medication may include:
Acetaminophen
or
NSAIDs
when medically appropriate.
NSAIDs
Anti-inflammatory medication may help reduce:
Pain
provided the patient does not have important:
Gastrointestinal
Renal
or other contraindications.
Aspirin
Enteric-coated aspirin has historically been used for:
Pain and inflammation
although other NSAIDs are now more commonly selected.
Chronic Opioids
There is no routine role for:
Long-term maintenance opioid therapy
in uncomplicated thoracic disc disease.
COX-2 Inhibitors
Selected patients may receive:
COX-2 selective anti-inflammatory medication
after considering:
Cardiovascular
Renal
and
Gastrointestinal risks.
Injections
Selected patients with persistent radicular pain may benefit from:
Thoracic epidural steroid injection
or
Intercostal injection.
These treatments may reduce pain but do not correct:
Mechanical spinal cord compression.
Surgery
Surgery is indicated when:
Neurologic compromise progresses
or nonoperative management fails to provide an acceptable:
Quality of life.
Major Surgical Indications
Common indications include:
Progressive myelopathy
Significant motor deficit
Severe spinal cord compression
or persistent disabling:
Pain.
Preoperative Assessment
Because thoracic surgical approaches may involve the chest and carry substantial physiologic stress, selected patients may require preoperative evaluation by:
Internal medicine
Cardiology
or
Anesthesiology.
Surgical Level Confirmation
Intraoperative imaging should be used to verify the:
Correct vertebral level
before disc removal.
Anterior Transthoracic Approach
The:
Anterior transthoracic approach
has traditionally been used for many central thoracic disc herniations because it permits direct access to the:
Anterior spinal canal.
Posterior Approaches
Direct posterior laminectomy alone is generally:
Not recommended
for central thoracic disc removal because manipulation of the spinal cord carries a high risk of:
Neurologic injury.
Pediculofacetectomy
A posterior:
Transpedicular or pediculofacetectomy approach
may be appropriate for selected:
Lateral lesions.
Lateral Approaches
Other options include:
Costotransversectomy
and
Lateral extracavitary approaches.
Thoracoscopic Surgery
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides a:
Minimally invasive anterior approach
for selected patients.
Fusion
Whether spinal fusion is required remains dependent on:
Extent of bone removal
Pre-existing deformity
and resultant:
Stability.
Rib-Cage Stability
The thoracic spine has inherent stability from the:
Rib cage.
However, substantial resection of:
Facets
Pedicles
or vertebral body structures may produce:
Iatrogenic instability.
Follow-Up
Follow-up should assess:
Pain
Neurologic status
and progression of:
Recovery.
Historical Follow-Up Schedule
A traditional postoperative schedule may include visits at approximately:
6 weeks
3 months
6 months
1 year
and
2 years
with subsequent long-term review as indicated.
Referral
Patients may require evaluation by other specialists when alternative diagnoses remain possible, including:
Thoracic surgeons
General surgeons
Rheumatologists
or other relevant:
Specialists.
Prognosis
Most appropriately selected patients undergoing thoracic disc excision achieve:
Good or excellent long-term outcomes.
Prognostic Factors
Recovery depends on:
Duration of symptoms
Severity of myelopathy
Extent of spinal cord compression
Disc calcification
and
Preoperative neurologic status.
Acute Soft Disc Prognosis
Younger patients with:
Soft acute herniations
and shorter symptom duration generally have greater potential for:
Neurologic recovery.
Chronic Calcified Disc Prognosis
Longstanding compression from:
Calcified disc material
may produce irreversible:
Spinal cord injury.
Complications
Surgical Complication Rate
Historical series have reported an overall complication rate of approximately:
14–15%
after thoracic disc excision.
Neurologic Injury
The most serious complication is:
Spinal cord injury
with:
Paraparesis
or
Paralysis.
Dural Injury
Possible complications include:
Dural tear
and
Cerebrospinal fluid leak.
Pulmonary Complications
Anterior thoracic approaches may be associated with:
Pneumothorax
Hemothorax
Pleural effusion
or other:
Pulmonary problems.
Infection
Potential infectious complications include:
Wound infection
and deeper:
Spinal infection.
Instability and Deformity
Extensive surgical resection may lead to:
Segmental instability
or
Postoperative kyphosis.
Nonoperative Neurologic Progression
Patients treated nonoperatively must be monitored for progression of:
Myelopathy
or other:
Neurologic compromise.
Patient Monitoring
Monitoring should include assessment of:
Pain
Gait
Motor function
Sensation
and
Bowel and bladder function.
After Fusion
If arthrodesis is performed, follow-up should also evaluate:
Fusion maturation
and
Spinal alignment.
Red-Flag Findings
Urgent reassessment is warranted for:
Progressive leg weakness
Increasing gait difficulty
New sensory level
Worsening spasticity
or
New bowel or bladder dysfunction.
Key Principle
Thoracic disc herniation is an uncommon symptomatic disorder despite the frequent finding of incidental thoracic disc abnormalities on MRI.
Clinical presentation may consist of:
Axial thoracic pain, radiculopathy, or spinal cord compression with myelopathy.
MRI is the preferred imaging study for assessing:
Neural compression, while CT is particularly valuable for evaluating:
Calcified disc material and bony anatomy.
Patients without significant neurologic compromise may initially be treated with:
Activity modification, analgesia, and physical therapy.
Surgery is reserved for:
Progressive myelopathy, substantial neurologic deficit, severe cord compression, or persistent disabling symptoms despite appropriate nonoperative care.
Simple posterior laminectomy for central disc excision is generally avoided because of the risk of:
Spinal cord injury.
- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Thoracic Disc Herniation
Basics
Thoracic disc herniation is protrusion or extrusion of an intervertebral disc within the:
Thoracic spine
that may compress the:
Spinal cord
or
Thoracic nerve roots.
The condition can be difficult to diagnose because symptoms are often:
Nonspecific
and may resemble disorders involving the:
Chest
Abdomen
Spine
or
Peripheral nervous system.
Incidental Disc Abnormalities
A major diagnostic challenge is the high prevalence of:
Asymptomatic thoracic disc abnormalities.
Disc degeneration or herniation on imaging does not necessarily indicate that the abnormality is responsible for the patient’s:
Symptoms.
Clinical findings must therefore correlate carefully with the:
Anatomic level
and degree of:
Neural compression.
Epidemiology
Symptomatic thoracic disc disease most commonly presents during approximately the:
Fifth decade of life.
Sex
A slight predominance in:
Males
has been reported historically.
Trauma
Up to approximately:
50% of symptomatic patients
report some preceding:
Traumatic event
before symptoms begin.
Incidence
Symptomatic thoracic disc herniation is uncommon, with an estimated incidence of approximately:
1 per 100,000 persons per year.
Prevalence on MRI
Thoracic disc abnormalities are much more common than clinically symptomatic disease.
MRI studies have reported abnormalities in up to approximately:
73% of individuals.
Asymptomatic Herniation
Approximately:
37%
of individuals in some imaging series have demonstrated:
Asymptomatic thoracic disc herniation.
Genetics
There is no recognized specific:
Genetic association
with thoracic disc herniation.
Pathophysiology
Symptoms develop when the herniated disc compresses the:
Spinal cord
or
Thoracic nerve root.
Spinal Cord Compression
Because the thoracic spinal canal contains the:
Spinal cord
rather than the cauda equina, central disc herniation may produce:
Myelopathy.
Thoracic Myelopathy
Thoracic cord compression may cause:
Lower-extremity weakness
Spasticity
Hyperreflexia
Sensory disturbance
Gait dysfunction
and
Bowel or bladder abnormalities.
Unlike cervical myelopathy, upper-extremity findings are generally:
Absent.
Radiculopathy
A lateral or foraminal herniation may compress a:
Thoracic nerve root
and produce band-like pain along the:
Chest wall
or
Abdominal wall.
Associated Conditions
Thoracic disc herniation may occasionally occur in adolescents with:
Scheuermann disease.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis requires careful assessment because of the broad:
Differential diagnosis
and the high frequency of incidental:
Thoracic MRI abnormalities.
Signs and Symptoms
Patients may present with:
Axial thoracic pain
Radicular pain
or
Myelopathy.
Axial Pain
Pain may be localized to the:
Mid-thoracic
or
Lower thoracic spine.
It can be:
Aching
Deep
or
Mechanical.
Radicular Pain
Thoracic radiculopathy often produces:
Band-like pain
around the trunk.
The:
T10 dermatome
is a commonly reported symptomatic distribution.
Bowel and Bladder Dysfunction
Bowel or bladder dysfunction has historically been reported in up to approximately:
20% of symptomatic patients.
These findings suggest significant:
Spinal cord involvement.
Clinical Patterns
Two broad clinical presentations are often described.
Younger Patients
Patients younger than approximately:
40 years
more commonly have:
Soft disc herniations.
Acute Soft Disc Herniation
These cases may follow:
Trauma
and may produce relatively acute:
Cord compression
or
Radiculopathy.
They often respond favorably to appropriately selected:
Nonoperative or operative treatment.
Older Patients
Patients older than approximately:
40 years
more commonly have:
Degenerative
or
Calcified disc herniations.
Chronic Calcified Herniation
These patients may have:
Longstanding symptoms
without a clear history of trauma.
Compression of the cord or nerve root tends to be more:
Chronic.
Physical Examination
A complete neurologic examination should be performed with careful assessment for:
Myelopathy.
Gait
Observe for:
Spastic gait
Balance disturbance
Shortened stride
or difficulty with:
Tandem walking.
Motor Examination
Assess lower-extremity:
Strength
and look for signs of:
Upper motor neuron dysfunction.
Reflexes
Evaluate:
Patellar reflexes
Achilles reflexes
and look for:
Hyperreflexia
Clonus
or abnormal:
Plantar responses.
Sensory Level
A sensory level may help localize the lesion.
Useful landmarks include:
T4 – nipple line
T7 – xiphoid process
T10 – umbilicus
and
T12 – inguinal crease.
Abdominal Muscle Examination
Asymmetric contraction of the:
Rectus abdominis
during a sit-up may suggest segmental:
Thoracic neurologic dysfunction.
Superficial Reflexes
The examination may include:
Superficial abdominal reflexes
and, when appropriate,
Cremasteric reflexes.
Range of Motion
Thoracic and lumbar:
Range of motion
should be assessed, although abnormalities are usually:
Nonspecific.
Laboratory Tests
Routine laboratory tests are not required for straightforward:
Disc herniation.
Infection or Malignancy
If infection or tumor is part of the differential diagnosis, testing may include:
Complete blood count
ESR
and
C-reactive protein.
Imaging
Plain Radiographs
AP and lateral thoracic spine radiographs may demonstrate:
Degenerative changes
Disc-space narrowing
Calcification
Deformity
or
Spondylolisthesis.
Excluding Other Disorders
Radiographs may also identify:
Fracture
Tumor
Infection
or other structural abnormalities.
Level Localization
Precise localization of the involved vertebral level is essential.
Imaging should include adequate landmarks to permit reliable:
Vertebral counting.
Historically, radiographs were obtained to include the:
First rib
Twelfth rib
and
Sacrum
when possible.
MRI
MRI is the preferred imaging study for suspected:
Thoracic disc herniation.
MRI Sequences
Evaluation should include:
Sagittal
and
Axial
T1- and T2-weighted sequences.
MRI Findings
MRI can demonstrate:
Disc morphology
Spinal cord compression
Nerve-root compression
and possible:
Cord signal abnormality.
Correct-Level Confirmation
Because wrong-level surgery is a major concern in the thoracic spine, the abnormal disc level must be:
Confirmed carefully.
A sagittal localizer may be used to count:
Downward from C2
and
Upward from the sacrum.
Correlation with:
Plain radiographs
or
CT
is useful.
CT
CT is particularly useful for identifying:
Calcification
and defining:
Bony anatomy.
CT Myelography
CT myelography can demonstrate:
Neural compression
and may be used when MRI is:
Contraindicated
or limited by:
Artifact.
Limitations of CT Myelography
Because it requires:
Intrathecal contrast injection
CT myelography is invasive.
Potential complications include:
Post-dural puncture headache.
Discography
Discography has historically been used to investigate:
Axial thoracic pain
when multiple disc levels are abnormal or severe pain persists despite relatively limited:
Imaging findings.
Its diagnostic value remains:
Controversial.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis is extensive.
Intrathoracic Causes
Potential causes include:
Pulmonary
Pleural
or other:
Thoracic abnormalities.
Intra-Abdominal Causes
Abdominal pathology can occasionally mimic:
Thoracic radicular pain.
Infectious Causes
Important possibilities include:
Discitis
Vertebral osteomyelitis
and
Epidural abscess.
Neoplastic Causes
Primary or metastatic tumors may cause:
Thoracic pain
Radiculopathy
or
Myelopathy.
Degenerative Causes
Other spinal causes include:
Facet arthropathy
Thoracic stenosis
and other forms of:
Degenerative spondylosis.
Metabolic and Deformity Causes
Consider:
Metabolic bone disease
Compression fracture
and spinal:
Deformity.
Neurogenic Causes
Neurologic alternatives include:
Peripheral neuropathy
Herpes zoster
Spinal cord tumor
and other causes of:
Thoracic neuralgia or myelopathy.
