- Published on
Ophthalmology – Giant Cell Arteritis
Basics
Description
Giant cell arteritis (GCA), also called temporal arteritis, is a systemic inflammatory vasculitis involving predominantly medium- and large-sized arteries. Inflammation within the arterial wall causes intimal proliferation, progressive narrowing of the vascular lumen, and ultimately tissue ischemia.
GCA is one of the most important ophthalmic emergencies because it can produce sudden, severe, and usually irreversible visual loss. Once one eye is affected, the fellow eye is at substantial risk if treatment is not started immediately. Systemic glucocorticoid therapy therefore should not be delayed while awaiting confirmatory testing when clinical suspicion is high.
The most common ocular cause of visual loss is arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AAION). Other ocular ischemic manifestations include central or branch retinal artery occlusion, cilioretinal artery occlusion, posterior ischemic optic neuropathy, and ocular ischemic syndrome.
Epidemiology
GCA occurs almost exclusively in adults older than 50 years and becomes increasingly common with advancing age. Women are affected more frequently than men, and the disease is particularly common in individuals of Northern European or Scandinavian ancestry.
Genetic susceptibility appears to contribute to disease risk. Associations with particular HLA class II alleles, especially HLA-DRB1 variants, have been described, although GCA is not a simple Mendelian genetic disorder.
Prevention
There is no established method for preventing the development of GCA.
The major preventable complication is permanent visual loss, and prevention depends on recognizing the disease promptly and initiating adequate glucocorticoid therapy before irreversible ischemic injury occurs.
Pathophysiology
Both the innate and adaptive immune systems contribute to GCA.
Activation of dendritic cells within susceptible arterial walls promotes recruitment and activation of CD4-positive T lymphocytes and macrophages. These cells release inflammatory cytokines and organize into a granulomatous inflammatory response.
Macrophages and multinucleated giant cells may accumulate near the internal elastic lamina and contribute to destruction of the arterial wall.
Cytokines such as interleukin-6 contribute to the systemic acute-phase response, producing elevated inflammatory markers and constitutional symptoms.
Progressive inflammation produces intimal hyperplasia, luminal stenosis, thrombosis, and vascular occlusion, resulting in ischemia of structures supplied by the affected arteries.
Etiology
The precise cause of GCA remains unknown.
It is thought to develop in genetically susceptible older individuals after inappropriate activation of the immune system. Infectious triggers have been proposed, but no single infectious organism has been established as the cause.
Commonly Associated Conditions
GCA is strongly associated with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR).
PMR typically causes bilateral aching and morning stiffness involving the shoulder girdle, neck, hips, and pelvic girdle. The two conditions can occur independently or together.
Diagnosis
History
Patients older than 50 years with possible GCA should be specifically questioned about systemic, cranial, and visual symptoms.
Constitutional manifestations may include fatigue, malaise, fever, decreased appetite, night sweats, and unintentional weight loss.
A new-onset or substantially changed headache is a common presenting symptom. The headache may be temporal but can occur elsewhere.
Patients may describe scalp tenderness, such as discomfort when brushing their hair or resting the head on a pillow.
Jaw claudication is particularly suggestive of GCA. Patients describe aching or fatigue of the jaw muscles when chewing that improves with rest. Tongue claudication and facial pain occur less frequently.
Symptoms of associated polymyalgia rheumatica include proximal muscle aching and marked morning stiffness.
Visual Symptoms
Visual manifestations require urgent attention.
Patients may experience transient monocular visual loss, episodes of dimming or graying of vision, diplopia, or sudden permanent visual loss.
Importantly, some patients with ocular GCA have few or no constitutional symptoms. Therefore, the absence of headache, jaw claudication, fever, or polymyalgia symptoms does not exclude the diagnosis.
Physical Examination
Temporal Arteries
The temporal arteries should be examined for tenderness, thickening, nodularity, reduced pulsation, or absence of pulse.
A normal temporal artery examination does not exclude GCA.
Arteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
The classic ophthalmic manifestation is AAION.
The optic disc is typically markedly swollen and often has a characteristic pale or chalky-white appearance, in contrast to the more frequently hyperemic disc swelling seen in nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy.
Visual acuity may be profoundly reduced. A relative afferent pupillary defect, dyschromatopsia, and severe visual-field loss are common when involvement is unilateral or asymmetric.
Later, the optic disc becomes pale and atrophic.
Retinal Arterial Occlusion
GCA can cause central, branch, or cilioretinal artery occlusion.
When an older patient develops retinal arterial occlusion without an obvious embolic source, especially in association with systemic symptoms or elevated inflammatory markers, GCA must be considered urgently.
Diplopia
Transient or persistent diplopia may result from ischemia affecting the third, fourth, or sixth cranial nerve or their vascular supply.
Diagnostic Tests and Interpretation
Inflammatory Markers
There is no single laboratory test that definitively confirms or excludes GCA.
The initial laboratory evaluation typically includes erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), complete blood count, and platelet count.
Most patients have elevated ESR and CRP, but normal inflammatory markers can occasionally occur. Consequently, a normal ESR alone must never be used to exclude GCA when the clinical presentation is strongly suggestive.
CRP is often particularly useful because it responds rapidly to systemic inflammation and is less strongly influenced by factors such as age and anemia.
Thrombocytosis and a normocytic anemia may provide additional supportive evidence.
Vascular Ultrasound
Modern practice increasingly uses vascular ultrasonography in the initial evaluation of suspected GCA when appropriate expertise is available.
The updated EULAR imaging recommendations identify ultrasound of the temporal and axillary arteries as the first-line imaging test in suspected GCA, with characteristic findings including arterial wall thickening and the hypoechoic “halo” sign.
Ultrasound is operator dependent and should ideally be performed rapidly because glucocorticoid therapy can reduce inflammatory imaging findings.
Temporal Artery Biopsy
Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) remains an important method of confirming cranial GCA, particularly where vascular ultrasound expertise is limited or when imaging is inconclusive.
Biopsy should not delay treatment in a patient with threatened or established visual loss.
The ACR/Vasculitis Foundation guideline favors obtaining an adequate biopsy specimen and recommends biopsy relatively soon after glucocorticoid initiation when used diagnostically.
Because GCA can produce skip lesions, a negative biopsy does not completely exclude the disease.
If the biopsy is negative but clinical suspicion remains high, additional vascular imaging or evaluation of the contralateral temporal artery may be appropriate.
Large-Vessel Imaging
GCA can involve the aorta and its major branches in addition to the cranial arteries.
Depending on the clinical presentation, CT angiography, MR angiography, PET imaging, or vascular ultrasound may be used to identify extracranial large-vessel involvement. Current guidelines recognize vascular imaging as an important component of diagnosis and assessment.
Fluorescein Angiography
In patients with suspected ocular ischemia, fluorescein angiography may show delayed or patchy choroidal filling, prolonged retinal arterial filling, and areas of choroidal nonperfusion.
These findings can support the diagnosis of arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy but do not replace systemic evaluation for GCA.
Pathological Findings
Temporal artery biopsy classically demonstrates granulomatous inflammation involving the arterial wall, often with lymphocytes, macrophages, and multinucleated giant cells.
Giant cells are characteristic but not required for the diagnosis.
Disruption of the internal elastic lamina, intimal thickening, and luminal narrowing may be present.
Inflammation may occur in discontinuous segments, producing the characteristic skip lesions.
Differential Diagnosis
The major ophthalmic differential diagnosis is nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION).
Compared with NAION, AAION generally occurs in an older patient, produces more profound visual loss, and is more likely to show markedly pale or chalky optic disc swelling.
Other conditions that may mimic portions of the clinical syndrome include other vasculitides, infectious diseases, compressive optic neuropathy, retinal vascular occlusion from embolic disease, and inflammatory optic neuropathies.
Treatment
GCA is a medical and ophthalmic emergency when visual symptoms are present.
The primary goal is to prevent additional ischemic injury, particularly blindness in the fellow eye, stroke, and other vascular complications.
Glucocorticoid Treatment
High-dose systemic glucocorticoids remain the foundation of initial therapy. Treatment should begin immediately when GCA is strongly suspected and should not wait for biopsy or imaging confirmation.
For patients without visual ischemia, current guidelines recommend high-dose oral glucocorticoid therapy, with the precise regimen individualized to clinical circumstances.
For patients with threatened or established visual loss or other cranial ischemic complications, pulse intravenous glucocorticoids such as methylprednisolone are commonly used initially, followed by high-dose oral glucocorticoid therapy. The ACR/Vasculitis Foundation guideline conditionally favors IV pulse glucocorticoids in patients with threatened vision loss.
Tocilizumab and Steroid-Sparing Therapy
Modern treatment increasingly incorporates tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor, to reduce relapse and cumulative glucocorticoid exposure.
The ACR/Vasculitis Foundation guideline conditionally recommends tocilizumab plus glucocorticoids over glucocorticoids alone for many patients with newly diagnosed GCA.
Methotrexate may be considered as an alternative steroid-sparing agent in selected patients, particularly when tocilizumab is unsuitable.
Treatment decisions should generally involve rheumatology or another physician experienced in systemic vasculitis.
Glucocorticoid Taper
Once disease control has been achieved, glucocorticoids are gradually tapered.
The taper must be individualized according to symptoms, inflammatory markers, recurrence risk, treatment-related toxicity, and use of steroid-sparing therapy.
EULAR guidance recommends reducing glucocorticoids progressively after remission rather than maintaining prolonged high doses; many patients still require treatment for an extended period.
Rapid tapering can precipitate relapse.
Management of Glucocorticoid Complications
Because affected patients are usually older and may require prolonged treatment, complications of glucocorticoids are clinically important.
Patients require assessment and prevention of osteoporosis, hyperglycemia or diabetes, hypertension, infection, gastrointestinal complications, weight gain, mood disturbance, sleep disruption, cataract, and glaucoma.
Calcium and vitamin D supplementation, osteoporosis risk assessment, and additional bone-protective therapy may be appropriate depending on individual risk.
Referral
Patients with suspected ocular GCA require immediate ophthalmologic evaluation and urgent systemic treatment.
Rheumatology or internal medicine involvement is important for confirmation of the diagnosis, glucocorticoid tapering, steroid-sparing therapy, and monitoring of systemic vascular disease.
Patients with substantial visual impairment may benefit from low-vision rehabilitation.
Ongoing Care and Follow-Up
Follow-up should assess both disease activity and treatment toxicity.
Patients should be questioned repeatedly about recurrence of headache, scalp tenderness, jaw claudication, polymyalgia symptoms, constitutional symptoms, transient visual disturbances, or new visual loss.
ESR and CRP can be useful in monitoring many patients, but clinical assessment remains essential. This is particularly important in patients receiving tocilizumab because IL-6 blockade can suppress CRP and ESR even when clinical disease assessment remains necessary.
Large-vessel disease may require periodic vascular imaging depending on the initial pattern of arterial involvement and subsequent clinical course.
Patient Education
Patients should understand that recurrent symptoms can indicate disease relapse even while taking treatment.
They should seek immediate medical attention for any new transient or permanent visual disturbance, including dimming, graying, a curtain over the vision, or diplopia.
They should also report recurrent headache, scalp tenderness, jaw pain with chewing, or symptoms of polymyalgia rheumatica.
The adverse effects of long-term glucocorticoid therapy and the importance of medication adherence and laboratory monitoring should be carefully explained.
Prognosis
The prognosis for recovery of vision after established arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy is poor. Treatment is primarily intended to prevent further deterioration and protect the fellow eye rather than restore already infarcted optic nerve tissue.
Visual deterioration can occasionally continue during the first days after treatment is started, emphasizing the importance of rapid recognition and therapy.
Without treatment, the risk of sequential involvement of the fellow eye is very high. Prompt systemic glucocorticoids dramatically reduce this risk.
The systemic prognosis is generally favorable with appropriate treatment, although relapses are common and patients require long-term monitoring.
Complications
The principal ophthalmic complications are permanent severe visual loss from AAION, retinal arterial occlusion, posterior ischemic optic neuropathy, and bilateral blindness.
Systemic vascular complications include ischemic stroke, aortic aneurysm or dissection, myocardial ischemia, and less commonly mesenteric ischemia.
Treatment itself can cause substantial morbidity through long-term glucocorticoid exposure, making careful steroid tapering and the use of appropriate steroid-sparing therapies important components of modern management.
- Published on
Ophthalmology – Fuchs’ Heterochromic Iridocyclitis
Basics
Description
Fuchs’ heterochromic iridocyclitis (FHI), also called Fuchs uveitis syndrome, is a chronic, usually unilateral, low-grade anterior uveitis characterized by diffuse iris atrophy, heterochromia, fine stellate keratic precipitates, and minimal external inflammation.
The condition is often relatively asymptomatic. Patients may have only mild blurred vision or floaters, and the eye is typically white and quiet, without the marked pain, photophobia, and redness seen in many other forms of anterior uveitis.
Although traditionally considered unilateral, bilateral disease is recognized and may make heterochromia less obvious.
A strong association exists between FHI and rubella virus, and chronic intraocular immune responses to rubella antigens are thought to play an important etiologic role.
Two major long-term complications are cataract and secondary glaucoma.
Epidemiology
FHI accounts for a relatively small proportion of anterior uveitis cases. It has been estimated to represent less than approximately 6% of anterior uveitis seen in tertiary referral settings.
Its true prevalence may be underestimated because many patients have minimal symptoms and may remain undiagnosed until they develop cataract, glaucoma, or vitreous opacities.
The frequency of FHI has declined in populations with widespread rubella vaccination, particularly among individuals born after introduction of routine childhood immunization programs.
Risk Factors
A history of lack of rubella vaccination or residence in a region without an effective rubella vaccination program may increase risk.
Because the disease may be nearly asymptomatic, patients who do not receive routine eye examinations may not be diagnosed until complications such as advanced glaucoma or visually significant cataract have developed.
No consistent genetic predisposition has been established.
Prevention
The principal preventive strategy is universal rubella vaccination.
Vaccination reduces circulation of rubella virus and appears to reduce the incidence of Fuchs uveitis syndrome in immunized populations.
Pediatric Considerations
FHI is less common among children born after widespread adoption of rubella vaccination.
When the condition is diagnosed in a child or young adult, the patient’s and maternal rubella vaccination history may be relevant.
Pregnancy Considerations
In a pregnant patient with clinical findings compatible with FHI, assessment of rubella immunity is important because primary rubella infection during pregnancy, especially early gestation, can cause congenital rubella syndrome.
The presence of FHI itself does not mean that the patient has an acute systemic rubella infection.
Pathophysiology
Fuchs uveitis syndrome is thought to result from a chronic, localized intraocular immune response, frequently associated with persistent exposure to rubella viral antigens.
A predominantly CD8-positive T-cell-mediated immune response has been demonstrated within the eye.
This chronic low-grade inflammation results in progressive iris stromal atrophy, characteristic keratic precipitates, abnormalities of the anterior chamber angle vessels, and eventually complications such as cataract and glaucoma.
Unlike many other forms of anterior uveitis, the inflammatory response is usually mild and does not typically produce posterior synechiae.
Etiology
Evidence strongly supports an association with rubella virus.
Intraocular production of rubella-specific antibodies has been detected in a high proportion of patients with the classic clinical syndrome.
Rubella viral RNA has also been detected in some ocular samples, especially in younger patients.
The disease is therefore thought to represent a chronic ocular immune response related to prior rubella infection rather than active systemic rubella disease.
Commonly Associated Conditions
The two most important associated ocular complications are cataract and glaucoma.
Cataract develops in a substantial proportion of affected eyes, often becoming the major cause of reduced vision.
Secondary glaucoma occurs less frequently but may be difficult to control and can cause permanent optic nerve damage.
Vitreous opacities are also common and can produce symptomatic floaters or reduced visual quality.
Diagnosis
History
Patients are commonly young or middle-aged and may be asymptomatic.
When symptoms occur, they may include mild unilateral blurred vision, gradual change in iris color, floaters, or mild ocular discomfort.
Severe pain, marked photophobia, and prominent redness are unusual and should raise suspicion for another diagnosis.
Some patients first present because of progressive visual loss from cataract or glaucoma.
Physical Examination
External Appearance
The affected eye usually appears white and quiet, despite the presence of chronic intraocular inflammation.
This absence of prominent conjunctival injection is an important diagnostic clue.
Heterochromia
Iris heterochromia is common.
In patients with dark irides, the affected eye typically appears lighter because of progressive iris stromal atrophy.
In patients with light-colored irides, the affected eye may paradoxically appear darker because thinning of the anterior iris stroma allows greater visualization of the underlying pigment epithelium.
In bilateral disease, obvious heterochromia may be absent.
Keratic Precipitates
A characteristic finding is the presence of diffuse, fine, stellate, nongranulomatous keratic precipitates distributed widely over the corneal endothelium.
Unlike the inferiorly concentrated keratic precipitates seen in many other forms of anterior uveitis, those in FHI are often diffusely distributed.
Anterior Chamber
A mild chronic anterior chamber cellular reaction may be present.
Inflammation is usually low grade.
Posterior synechiae are typically absent, which is a useful distinguishing feature from many other chronic anterior uveitides.
Peripheral anterior synechiae are also not characteristic.
Iris Atrophy
Diffuse iris stromal atrophy is typical and contributes to heterochromia.
The iris architecture may become less distinct over time.
Anterior Chamber Angle
Gonioscopy may demonstrate abnormal fine vessels crossing or bridging the anterior chamber angle.
These fragile vessels are clinically important because they may bleed during surgery or other intraocular manipulation.
Cataract
Cataract is a very common long-term complication and may become the principal cause of visual impairment.
Glaucoma
Secondary glaucoma may develop and requires careful long-term monitoring because FHI is often asymptomatic.
Vitreous
Vitreous cells and opacities are common and may cause floaters or reduced visual quality.
Posterior segment disease is otherwise uncommon, although occasional chorioretinal scars or cystoid macular edema may occur.
Diagnostic Tests and Interpretation
Clinical Diagnosis
In many patients, the diagnosis can be made from the characteristic clinical pattern of:
quiet eye + diffuse stellate keratic precipitates + iris atrophy or heterochromia + absence of posterior synechiae + vitreous involvement.
Not every finding is present simultaneously, so repeated examinations may be helpful.
Intraocular Rubella Antibody Testing
When the diagnosis is uncertain, analysis of aqueous humor for intraocular rubella antibody production can provide strong laboratory support.
A modified Goldmann–Witmer coefficient or antibody index may be used to compare intraocular and serum rubella-specific antibody levels.
Detection of significant intraocular rubella antibody production strongly supports FHI, while absence of such antibody makes the diagnosis less likely in a clinically ambiguous case.
This testing is generally reserved for selected patients rather than routinely performed in every classic case.
Oligoclonal IgG
Intraocular oligoclonal IgG has been reported in FHI, but it is not specific enough to replace clinical diagnosis or pathogen-directed antibody testing.
Photography
External and slit-lamp photography may be useful to document heterochromia, iris atrophy, cataract progression, and other structural changes.
Pathological Findings
Histopathologic specimens demonstrate lymphocytes and plasma cells, supporting the concept of a chronic immune-mediated response.
These findings are consistent with persistent viral antigen-driven intraocular inflammation.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes other causes of chronic unilateral anterior uveitis, especially herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, toxoplasmosis-associated uveitis, and Posner–Schlossman syndrome.
Herpetic anterior uveitis may produce elevated intraocular pressure and iris atrophy but is more likely to show sectoral rather than diffuse iris atrophy and may be associated with corneal disease.