Treatment
Treatment depends primarily on the presence or absence of:
Neurologic compromise.
General Measures
Acute thoracic disc herniation without significant neurologic deficit can often be treated initially:
Nonoperatively.
Natural History
Soft acute thoracic disc herniations may behave similarly to:
Lumbar disc herniations
and may improve with:
Time
and
Conservative management.
Activity
Activity may continue:
As tolerated
provided there is no associated:
Fracture
Gross instability
or other structural contraindication.
Relative Rest
Short-term reduction of provoking activities may help control:
Acute pain.
Prolonged bed rest is generally avoided.
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy may be useful for:
Pain control
Mobility
Flexibility
and
Strengthening.
Acute Phase
Passive modalities may include:
Heat
Ice
and selected therapeutic:
Modalities.
Rehabilitation Phase
As symptoms improve, treatment may progress to:
Range-of-motion exercises
Flexibility exercises
and
Strengthening.
Extension Exercises
Some programs include:
Thoracic extension exercises.
These should be individualized and discontinued if they increase:
Radicular pain
or
Myelopathic symptoms.
Medication
First-Line Treatment
Medication may include:
Acetaminophen
or
NSAIDs
when medically appropriate.
NSAIDs
Anti-inflammatory medication may help reduce:
Pain
provided the patient does not have important:
Gastrointestinal
Renal
or other contraindications.
Aspirin
Enteric-coated aspirin has historically been used for:
Pain and inflammation
although other NSAIDs are now more commonly selected.
Chronic Opioids
There is no routine role for:
Long-term maintenance opioid therapy
in uncomplicated thoracic disc disease.
COX-2 Inhibitors
Selected patients may receive:
COX-2 selective anti-inflammatory medication
after considering:
Cardiovascular
Renal
and
Gastrointestinal risks.
Injections
Selected patients with persistent radicular pain may benefit from:
Thoracic epidural steroid injection
or
Intercostal injection.
These treatments may reduce pain but do not correct:
Mechanical spinal cord compression.
Surgery
Surgery is indicated when:
Neurologic compromise progresses
or nonoperative management fails to provide an acceptable:
Quality of life.
Major Surgical Indications
Common indications include:
Progressive myelopathy
Significant motor deficit
Severe spinal cord compression
or persistent disabling:
Pain.
Preoperative Assessment
Because thoracic surgical approaches may involve the chest and carry substantial physiologic stress, selected patients may require preoperative evaluation by:
Internal medicine
Cardiology
or
Anesthesiology.
Surgical Level Confirmation
Intraoperative imaging should be used to verify the:
Correct vertebral level
before disc removal.
Anterior Transthoracic Approach
The:
Anterior transthoracic approach
has traditionally been used for many central thoracic disc herniations because it permits direct access to the:
Anterior spinal canal.
Posterior Approaches
Direct posterior laminectomy alone is generally:
Not recommended
for central thoracic disc removal because manipulation of the spinal cord carries a high risk of:
Neurologic injury.
Pediculofacetectomy
A posterior:
Transpedicular or pediculofacetectomy approach
may be appropriate for selected:
Lateral lesions.
Lateral Approaches
Other options include:
Costotransversectomy
and
Lateral extracavitary approaches.
Thoracoscopic Surgery
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides a:
Minimally invasive anterior approach
for selected patients.
Fusion
Whether spinal fusion is required remains dependent on:
Extent of bone removal
Pre-existing deformity
and resultant:
Stability.
Rib-Cage Stability
The thoracic spine has inherent stability from the:
Rib cage.
However, substantial resection of:
Facets
Pedicles
or vertebral body structures may produce:
Iatrogenic instability.
Follow-Up
Follow-up should assess:
Pain
Neurologic status
and progression of:
Recovery.
Historical Follow-Up Schedule
A traditional postoperative schedule may include visits at approximately:
6 weeks
3 months
6 months
1 year
and
2 years
with subsequent long-term review as indicated.
Referral
Patients may require evaluation by other specialists when alternative diagnoses remain possible, including:
Thoracic surgeons
General surgeons
Rheumatologists
or other relevant:
Specialists.
Prognosis
Most appropriately selected patients undergoing thoracic disc excision achieve:
Good or excellent long-term outcomes.
Prognostic Factors
Recovery depends on:
Duration of symptoms
Severity of myelopathy
Extent of spinal cord compression
Disc calcification
and
Preoperative neurologic status.
Acute Soft Disc Prognosis
Younger patients with:
Soft acute herniations
and shorter symptom duration generally have greater potential for:
Neurologic recovery.
Chronic Calcified Disc Prognosis
Longstanding compression from:
Calcified disc material
may produce irreversible:
Spinal cord injury.
Complications
Surgical Complication Rate
Historical series have reported an overall complication rate of approximately:
14–15%
after thoracic disc excision.
Neurologic Injury
The most serious complication is:
Spinal cord injury
with:
Paraparesis
or
Paralysis.
Dural Injury
Possible complications include:
Dural tear
and
Cerebrospinal fluid leak.
Pulmonary Complications
Anterior thoracic approaches may be associated with:
Pneumothorax
Hemothorax
Pleural effusion
or other:
Pulmonary problems.
Infection
Potential infectious complications include:
Wound infection
and deeper:
Spinal infection.
Instability and Deformity
Extensive surgical resection may lead to:
Segmental instability
or
Postoperative kyphosis.
Nonoperative Neurologic Progression
Patients treated nonoperatively must be monitored for progression of:
Myelopathy
or other:
Neurologic compromise.
Patient Monitoring
Monitoring should include assessment of:
Pain
Gait
Motor function
Sensation
and
Bowel and bladder function.
After Fusion
If arthrodesis is performed, follow-up should also evaluate:
Fusion maturation
and
Spinal alignment.
Red-Flag Findings
Urgent reassessment is warranted for:
Progressive leg weakness
Increasing gait difficulty
New sensory level
Worsening spasticity
or
New bowel or bladder dysfunction.
Key Principle
Thoracic disc herniation is an uncommon symptomatic disorder despite the frequent finding of incidental thoracic disc abnormalities on MRI.
Clinical presentation may consist of:
Axial thoracic pain, radiculopathy, or spinal cord compression with myelopathy.
MRI is the preferred imaging study for assessing:
Neural compression, while CT is particularly valuable for evaluating:
Calcified disc material and bony anatomy.
Patients without significant neurologic compromise may initially be treated with:
Activity modification, analgesia, and physical therapy.
Surgery is reserved for:
Progressive myelopathy, substantial neurologic deficit, severe cord compression, or persistent disabling symptoms despite appropriate nonoperative care.
Simple posterior laminectomy for central disc excision is generally avoided because of the risk of:
Spinal cord injury.
- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Tenosynovitis
Basics
Tenosynovitis is a painful disorder involving:
Inflammation or irritation of a tendon and its surrounding synovial sheath.
It most often affects long tendons in the:
Fingers
Wrist
or
Ankle.
Causes
Tenosynovitis may result from:
Acute injury
Repetitive mechanical loading
Systemic inflammatory disease
Infection
or, in some patients,
No identifiable cause.
Age
The condition is uncommon in:
Children
and is seen most frequently during:
Early to middle adulthood.
Classification by Duration
Tenosynovitis may be described as:
Acute
or
Chronic.
Acute Tenosynovitis
Acute tenosynovitis generally produces symptoms lasting only:
Several days.
Noninfectious acute cases may improve relatively quickly with:
Activity modification
Rest
and
Anti-inflammatory treatment.
Chronic Tenosynovitis
Symptoms persisting longer than approximately:
2–3 weeks
may be considered chronic.
Chronic disease may be accompanied by greater:
Sheath thickening
Fibrosis
and
Tendon degeneration.
These cases may be more difficult to:
Resolve completely.
Common Locations
Frequent clinical forms include:
Posterior tibial tenosynovitis
Flexor tendon tenosynovitis of the hand
Biceps tenosynovitis
and
de Quervain tenosynovitis.
de Quervain Tenosynovitis
de Quervain disease affects the first dorsal extensor compartment, principally the:
Abductor pollicis longus
and
Extensor pollicis brevis tendons.
Synonym
The term:
Tendinitis
is sometimes used interchangeably, although tendinitis refers primarily to the:
Tendon itself
whereas tenosynovitis specifically involves the:
Synovial tendon sheath.
Prevention
Because many cases arise unpredictably, there is no reliable method for preventing all forms of:
Tenosynovitis.
Activity Modification
In patients whose symptoms are related to repetitive loading, prevention of recurrence may involve:
Ergonomic adjustment
Technique modification
and avoidance of abrupt increases in:
Repetitive activity.
Epidemiology
Tenosynovial disorders are among the more common:
Musculoskeletal complaints.
Many individuals experience at least one episode of tendon or tendon-sheath irritation during:
Their lifetime.
Sex
Women appear to be affected slightly more frequently than:
Men.
Risk Factors
Potential risk factors include:
Rheumatoid arthritis
Other inflammatory arthropathies
Previous tenosynovitis
Pregnancy
and selected repetitive:
Occupational or recreational activities.
Repetitive Motion
The relationship between repetitive motion and every form of tenosynovitis is not absolute.
However, repetitive loading may contribute in susceptible patients, especially when activity is:
New
Unusually intense
or associated with poor:
Biomechanics.
Etiology
Repeated use or mechanical constriction may irritate the:
Tendon sheath
causing thickening and impaired:
Tendon gliding.
Noninfectious Tenosynovitis
Many noninfectious cases occur in adults between approximately:
30 and 50 years of age
who perform repetitive:
Hand
Wrist
or
Lower-extremity activities.
Systemic Inflammatory Disease
Tenosynovitis may be a manifestation of:
Rheumatoid arthritis
Systemic lupus erythematosus
or other:
Inflammatory arthritides.
Infectious Tenosynovitis
Infection usually develops when bacteria gain access to the:
Tendon sheath
through:
Penetrating trauma
Laceration
Puncture wound
or, less commonly,
Hematogenous spread.
Flexor Tendon Sheath Infection
Infectious flexor tenosynovitis of the hand is particularly important because infection can spread rapidly within the:
Closed tendon sheath.
It represents an:
Urgent surgical condition.
Pregnancy Considerations
Pregnancy may precipitate or worsen:
Tenosynovitis
particularly:
de Quervain tenosynovitis.
Fluid retention and hormonal changes may contribute to:
Tendon-sheath swelling.
Associated Conditions
Important associated disorders include:
Rheumatoid arthritis
Lupus
and other:
Inflammatory arthropathies.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is usually based on:
History
Physical examination
and, when necessary,
Laboratory or imaging studies.
Signs and Symptoms
The most common symptom is:
Pain along the course of the affected tendon.
Onset
Pain may develop:
Suddenly
or
Gradually.
It frequently follows a period of:
New or unusually strenuous activity.
Activity-Related Pain
Symptoms generally worsen with:
Use of the involved tendon
and improve with:
Rest.
Swelling
There may be localized:
Swelling
or fullness along the:
Tendon sheath.
Crepitus
Some patients develop palpable or audible:
Crepitus
as the tendon moves within an inflamed or thickened:
Sheath.
de Quervain Symptoms
de Quervain tenosynovitis typically causes:
Radial-sided wrist pain
near the:
Radial styloid.
Symptoms worsen with:
Thumb motion
Gripping
and
Ulnar deviation of the wrist.
Trigger Finger
Tenosynovial thickening around the flexor tendons may produce:
Trigger finger.
Triggering Mechanism
The tendon catches as it passes through a constricted:
Flexor pulley system.
This may produce:
Clicking
Snapping
or
Locking
during finger flexion or extension.
Physical Examination
The examination should identify the specific:
Tendon or tendon sheath
responsible for symptoms.
Tenderness
Tenderness is typically distributed:
Longitudinally
along the course of the:
Affected tendon.
Severity
Tenderness may be:
Mild
Moderate
or
Severe
depending on the underlying:
Cause and duration.
Swelling
Visible or palpable swelling may follow the:
Tendon sheath.
Crepitus With Motion
Moving the affected tendon may reproduce:
Pain
and occasionally:
Crepitus.
Range of Motion
Assess:
Active
and
Passive range of motion.
Restriction may result from:
Pain
Swelling
or mechanical:
Tendon constriction.
Infectious Flexor Tenosynovitis
When infection is suspected in a finger, look for the classic:
Kanavel signs.
These include:
Fusiform swelling of the digit
Tenderness along the flexor tendon sheath
Finger held in slight flexion
and
Pain with passive extension.
The presence of these findings should prompt:
Urgent surgical evaluation.
Laboratory Tests
Laboratory studies are not always required for uncomplicated noninfectious:
Tenosynovitis.
Suspected Infection
When infection is possible, useful studies may include:
Complete blood count
Erythrocyte sedimentation rate
and
C-reactive protein.
Systemic Disease Evaluation
Additional testing may be appropriate when symptoms suggest:
Rheumatoid arthritis
Lupus
Gout
or another systemic:
Inflammatory disorder.
Imaging
Plain Radiographs
Radiographs may be useful when there is:
Penetrating trauma
Suspected fracture
Adjacent arthritis
or another potential:
Bony cause of symptoms.
Radiographic Role
Plain films generally do not demonstrate the tendon-sheath inflammation directly.
They are primarily used to identify:
Alternative diagnoses
and associated:
Skeletal abnormalities.
Ultrasound
Ultrasound can demonstrate:
Tendon-sheath fluid
Synovial thickening
Tendon abnormalities
and dynamic:
Tendon motion.
MRI
MRI may show:
Fluid surrounding the tendon
Synovial thickening
Tendon degeneration
or associated:
Soft-tissue pathology.
Role of Advanced Imaging
Ultrasound or MRI is most helpful when:
The diagnosis is uncertain
Symptoms persist despite treatment
or a mass, tear, or other structural lesion is:
Suspected.
Pathological Findings
The pathological appearance varies according to the:
Cause.
Acute Inflammatory Disease
Acute inflammatory tenosynovitis may show:
Synovial edema
Hyperemia
and infiltration by:
Inflammatory cells.
Chronic Disease
Chronic cases may demonstrate:
Synovial thickening
Fibrosis
and degenerative changes affecting the:
Tendon.
Infectious Disease
Septic tenosynovitis may contain:
Purulent fluid
with marked:
Synovial inflammation
and potentially:
Tendon damage.
Differential Diagnosis
Important alternatives include:
Tendon strain
Partial tendon tear
Complete tendon rupture
Tendon-sheath infection
Arthritis
and other causes of regional:
Soft-tissue pain.
Treatment
Treatment depends on whether the process is:
Mechanical
Inflammatory
or
Infectious.
General Measures
Most uncomplicated noninfectious cases are initially treated with:
Relative rest
Activity modification
and gentle:
Range-of-motion exercises.
Relative Rest
The provoking activity should be reduced sufficiently to allow symptoms to:
Settle.
Complete inactivity is generally avoided when painless movement is:
Possible.
Immobilization
Short-term use of a:
Splint
or
Brace
may be helpful when symptoms are severe.
Prolonged immobilization should generally be avoided because it may lead to:
Stiffness
and
Weakness.
Physical and Occupational Therapy
Physical and occupational therapists may assist with:
Splinting
Stretching
Strengthening
and
Work or activity modification.
Ergonomic Modification
When occupational activity contributes to symptoms, therapy may focus on:
Tool modification
Workstation adjustment
and changes in:
Repetitive movement patterns.
Stretching
Gentle stretching can help maintain:
Tendon excursion
and surrounding:
Joint mobility.
Strengthening
Once acute pain improves, progressive strengthening may restore:
Tendon capacity
and reduce recurrence.
Medication
NSAIDs
NSAIDs may provide short-term relief of:
Pain
and
Inflammatory symptoms.
They are commonly used in:
Noninfectious tenosynovitis.
Corticosteroid Injection
Corticosteroid injection may be effective for selected disorders, particularly:
de Quervain tenosynovitis
and
Trigger finger.
Injection Precautions
Injection should be performed carefully to avoid:
Direct intratendinous injection
which can increase the risk of:
Tendon weakening or rupture.
Systemic Inflammatory Disease
Tenosynovitis caused by rheumatoid arthritis or another inflammatory disease may improve with:
Disease-modifying antirheumatic therapy
and appropriate systemic:
Anti-inflammatory treatment.
Infectious Tenosynovitis
Septic tenosynovitis requires:
Urgent treatment.
Antibiotics
Treatment includes prompt:
Intravenous or appropriately targeted antibiotics
based on the suspected organism and:
Culture results.
Surgery
Surgery may be required when:
Nonoperative treatment fails
or when mechanical compression prevents normal:
Tendon gliding.
Surgical Release
Operative treatment may involve:
Opening or releasing the tendon sheath
to relieve:
Constriction.
Synovectomy
Diseased or hypertrophic synovium may be:
Excised
to improve tendon:
Gliding.
Tendon Débridement
Degenerated tendon tissue may require:
Débridement
in selected chronic cases.
de Quervain Surgery
Persistent de Quervain disease may require complete release of the:
First dorsal extensor compartment.
Both the:
Abductor pollicis longus
and any separate compartment containing the:
Extensor pollicis brevis
must be adequately decompressed.
Postoperative Splinting
Temporary splinting may be used after surgery depending on:
Procedure
and
Tendon condition.
Septic Tenosynovitis Surgery
Infectious tenosynovitis may require urgent:
Tendon-sheath irrigation and decompression
with removal of:
Purulent material
and
Infected synovium.
Timing in Infection
Delay in treatment can lead to:
Tendon necrosis
Adhesions
Loss of motion
or spread of:
Infection.
Referral
Patients with suspected systemic inflammatory disease should be referred for appropriate:
Rheumatologic evaluation.
Rheumatology
Patients with:
Rheumatoid arthritis
Lupus
or another inflammatory arthropathy may require:
Disease-modifying therapy
rather than isolated treatment of the:
Tendon sheath.
Follow-Up
Patients should be reassessed according to:
Severity
Location
and
Treatment response.
Typical Monitoring
Nonoperative cases may be reviewed at approximately:
4–6 week intervals.
Examination During Follow-Up
Follow-up should evaluate:
Pain
Swelling
Range of motion
Tendon function
and return to:
Normal activity.
Prognosis
Most uncomplicated cases respond successfully to:
Nonoperative treatment.
Recurrent Disease
Some tendon regions have a greater tendency toward recurrence, particularly the:
Posterior tibial tendon
and
Achilles tendon.
Chronic Tenosynovitis
Longstanding disease may be more difficult to resolve because of:
Fibrosis
Tendon degeneration
and persistent:
Mechanical irritation.
Infectious Prognosis
Outcome in septic tenosynovitis depends heavily on:
Early recognition
and
Prompt treatment.
Delayed care increases the risk of permanent:
Tendon and joint dysfunction.
Complications
The principal complication of noninfectious disease is:
Persistence or recurrence of symptoms.
Tendon Degeneration
Chronic tenosynovitis may contribute to:
Tendon weakening
and occasionally:
Tendon rupture.
Adhesions
Inflammation or surgery can lead to:
Tendon adhesions
and impaired:
Tendon gliding.
Stiffness
Pain and prolonged immobilization can result in:
Joint stiffness
and reduced:
Range of motion.
Infection Complications
Untreated septic tenosynovitis may cause:
Abscess formation
Tendon necrosis
Joint infection
Osteomyelitis
or permanent:
Functional loss.
Patient Monitoring
Patients should be monitored for:
Resolution of pain
Improved tendon excursion
Restoration of range of motion
and recurrence of:
Swelling or triggering.
Key Principle
Tenosynovitis is a disorder of the synovial tendon sheath that may result from mechanical overuse, systemic inflammatory disease, infection, or an idiopathic process.
Typical findings include:
Pain and tenderness along the tendon, swelling, crepitus, and pain with use.
Most noninfectious cases improve with:
Relative rest, temporary splinting, NSAIDs, activity modification, and therapy.
Selected conditions such as:
de Quervain tenosynovitis and trigger finger
may respond to:
Corticosteroid injection.
Persistent mechanical disease may require:
Surgical sheath release or synovectomy, whereas:
Septic flexor tenosynovitis is an urgent condition requiring antibiotics and often operative irrigation and decompression.
- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Tennis Elbow
Basics
Tennis elbow, also called:
Lateral epicondylitis
is a degenerative tendinopathy involving the origin of the:
Extensor carpi radialis brevis
at the:
Lateral epicondyle of the humerus.
Despite the traditional term “epicondylitis,” the disorder is predominantly:
Degenerative rather than inflammatory.
Synonyms
Other terms include:
Lateral epicondylosis
Lateral epicondylalgia
Wrist extensor tendinosis
and
Tennis elbow.
Anatomy
The lateral epicondyle provides attachment for the:
Common extensor tendon.
Important contributing muscles include:
Extensor carpi radialis longus
Extensor carpi radialis brevis
Extensor digitorum communis
and
Extensor carpi ulnaris.
Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis
The:
Extensor carpi radialis brevis, or ECRB
is the tendon most commonly involved.
It lies deep to the:
Extensor carpi radialis longus.
Function
The wrist extensors stabilize the wrist during:
Gripping
Lifting
and repetitive:
Forearm and hand activity.
They are also highly active during the:
Backhand stroke in tennis.
Clinical Setting
Although strongly associated with racket sports by name, lateral epicondylosis is actually more commonly encountered in patients performing repetitive:
Occupational
or
Daily-living activities.
It affects both:
Athletes
and
Nonathletes.
Typical Patient
The classic presentation is an adult in the:
Fourth or fifth decade
with overuse of the:
Dominant upper extremity.
Natural History
Lateral epicondylosis is generally:
Self-limited.
Symptoms may nevertheless persist for:
Many months
and occasionally longer before resolving.
Prevention
Prevention focuses on reducing excessive repetitive loading of the:
Wrist extensor origin.
Ergonomics
Patients performing repetitive occupational activity may benefit from:
Ergonomic assessment
and modification of their:
Workstation or tools.
This is particularly relevant for patients with prolonged:
Computer
Manual
or
Repetitive hand use.
Athletic Technique
Tennis players should be assessed for:
Racket grip size
Backhand technique
Racket weight
String tension
and training:
Volume.
Epidemiology
Lateral epicondylosis affects:
Men and women approximately equally.
Incidence
Peak incidence occurs during approximately the:
Fifth decade of life.
Lifetime Occurrence
Approximately:
1–3% of the population
develop lateral epicondylosis at some point.
Risk Factors
The condition is associated with activities involving repetitive:
Forearm pronation
Supination
Wrist extension
and
Gripping.
Elbow Position
Repetitive forearm rotation performed with the elbow near:
Full extension
may increase loading at the:
Common extensor origin.
Sports
Associated athletic activities include:
Tennis
Other racket sports
and
Fencing.
Occupational Activities
Occupations and activities associated with repetitive upper-extremity use include:
Plumbing
Painting
Knitting
Dentistry
and prolonged:
Computer work.
Tennis-Specific Factors
Potential contributing factors include:
Poor stroke mechanics
Incorrect racket grip size
Excessive racket weight
and inappropriate:
String tension.
Playing Surface
Harder court surfaces may increase force transmission through the:
Racket
and upper extremity, potentially increasing stress at the:
Lateral epicondyle.
Etiology
The disorder usually begins as repetitive microscopic injury to the:
ECRB origin.
Microtrauma
Repeated loading may produce:
Microscopic tendon tearing
that exceeds the tendon’s ability to:
Repair itself.
Other Involved Tendons
The:
Extensor carpi radialis longus
and
Extensor digitorum communis
may occasionally also demonstrate:
Degenerative involvement.
Failed Tendon Healing
An inadequate healing response leaves the tendon susceptible to repeated:
Microtrauma
and progressive:
Tendinosis.
Pathophysiology
The process is characterized more by:
Collagen degeneration
than by acute:
Inflammation.
This explains why the term:
Lateral epicondylosis
is often considered more pathologically accurate than “epicondylitis.”
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is usually:
Clinical.
The combination of characteristic:
Lateral elbow tenderness
and pain with resisted:
Wrist extension
is strongly suggestive.
Signs and Symptoms
Patients typically report a history of:
Repetitive upper-extremity activity.
Pain Location
Pain is centered around the:
Lateral epicondyle
and may radiate a short distance distally along the:
Proximal extensor muscle mass.
Activity-Related Pain
Symptoms generally worsen with:
Activity
and improve with:
Rest.
Gripping Pain
Patients commonly report pain while:
Gripping objects
Lifting a cup
Shaking hands
or
Carrying objects.
Resisted Wrist Extension
Pain is reproduced when the patient extends the wrist against:
Resistance.
Symptoms are often more pronounced when the elbow is:
Extended.
Range of Motion
Elbow range of motion is generally:
Preserved.
Loss of motion should raise concern for:
Alternative or additional pathology.
Physical Examination
The most characteristic finding is localized tenderness over the:
Common extensor origin
at or just distal to the:
Lateral epicondyle.
Distal Tenderness
Tenderness may extend several centimeters distally over the:
ECRB region.
Resisted Wrist Extension Test
The examiner stabilizes the forearm while the patient attempts:
Wrist extension against resistance.
Reproduction of lateral elbow pain supports the diagnosis.
Passive Wrist Flexion
Passive flexion of the wrist with the elbow:
Extended
stretches the common extensor origin and may reproduce:
Pain.
Grip Testing
Painful or reduced:
Grip strength
may be present because gripping requires stabilization by the:
Wrist extensors.
Radial Tunnel Examination
The clinician should evaluate for:
Radial tunnel syndrome.
Resisted Middle-Finger Extension
Pain reproduced with resisted:
Middle-finger extension
may suggest involvement of the:
Radial tunnel or posterior interosseous nerve region.
This finding should be interpreted with the remainder of the:
Clinical examination.
Cervical Spine Examination
A cervical spine examination is appropriate, especially when symptoms are:
Bilateral
Atypical
or accompanied by:
Neck pain or neurologic findings.
Imaging
Plain Radiographs
AP and lateral radiographs of the elbow may be obtained to exclude:
Fracture
Arthritis
Loose body
or other:
Bony pathology.
Typical Radiographic Findings
Plain radiographs are usually:
Normal.
Calcification
Historical studies report local soft-tissue calcification near the lateral epicondyle in approximately:
23% of patients.