Posner–Schlossman syndrome is characterized by recurrent episodes of markedly elevated intraocular pressure with relatively mild inflammation, but it does not typically produce the full classic picture of diffuse iris atrophy and stellate keratic precipitates.
Other causes of heterochromia include Horner syndrome and iris melanoma.
The absence of posterior synechiae despite chronic inflammation is particularly supportive of FHI.
Treatment
Inflammation
Unlike most forms of anterior uveitis, chronic low-grade inflammation in FHI often does not require topical corticosteroid therapy.
Steroid drops may have limited effect on the underlying inflammation and can increase the risk of cataract formation and steroid-induced ocular hypertension or glaucoma.
Therefore, mild asymptomatic inflammation is often observed rather than chronically treated.
If significant inflammation occurs around ocular surgery or in an atypical exacerbation, short-term corticosteroid treatment may be appropriate.
Glaucoma
Secondary glaucoma should be treated aggressively because glaucomatous optic neuropathy is an important cause of permanent visual loss.
Initial treatment usually involves standard intraocular pressure-lowering medications.
Patients with poorly controlled pressure or progressive optic nerve or visual-field damage should be referred to a glaucoma specialist.
Surgical glaucoma treatment may ultimately be necessary.
Cataract Surgery
Cataract extraction can provide substantial visual improvement when the cataract is the major cause of reduced vision.
However, surgery may be complicated by bleeding from the fragile abnormal angle vessels.
A characteristic finding is Amsler sign, in which blood appears in the anterior chamber following paracentesis or intraocular manipulation because of rupture of these abnormal vessels.
Perioperative topical corticosteroids, and occasionally systemic anti-inflammatory therapy, may be used to limit surgery-induced inflammation.
Postoperative visual outcome may still be limited by glaucoma, vitreous opacities, posterior capsule opacification, or other ocular pathology.
Vitrectomy
Pars plana vitrectomy may be considered when dense or persistent vitreous opacities cause significant visual impairment.
This is generally reserved for patients whose symptoms cannot be explained by cataract or other anterior segment abnormalities.
Referral
Patients with uncontrolled intraocular pressure, progressive optic nerve damage, or worsening visual-field loss should be referred to a glaucoma specialist.
Referral to a uveitis specialist may be useful when the diagnosis is uncertain or when the clinical presentation is atypical.
Follow-Up
Because FHI is a chronic and frequently asymptomatic disease, regular ophthalmic follow-up is essential even when the patient feels well.
The interval depends largely on the presence and severity of glaucoma and cataract.
Follow-up should include assessment of visual acuity, intraocular pressure, optic nerve status, cataract progression, anterior chamber inflammation, and vitreous opacities.
Patients with glaucoma require appropriate optic nerve imaging and visual-field monitoring.
Patient Education
Patients should understand that the disease is usually chronic but often causes little discomfort.
They should be informed that lack of pain or redness does not mean the disease is inactive or harmless, because glaucoma can progress without symptoms.
Compliance with prescribed glaucoma therapy and scheduled follow-up is particularly important.
Patients should also understand that cataract is common but is generally treatable surgically.
Prognosis
The visual prognosis is generally good when glaucoma and cataract are recognized and treated appropriately.
Many patients maintain useful vision for many years.
The most important threat to irreversible vision loss is uncontrolled secondary glaucoma, whereas cataract-related vision loss is usually reversible with surgery.
Vitreous opacities and occasional posterior segment complications can also limit final vision.
Complications
Major complications include cataract, secondary glaucoma, vitreous opacities, and occasional cystoid macular edema.
Cataract or glaucoma surgery may be complicated by intraoperative or postoperative hyphema because of abnormal angle vessels.
Permanent visual loss is most likely when glaucoma is diagnosed late or remains inadequately controlled.
- Published on
Ophthalmology – Fuchs’ Heterochromic Iridocyclitis
Basics
Description
Fuchs’ heterochromic iridocyclitis (FHI), also called Fuchs uveitis syndrome, is a chronic, usually unilateral, low-grade anterior uveitis characterized by diffuse iris atrophy, heterochromia, fine stellate keratic precipitates, and minimal external inflammation.
The condition is often relatively asymptomatic. Patients may have only mild blurred vision or floaters, and the eye is typically white and quiet, without the marked pain, photophobia, and redness seen in many other forms of anterior uveitis.
Although traditionally considered unilateral, bilateral disease is recognized and may make heterochromia less obvious.
A strong association exists between FHI and rubella virus, and chronic intraocular immune responses to rubella antigens are thought to play an important etiologic role.
Two major long-term complications are cataract and secondary glaucoma.
Epidemiology
FHI accounts for a relatively small proportion of anterior uveitis cases. It has been estimated to represent less than approximately 6% of anterior uveitis seen in tertiary referral settings.
Its true prevalence may be underestimated because many patients have minimal symptoms and may remain undiagnosed until they develop cataract, glaucoma, or vitreous opacities.
The frequency of FHI has declined in populations with widespread rubella vaccination, particularly among individuals born after introduction of routine childhood immunization programs.
Risk Factors
A history of lack of rubella vaccination or residence in a region without an effective rubella vaccination program may increase risk.
Because the disease may be nearly asymptomatic, patients who do not receive routine eye examinations may not be diagnosed until complications such as advanced glaucoma or visually significant cataract have developed.
No consistent genetic predisposition has been established.
Prevention
The principal preventive strategy is universal rubella vaccination.
Vaccination reduces circulation of rubella virus and appears to reduce the incidence of Fuchs uveitis syndrome in immunized populations.
Pediatric Considerations
FHI is less common among children born after widespread adoption of rubella vaccination.
When the condition is diagnosed in a child or young adult, the patient’s and maternal rubella vaccination history may be relevant.
Pregnancy Considerations
In a pregnant patient with clinical findings compatible with FHI, assessment of rubella immunity is important because primary rubella infection during pregnancy, especially early gestation, can cause congenital rubella syndrome.
The presence of FHI itself does not mean that the patient has an acute systemic rubella infection.
Pathophysiology
Fuchs uveitis syndrome is thought to result from a chronic, localized intraocular immune response, frequently associated with persistent exposure to rubella viral antigens.
A predominantly CD8-positive T-cell-mediated immune response has been demonstrated within the eye.
This chronic low-grade inflammation results in progressive iris stromal atrophy, characteristic keratic precipitates, abnormalities of the anterior chamber angle vessels, and eventually complications such as cataract and glaucoma.
Unlike many other forms of anterior uveitis, the inflammatory response is usually mild and does not typically produce posterior synechiae.
Etiology
Evidence strongly supports an association with rubella virus.
Intraocular production of rubella-specific antibodies has been detected in a high proportion of patients with the classic clinical syndrome.
Rubella viral RNA has also been detected in some ocular samples, especially in younger patients.
The disease is therefore thought to represent a chronic ocular immune response related to prior rubella infection rather than active systemic rubella disease.
Commonly Associated Conditions
The two most important associated ocular complications are cataract and glaucoma.
Cataract develops in a substantial proportion of affected eyes, often becoming the major cause of reduced vision.
Secondary glaucoma occurs less frequently but may be difficult to control and can cause permanent optic nerve damage.
Vitreous opacities are also common and can produce symptomatic floaters or reduced visual quality.
Diagnosis
History
Patients are commonly young or middle-aged and may be asymptomatic.
When symptoms occur, they may include mild unilateral blurred vision, gradual change in iris color, floaters, or mild ocular discomfort.
Severe pain, marked photophobia, and prominent redness are unusual and should raise suspicion for another diagnosis.
Some patients first present because of progressive visual loss from cataract or glaucoma.
Physical Examination
External Appearance
The affected eye usually appears white and quiet, despite the presence of chronic intraocular inflammation.
This absence of prominent conjunctival injection is an important diagnostic clue.
Heterochromia
Iris heterochromia is common.
In patients with dark irides, the affected eye typically appears lighter because of progressive iris stromal atrophy.
In patients with light-colored irides, the affected eye may paradoxically appear darker because thinning of the anterior iris stroma allows greater visualization of the underlying pigment epithelium.
In bilateral disease, obvious heterochromia may be absent.
Keratic Precipitates
A characteristic finding is the presence of diffuse, fine, stellate, nongranulomatous keratic precipitates distributed widely over the corneal endothelium.
Unlike the inferiorly concentrated keratic precipitates seen in many other forms of anterior uveitis, those in FHI are often diffusely distributed.
Anterior Chamber
A mild chronic anterior chamber cellular reaction may be present.
Inflammation is usually low grade.
Posterior synechiae are typically absent, which is a useful distinguishing feature from many other chronic anterior uveitides.
Peripheral anterior synechiae are also not characteristic.
Iris Atrophy
Diffuse iris stromal atrophy is typical and contributes to heterochromia.
The iris architecture may become less distinct over time.
Anterior Chamber Angle
Gonioscopy may demonstrate abnormal fine vessels crossing or bridging the anterior chamber angle.
These fragile vessels are clinically important because they may bleed during surgery or other intraocular manipulation.
Cataract
Cataract is a very common long-term complication and may become the principal cause of visual impairment.
Glaucoma
Secondary glaucoma may develop and requires careful long-term monitoring because FHI is often asymptomatic.
Vitreous
Vitreous cells and opacities are common and may cause floaters or reduced visual quality.
Posterior segment disease is otherwise uncommon, although occasional chorioretinal scars or cystoid macular edema may occur.
Diagnostic Tests and Interpretation
Clinical Diagnosis
In many patients, the diagnosis can be made from the characteristic clinical pattern of:
quiet eye + diffuse stellate keratic precipitates + iris atrophy or heterochromia + absence of posterior synechiae + vitreous involvement.
Not every finding is present simultaneously, so repeated examinations may be helpful.