Cervical Spine Imaging
Cervical radiographs may be considered when symptoms could originate from:
Cervical radiculopathy.
CT
CT is rarely needed for isolated tennis elbow.
It may be useful when evaluating:
Loose bodies
Arthritis
or other complex:
Intra-articular pathology.
MRI
MRI is not routinely required for the diagnosis.
Indications for MRI
MRI may be useful when symptoms are:
Persistent
Atypical
or when there is concern for:
Partial tendon tearing
or another:
Elbow disorder.
MRI Findings
Possible findings include:
Tendon thickening
Increased T1 and T2 signal
and
Partial tearing
at the common extensor origin.
Electrodiagnostic Testing
Electromyography and nerve-conduction studies are not usually required for isolated:
Lateral epicondylosis.
They may help when distinguishing it from:
Radial tunnel syndrome
or another:
Neuropathic disorder.
Pathological Findings
Microscopic examination demonstrates:
Degenerative tearing
within the substance of the:
ECRB tendon.
Histology
Characteristic changes include replacement of normal tendon collagen with:
Fibroblastic tissue
Abnormal vascular proliferation
and disorganized:
Collagen.
This has historically been termed:
Angiofibroblastic or angioblastic proliferation.
Inflammation
Importantly, significant acute inflammatory-cell infiltration is usually:
Absent.
The process therefore represents:
Tendinosis
rather than classic:
Tendinitis.
Differential Diagnosis
Important alternatives include:
Cervical radiculopathy
Radial tunnel syndrome
Olecranon bursitis
Medial epicondylitis
Ulnar collateral ligament injury
and
Intra-articular elbow disease.
Radial Tunnel Syndrome
Radial tunnel syndrome involves compression of the:
Posterior interosseous nerve
or radial nerve around the:
Supinator.
Coexisting Radial Tunnel Syndrome
Historical reports suggest that radial tunnel syndrome may coexist with lateral epicondylosis in approximately:
5% of patients.
Intra-Articular Disorders
Conditions such as:
Elbow arthritis
Capitellar osteochondritis dissecans
or a:
Loose body
may produce lateral elbow pain.
Treatment
Most patients are initially treated:
Nonoperatively.
General Measures
Treatment may include:
Activity modification
Relative rest
Ice or cryotherapy
NSAIDs
Physical therapy
Counterforce bracing
and occasionally:
Wrist splinting.
Activity Modification
Activities that reproduce pain should be:
Reduced or modified.
Complete inactivity is generally unnecessary.
Return to Activity
Normal activity can be resumed:
Gradually
as pain and strength:
Improve.
Ergonomic Correction
Work-related factors should be addressed through:
Tool modification
Workstation adjustment
and reduction of repetitive:
Grip or wrist-extension loading.
Athletic Modification
Athletes should optimize:
Stroke mechanics
Equipment
and
Training volume.
Counterforce Brace
A:
Counterforce strap
placed around the proximal forearm may reduce load transferred to the:
Common extensor origin.
Wrist Splint
Short-term use of a wrist splint, particularly at:
Night
or during aggravating activities, may reduce tension on the:
Extensor tendons.
Physical Therapy
Physical therapy is useful when symptoms persist.
Eccentric Exercise
A major component of rehabilitation is:
Eccentric strengthening of the wrist extensors.
Progressive Loading
Rehabilitation may gradually progress from:
Isometric exercises
to
Eccentric and concentric strengthening
as tolerated.
Stretching
Gentle stretching of the:
Wrist extensor musculature
may be incorporated into the program.
Soft-Tissue Treatment
Adjunctive techniques may include:
Friction massage
Soft-tissue mobilization
and other manual:
Therapies.
Therapeutic Modalities
Historically used modalities include:
Ultrasound
and
Iontophoresis.
Evidence for substantial additional benefit is:
Limited.
NSAIDs
NSAIDs may provide short-term:
Pain relief.
Because the underlying process is largely degenerative rather than inflammatory, they do not directly reverse:
Tendon degeneration.
Corticosteroid Injection
Corticosteroid injection may provide:
Short-term pain relief
in selected patients.
Limitations of Corticosteroid Injection
Benefits often diminish over time, and repeated injections may increase the risk of:
Tendon degeneration
or
Tendon rupture.
Therefore, repeated injections should be used:
Cautiously.
Nitroglycerin
Topical:
Nitroglycerin patches
have been studied as an adjunct to rehabilitation and may improve pain in some patients with:
Chronic tendinopathy.
Their role remains:
Selective rather than routine.
Shock-Wave Therapy
Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy has been investigated for:
Lateral epicondylosis.
Results across studies have been:
Variable
and it has not consistently demonstrated a large advantage over:
Placebo or standard rehabilitation.
Low-Level Laser Therapy
Low-level laser treatment has also been investigated, but evidence for a substantial clinically important benefit remains:
Limited.
Biologic Therapy
Autologous blood and:
Platelet-rich plasma
have been proposed to stimulate tendon healing by increasing local:
Growth factors.
PRP
PRP has shown benefit in some studies, particularly for:
Chronic symptoms.
However, results are inconsistent, and it has not consistently demonstrated superiority over:
Structured exercise-based treatment.
Nonoperative Success
Most patients improve without surgery.
Historical series report successful nonoperative treatment in approximately:
90–95% of patients.
Surgery
Surgery is rarely required.
Indications
Operative treatment may be considered after approximately:
6–12 months
of persistent symptoms despite appropriate:
Nonoperative management.
Surgical Principle
Traditional surgery involves removal of:
Degenerated ECRB tissue
from the:
Lateral epicondyle.
Open Débridement
Open surgery may include:
Débridement of the diseased ECRB origin
with repair or reattachment of:
Healthy tendon.
Radial Tunnel Release
If clinically significant coexisting:
Radial tunnel syndrome
is present, decompression may be considered during the same:
Procedure.
Arthroscopic Treatment
Arthroscopic treatment allows:
Débridement of the ECRB origin
while simultaneously evaluating:
Intra-articular pathology.
Open Versus Arthroscopic Surgery
Both open and arthroscopic procedures can provide:
Good outcomes.
Arthroscopy may allow somewhat faster:
Early recovery
in selected patients.
Follow-Up After Surgery
Postoperative rehabilitation is:
Progressive.
Early Period
A splint may be removed at approximately:
1 week
depending on the:
Procedure and wound.
Range of Motion
Gentle:
Elbow
and
Wrist range-of-motion exercises
are then initiated.
Strengthening
Once the wound has healed and motion is comfortable, progressive:
Strengthening
is added.
Activity
Pain-limited activities may be resumed as healing:
Progresses.
Full Activity
Return to unrestricted activity is often possible by approximately:
3 months
although timing varies according to:
Procedure
Occupation
and
Sport demands.
Prognosis
Lateral epicondylosis generally has a:
Good prognosis.
Chronic Course
Symptoms may fluctuate with periods of:
Exacerbation
and
Improvement.
Natural Resolution
Even without invasive treatment, many cases gradually improve because the disorder is often:
Self-limiting.
Nonoperative Outcome
Approximately:
90–95%
of patients can be managed successfully without:
Surgery.
Complications
Complications from conservative treatment are generally:
Uncommon.
Injection Complications
Potential complications of corticosteroid injection include:
Skin depigmentation
Subcutaneous fat atrophy
and
Tendon weakening or rupture.
Surgical Complications
Potential complications include:
Infection
Persistent pain
Recurrent tendon degeneration
Elbow stiffness
and reduced:
Range of motion.
Tendon Retear
The repaired or débrided extensor origin may rarely develop:
Recurrent tearing.
Patient Monitoring
Patients should be followed according to:
Symptoms
and response to:
Treatment.
Persistent Pain
If pain remains unexplained or persistent after several months, reassessment should consider:
Radial tunnel syndrome
Cervical radiculopathy
Arthritis
Loose body
or another:
Elbow diagnosis.
Repeat Imaging
Repeat radiographs or advanced imaging may be appropriate if symptoms remain persistent after approximately:
Several months
or if the clinical picture changes.
Key Principle
Tennis elbow is primarily a degenerative tendinopathy of the ECRB origin at the lateral epicondyle rather than a true inflammatory disorder.
Patients characteristically develop:
Lateral elbow pain with gripping and resisted wrist extension, while elbow range of motion is usually:
Normal.
Diagnosis is primarily:
Clinical, with imaging reserved for atypical, persistent, or diagnostically uncertain cases.
Most patients improve with:
Activity modification, ergonomic or technique correction, eccentric extensor strengthening, counterforce bracing, and time.
Injections may provide selective symptomatic relief, but repeated corticosteroid exposure should be used cautiously because of potential:
Tendon weakening.
Surgery is reserved for a small minority of patients with:
Persistent symptoms despite prolonged appropriate nonoperative treatment.
- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome
Basics
Tarsal tunnel syndrome is an entrapment neuropathy involving the:
Tibial nerve
or one of its distal branches as the nerve passes through the:
Tarsal tunnel.
The neuropathy may result from:
Compression
or
Traction.
Anatomy
The proximal tarsal tunnel is a:
Fibro-osseous canal
located along the posteromedial aspect of the:
Ankle.
It represents a distal continuation of the:
Deep posterior compartment of the leg.
Contents of the Tarsal Tunnel
From anterior to posterior, the tunnel contains the:
Posterior tibial tendon
Flexor digitorum longus tendon
Posterior tibial artery and vein
Tibial nerve
and
Flexor hallucis longus tendon.
Floor of the Tunnel
The floor is formed by:
The medial talus
The sustentaculum tali
and
The medial wall of the calcaneus.
Roof of the Tunnel
The roof is formed by the:
Flexor retinaculum.
This structure may begin as far as approximately:
10 cm proximal to the medial malleolus.
Fibro-Osseous Compartments
The tendons and neurovascular bundle travel in relatively constrained:
Fibro-osseous compartments
connected to the:
Flexor retinaculum.
Because the tunnel is not easily expandable, even a modest increase in local volume can produce:
Nerve compression.
Tibial Nerve Branches
Within or near the tarsal tunnel, the tibial nerve gives rise to:
Medial calcaneal nerve
Medial plantar nerve
and
Lateral plantar nerve.
The exact branching anatomy is:
Variable.
Medial Calcaneal Nerve
The:
Medial calcaneal nerve
arises directly from the tibial nerve in approximately:
69–90% of individuals.
It may also originate from the:
Lateral plantar nerve.
Number of Calcaneal Branches
A single medial calcaneal branch is present in approximately:
79%
although multiple branches may occur.
Sensory Distribution
The medial calcaneal nerve supplies sensation to the:
Medial heel.
Because it may branch proximal to the site of compression, heel sensation can occasionally be:
Preserved
despite tarsal tunnel syndrome.
Medial and Lateral Plantar Nerves
The tibial nerve terminates as the:
Medial plantar nerve
and
Lateral plantar nerve.
In approximately:
93–96%
of individuals, this bifurcation occurs within the:
Tarsal tunnel.
In the remainder, the division occurs more proximally in the:
Leg.
Medial Plantar Nerve
The medial plantar nerve provides sensation to:
The plantar medial foot
Great toe
Second toe
Third toe
and the:
Medial side of the fourth toe.
Medial Plantar Motor Supply
It provides motor innervation to:
Abductor hallucis
Flexor digitorum brevis
Flexor hallucis brevis
and the:
First lumbrical.
Lateral Plantar Nerve
The lateral plantar nerve supplies sensation to:
The lateral side of the fourth toe
and
The fifth toe.
Lateral Plantar Motor Supply
It provides motor innervation to:
Quadratus plantae
Abductor digiti minimi
Flexor digiti minimi brevis
The lateral three lumbricals
Adductor hallucis
and
The interossei.
Most Commonly Involved Branch
The:
Lateral plantar nerve
is frequently involved in tarsal tunnel syndrome.
Distal Tarsal Tunnel
Distally, the medial and lateral plantar nerves pass through separate:
Fibrous tunnels
deep to the:
Abductor hallucis muscle.
These sites can also become points of:
Entrapment.
Medial Plantar Nerve Entrapment
The medial plantar nerve can become compressed between the:
Navicular
and
Abductor hallucis
or near the:
Knot of Henry.
First Branch of the Lateral Plantar Nerve
The first branch of the lateral plantar nerve may be compressed within the fascia of:
Abductor hallucis
as it courses toward the:
Abductor digiti minimi.
This may produce:
Chronic heel pain.
Pregnancy Considerations
Tarsal tunnel symptoms may develop during:
Pregnancy
because of:
Fluid retention
and increased local:
Tissue volume.
Management is usually:
Supportive
because symptoms often improve after:
Delivery.
Epidemiology
Tarsal tunnel syndrome can occur over a wide:
Age range.
Historical series have reported affected patients between approximately:
14 and 80 years.
Sex
It appears to be slightly more common in:
Women
than in men.
One historical review reported approximately:
56% female patients.
Incidence
The true incidence is:
Unknown.
Risk Factors
No single risk factor has been conclusively established.
Several occupations and repetitive activities have nevertheless been associated with:
Tibial nerve traction or compression.
Jogger’s Foot
Excessive:
Hindfoot valgus
may place traction on the tibial nerve during repetitive:
Running.
This presentation has sometimes been termed:
Jogger’s foot.
Repetitive Squatting
Activities requiring repeated:
Squatting
or
Crouching
may increase pressure within the tarsal tunnel.
Historical examples include:
Race jockeys.
Pathophysiology
Tarsal tunnel syndrome develops when the tibial nerve or one of its branches is subjected to:
Compression
Traction
or both.
Restricted Tunnel Volume
Because the tarsal tunnel has relatively rigid boundaries, increases in local tissue volume may raise:
Intratunnel pressure.
Sensory Dysfunction
Sensory symptoms are thought to result partly from:
Nerve ischemia
and impaired:
Axonal conduction.
Motor Dysfunction
Late motor deficits may result from more prolonged:
Direct nerve compression
and axonal injury.
Chronic Traction
Repetitive traction can lead to:
Epineurial fibrosis
and decreased:
Nerve mobility.
This may make the nerve more susceptible to additional:
Compression or injury.
Etiology
A specific cause can be identified in approximately:
60–80% of patients.
Causes can broadly be grouped into:
Trauma
Space-occupying lesions
and
Foot or hindfoot deformity.
Common Causes
Historical series have reported approximate frequencies of:
Trauma – 17%
Varicosities – 13%
Hindfoot varus – 11%
Fibrosis – 9%
and
Hindfoot valgus – 8%.
Space-Occupying Lesions
Other causes include:
Ganglion cyst
Lipoma
Neurilemmoma
Inflammatory synovitis
Pigmented villonodular synovitis
Tarsal coalition
and
Accessory musculature.
Diagnosis
Tarsal tunnel syndrome is commonly:
Missed or misdiagnosed
because symptoms can be:
Variable
and
Poorly localized.
Signs and Symptoms
The typical presentation is an:
Insidious or intermittent onset
of neuropathic:
Pain
Burning
Paresthesia
or
Numbness.
Distribution of Symptoms
Symptoms depend on which branch of the tibial nerve is:
Affected.
They may involve the:
Plantar foot
Heel
or
Toes.
Valleix Phenomenon
Pain or paresthesia may radiate proximally up the:
Medial leg
along the course of the tibial nerve.
This is known as the:
Valleix phenomenon.
Historical series have reported it in approximately:
One-third of patients with severe compression.
Distal Radiation
Symptoms may also radiate distally along the distribution of the:
Medial or lateral plantar nerves.
Activity-Related Symptoms
Pain typically worsens with:
Prolonged standing
Walking
or
Activity.
Night Pain
Some patients report substantial:
Night pain.
Venous congestion or prolonged nerve irritation may contribute.
Factors That Relieve Symptoms
Symptoms may improve with:
Rest
Loose footwear
and
Elevation.
Physical Examination
A complete examination of the:
Foot and ankle
should be performed.
Foot Alignment
Assess the patient for:
Hindfoot valgus
or
Hindfoot varus.
Alignment abnormalities may increase:
Traction
or
Compression
on the tibial nerve.
Provocative Positioning
Forced:
Dorsiflexion
Inversion
or
Eversion
may reproduce symptoms by stretching or narrowing the:
Tarsal tunnel.
Palpation
Palpate the tarsal tunnel and the course of the tibial nerve for:
Tenderness
Swelling
or evidence of a:
Mass.
Tinel Sign
Percussion over the:
Tibial nerve
may reproduce distal:
Paresthesia.
A positive Tinel sign supports a diagnosis of:
Tibial nerve irritation.
Cuff Test
A pneumatic cuff may be used to produce temporary:
Venous congestion.
Engorgement of varicosities can reproduce symptoms when venous structures are contributing to:
Compression.
This test is used infrequently in modern practice.
Compression Test
Direct pressure over the:
Tarsal tunnel
for approximately:
60 seconds
may reproduce the patient’s:
Neuropathic symptoms.
Sensory Examination
Examine sensation over the territories of the:
Medial calcaneal
Medial plantar
and
Lateral plantar nerves.
Heel Sensation
The medial calcaneal nerve is often:
Spared
because it may branch proximal to the site of:
Compression.
Two-Point Discrimination
Reduced:
Two-point discrimination
may be an early finding of:
Sensory dysfunction.
Motor Examination
Motor deficits are usually:
Late findings.
Intrinsic Weakness
Weakness of the intrinsic muscles can be difficult to:
Detect clinically.
Toe Plantarflexion
Rarely, weakness of:
Toe plantarflexion
may be evident.
Muscle Atrophy
Late disease may produce atrophy of:
Abductor hallucis
or
Abductor digiti minimi.
Laboratory Tests
Routine laboratory tests do not diagnose:
Tarsal tunnel syndrome.
They may help identify systemic causes of:
Peripheral neuropathy.
Diabetes and Systemic Disease
Testing may be appropriate when evaluating for:
Diabetes mellitus
Vitamin deficiency
Thyroid disease
or other systemic:
Neuropathies.
Imaging
Weight-Bearing Radiographs
Routine weight-bearing foot and ankle radiographs help assess:
Alignment
Bony deformity
Exostosis
and
Tarsal coalition.
MRI
MRI is useful when evaluating for:
Space-occupying lesions
or other structural causes of:
Nerve compression.
MRI Findings
MRI can identify:
Ganglion cysts
Tumors
Varicosities
Accessory muscles
and inflammatory:
Soft-tissue abnormalities.
Diagnostic Yield
One historical study identified a potential causative abnormality on MRI in approximately:
88% of symptomatic feet.
Pediatric Considerations
In children, MRI is especially valuable because nerve compression may occasionally result from:
Neoplastic or other mass lesions.
Electrodiagnostic Studies
Electrodiagnostic testing may help evaluate:
Tibial nerve dysfunction
and identify more generalized:
Peripheral neuropathy.
Motor Latency
Isolated motor latency testing has relatively:
Low sensitivity.
Sensory Action Potentials
Sensory action potentials are among the more sensitive:
Electrodiagnostic measurements.
Historical data have reported sensitivity around:
90.5%
but with a modest:
False-positive rate.
Mixed Nerve Conduction Studies
Mixed motor-sensory conduction studies may demonstrate abnormalities with relatively good:
Specificity.
Historical series have reported abnormalities in approximately:
85.7% of cases.
Limitations of Electrodiagnostic Testing
Normal electrodiagnostic studies do not completely exclude:
Tarsal tunnel syndrome.
Findings must be interpreted together with:
History
Physical examination
and
Imaging.
Proximal Nerve Compression
Evaluation should also consider more proximal causes such as:
Lumbar radiculopathy
or a:
Double-crush phenomenon.
Pathological Findings
Surgical exploration may reveal:
Focal nerve swelling
Fibrosis
Scarring
or an identifiable:
Compressive lesion.
Differential Diagnosis
Important differential diagnoses include:
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy
Peripheral neuritis
Peripheral vascular disease
Morton neuroma
Metatarsalgia
Subtalar arthritis
Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction
Plantar fasciitis
Complex regional pain syndrome
Proximal tibial nerve or sciatic nerve compression
and
Lumbar radiculopathy.
Plantar Fasciitis
Plantar fasciitis usually produces:
Mechanical plantar heel pain
rather than burning or paresthetic:
Neuropathic symptoms.
Lumbar Radiculopathy
Lumbar nerve-root compression may mimic distal tibial nerve symptoms.
A complete neurologic examination should therefore include assessment for:
Proximal neurologic disease.
Treatment
Initial treatment is generally:
Nonoperative.
Exceptions include:
Acute severe nerve compression
or an identified:
Space-occupying lesion
that requires removal.
General Measures
Conservative treatment may include:
Activity modification
Rest
Temporary immobilization
Orthotics
Anti-inflammatory medication
Neuropathic pain medication
Physical therapy
Compression stockings
and
Weight reduction when appropriate.
Immobilization
A boot or brace may temporarily decrease:
Nerve irritation
by reducing repetitive:
Ankle and hindfoot motion.
Orthotics
Orthotic devices may help correct:
Hindfoot valgus
or other alignment abnormalities that increase:
Tibial nerve tension.
NSAIDs
NSAIDs may reduce:
Associated inflammatory pain
although they do not directly reverse:
Nerve compression.
Corticosteroid Injection
A carefully placed corticosteroid injection may sometimes reduce local:
Inflammation
or
Synovitis.
Injections should be performed cautiously because of the proximity of the:
Tibial nerve and vascular structures.
Neuropathic Pain Medication
Medications used for neuropathic symptoms may include selected:
Tricyclic antidepressants
or
Antiepileptic agents.
Nerve Blocks
Diagnostic or therapeutic:
Nerve blocks
may occasionally be used in selected patients.
Physical Therapy
Therapy may include:
Neural mobilization
Desensitization
Stretching
and correction of:
Biomechanical abnormalities.
Compression Stockings
When symptoms are related to:
Venous congestion
or
Varicosities
compression stockings may help reduce:
Local swelling.
Weight Management
Weight reduction may decrease repetitive:
Mechanical loading
and pressure around the:
Tarsal tunnel.
Surgery
Surgical decompression may be considered when:
Conservative treatment fails
or when a clear structural cause is identified.
Indications for Surgery
Typical indications include:
Persistent symptoms after approximately 3–6 months of nonoperative treatment
Acute tarsal tunnel syndrome
or
Space-occupying lesion.
Surgical Approach
A curved:
Posteromedial incision
is made along the course of the:
Tibial nerve.
Flexor Retinaculum Release
The entire:
Flexor retinaculum
should be released to decompress the proximal:
Tarsal tunnel.
Distal Decompression
The:
Medial plantar
and
Lateral plantar nerves
should also be released distally as they pass beneath the:
Abductor hallucis.
Space-Occupying Lesions
Any responsible lesion such as a:
Ganglion
Tumor
or other mass should be:
Excised or treated.
Associated Pathology
Underlying abnormalities such as:
Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction
or
Tarsal coalition
may also require treatment.
Scar Prevention
Surgical dissection should be minimized when possible because excessive tissue disruption may increase:
Postoperative scar formation
around the:
Nerve.
Follow-Up
Postoperative care usually begins with:
Protected non-weight-bearing.
Initial Immobilization
A splint is maintained until the incision heals, generally for approximately:
2–3 weeks.
Weight-Bearing Progression
After wound healing, patients gradually begin:
Weight bearing
and
Range-of-motion exercises.
Swelling Control
Elevation, compression, and other swelling-control measures may help reduce postoperative:
Edema.
Prognosis
Outcomes are generally more favorable when:
The patient is younger
Symptoms have been present for a shorter duration
and a specific:
Compressive lesion
can be identified.
Timing of Surgery
Results tend to be better when decompression is performed before development of:
Motor weakness
or
Muscle atrophy.
Surgical Outcomes
Historical reviews have reported improvement or resolution of symptoms in approximately:
90% of selected patients.
However, longer-term studies using stricter outcome criteria have reported:
Less predictable results
and deterioration of benefit in some:
Patients.
Complications
The principal adverse outcome is:
Persistent or recurrent symptoms after decompression.
Failed Tarsal Tunnel Release
Important causes of failed surgery include:
Incorrect initial diagnosis
Incomplete surgical release
Adhesive neuritis
Intraneural damage
and
Untreated proximal or additional nerve compression.
Incorrect Diagnosis
Symptoms may persist when the true problem is:
Lumbar radiculopathy
Peripheral neuropathy
or another:
Foot disorder.
Incomplete Release
Failure to release the full length of the:
Flexor retinaculum
or distal plantar nerve tunnels may leave residual:
Compression.
Adhesive Neuritis
Postoperative scar formation around the nerve may produce:
Adhesive neuritis
with recurrent:
Pain and paresthesia.
Intraneural Damage
Chronic systemic neuropathy or direct nerve injury may produce irreversible:
Intraneural damage.
Double-Crush Phenomenon
Symptoms may persist if both:
Distal tibial nerve compression
and a more proximal lesion such as:
Lumbar radiculopathy
are present.
Evaluation After Failed Release
The surgical scar and extent of the previous incision should be examined carefully because an incision that is too short may suggest:
Incomplete decompression.
Electrodiagnostic Testing After Failed Surgery
Electrodiagnostic studies are generally less useful for determining the cause of:
Failed tarsal tunnel release.
Revision Surgery
Revision decompression may be considered in selected patients with:
Incomplete release
or
Adhesive neuritis.
Barrier Procedures
In cases of extensive scar formation, the nerve may be wrapped with:
Vein
or
Synthetic biologic material
to reduce recurrent:
Adhesion formation.
Revision Prognosis
Outcomes after:
Revision surgery
are generally less favorable than after successful:
Primary decompression.
Patient Monitoring
Patients should be followed for changes in:
Pain
Paresthesia
Sensation
Intrinsic muscle strength
and
Functional walking tolerance.
Key Principle
Tarsal tunnel syndrome is an entrapment neuropathy of the tibial nerve or its distal branches within the fibro-osseous tunnel along the medial ankle.
Symptoms typically include:
Burning pain, paresthesia, numbness, and activity-related plantar foot discomfort, sometimes with a positive:
Tinel sign.
Evaluation should identify potential causes such as:
Trauma, varicosities, hindfoot deformity, fibrosis, ganglion cyst, tumor, tarsal coalition, or accessory muscle.