Intraocular Rubella Antibody Testing
When the diagnosis is uncertain, analysis of aqueous humor for intraocular rubella antibody production can provide strong laboratory support.
A modified Goldmann–Witmer coefficient or antibody index may be used to compare intraocular and serum rubella-specific antibody levels.
Detection of significant intraocular rubella antibody production strongly supports FHI, while absence of such antibody makes the diagnosis less likely in a clinically ambiguous case.
This testing is generally reserved for selected patients rather than routinely performed in every classic case.
Oligoclonal IgG
Intraocular oligoclonal IgG has been reported in FHI, but it is not specific enough to replace clinical diagnosis or pathogen-directed antibody testing.
Photography
External and slit-lamp photography may be useful to document heterochromia, iris atrophy, cataract progression, and other structural changes.
Pathological Findings
Histopathologic specimens demonstrate lymphocytes and plasma cells, supporting the concept of a chronic immune-mediated response.
These findings are consistent with persistent viral antigen-driven intraocular inflammation.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes other causes of chronic unilateral anterior uveitis, especially herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, toxoplasmosis-associated uveitis, and Posner–Schlossman syndrome.
Herpetic anterior uveitis may produce elevated intraocular pressure and iris atrophy but is more likely to show sectoral rather than diffuse iris atrophy and may be associated with corneal disease.
Posner–Schlossman syndrome is characterized by recurrent episodes of markedly elevated intraocular pressure with relatively mild inflammation, but it does not typically produce the full classic picture of diffuse iris atrophy and stellate keratic precipitates.
Other causes of heterochromia include Horner syndrome and iris melanoma.
The absence of posterior synechiae despite chronic inflammation is particularly supportive of FHI.
Treatment
Inflammation
Unlike most forms of anterior uveitis, chronic low-grade inflammation in FHI often does not require topical corticosteroid therapy.
Steroid drops may have limited effect on the underlying inflammation and can increase the risk of cataract formation and steroid-induced ocular hypertension or glaucoma.
Therefore, mild asymptomatic inflammation is often observed rather than chronically treated.
If significant inflammation occurs around ocular surgery or in an atypical exacerbation, short-term corticosteroid treatment may be appropriate.
Glaucoma
Secondary glaucoma should be treated aggressively because glaucomatous optic neuropathy is an important cause of permanent visual loss.
Initial treatment usually involves standard intraocular pressure-lowering medications.
Patients with poorly controlled pressure or progressive optic nerve or visual-field damage should be referred to a glaucoma specialist.
Surgical glaucoma treatment may ultimately be necessary.
Cataract Surgery
Cataract extraction can provide substantial visual improvement when the cataract is the major cause of reduced vision.
However, surgery may be complicated by bleeding from the fragile abnormal angle vessels.
A characteristic finding is Amsler sign, in which blood appears in the anterior chamber following paracentesis or intraocular manipulation because of rupture of these abnormal vessels.
Perioperative topical corticosteroids, and occasionally systemic anti-inflammatory therapy, may be used to limit surgery-induced inflammation.
Postoperative visual outcome may still be limited by glaucoma, vitreous opacities, posterior capsule opacification, or other ocular pathology.
Vitrectomy
Pars plana vitrectomy may be considered when dense or persistent vitreous opacities cause significant visual impairment.
This is generally reserved for patients whose symptoms cannot be explained by cataract or other anterior segment abnormalities.
Referral
Patients with uncontrolled intraocular pressure, progressive optic nerve damage, or worsening visual-field loss should be referred to a glaucoma specialist.
Referral to a uveitis specialist may be useful when the diagnosis is uncertain or when the clinical presentation is atypical.
Follow-Up
Because FHI is a chronic and frequently asymptomatic disease, regular ophthalmic follow-up is essential even when the patient feels well.
The interval depends largely on the presence and severity of glaucoma and cataract.
Follow-up should include assessment of visual acuity, intraocular pressure, optic nerve status, cataract progression, anterior chamber inflammation, and vitreous opacities.
Patients with glaucoma require appropriate optic nerve imaging and visual-field monitoring.
Patient Education
Patients should understand that the disease is usually chronic but often causes little discomfort.
They should be informed that lack of pain or redness does not mean the disease is inactive or harmless, because glaucoma can progress without symptoms.
Compliance with prescribed glaucoma therapy and scheduled follow-up is particularly important.
Patients should also understand that cataract is common but is generally treatable surgically.
Prognosis
The visual prognosis is generally good when glaucoma and cataract are recognized and treated appropriately.
Many patients maintain useful vision for many years.
The most important threat to irreversible vision loss is uncontrolled secondary glaucoma, whereas cataract-related vision loss is usually reversible with surgery.
Vitreous opacities and occasional posterior segment complications can also limit final vision.
Complications
Major complications include cataract, secondary glaucoma, vitreous opacities, and occasional cystoid macular edema.
Cataract or glaucoma surgery may be complicated by intraoperative or postoperative hyphema because of abnormal angle vessels.
Permanent visual loss is most likely when glaucoma is diagnosed late or remains inadequately controlled.
- Published on
Ophthalmology – Fuchs’ Corneal Dystrophy
Basics
Description
Fuchs’ corneal dystrophy, more precisely called Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD), is a progressive, usually bilateral and noninflammatory disorder of the corneal endothelium. It is characterized by the formation of focal excrescences of Descemet membrane known as corneal guttae, progressive loss and dysfunction of endothelial cells, and subsequent stromal and epithelial corneal edema.
The corneal endothelium normally maintains corneal deturgescence by acting as both a permeability barrier and an active fluid pump. As endothelial cells become dysfunctional and decrease in number, the cornea gradually loses its ability to remain dehydrated and transparent.
Patients typically complain of blurred vision and glare that are worse in the morning after awakening. As disease progresses, epithelial edema may lead to formation of painful bullae. Rupture of these bullae can cause recurrent erosions, pain, photophobia, and tearing.
Epidemiology
Fuchs dystrophy most commonly becomes clinically significant in the fifth and sixth decades of life, although corneal guttae may be detected earlier.
A rare early-onset form can present during childhood or the first few decades of life.
Women are affected more commonly than men.
The prevalence of clinically apparent disease increases with age, and corneal guttae are relatively common in older adults.
Risk Factors
The strongest risk factor is increasing age.
Other factors that can worsen endothelial dysfunction include elevated intraocular pressure, ocular inflammation, and previous intraocular surgery, particularly cataract surgery.
Because patients with Fuchs dystrophy already have reduced endothelial reserve, additional endothelial cell loss during intraocular surgery can precipitate clinically significant corneal edema.
Genetics
Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy has a strong genetic component but is genetically heterogeneous.
Some families show autosomal dominant inheritance with incomplete penetrance and variable expression.
Several genetic loci and genes have been associated with FECD. Early-onset disease has been linked to mutations in COL8A2, while common late-onset disease is associated with other genetic abnormalities, including variants involving TCF4 in many populations.
Because expression can vary markedly even within the same family, relatives with the same pathogenic variant may have very different clinical severity.
Pathophysiology
The primary abnormality is progressive dysfunction and loss of corneal endothelial cells.
The diseased endothelium produces abnormal Descemet membrane, resulting in focal collagenous excrescences called guttae. Over time, Descemet membrane becomes abnormally thickened.
As endothelial cell density falls, the remaining cells enlarge and change shape in an attempt to cover the posterior corneal surface. These changes are described as polymegathism, meaning variation in cell size, and pleomorphism or polymorphism, meaning variation in cell shape.
Eventually, the endothelial barrier and pump functions become insufficient. Failure of the endothelial Na+/K+-ATPase-dependent fluid transport system allows fluid to accumulate in the corneal stroma.
Stromal edema initially develops posteriorly and then progresses anteriorly. With more advanced disease, the epithelium becomes edematous and develops microcysts that coalesce into epithelial bullae.
Chronic edema may eventually cause subepithelial fibrosis, anterior basement membrane abnormalities, corneal scarring, and superficial neovascularization.
Etiology
Endothelial cell density normally decreases throughout life. Patients with Fuchs dystrophy experience an accelerated and pathologic loss of endothelial cells.
In infancy, endothelial cell density is much higher than in adulthood. Because human corneal endothelial cells have very limited ability to regenerate, progressive cell loss gradually reduces endothelial reserve.
Additional endothelial injury from cataract surgery, other intraocular procedures, inflammation, trauma, or elevated intraocular pressure may accelerate decompensation.
Commonly Associated Conditions
Fuchs dystrophy is frequently associated with cataract, particularly because both conditions become more common with age.
Other associations include open-angle glaucoma, angle-closure glaucoma, recurrent epithelial erosions, and painful bullous keratopathy.
Keratoconus has occasionally been reported in association with Fuchs dystrophy but is uncommon.
Diagnosis
History
Patients commonly report gradually progressive blurred vision and glare.
A particularly characteristic symptom is that vision is worse after awakening and improves during the day. During sleep, the closed eyelids reduce evaporation from the corneal surface, allowing corneal edema to increase. After awakening, evaporation gradually helps reduce the edema.
Patients with more advanced disease may describe pain, foreign-body sensation, photophobia, and tearing, especially when epithelial bullae rupture.
A history of previous cataract surgery, other intraocular surgery, glaucoma, or uveitis is important because these conditions can accelerate endothelial failure.
Physical Examination
A complete ophthalmic examination should include visual acuity, intraocular pressure, slit-lamp examination, and dilated fundus examination when the posterior segment can be visualized.
Early Disease
In early disease, slit-lamp examination shows central corneal guttae.
These may be best appreciated using direct illumination, specular reflection, or retroillumination.
The guttae commonly begin centrally and gradually spread toward the peripheral cornea.
Moderate Disease
As disease progresses, the posterior corneal surface develops a characteristic beaten-metal or hammered-metal appearance because of numerous confluent guttae and associated endothelial pigmentation.