Initial treatment is usually:
Nonoperative, using activity modification, orthotics, medication, physical therapy, and treatment of contributing deformity or swelling.
Surgical decompression is considered for:
Persistent symptoms, acute compression, or a defined space-occupying lesion, and should include release of the:
Flexor retinaculum and distal medial and lateral plantar nerve tunnels.
- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Talus Fracture
Basics
The talus is a critical bone of the:
Hindfoot
that transmits body weight from the tibia to the:
Foot.
It articulates with the:
Tibia
Fibula
Calcaneus
and
Navicular.
Functional Importance
The talus plays an essential role in:
Ankle motion
Subtalar motion
and distribution of:
Weight-bearing forces.
Because of its importance to both the ankle and hindfoot, even relatively small abnormalities in talar alignment may substantially affect:
Foot function.
Articular Cartilage
Approximately:
60% of the talar surface
is covered with:
Articular cartilage.
This leaves relatively little surface area available for entry of:
Blood vessels.
Blood Supply
The talar blood supply enters through a limited number of:
Soft-tissue attachments
particularly around the:
Talar neck.
As a result, displaced fractures can interrupt vascular inflow and predispose the talus to:
Osteonecrosis.
Clinical Importance
Talus fractures can be difficult to:
Diagnose
and may have serious complications even when treated appropriately.
A high index of suspicion is important because delayed diagnosis can increase the risk of:
Malunion
Arthritis
and
Osteonecrosis.
Anatomical Types
Fractures may involve the:
Talar neck
Talar body
Posterior process
or
Lateral process.
Osteochondral injuries of the talar dome represent another important group of:
Talar injuries.
Talar Neck Classification
Talar neck fractures are commonly classified using the:
Modified Hawkins classification.
Hawkins Type I
Type I is a:
Nondisplaced talar neck fracture
with preserved alignment of the:
Subtalar
and
Tibiotalar joints.
Hawkins Type II
Type II consists of a displaced talar neck fracture with:
Subluxation or dislocation of the subtalar joint
while the:
Tibiotalar joint remains reduced.
Hawkins Type III
Type III involves a displaced talar neck fracture with dislocation of both the:
Subtalar joint
and
Tibiotalar joint.
This pattern carries a substantially greater risk of:
Osteonecrosis.
Hawkins Type IV
Type IV represents the most severe pattern, with displacement involving the talus and disruption of additional:
Peritalar articulations, classically including the talonavicular joint.
Severe cases may approach:
Talar extrusion.
Talar Body Fractures
Talar body fractures may be described according to the orientation of the:
Fracture plane.
Type I Talar Body Fracture
Type I fractures are primarily:
Coronal
or
Sagittal.
Type II Talar Body Fracture
Type II fractures are primarily:
Horizontal.
Talar Process Fractures
Process fractures include:
Posterior process fractures
and
Lateral process fractures.
Pediatric Considerations
Children have a relatively greater:
Cartilage-to-bone ratio
than adults.
The pediatric talus is therefore somewhat more capable of:
Deformation
before developing a complete:
Fracture.
Epidemiology
Talus fractures are:
Uncommon.
There is no strong universal association with:
Age
or
Sex.
Incidence
Talus fractures account for approximately:
3% of foot fractures.
About:
Half
involve the:
Talar neck.
Talar Body Fractures
Talar body fractures are less common.
Historical reports have estimated that they account for approximately:
7–38% of tarsal fractures
depending on the definition and study population.
Risk Factors
Important mechanisms and activities associated with talus fracture include:
Motor vehicle collisions
Falls from height
and
Snowboarding.
Pathophysiology
The fracture pattern depends on the:
Direction and magnitude of force.
Talar Neck Mechanism
Talar neck fractures commonly occur when the foot is forced into:
Extreme dorsiflexion.
The talar neck becomes impacted against the:
Anterior distal tibia
and may fracture.
Lateral Process Fracture
Lateral process fractures are particularly associated with:
Snowboarding.
A common mechanism is:
External rotation
applied to a:
Dorsiflexed foot
inside a rigid:
Boot.
Talar Body Fracture
Talar body fractures typically result from:
Axial compression
of the talus between the:
Tibia
and
Calcaneus.
Etiology
Most major talus fractures result from:
High-energy trauma.
The classic mechanism includes forceful:
Dorsiflexion of the forefoot and ankle
often combined with:
Axial loading.
Associated Conditions
Talar neck fractures may occur with:
Medial malleolus fractures
and other injuries involving the:
Ankle
Calcaneus
or
Midfoot.
High-Energy Trauma
Because many talar fractures follow high-energy mechanisms, the patient should also be evaluated for additional:
Lower-extremity
Pelvic
Spinal
or systemic:
Traumatic injuries.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis requires:
Careful examination
and appropriate:
Imaging.
Some talar fractures, particularly small process fractures, are easily:
Missed.
Signs and Symptoms
Typical symptoms include:
Severe ankle or hindfoot pain
after substantial:
Trauma.
Swelling
Marked:
Swelling
may develop around the:
Ankle and hindfoot.
Ecchymosis
Bruising may occur over the:
Ankle
Hindfoot
or
Midfoot.
Deformity
Displaced fractures may produce visible:
Deformity
or abnormal prominence of:
Talar fragments.
History
Common injury mechanisms include:
Motor vehicle collision
and
Fall from height.
Aviator’s Astragalus
Historically, talar neck fractures were associated with pilots who sustained violent dorsiflexion injuries while bracing their feet against:
Aircraft rudder pedals.
This led to the historic term:
Aviator’s astragalus.
Physical Examination
Examine the:
Ankle
and
Hindfoot
carefully.
Tenderness
Assess for:
Focal talar tenderness
including around the:
Talar neck
Lateral process
and
Posterior process.
Deformity
Look for:
Abnormal contour
Skin tenting
or displacement suggesting:
Dislocation or fracture-dislocation.
Motion
Assess ankle and subtalar motion carefully when safe.
Pain with:
Ankle
or
Subtalar movement
may indicate significant:
Talar injury.
Skin Examination
Because there is very little protective soft tissue around portions of the talus, displaced fragments may threaten:
Skin viability.
Look for:
Tenting
Blanching
Open wounds
or impending:
Skin necrosis.
Neurovascular Examination
Document:
Sensation
Motor function
Pulses
and
Capillary refill.
Missed Process Fractures
Lateral and posterior process fractures are frequently mistaken for:
Ankle sprains.
Persistent focal pain after an apparently routine ankle injury should lower the threshold for:
CT imaging.
Imaging
Plain Radiographs
Initial imaging usually includes:
AP and lateral ankle radiographs
and appropriate:
Foot views.
Talar Neck View
A specialized oblique view of the talar neck may improve visualization.
This is commonly obtained with the foot in:
Plantarflexion
and approximately:
15° of pronation.
This is often referred to as the:
Canale view.
CT
CT is extremely useful for determining:
Fracture displacement
Comminution
Articular involvement
and presence of:
Associated fractures.
Role of CT
CT is particularly valuable for:
Talar neck
Talar body
and
Process fractures
that are incompletely defined on:
Plain radiographs.
MRI
MRI is not usually the first study for an acute displaced fracture.
It is more useful later when evaluating:
Osteonecrosis
or occult injury when radiographs and CT are:
Nondiagnostic.
Pathological Findings
Occasionally a talar fracture occurs through:
Abnormal bone.
Possible underlying lesions include:
Bone cysts
or
Bone tumors.
Differential Diagnosis
Important differential diagnoses include:
Ankle fracture
Ankle dislocation
Talar dislocation
Calcaneus fracture
and
Navicular fracture.
Treatment
Treatment depends on:
Fracture location
Displacement
Joint congruity
Soft-tissue condition
and
Vascular risk.
Initial Stabilization
Initial treatment includes:
Immobilization
Elevation
and
Cold therapy
for swelling and pain.
Urgent Reduction
A displaced talar fracture or fracture-dislocation with threatened skin should undergo:
Urgent reduction.
The immediate priority is restoration of:
Alignment
and relief of pressure on:
Skin and neurovascular structures.
Importance of Early Reduction
Prompt reduction decreases the risk of:
Skin necrosis
Soft-tissue compromise
and secondary:
Infection.
Nondisplaced Fractures
Selected nondisplaced fractures may be treated with:
Cast or boot immobilization
and strict:
Non-weight-bearing.
Historical Immobilization
Traditional treatment of nondisplaced talar neck fractures may involve below-knee immobilization for up to approximately:
12 weeks
with at least:
6 weeks of non-weight-bearing.
Duration should be individualized according to:
Radiographic healing.
Hawkins Type II
Type II talar neck fractures require:
Anatomic reduction.
Reduction may be achieved by:
Closed
or
Open methods.
Hawkins Type III
Type III injuries almost always require:
Operative reduction and fixation
because of substantial:
Displacement and instability.
Talar Body Fractures
Displaced talar body fractures usually require:
Operative fixation
to restore:
Articular congruity.
Osteonecrosis Risk
Talar body fractures have a particularly high risk of:
Posttraumatic osteonecrosis
and
Posttraumatic arthritis.
Irreducible Fracture
A displaced fracture that cannot be reduced closed requires:
Open reduction and internal fixation.
Soft-Tissue Risk
Displaced talar fragments may create severe pressure against the thin overlying:
Skin.
This can cause:
Skin necrosis
and subsequent:
Infection.
Process Fractures
Small minimally displaced process fractures may often be treated:
Nonoperatively.
Small Process Fracture
A talar process fracture measuring less than approximately:
1 cm
and displaced less than:
2 mm
may be treated with:
Non-weight-bearing immobilization
for approximately:
6 weeks.
Larger Process Fracture
Larger or more displaced fragments may require:
Open reduction and internal fixation
or, in selected small symptomatic fragments,
Excision.
Pediatric Treatment
Nondisplaced pediatric fractures may be treated with:
Immobilization
for approximately:
6–8 weeks.
Acceptable Pediatric Alignment
Because children have greater remodeling capacity, small residual deformity may be acceptable.
Historical thresholds include less than approximately:
5 mm of displacement
and
5° of angulation
after reduction.
Activity
Patients are generally kept:
Non-weight-bearing
for at least:
4–6 weeks
and often longer depending on:
Fracture severity and healing.
Physical Therapy
Range-of-motion exercises are typically started after adequate fracture:
Stability
and removal of:
Immobilization.
Rehabilitation Goals
Therapy focuses on restoring:
Ankle motion
Subtalar motion
Strength
and
Gait.
Medication
Acute pain may initially require:
Short-term opioid analgesia.
As symptoms improve, treatment can transition to:
Acetaminophen
or
NSAIDs
when medically appropriate.
Surgery
The principal surgical goal is:
Anatomic reduction of the articular surfaces
with stable:
Internal fixation.
Surgical Approaches
Talar neck fractures may be approached through:
Medial
and
Lateral incisions.
Dual-Incision Technique
Displaced fractures often benefit from:
Combined anteromedial and anterolateral approaches
because visualization from both sides improves:
Reduction accuracy.
Fluoroscopy
Reduction and implant placement are confirmed with:
Intraoperative fluoroscopy.
Screw Fixation
Cannulated screws may be placed in:
Antegrade
or
Retrograde orientation
depending on fracture geometry.
Plate Fixation
Comminuted talar neck fractures may not provide adequate purchase for screws alone.
In these cases:
Low-profile plate fixation
may help maintain:
Length
Alignment
and
Rotation.
Talar Body Exposure
Talar body fractures can be more difficult to expose because of the surrounding:
Articular surfaces
and
Malleoli.
Medial Malleolar Osteotomy
A:
Medial malleolar osteotomy
may be required to obtain adequate visualization of selected:
Talar body fractures.
Articular Screw Placement
When screws pass through an articular surface, the heads should be:
Countersunk
to avoid damage to opposing:
Cartilage.
Process Fracture Fixation
Large or displaced process fractures may be stabilized using:
Small screws
or
Kirschner wires.
Compartment Syndrome
Severe hindfoot injuries may be associated with:
Foot compartment syndrome.
Monitoring for Compartment Syndrome
Watch for:
Progressive pain
Tense swelling
Pain with passive toe motion
and neurologic:
Changes.
Pressure Measurement
If the diagnosis remains uncertain, intracompartmental pressures may be:
Measured.
Fasciotomy
Confirmed compartment syndrome requires urgent:
Fasciotomy.
Postoperative Immobilization
After fixation, the extremity is placed in a:
Well-padded splint
until swelling decreases.
It may then be converted to a:
Below-knee cast or boot.
Weight Bearing After Surgery
Weight bearing is generally restricted until there is sufficient:
Fracture healing
and stability.
The duration varies according to:
Fracture pattern
Fixation
and evidence of:
Osteonecrosis.
Follow-Up
Long-term radiographic follow-up is important.
Duration
Nondisplaced fractures may be followed radiographically for at least:
18–24 months.
Displaced fractures and fractures complicated by:
Osteonecrosis
may require even longer:
Surveillance.
Prognosis
Outcome is strongly related to the:
Severity of the original injury.
Even with accurate reduction and fixation, severe initial disruption can lead to:
Osteonecrosis
and
Arthritis.
Talar Body Prognosis
Talar body fractures generally have a:
Less favorable prognosis
because of extensive:
Articular injury
and
Vascular disruption.