Descemet membrane becomes thickened.
Stromal edema develops, initially in the posterior cornea. Descemet folds may become visible as edema worsens.
Advanced Disease
Progressive edema eventually reaches the epithelium, producing microcystic epithelial edema.
The epithelial microcysts may merge into larger bullae. Rupture of these bullae produces significant pain and recurrent epithelial defects.
End-stage disease may show subepithelial fibrosis, anterior stromal scarring, superficial vascularization, and chronic bullous keratopathy.
Diagnostic Testing
Pachymetry
Corneal pachymetry measures central corneal thickness.
An increase in corneal thickness can indicate progressive edema and reduced endothelial function. Serial measurements can help assess progression.
However, corneal thickness should always be interpreted together with symptoms, slit-lamp findings, and endothelial imaging.
Specular Microscopy
Specular microscopy allows evaluation of endothelial cell density and morphology.
It can demonstrate reduced endothelial cell counts, guttae, polymegathism, and pleomorphism.
In advanced disease, dense guttae or severe corneal edema may make accurate endothelial cell counting difficult.
Confocal Microscopy
Confocal microscopy can provide additional information about endothelial morphology and may be useful when conventional visualization is limited.
B-Scan Ultrasonography
If severe corneal edema or coexisting cataract prevents adequate visualization of the posterior segment, B-scan ultrasonography can be used to exclude significant retinal or vitreous pathology.
Pathological Findings
Histopathology demonstrates a diffusely thickened Descemet membrane with characteristic excrescences or guttae.
There is a reduced number of endothelial cells, often with marked variation in cell size and shape.
Advanced disease may show subepithelial fibrosis, epithelial basement membrane abnormalities, bullous keratopathy, and superficial corneal neovascularization.
Differential Diagnosis
The differential diagnosis includes other causes of corneal endothelial failure or edema.
Important possibilities include pseudophakic or aphakic bullous keratopathy, posterior polymorphous corneal dystrophy, congenital hereditary endothelial dystrophy, iridocorneal endothelial syndrome, and chronic inflammatory or infectious endothelial disease.
Central herpetic disciform keratitis can cause corneal edema but is usually associated with inflammatory signs and a different clinical history.
Corneal pseudoguttae may occur transiently after trauma, intraocular inflammation, infection, or toxic injury and should be distinguished from true Fuchs dystrophy.
Treatment
Treatment depends on the severity of symptoms and degree of corneal decompensation.
First-Line Medical Treatment
For mild to moderate corneal edema, hypertonic sodium chloride 5% drops can be used during the day.
Hypertonic sodium chloride ointment is particularly useful at bedtime because it provides longer contact with the ocular surface.
These treatments draw water from the corneal epithelium and may temporarily improve vision and discomfort. They do not reverse the underlying endothelial disease or stop its progression.
Morning Edema
Because edema is often worse after sleep, some patients obtain temporary symptomatic benefit from increasing evaporation after awakening.
Historically, use of a hair dryer at arm’s length with cool or low-warm airflow directed toward the closed or blinking eyes has been suggested to encourage evaporation, although this is a symptomatic measure rather than disease-modifying therapy.
Management of Elevated Intraocular Pressure
If intraocular pressure is elevated, appropriate glaucoma therapy should be initiated because excessive pressure can further compromise endothelial function.
Choice of medication should take the overall ocular condition into account.
Management of Bullous Keratopathy
Painful epithelial bullae may be managed temporarily with lubrication and a therapeutic bandage contact lens.
Because an epithelial defect increases the risk of microbial keratitis, these patients require appropriate monitoring.
Recurrent or persistent painful bullae in an eye with poor visual potential may require additional palliative procedures, but in an eye with useful visual potential definitive endothelial replacement is usually preferred.
Surgical Treatment
Definitive treatment is indicated when corneal edema causes significant visual impairment or painful bullous keratopathy that is not adequately controlled medically.
Endothelial Keratoplasty
For most patients with Fuchs dystrophy who do not have significant anterior stromal scarring, endothelial keratoplasty is preferred.
DMEK
Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) replaces diseased Descemet membrane and endothelium with donor Descemet membrane and endothelial cells.
It generally provides rapid visual rehabilitation, minimal induced astigmatism, and excellent optical quality.
DSAEK/DSEK
Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) or DSEK replaces the diseased endothelium and Descemet membrane along with a thin layer of donor posterior stroma.
It remains an effective option, although DMEK often provides faster visual recovery and better final optical quality when technically suitable.
Penetrating Keratoplasty
Penetrating keratoplasty (PKP) replaces the full thickness of the cornea.
It is generally reserved for patients with advanced Fuchs dystrophy who have substantial anterior stromal scarring, subepithelial fibrosis, or other corneal pathology that would limit vision even after endothelial replacement alone.
Compared with endothelial keratoplasty, PKP usually has a longer visual recovery period and greater risk of induced astigmatism and wound-related complications.
Fuchs Dystrophy and Cataract Surgery
Cataract and Fuchs dystrophy commonly coexist.
Before cataract surgery, the surgeon should assess the severity of endothelial disease using the clinical examination, pachymetry, endothelial imaging when possible, visual symptoms, and extent of guttae or edema.
Patients with relatively mild disease may undergo cataract surgery alone, but they should be counseled that postoperative corneal edema may be prolonged and that endothelial keratoplasty may eventually be required.
Patients with significant endothelial dysfunction and a visually important cataract may benefit from combined cataract surgery and endothelial keratoplasty, sometimes called a triple procedure.
Historical thresholds such as endothelial cell density below approximately 1,000 cells/mm² or markedly increased corneal thickness have been used to estimate risk, but contemporary surgical decisions are individualized and should not rely on a single numerical cutoff.
Follow-Up
Follow-up frequency depends on disease severity.
Patients with mild, stable disease may be examined approximately every 6–12 months, while those with progressive edema or declining vision require closer follow-up.
Monitoring should include visual acuity, slit-lamp examination, intraocular pressure, and assessment of corneal thickness or endothelial status when clinically useful.
Patients with epithelial defects or ruptured bullae need closer follow-up because of the risk of infectious keratitis.
Patient Education
Patients should understand that Fuchs dystrophy is usually a slowly progressive condition and that the rate of progression varies considerably between individuals.
Morning blur is characteristic because corneal edema increases while the eyelids are closed during sleep.
Hypertonic saline drops may sting, while ointment frequently causes temporary blur. These effects should be explained so that patients are not unnecessarily alarmed.
Patients considering cataract surgery should understand that their reduced endothelial reserve increases the risk of persistent postoperative corneal edema and eventual need for endothelial transplantation.
Prognosis
The natural course is progressive but variable.
Many patients remain mildly symptomatic for years, while others develop clinically significant corneal edema and visual impairment.
Modern endothelial keratoplasty has greatly improved prognosis. DMEK and DSAEK generally provide excellent corneal clarity and substantial visual improvement in appropriately selected patients.
Final vision depends not only on the cornea but also on other ocular conditions such as cataract, glaucoma, macular disease, and optic nerve disease.
Complications
Untreated advanced disease may lead to painful bullous keratopathy, recurrent epithelial erosions, infectious keratitis, corneal ulceration, fibrosis, scarring, and neovascularization.
Potential complications after corneal transplantation include graft rejection, graft failure, glaucoma, infection, astigmatism, wound problems, retinal detachment, uveitis, and endophthalmitis.
Following endothelial keratoplasty, additional procedure-specific complications can include graft detachment requiring rebubbling, primary graft failure, and endothelial cell loss.
- Published on
Ophthalmology – Fracture, White-Eyed Blowout
Basics
Description
A white-eyed blowout fracture (WEBOF) is a trapdoor or greenstick fracture of the orbital floor or, less commonly, the medial orbital wall that causes entrapment of orbital soft tissue or an extraocular muscle. The entrapped muscle may become ischemic, producing severe restriction of ocular movement and persistent diplopia.
The condition occurs predominantly in children and adolescents, although young adults in their early 20s may also be affected.
The term white-eyed refers to the striking absence of external signs despite a potentially serious orbital injury. There may be little or no eyelid swelling, ecchymosis, or subconjunctival hemorrhage. Consequently, the injury may initially be mistaken for a concussion or minor facial trauma.
White-eyed blowout fracture is also known as a trapdoor orbital fracture.
Epidemiology
White-eyed blowout fractures occur primarily in children and young adults. There is no established racial predilection.
No definite sex predilection has been demonstrated, although males experience traumatic injuries more frequently overall.
The orbital floor is affected more commonly than the medial orbital wall or lamina papyracea.
The exact incidence and prevalence are unknown.
Risk Factors
The major risk factors are young age and recent blunt periocular trauma.
Common mechanisms include sports-related injuries, motor vehicle accidents, falls, and physical altercations.
Prevention
Prevention centers on reducing the risk of orbital trauma.
Children participating in sports should use appropriate polycarbonate protective glasses, goggles, face shields, or other sport-specific eye protection.
Age-appropriate seat belts, car seats, and other restraint systems should be used consistently in motor vehicles.
Pathophysiology
Two principal mechanisms have been proposed for orbital blowout fractures.
In the hydraulic mechanism, a blunt object strikes the globe and orbital entrance, suddenly increasing intraorbital pressure. This pressure is transmitted to the thin orbital floor or medial wall, causing the bone to fracture into an adjacent paranasal sinus.
In the buckling mechanism, a blow to the inferior orbital rim transmits force posteriorly through the orbital skeleton, causing the orbital floor to buckle and fracture.
The Pediatric Trapdoor Mechanism
The orbital bones of children are relatively thin, elastic, and incompletely calcified compared with those of adults.
Following blunt trauma, the orbital floor or medial wall may temporarily bend or crack open. Increased orbital pressure forces orbital fat, connective tissue, and sometimes an extraocular muscle through the opening.