Historical Outcomes
Some historical series report that as many as:
88%
of patients with talar body fractures developed:
Osteonecrosis
Posttraumatic arthritis
or both.
Complications
Major complications include:
Foot compartment syndrome
Osteonecrosis
Skin necrosis
Infection
Delayed union
Nonunion
Malunion
and
Posttraumatic arthritis.
Osteonecrosis
Osteonecrosis is one of the most feared complications because the talus has a relatively:
Tenuous vascular supply.
Risk increases with:
Fracture displacement
Dislocation
and greater:
Soft-tissue disruption.
Delayed Union
Delayed healing is relatively common because of the limited:
Blood supply
and high proportion of:
Articular cartilage.
Nonunion
Nonunion may cause:
Persistent pain
and chronic:
Disability.
Treatment may require:
Revision fixation
Bone grafting
or
Fusion.
Malunion
Malunion alters normal:
Hindfoot mechanics
and redistributes force across the:
Ankle and subtalar joints.
This may result in:
Chronic pain
and progressive:
Arthritis.
Posttraumatic Arthritis
Arthritis may develop in the:
Tibiotalar
Subtalar
or
Talonavicular joints.
It may occur with or without:
Osteonecrosis.
Salvage Procedures
Severe symptomatic arthritis or talar collapse may ultimately require:
Subtalar fusion
Tibiotalar fusion
or
Pantalar fusion.
Patient Monitoring
Follow-up should assess:
Fracture union
Alignment
Joint congruity
and evidence of:
Talar vascularity.
Hawkins Sign
The:
Hawkins sign
is a subchondral radiolucent band that may appear in the:
Talar dome
during follow-up.
Meaning of Hawkins Sign
It represents:
Subchondral bone resorption
and therefore indicates that at least some:
Talar blood supply is preserved.
Clinical Significance
The presence of a Hawkins sign is reassuring and makes:
Osteonecrosis less likely.
Its absence, however, does not by itself prove:
Osteonecrosis.
MRI for Osteonecrosis
MRI can help confirm or further assess suspected:
Talar osteonecrosis
when radiographic findings are:
Uncertain.
Key Principle
Talus fractures are uncommon but potentially severe hindfoot injuries because much of the talus is covered by articular cartilage and its vascular supply is relatively vulnerable.
Fractures may involve the:
Neck, body, lateral process, or posterior process, with talar neck injuries commonly classified by the:
Modified Hawkins system.
Displaced fractures require:
Urgent reduction to protect the skin, soft tissues, joints, and remaining vascular supply, followed by stable fixation when indicated.
CT is particularly valuable for defining:
Displacement, comminution, and articular involvement.
The most important long-term complications are:
Osteonecrosis, posttraumatic arthritis, malunion, nonunion, and hindfoot stiffness.
Long-term radiographic surveillance is essential, with the:
Hawkins sign serving as a reassuring indicator of preserved talar vascularity when present.
- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Syndactyly
Basics
Syndactyly is a congenital condition characterized by:
Webbing or fusion of adjacent fingers or toes.
It is usually evident:
At birth.
Synonym
Another term is:
Webbed digits.
Classification
Syndactyly can be classified according to:
The tissues involved
and
The extent of fusion.
Simple Syndactyly
Simple syndactyly involves fusion of:
Skin and soft tissue only
without underlying:
Bony fusion.
Complex Syndactyly
Complex syndactyly includes abnormalities involving:
Bone
Joint
or other deeper structures.
The adjacent bones may be partially or completely:
Fused.
Complete Syndactyly
Complete syndactyly extends along essentially the:
Entire length of the involved digits
to the:
Fingertips.
Incomplete Syndactyly
Incomplete syndactyly involves only a:
Portion of the digit length
with separation present distally or proximally.
Fenestrated Syndactyly
Fenestrated syndactyly describes digits that are:
Separated proximally
but remain joined:
Distally.
Epidemiology
Syndactyly is one of the more common congenital:
Hand abnormalities.
Incidence
It occurs in approximately:
1 in 2,000 live births.
Bilateral Involvement
Approximately:
50% of cases
involve both:
Hands or feet.
Sex and Population
Historical studies have reported syndactyly more frequently in:
Males
and in:
White populations.
Risk Factors
The presence of other congenital abnormalities may increase the likelihood that syndactyly is part of a:
Recognizable syndrome.
Genetics
Most cases are:
Sporadic.
Approximately:
10–40%
have been reported to show a:
Familial pattern.
Sporadic Cases
Historical series suggest that up to approximately:
80%
of cases occur without an obvious:
Family history.
Inheritance
Familial syndactyly can demonstrate:
Autosomal dominant inheritance
in some families, although inheritance depends on the specific:
Syndrome or genetic subtype.
Etiology
Syndactyly results from failure of normal:
Separation of adjacent digits
during embryologic development.
Embryology
Finger and toe separation normally occurs during approximately the:
Sixth to eighth weeks of gestation.
Failure of programmed tissue separation during this period produces:
Persistent webbing.
Cause
In most isolated cases, the precise cause is:
Unknown.
Isolated Versus Syndromic Disease
Syndactyly may occur:
As an isolated congenital abnormality
or as part of a:
Genetic or congenital syndrome.
Most cases are:
Isolated.
Associated Conditions
Conditions associated with syndactyly include:
Apert syndrome
Poland syndrome
Congenital constriction band syndrome
and selected other:
Genetic disorders.
Apert Syndrome
Apert syndrome is characterized by:
Craniosynostosis
and severe:
Complex syndactyly
of the hands and feet.
It has historically been termed:
Acrocephalosyndactyly.
Poland Syndrome
Poland syndrome may include:
Absence or hypoplasia of the pectoralis major muscle
with ipsilateral:
Upper-extremity abnormalities
including:
Syndactyly or brachydactyly.
Congenital Constriction Band Syndrome
Amniotic or congenital constriction bands may produce:
Syndactyly
Distal swelling
Digital deformity
or even:
Amputation.
Neurofibromatosis
Some historical reports describe a slightly increased occurrence of syndactyly with:
Neurofibromatosis
although this is not among its major defining features.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is usually made by:
Physical examination at birth.
Imaging helps determine whether the condition is:
Simple or complex.
Signs and Symptoms
Syndactyly itself is generally:
Painless.
Functional limitation depends on:
Which digits are involved
and the degree of:
Soft-tissue or bony fusion.
Physical Examination
The examination should assess:
Extent of webbing
Digit length
Joint motion
Independent movement
Nail development
and associated:
Congenital abnormalities.
Joint Motion
Evaluate both:
Active
and
Passive range of motion
at each joint of the involved digits.
Independent Digital Movement
Ask the patient, when developmentally able, to move the two involved digits:
Separately.
Independent motion suggests that major:
Bony fusion
or extensive tendon interconnection is less likely.
Skin Availability
The amount of available skin between the digits is important for planning:
Surgical reconstruction.
A deficiency of local skin may increase the need for:
Skin grafting.
Nail Examination
Inspect the nails for:
Separate nail plates
or
Nail fusion.
Joined nails may suggest more extensive:
Distal skeletal involvement.
Rotational and Angular Deformity
The surgeon should assess for:
Rotation
Angular deformity
and unequal:
Digit length.
These findings may complicate:
Reconstruction.
Imaging
Plain Radiographs
Radiographs are useful for distinguishing:
Simple syndactyly
from
Complex syndactyly.
Radiographic Findings
Imaging can identify:
Bony fusion
Abnormal phalanges
Joint abnormalities
and differences in:
Digit length or alignment.
Vascular Imaging
In difficult complex cases, evaluation of the:
Digital vascular anatomy
may occasionally be required.
MRA or Angiography
MR angiography or conventional angiography may help define:
Neurovascular branching patterns
when standard anatomy is uncertain.
Distal Vascular Bifurcation
If the shared digital artery divides:
Very distally
separation may threaten the blood supply to one of the:
Digits.
This can limit how completely the digits can be:
Separated.
Pathological Findings
Syndactyly may be associated with:
Insufficient skin
between the involved digits.
Fascial Abnormalities
There may be abnormal connections between:
Fascial planes.
Tendon Interconnections
The:
Flexor
and
Extensor tendons
may have abnormal cross-connections between:
Adjacent digits.
Bone and Joint Abnormalities
Complex cases may demonstrate:
Fused phalanges
Abnormal joints
Delta phalanx
or other congenital:
Skeletal abnormalities.
Differential Diagnosis
The major diagnostic distinction is between:
Simple
and
Complex syndactyly.
Other congenital conditions that may resemble or accompany digital fusion include:
Constriction band syndrome
Symbrachydactyly
and syndromic:
Hand malformations.
Treatment
Treatment depends on:
Digits involved
Severity
Functional limitation
Growth asymmetry
and whether the syndactyly is:
Simple or complex.
General Measures
Not every syndactyly requires:
Surgery.
Mild Webbing
Minor incomplete webbing that causes little functional or cosmetic concern may be managed with:
Observation.
Goals of Release
Surgical separation may improve:
Finger independence
Grasp
Pinch
Digit growth
and
Cosmetic appearance.
Border Digits
Syndactyly involving digits of substantially different lengths can lead to:
Growth tethering
and secondary:
Angular deformity.
This is particularly important for:
Thumb-index
and
Ring-small finger syndactyly.
Timing of Surgery
Timing depends on which digits are involved and the complexity of:
The deformity.
Border-Digit Syndactyly
For border digits, release is often performed after approximately:
6 months of age
because unequal digit lengths may produce progressive:
Growth distortion.
Central-Digit Syndactyly
For central digits, surgery is commonly delayed until approximately:
12 months of age
or later when there is less urgency related to:
Growth imbalance.
Complex Cases
Complex syndactyly may require earlier or staged treatment depending on:
Bone fusion
Nail abnormalities
Digit length discrepancy
and
Vascular anatomy.
Physical Therapy
Formal therapy is usually:
Not required before surgery.
Postoperative Therapy
Hand therapy may be useful for:
Scar management
Web-space splinting
and
Range-of-motion exercises.
Surgery
The operative technique depends on:
Extent of webbing
Skin availability
Bony involvement
and
Vascular anatomy.
Web-Space Reconstruction
A properly shaped commissure or web space must be created to reproduce the normal:
Interdigital cleft.
Dorsal Flap
For simple syndactyly, a broad:
Dorsal commissural flap
is commonly used.
The flap is designed with a wider:
Proximal base
to preserve:
Blood supply.
Zigzag Incisions
Interdigitating:
Z-plasty or zigzag skin incisions
are frequently used along the digits.
These reduce the risk of:
Linear scar contracture.
Skin Grafting
After separation, there is often insufficient local skin to cover both digits completely.
Therefore:
Full-thickness skin grafting
may be necessary.
Graft Donor Sites
Potential donor sites include:
Groin
Wrist crease
or other areas providing suitable:
Full-thickness skin.
Graft-Free Techniques
Some modern techniques use local flaps designed to minimize or eliminate the need for:
Skin grafts
in selected simple cases.
Complex Syndactyly
When bones are fused, surgical treatment may require:
Bony separation
in addition to:
Soft-tissue reconstruction.
Tendon and Ligament Reconstruction
Abnormal:
Tendon
Ligament
or
Joint structures
may also need to be:
Reconstructed.
Neurovascular Considerations
Each separated digit must retain an adequate:
Digital artery
and intact:
Digital nerve supply.
Staged Release
When three adjacent digits are joined, separation is often performed in:
Stages.
This helps preserve at least one intact:
Neurovascular bundle
on each side of a digit during healing.
Postoperative Dressing
Postoperative dressing is a critical part of:
Treatment.
Immobilization
The hand and arm may be immobilized in a:
Bulky protective dressing
with or without an:
Above-elbow cast.
Duration of Dressing
The initial protective dressing is commonly maintained for approximately:
2–3 weeks
depending on:
Wound healing
and surgeon preference.
Follow-Up
Patients require follow-up to assess:
Wound healing
Skin graft survival
Digit perfusion
and
Web-space shape.
Long-Term Follow-Up
As the child grows, monitoring should continue for:
Scar contracture
Web creep
Angular deformity
and recurrent:
Syndactyly appearance.
Prognosis
The prognosis after appropriate treatment is generally:
Good.
Cosmetic Outcome
Minor differences in:
Finger width
Nail shape
Skin appearance
or
Web depth
may remain after reconstruction.
Functional Outcome
Most children achieve useful:
Independent finger motion
and improved:
Hand function.
Complications
Potential complications include:
Stiffness
Wound dehiscence
Scar contracture
Partial web recurrence
and rare:
Vascular compromise.
Web Creep
One of the more common long-term complications is:
Web creep.
This refers to gradual distal migration of the reconstructed:
Web space
as the child grows.
Scar Contracture
Linear or hypertrophic scars can produce:
Contracture
and restrict:
Finger motion.
Wound Dehiscence
Separation of the surgical wound can occur, particularly when:
Skin tension
is excessive.
Digital Stiffness
Complex reconstruction may occasionally result in loss of:
Joint motion.
Circulatory Compromise
Damage to shared digital vessels can cause:
Ischemia
and in severe cases:
Loss of the digit.
This complication is:
Rare.