Because pediatric bone is highly elastic, the fractured segment may immediately spring back toward its original position. This creates a trapdoor effect, tightly incarcerating the prolapsed orbital tissue.
The inferior rectus or its surrounding tissues are most commonly involved in orbital floor fractures. The medial rectus or adjacent tissues may be involved with medial wall fractures.
Prolonged incarceration can impair blood flow to the muscle and lead to ischemia, fibrosis, and permanent restrictive strabismus.
Oculocardiac Reflex
One of the most important features of a white-eyed blowout fracture is the oculocardiac reflex.
Traction on or entrapment of an extraocular muscle stimulates trigeminal afferent pathways and produces a vagal response.
Affected patients may develop nausea, vomiting, dizziness, bradycardia, hypotension, syncope, or, rarely, cardiac conduction abnormalities.
The nausea and vomiting can be dramatic and may be mistaken for manifestations of a concussion.
The combination of recent orbital trauma, restricted ocular motility, pain with eye movement, nausea, vomiting, or bradycardia should therefore raise immediate concern for a trapdoor fracture with tissue entrapment.
Etiology
The condition results from blunt periocular trauma.
Sports injuries are particularly common in children, but motor vehicle accidents, falls, and interpersonal trauma can also produce the injury.
Commonly Associated Conditions
Associated ocular injuries may include hyphema, vitreous hemorrhage, choroidal rupture, retinal injury, and other intraocular trauma.
The oculocardiac reflex may produce clinically important bradycardia and, rarely, heart block.
Significant intracranial injury is not a defining feature of white-eyed blowout fracture. Nevertheless, the mechanism of trauma should determine whether concurrent neurologic injury requires investigation.
Diagnosis
History
A typical patient has sustained recent blunt trauma to the periocular region.
The patient may complain of diplopia and significant pain when attempting to move the affected eye.
Nausea and vomiting, particularly when precipitated or worsened by attempted eye movement, are important diagnostic clues.
The absence of dramatic bruising or swelling should not reassure the clinician.
Loss of consciousness is not characteristic of an isolated white-eyed blowout fracture, although associated head injury must still be considered according to the mechanism and clinical findings.
Physical Examination
External Examination
The external appearance may be surprisingly normal.
There may be only minimal eyelid edema, minimal ecchymosis, or a small subconjunctival hemorrhage despite significant tissue entrapment.
This discrepancy between a relatively quiet external appearance and severe functional impairment is the hallmark of the condition.
Ocular Motility
Marked restriction of ocular movement is a major finding.
With an orbital floor trapdoor fracture, vertical motility is usually impaired, particularly upgaze, although the exact pattern depends on which tissues are incarcerated.
With a medial wall trapdoor fracture, horizontal motility may be restricted.
The child may refuse to open or move the eye because attempted movement produces significant pain, nausea, or vomiting.
Diplopia
Diplopia results from mechanical restriction of the entrapped muscle or surrounding connective tissues.
The severity of diplopia does not necessarily correlate with the amount of external swelling.
Facial Sensation
Contusion or injury of the infraorbital nerve may produce numbness or altered sensation over the cheek, upper lip, or lateral nose when the orbital floor is involved.
Complete Ophthalmic Examination
A complete examination is essential to exclude associated globe, retinal, and optic nerve injuries.
Visual acuity, pupillary responses, ocular motility, anterior segment findings, intraocular pressure when appropriate, and the posterior segment should be assessed.
Diagnostic Tests and Interpretation
CT Imaging
Thin-section CT of the orbits with multiplanar reconstruction is the preferred imaging study.
Both bone and soft-tissue windows should be reviewed carefully.
White-eyed blowout fractures can be subtle and easily missed on CT because the elastic fractured bone may return nearly to its normal position after trapping the orbital tissues.
Consequently, a CT report describing little or no displacement does not exclude clinically important entrapment when the history and examination are strongly suggestive.
Dedicated orbital imaging is preferable because a routine head CT may not provide sufficiently detailed evaluation of the orbital walls and extraocular muscles.
In children, radiation exposure should be minimized using appropriate pediatric CT protocols.
MRI and Plain Radiographs
Plain radiographs provide inadequate detail and are generally not useful when modern CT imaging is available.
MRI is not the initial study of choice for acute orbital fractures because CT provides superior assessment of the bony orbital anatomy.
Intracranial Imaging
Additional evaluation for intracranial trauma should be performed when indicated by the mechanism of injury, neurologic examination, or other concerning symptoms.
Other Diagnostic Considerations
If the patient has significant persistent bradycardia or another manifestation of the oculocardiac reflex, cardiac monitoring may be necessary.
In severe cases, hospital admission may be appropriate while definitive treatment is arranged.
Pathologically, the fracture may trap the extraocular muscle itself or only the perimuscular fascia, connective tissue, and orbital fat. Either situation can produce substantial restriction of ocular movement.
Differential Diagnosis
Concussion or Intracranial Injury
Nausea and vomiting following trauma can lead to an incorrect diagnosis of concussion.
The presence of marked ocular motility restriction and symptoms provoked by eye movement should raise suspicion for a trapdoor fracture and oculocardiac reflex.
Extraocular Muscle Contusion
Orbital trauma without entrapment can cause muscle edema and contusion, resulting in temporary diplopia and motility limitation.
However, simple contusion generally does not produce the pronounced oculocardiac symptoms associated with significant trapdoor entrapment.
Treatment
White-eyed blowout fracture with clinically significant entrapment is considered an urgent surgical condition.
Medical therapy alone cannot release incarcerated tissue.
The objective is to free the entrapped tissue before prolonged ischemia and fibrosis result in permanent restrictive strabismus.
Timing of Surgery
Patients with convincing clinical evidence of extraocular muscle or soft-tissue entrapment should receive urgent orbital surgical evaluation and prompt repair.
Surgery should not be unnecessarily delayed solely to allow orbital swelling to resolve, as might be appropriate for some uncomplicated adult blowout fractures.
Marked motility restriction associated with pain, nausea, vomiting, bradycardia, or other manifestations of the oculocardiac reflex strengthens the indication for urgent intervention.
Earlier literature commonly advocated repair within approximately 24–72 hours. In practice, the urgency is determined by the severity of entrapment and systemic manifestations, with significant oculocardiac reflex or severe restriction generally warranting particularly rapid intervention.
Preoperative Management
The patient should remain NPO when urgent surgery is anticipated.
Severe vomiting may result in dehydration, particularly when symptoms have persisted for many hours or days. Intravenous fluid replacement may therefore be necessary.
Antiemetics can be administered for symptomatic relief, although they may not fully control symptoms while the tissue remains entrapped.
The patient should undergo a complete ophthalmic examination and appropriate orbital imaging before surgery whenever the clinical situation permits.
Cardiac monitoring should be considered when significant bradycardia or conduction abnormalities are present.
Antibiotics and Corticosteroids
Some clinicians prescribe short courses of systemic antibiotics after orbital fracture repair, particularly when there is concern about sinus contamination. However, routine prophylactic antibiotics in otherwise uncomplicated closed fractures have limited supporting evidence.
Systemic corticosteroids have also historically been prescribed in an attempt to reduce post-traumatic edema and fibrosis. Their routine benefit in white-eyed blowout fractures has not been firmly established.
Neither antibiotics nor corticosteroids should delay definitive release of entrapped tissue.
Surgery and Other Procedures
Surgical treatment consists of orbital exploration and release of the incarcerated muscle, fascia, fat, and other soft tissues.
After the tissue is released, the surgeon assesses the residual orbital wall defect.
If the trapdoor bone returns to an appropriate position and there is no risk of recurrent entrapment, an implant may not always be necessary.
More commonly, a residual defect remains after tissue release. An orbital implant may then be positioned across the defect to prevent recurrent herniation or re-entrapment.
Both absorbable and nonabsorbable materials may be used according to the clinical situation and surgeon preference.
Many orbital floor trapdoor fractures can be repaired through a transconjunctival approach, avoiding an external skin incision.
Inpatient Considerations
Admission
Hospital admission may be required for intractable nausea and vomiting, dehydration, clinically important bradycardia, cardiac conduction abnormalities, or other associated injuries.
Postoperative Monitoring
Following successful release of entrapped tissue, nausea and vomiting caused by the oculocardiac reflex usually improve rapidly.
Visual acuity, pupils, pain, and orbital swelling should be monitored after surgery because postoperative orbital hemorrhage can rarely cause orbital compartment syndrome and compressive optic neuropathy.
Unexpected severe pain, rapidly increasing proptosis or swelling, reduced vision, or a new pupillary abnormality requires immediate assessment.
Cold compresses can be used during the early postoperative period to reduce edema and discomfort.
Postoperative Diplopia
Persistent diplopia immediately after successful surgery is common and does not necessarily indicate surgical failure.
The entrapped muscle may have sustained edema, ischemia, contusion, or neuropraxia. Ocular motility can therefore take weeks to months to recover.
Patients and their families should be counseled about this possibility before surgery.
In contrast, persistent or recurrent nausea, vomiting, severe movement-related pain, or other oculocardiac symptoms after repair may raise concern for inadequate release or recurrent entrapment and should prompt reassessment.
Ongoing Care and Follow-Up
Patients are usually reviewed within approximately one week after repair, with subsequent follow-up based on ocular motility and recovery.
Cold compresses are generally continued during the first few postoperative days.
Patients should avoid nose blowing, strenuous exercise, heavy lifting, and contact sports during the initial healing period as directed by the treating surgeon.
Visual function should be monitored carefully, and patients and families should be educated about symptoms of postoperative orbital hemorrhage.
A repeat dilated retinal examination may be appropriate after the acute injury period to identify delayed manifestations of associated ocular trauma.
Management of Persistent Diplopia
Temporary occlusion of one eye may be used for troublesome postoperative diplopia.
Care must be taken in young children because prolonged monocular occlusion can cause or worsen amblyopia.
Persistent ocular misalignment should be followed with serial measurements while the injured muscle recovers.
Definitive strabismus surgery should generally be deferred until ocular alignment and motility have stabilized, often for several months, because substantial spontaneous improvement may occur following timely fracture repair.
Patient Monitoring
The most important parameters during follow-up are visual acuity, pupillary function, ocular alignment, extraocular motility, diplopia, globe position, and recovery of facial sensation.
Persistent motility restriction does not necessarily indicate a poor outcome early after surgery. Improvement may continue gradually over weeks or months.
Prognosis
The prognosis is generally excellent when significant entrapment is recognized and released promptly.
Most appropriately treated patients experience substantial recovery of extraocular motility and resolution of diplopia in functionally important positions of gaze.
Some residual diplopia may remain in extreme gaze, particularly upgaze, without causing significant functional disability.
Delayed recognition and prolonged incarceration increase the risk of muscle ischemia, fibrosis, restrictive strabismus, and persistent diplopia.
Complications
One of the most important complications is delayed or missed diagnosis, particularly when the injury is mistaken for concussion or when a subtle fracture is overlooked on imaging.
Persistent diplopia and restrictive strabismus may occur because of ischemic or fibrotic damage to the entrapped muscle.
Surgical complications include orbital hemorrhage, compressive optic neuropathy, persistent infraorbital sensory disturbance, eyelid malposition, scarring, implant migration or extrusion, sinusitis, and orbital cellulitis.
Enophthalmos and hypoglobus are possible but are generally less prominent than in large adult blowout fractures because pediatric trapdoor fractures often involve relatively small bony defects.
The key clinical principle is that a child with minimal external trauma but severe ocular motility restriction, pain with eye movement, nausea, vomiting, or bradycardia should be presumed to have significant orbital entrapment until appropriately evaluated.
- Published on
Ophthalmology – Fractures, Orbital Medial Wall
Basics
Description
An orbital medial wall fracture is a traumatic defect involving the bony medial wall of the orbit. The medial wall is formed mainly by the ethmoid bone, with contributions from the lacrimal, maxillary, and sphenoid bones.
Medial wall fractures may occur as extensions of other facial fractures or together with an orbital floor fracture. An isolated indirect or blowout fracture of the medial wall can also occur without disruption of the orbital rim.
Because the medial orbital wall is very thin, trauma may permit orbital fat and occasionally the medial rectus muscle or adjacent soft tissues to herniate into the ethmoid sinuses. This can lead to diplopia, ocular motility restriction, enophthalmos, or globe dystopia.
Epidemiology
The incidence and prevalence of medial orbital wall fractures vary according to the population and mechanism of injury. They are frequently seen in association with broader orbital or midfacial trauma.
Risk Factors
Orbital fractures occur more commonly in males and younger individuals, particularly those between approximately 15 and 30 years of age.
Important risk factors include participation in contact or projectile sports and activities associated with facial trauma. Substance use may indirectly increase risk through falls, interpersonal violence, and motor vehicle accidents.
Prevention
Protective eyewear should be used during sports and occupational activities involving high-velocity objects.
Sports such as baseball, softball, and hockey are important examples in which appropriate eye and facial protection can reduce the risk of orbital trauma.
Pathophysiology
Medial wall blowout fractures frequently occur together with orbital floor blowout fractures, although isolated medial wall fractures can also occur.
Blunt trauma to the orbital entrance can cause a sudden increase in intraorbital pressure. Because the medial wall is extremely thin, especially at the lamina papyracea, it may fracture under this pressure.
Orbital fat may then herniate into the ethmoid sinus. In more severe cases, the medial rectus muscle or surrounding connective tissue can become trapped within the fracture.
Entrapment may produce restricted horizontal ocular movement and diplopia. Large defects can also increase orbital volume and later result in enophthalmos or abnormal globe position.
Etiology
The main cause is blunt orbital or facial trauma.
A classic mechanism involves the orbital entrance being struck by an object larger than the diameter of the orbital opening, such as a fist, ball, dashboard, or other blunt object.
Commonly Associated Conditions
Medial orbital wall fractures may coexist with significant ocular injuries, including globe rupture, hyphema or microhyphema, traumatic iritis, commotio retinae, choroidal rupture, and traumatic optic neuropathy.
Because these associated conditions can threaten vision independently of the fracture itself, a complete ocular examination is essential.
Diagnosis
History
A careful history should establish the timing, mechanism, direction, and severity of the trauma.
Patients should be asked about decreased vision, diplopia, ocular pain, facial numbness, and changes in globe position.
A history of nausea, vomiting, or bradycardia, especially when triggered by eye movement, raises concern for extraocular muscle or soft-tissue entrapment causing an oculocardiac reflex.
This is particularly important in children and in patients with an associated orbital floor fracture.
Physical Examination
Periorbital Findings
Patients may develop eyelid edema and ecchymosis following the injury.
Because the medial orbital wall communicates with the ethmoid sinuses, air may enter the orbital and eyelid tissues, producing orbital or eyelid emphysema. Subcutaneous crepitus may sometimes be detected on examination.
Visual Assessment
Visual acuity should be documented in both eyes whenever possible.
Pupillary examination is essential because a relative afferent pupillary defect may indicate significant retinal or optic nerve injury.
A complete anterior and posterior segment examination should be performed to identify associated traumatic ocular pathology.
Diplopia and Ocular Motility
Patients may develop diplopia due to orbital edema, hemorrhage, muscle contusion, or mechanical entrapment.
Entrapment of the medial rectus muscle or adjacent tissues can produce horizontal motility restriction.
Ocular movements should therefore be carefully assessed in all directions of gaze.
Globe Dystopia
Large medial wall fractures may allow orbital contents to herniate into the ethmoid sinus.
This increases effective orbital volume and can lead to enophthalmos or other globe displacement. Enophthalmos may initially be masked by acute swelling and become more apparent after edema resolves.
Forced-Duction Testing
Forced-duction testing can be useful when it is necessary to distinguish mechanical restriction from a neurogenic ocular motility disorder.
Resistance to passive movement supports a restrictive process, whereas normal passive movement is more consistent with a paralytic cause.
This test is not necessary in every patient and should be performed only when clinically appropriate.
Diagnostic Tests and Interpretation
Imaging
CT of the orbits with thin sections and multiplanar reconstruction is the principal imaging study for suspected medial orbital wall fractures.
CT can demonstrate the bony defect, associated orbital floor fractures, herniation of orbital fat into the ethmoid sinus, and displacement or possible entrapment of extraocular muscles and adjacent soft tissues.
Imaging findings should always be correlated with the clinical examination because herniation seen on CT does not necessarily mean that clinically significant entrapment is present.
Differential Diagnosis
Orbital hemorrhage or edema without fracture can produce swelling, diplopia, and motility limitation, but CT demonstrates no corresponding bony defect.
A cranial nerve palsy can also produce ocular misalignment and diplopia. Unlike mechanical entrapment, forced-duction testing is generally normal.
Other possibilities include extraocular muscle contusion, orbital hematoma, traumatic neuropathy, and associated orbital floor fractures.
Treatment
Management depends on the size of the fracture, presence of soft-tissue or muscle entrapment, diplopia, ocular motility, globe position, associated ocular injuries, and the age of the patient.
Many uncomplicated medial wall fractures can be managed conservatively.
Initial Management
The immediate priority is to identify and treat any associated vision-threatening ocular or orbital injury.
Cold compresses can be used during the early period after trauma to reduce swelling.
Patients should be instructed to avoid nose blowing, because increased sinus pressure can force additional air or contaminated sinus contents into the orbit.
Nasal decongestants may be considered in selected patients when not contraindicated.
Antibiotics
Older protocols often recommended prophylactic broad-spectrum oral antibiotics because the fracture communicates with the paranasal sinuses.
In current practice, routine prophylactic antibiotics for every uncomplicated closed orbital fracture are not universally required.
Antibiotics may be appropriate when there are additional risk factors such as active sinusitis, contaminated wounds, open fractures, immunocompromise, or other significant infectious risks.
Corticosteroids
A short course of systemic corticosteroids may occasionally be considered when there is substantial orbital edema.
Their main purpose is to reduce swelling and facilitate assessment of ocular motility. They are not routinely required for every fracture.
Referral
Patients with orbital trauma should receive appropriate ophthalmologic assessment to exclude associated ocular injuries.
Patients with significant diplopia, persistent motility restriction, enophthalmos, a large fracture, or suspected tissue entrapment should be referred to an oculoplastic or orbital surgeon or another surgeon experienced in orbital fracture management.
Urgent Referral
Patients with nausea, vomiting, or bradycardia associated with restricted ocular movement require urgent specialist evaluation because these findings may indicate extraocular muscle entrapment with an oculocardiac reflex.
Such patients may require urgent surgical release.
Pediatric Considerations
Children may develop a characteristic trapdoor fracture.
Because pediatric orbital bones are relatively elastic, a fractured segment can temporarily displace and then recoil toward its original position, trapping orbital soft tissue or an extraocular muscle.
This can produce a white-eyed blowout fracture, in which severe motility restriction and systemic symptoms occur despite minimal external bruising.
A child with orbital trauma and diplopia, marked motility restriction, nausea, vomiting, or bradycardia should be considered to have possible entrapment even if the external examination appears relatively normal.
When entrapment is confirmed or strongly suspected, early surgical release is generally indicated.
Surgery and Other Procedures
Not all medial wall fractures require surgery.
Surgical repair may be considered when there is persistent functionally significant diplopia with mechanical restriction, clinically important enophthalmos or globe dystopia, significant soft-tissue entrapment, or a large defect likely to cause late orbital volume expansion.
A medial wall fracture that is continuous with a large orbital floor fracture may be more likely to require reconstruction.
Historically, enophthalmos greater than approximately 2 mm has been used as one factor supporting surgical repair when cosmetically or functionally significant.