Prevention of Vascular Injury
Risk can be reduced by carefully preserving at least one:
Collateral digital vascular supply
and avoiding simultaneous release on both sides of a digit when this would endanger:
Perfusion.
Patient Monitoring
Children should be monitored throughout growth for:
Web creep
Scar contracture
Joint stiffness
Digit angulation
and evolving:
Functional limitation.
Key Principle
Syndactyly is a congenital failure of separation of adjacent digits during approximately the sixth to eighth weeks of embryonic development.
It may be:
Simple or complex
and
Complete or incomplete.
Most cases are isolated, although syndactyly may occur with conditions such as:
Apert syndrome, Poland syndrome, or congenital constriction band syndrome.
Surgical release is performed when the deformity affects:
Function, growth, or appearance, with earlier treatment often preferred for border digits because unequal digit lengths may cause progressive:
Angular deformity.
Successful reconstruction requires careful management of:
Skin coverage, neurovascular anatomy, web-space formation, and postoperative scar control.
- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Swan Neck Deformity
Basics
Swan neck deformity is a characteristic digital deformity consisting of:
Hyperextension of the proximal interphalangeal joint
combined with:
Flexion of the distal interphalangeal joint.
There may also be compensatory:
Flexion at the metacarpophalangeal joint.
Characteristic Posture
The classic deformity therefore consists of:
MCP flexion
PIP hyperextension
and
DIP flexion.
Not every patient demonstrates abnormalities at all three joints.
Mechanism
The deformity develops when the balance between:
Flexion
and
Extension forces
across the finger becomes abnormal.
The essential biomechanical feature is excessive:
Extension force across the PIP joint
relative to available:
Flexion restraint.
Traumatic Causes
Traumatic causes include:
Mallet finger
Flexor digitorum superficialis laceration
and injuries involving the:
Extensor mechanism around the PIP joint.
Other Causes
Swan neck deformity may also result from:
Intrinsic muscle contracture
Volar plate laxity
or
Volar subluxation of the MCP joint.
These mechanisms are particularly important in:
Rheumatoid arthritis.
Epidemiology
Swan neck deformity can occur after:
Trauma
or as part of chronic:
Inflammatory joint disease.
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the deformity is reported more commonly in:
Women
than in men.
This partly reflects the greater overall prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in:
Women.
Incidence
Rheumatoid arthritis affects approximately:
0.5–1% of the general population.
Among patients with established rheumatoid arthritis, swan neck deformity may eventually develop in a substantial proportion.
Historical series have reported occurrence in up to:
Approximately half of patients
during the course of longstanding disease.
Short-Term Incidence
Some studies have reported an incidence of approximately:
8% over 2 years
among patients with rheumatoid disease.
Risk Factors
Important risk factors include:
Rheumatoid arthritis
Mallet finger
Digital laceration
Intrinsic muscle tightness
Neurologic spasticity
and
Volar plate laxity.
Sports Injury
Sports participation may predispose to:
Mallet finger
through closed avulsion injury of the:
Distal extensor tendon.
A chronic untreated mallet finger can subsequently lead to:
Swan neck deformity.
Digital Laceration
Dorsal or volar lacerations may disrupt:
Extensor
or
Flexor structures
and alter normal force balance across the:
PIP joint.
Neurologic Disorders
Intrinsic muscle tightness may occur with:
Traumatic brain injury
Stroke
or other conditions producing:
Spasticity.
This can contribute to excessive:
PIP extension.
Rheumatoid Disease
Rheumatoid arthritis may create multiple contributing abnormalities, including:
Intrinsic muscle contracture
Volar plate attenuation
MCP subluxation
and progressive destruction of:
Joint stabilizers.
Etiology
The deformity develops when the net forces acting across the:
PIP joint
favor excessive:
Extension.
This is accompanied by secondary alteration in the:
Distal extensor mechanism
producing:
DIP flexion.
Mallet Finger Mechanism
In chronic mallet finger, loss of terminal extensor function at the:
DIP joint
allows the extensor mechanism to redistribute proximally.
This can increase extension force across the:
PIP joint
and eventually produce:
Swan neck posture.
FDS Injury
Injury or loss of function of the:
Flexor digitorum superficialis
removes an important flexion restraint at the:
PIP joint.
This predisposes the joint to:
Hyperextension.
Volar Plate Laxity
The:
Volar plate
normally resists excessive PIP:
Hyperextension.
Attenuation or laxity permits the PIP joint to move beyond its normal:
Extension limit.
Intrinsic Tightness
Tight intrinsic muscles can increase:
PIP extension
and alter the balance of:
Digital tendon forces.
Associated Conditions
The principal associated systemic disorder is:
Rheumatoid arthritis.
Other associated conditions may include:
Neurologic spasticity
and chronic post-traumatic:
Tendon imbalance.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is usually made by:
Clinical examination.
The clinician should determine both:
The underlying cause
and whether the deformity remains:
Flexible or fixed.
Signs and Symptoms
The most obvious finding is:
PIP hyperextension
with
DIP flexion.
Functional Symptoms
Patients may report difficulty with:
Grasping objects
Making a fist
Pinch activities
or placing the hand into:
Pockets or gloves.
Pain
Pain may arise from:
Inflammatory arthritis
PIP joint degeneration
or associated:
Tendon pathology.
Some flexible deformities may produce relatively little:
Pain.
History
A detailed history should address:
Prior finger trauma
Mallet finger
Digital lacerations
and symptoms of:
Inflammatory arthritis.
Rheumatologic History
Ask about:
Joint swelling
Morning stiffness
Multiple-joint pain
and personal or family history of:
Rheumatoid arthritis or other inflammatory disease.
Physical Examination
Examine:
MCP
PIP
and
DIP joints
of the affected finger.
Both:
Active
and
Passive range of motion
should be documented.
Comparison Examination
The affected digit should be compared with:
Adjacent fingers
and the corresponding digit of the:
Contralateral hand.
Flexible Deformity
Early swan neck deformity may remain:
Passively correctable.
The patient may also retain nearly full:
Active motion.
Fixed Deformity
With chronic progression, the joints may develop:
Capsular contracture
Tendon shortening
and
Articular degeneration.
The deformity then becomes:
Stiff or fixed.
Finochietto–Bunnell Test
The:
Finochietto–Bunnell test
helps distinguish:
Intrinsic muscle tightness
from
PIP capsular restriction.
Test Technique
Passively flex the:
PIP joint
while comparing motion with the:
MCP joint extended
and then:
Flexed.
Capsular Restriction
If PIP flexion remains equally limited regardless of MCP position, the problem is more consistent with:
Capsular restriction.
Intrinsic Tightness
If PIP flexion improves when the MCP joint is:
Flexed
the limitation is more consistent with:
Intrinsic muscle tightness.
Joint Stability
The PIP joint should also be assessed for:
Volar plate laxity
and excessive:
Hyperextension.
Tendon Examination
Evaluate:
Terminal extensor function
at the DIP joint and function of the:
Flexor digitorum superficialis.
This helps identify the mechanical cause of the:
Deformity.
Imaging
Plain Radiographs
Standard radiographs should include:
PA
Lateral
and
Oblique views.
Radiographic Assessment
Imaging can identify:
Joint-space narrowing
Articular destruction
Subluxation
Fracture
and
Bony mallet injury.
Rheumatoid Disease
In rheumatoid arthritis, radiographs may demonstrate:
Erosions
Joint-space loss
MCP subluxation
and other features of:
Inflammatory arthropathy.
Differential Diagnosis
Important differential diagnoses include:
Boutonnière deformity
Mallet finger
PIP dislocation
and
Nonunion of proximal or middle phalanx fractures.
Boutonnière Deformity
Boutonnière deformity is essentially the opposite digital posture:
PIP flexion
with
DIP hyperextension.
This distinction is important because the underlying tendon imbalance and treatment are:
Different.
Mallet Finger
Mallet finger consists primarily of:
DIP flexion
due to loss of terminal extensor function.
A chronic mallet injury may progress to:
Swan neck deformity.
PIP Dislocation
Prior PIP dislocation may cause:
Volar plate injury
and chronic:
Hyperextension instability.
Treatment
Management depends on:
Cause
Flexibility of the deformity
Joint condition
Symptoms
and
Functional impairment.
General Measures
Flexible deformities can often be managed initially with:
Nonoperative treatment.
Ring Splints
A:
Double-ring splint
or other anti-hyperextension splint may prevent excessive:
PIP extension.
This can substantially improve:
Finger function.
Extension-Block Splint
An:
Extension-block splint
allows PIP flexion while preventing excessive:
Hyperextension.
DIP Splinting
Progressive splinting may also be used to address:
Persistent DIP flexion deformity
and improve:
Distal joint extension.
Hand Therapy
Hand therapy is useful for:
Passive stretching
Joint mobilization
Splint fabrication
and maintenance of:
Functional motion.
Flexible Versus Fixed Deformity
Nonoperative treatment is most effective when the deformity remains:
Flexible
and the articular surfaces are relatively:
Preserved.
Medication
Pain relief may include:
Acetaminophen
or
NSAIDs
when medically appropriate.
Acute Tendon Repair
If an acute extensor or flexor tendon injury requires repair, a:
Digital nerve block
or other suitable anesthesia may be used.
Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment
When the deformity is secondary to:
Rheumatoid arthritis
management of the systemic disease is essential.
DMARD Therapy
Treatment may require:
Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs
under the care of a:
Rheumatologist.
Other Rheumatoid Medications
Depending on disease severity, treatment may also include:
Glucocorticoids
NSAIDs
and other:
Analgesics.
Controlling the underlying inflammatory disease may slow progression of:
Joint destruction and deformity.
Surgery
Surgery is considered when there is:
Persistent functional limitation
Pain
Failure of splinting
or progressive:
Fixed deformity.
Flexible Deformity Surgery
When passive motion is preserved, surgery focuses on restoring:
Tendon balance
and preventing excessive:
PIP hyperextension.
Volar Plate Advancement
The volar plate may be:
Advanced or tightened
to improve restraint against:
PIP hyperextension.
Central Slip Tenotomy
Selected deformities may be treated with:
Central slip tenotomy
to reduce excessive extension force across the:
PIP joint.
Intrinsic Release
When intrinsic muscle tightness is the major cause, an:
Intrinsic release
may improve:
PIP flexion.
FDS Tenodesis
The:
Flexor digitorum superficialis
may be used as a:
Tenodesis
to limit excessive:
PIP extension.
Volar Skin Procedure
A:
Volar skin ellipse
at the PIP joint may occasionally be used to restrict:
Hyperextension.
Late-Stage Disease
In advanced disease, chronic deformity may be accompanied by:
Joint arthrosis
and loss of:
Passive correctability.
Arthrodesis
A severely painful or destroyed PIP joint may require:
Fusion
in a functional position.
Arthroplasty
Joint replacement may be considered in selected patients with:
Advanced arthritic destruction
where preservation of some:
Motion
is desirable.
Follow-Up
Patients should be reassessed for:
Progression of deformity
Splint effectiveness
Range of motion
and
Functional improvement.
Rheumatology Follow-Up
Patients with inflammatory arthritis require continued:
Rheumatologic management
to control the underlying:
Systemic disease.
Hand Surgeon Referral
Referral to a:
Hand surgeon
is appropriate when the deformity is:
Progressive
Functionally limiting
Painful
or likely to require:
Operative reconstruction.
Prognosis
Both nonoperative and surgical treatment can produce:
Meaningful deformity correction
and improved:
Hand function.
Recurrence
Recurrence is relatively common because the deformity often results from persistent underlying:
Tendon imbalance
Joint laxity
or
Inflammatory disease.
Flexible Deformities
Flexible deformities generally have a better prognosis with:
Splinting
and
Soft-tissue reconstruction.
Fixed Deformities
Chronic fixed deformities are more difficult to correct because of:
Capsular contracture
Tendon shortening
and
Arthrosis.
Complications
Incomplete Correction
The deformity may not be completely corrected by either:
Splinting
or
Surgery.
Recurrence
Even after successful treatment, excessive PIP extension may:
Recur.
PIP Stiffness
Overcorrection or postoperative scarring may result in:
PIP stiffness.
Loss of DIP Extension
Excessive alteration of extensor balance may produce:
Loss of DIP extension.
Surgical Imbalance
Because correction requires redistribution of complex tendon forces, excessive correction in one direction may produce a new:
Digital imbalance.
Patient Monitoring
Monitoring should include:
Active and passive MCP motion
PIP motion
DIP motion
Joint stability
and progression of:
Functional limitation.
Key Principle
Swan neck deformity is characterized by:
PIP hyperextension with DIP flexion, sometimes accompanied by MCP flexion.
It results from an imbalance in digital tendon forces, commonly associated with:
Rheumatoid arthritis, chronic mallet finger, FDS injury, volar plate laxity, or intrinsic muscle tightness.
The:
Finochietto–Bunnell test
helps distinguish intrinsic tightness from capsular restriction.
Flexible deformities are commonly treated with:
Ring splints, extension-block splints, stretching, and hand therapy.
When deformity is persistent or advanced, surgery may involve:
Volar plate advancement, central slip tenotomy, intrinsic release, FDS tenodesis, arthrodesis, or arthroplasty, depending on the:
Stage of disease and condition of the joint.