For nonurgent fractures requiring reconstruction, surgery is commonly performed after acute swelling improves, often within approximately 1–2 weeks, although timing should be individualized.
Entrapment associated with an oculocardiac reflex, particularly in children, may require much earlier surgery.
Surgical Approaches
An orbital floor approach through an eyelid or transconjunctival incision can be extended superiorly to expose the medial wall when both areas require repair.
An isolated medial wall fracture can also be approached through a transcaruncular incision, which provides direct access to the medial orbit without an external skin incision.
During surgery, entrapped tissue is released and the defect may be reconstructed with an orbital implant when necessary to restore orbital volume and prevent recurrent herniation.
Ongoing Care and Follow-Up
Follow-up should assess visual acuity, pupillary responses, ocular motility, diplopia, globe position, and resolution of swelling and orbital emphysema.
Patients may require continued care from an ophthalmologist, with involvement of oculoplastic surgery, otolaryngology, or oral and maxillofacial surgery depending on the associated injuries.
Persistent or worsening diplopia, progressive enophthalmos, new visual loss, increasing pain, fever, proptosis, or worsening motility restriction requires reassessment.
Patient Education
Patients should avoid nose blowing and activities that markedly increase sinonasal pressure during the early healing period.
They should seek urgent medical attention for new or worsening vision loss, severe ocular pain, increasing redness or swelling, fever, worsening diplopia, or nausea and vomiting associated with eye movement.
Prognosis
The prognosis depends primarily on the severity of the initial trauma and associated ocular, orbital, and facial injuries.
Many uncomplicated medial wall fractures heal well with conservative management.
Patients with significant extraocular muscle entrapment, extensive tissue herniation, traumatic optic neuropathy, or major associated globe injury have a more guarded prognosis.
Complications
Potential complications include decreased vision, persistent diplopia, restrictive strabismus, enophthalmos, and abnormal globe position.
Entrapped extraocular muscle or soft tissue can result in persistent motility dysfunction if not recognized and managed appropriately.
Because the medial wall communicates with the ethmoid sinuses, infection can occasionally spread into the orbit and produce orbital cellulitis.
The most serious visual complications generally result from associated injuries such as globe rupture, retinal damage, or traumatic optic neuropathy, rather than from the medial wall fracture itself.
- Published on
Ophthalmology – Orbital Floor Fractures
Basics
Description
An orbital floor fracture is a traumatic disruption of the bony floor of the orbit. The fracture may occur as an extension of an inferior orbital rim fracture, or it may occur as an isolated blowout fracture.
An indirect or blowout fracture occurs when the orbital floor fractures while the orbital rim remains intact. Orbital soft tissues, including orbital fat and occasionally an extraocular muscle, may herniate or become entrapped within the fracture defect. This can produce diplopia, restricted ocular motility, enophthalmos, and infraorbital sensory loss.
Epidemiology
The incidence and prevalence of orbital floor fractures vary according to population and mechanism of injury. They are particularly common following facial trauma in adolescents and young adults.
Risk Factors
Orbital floor fractures occur more commonly in males and younger individuals, particularly those between approximately 15 and 30 years of age.
Participation in contact or projectile sports increases the risk. Substance use may also increase risk through its association with interpersonal violence, falls, and motor vehicle trauma.
Prevention
Appropriate protective eyewear should be worn during sports and occupations involving high-velocity objects.
Sports such as baseball, softball, and hockey are important examples in which properly fitted protective equipment can reduce the risk of orbital and ocular trauma.
Pathophysiology
Two principal mechanisms have traditionally been proposed to explain orbital floor blowout fractures.
The hydraulic theory proposes that a relatively large, nonpenetrating object strikes the orbital entrance and rapidly increases intraorbital pressure. The globe and orbital contents are displaced posteriorly, transmitting pressure to the orbital walls. The weakest portion of the orbit then fractures, commonly involving the thin posterior-medial orbital floor overlying the maxillary sinus.
The buckling theory proposes that an impact to the inferior orbital rim transmits a compressive force posteriorly through the orbital bones. This causes the relatively thin orbital floor to buckle and fracture even when the orbital rim itself remains intact.
Following either mechanism, orbital fat and other soft tissues may prolapse into the maxillary sinus. In some patients, the inferior rectus muscle or surrounding connective tissue becomes entrapped, producing restrictive ocular motility.
Etiology
Orbital floor fractures are caused by blunt facial or orbital trauma.
A classic mechanism involves an object larger than the orbital opening, such as a fist, ball, dashboard, or other blunt object, striking the orbital region.
Associated Ocular Injuries
Because considerable force may be required to produce an orbital fracture, a complete evaluation for associated ocular trauma is essential.
Potential associated injuries include globe rupture, hyphema or microhyphema, traumatic iritis, commotio retinae, choroidal rupture, and traumatic optic neuropathy.
These injuries may be more immediately vision-threatening than the orbital fracture itself.
Diagnosis
History
The clinician should determine the exact mechanism, timing, and severity of trauma.
Patients should be questioned about diplopia, decreased vision, ocular pain, facial numbness, and changes in the position of the eye.
A classic history involves blunt trauma from an object larger than the orbital opening.
Particular attention should be given to nausea, vomiting, dizziness, or bradycardia after orbital trauma. These findings can indicate an oculocardiac reflex caused by extraocular muscle or soft-tissue entrapment and may require urgent surgical assessment.
Physical Examination
Examination commonly demonstrates periorbital edema and ecchymosis.
Visual acuity, pupils, intraocular structures, and the posterior segment should be examined carefully to exclude associated ocular injury.
Ocular Motility and Diplopia
Diplopia may occur because of edema, hemorrhage, muscle contusion, nerve injury, or mechanical entrapment.
Patients with orbital floor fractures commonly have limitation of upgaze, downgaze, or both, depending on the tissues involved.
Persistent restriction, particularly when accompanied by nausea, vomiting, or bradycardia, raises concern for entrapment.
Globe Position
Enophthalmos may occur when orbital contents herniate through a sufficiently large floor defect, effectively increasing orbital volume.
The globe may also become displaced inferiorly, producing hypoglobus.
Significant enophthalmos may initially be concealed by acute orbital edema and become more apparent after the swelling subsides.
Infraorbital Sensation
Damage or compression of the infraorbital nerve may cause hypesthesia or paresthesia of the lower eyelid, cheek, lateral nose, and upper lip on the affected side.
Orbital Emphysema
Air may enter the orbit from the adjacent maxillary sinus, producing orbital or eyelid emphysema.
For this reason, patients should be instructed not to blow their nose following an orbital fracture.
Orbital Rim
Palpation may reveal tenderness or a step-off deformity when the fracture extends to involve the orbital rim.
Forced-Duction Testing
Forced-duction testing can help distinguish mechanical restriction from a neurogenic motility deficit.
After appropriate topical anesthesia, the globe is gently manipulated to determine whether passive movement is mechanically restricted.
A positive forced-duction test supports restrictive entrapment. However, the need for this test depends on the clinical situation, and imaging plus specialist examination frequently provides the necessary information.
Diagnostic Testing
Imaging
CT of the orbits with thin sections and multiplanar reconstruction is the principal imaging study for suspected orbital floor fracture.
CT can demonstrate the location and extent of the bony defect, herniation of orbital fat into the maxillary sinus, associated orbital wall fractures, and displacement or possible entrapment of extraocular muscles and adjacent soft tissues.
Importantly, radiographic herniation of tissue does not by itself establish clinically significant entrapment. The CT findings must be interpreted together with ocular motility, symptoms, and the remainder of the clinical examination.
Differential Diagnosis
Orbital hemorrhage and edema without fracture may produce swelling, proptosis, diplopia, and restricted movement, but CT does not demonstrate a bony fracture.
A cranial nerve palsy may also cause diplopia and ocular motility abnormalities. Unlike a mechanically restrictive fracture, passive globe movement is generally not restricted.
Muscle contusion, traumatic neuropathy, orbital hematoma, and other orbital injuries should also be considered.
Treatment
Treatment depends on the size of the fracture, presence of tissue entrapment, ocular motility, diplopia, globe position, associated injuries, and the patient’s age.
Not every orbital floor fracture requires surgery.
Initial Management
The first priority is identification and management of potentially vision-threatening injuries, particularly open-globe injury, orbital compartment syndrome, retinal injury, and traumatic optic neuropathy.
Cold compresses can be used during the early post-traumatic period to reduce swelling.
Patients should be specifically instructed to avoid nose blowing, because increased intranasal pressure may force air or contaminated sinus material through the fracture into the orbit.
Nasal decongestants may be considered in selected patients when not otherwise contraindicated.
Analgesia should be provided as necessary.
Antibiotics
Older treatment protocols frequently recommended prophylactic broad-spectrum oral antibiotics, particularly when an orbital fracture communicated with a paranasal sinus.
In contemporary practice, routine prophylactic antibiotics for every uncomplicated closed orbital floor fracture are not universally recommended, because evidence supporting their benefit is limited.
Antibiotic therapy may nevertheless be appropriate in selected patients, such as those with contaminated wounds, active sinus infection, open fractures, immunocompromise, or other increased infectious risk. Management should therefore be individualized.
Corticosteroids
A short course of systemic corticosteroids may occasionally be considered when substantial orbital edema makes assessment of ocular motility difficult.
They are not mandatory for every orbital floor fracture, and contraindications to systemic corticosteroid therapy must be considered.
Referral
Patients with an orbital floor fracture should receive appropriate ophthalmic assessment to exclude associated ocular injuries.
Patients with persistent diplopia, significant motility restriction, enophthalmos, large fractures, or suspected entrapment should be evaluated by an oculoplastic/orbital surgeon or other surgeon experienced in orbital fracture management.
Routine nonurgent fractures can generally be reassessed after the initial edema begins to resolve.
Urgent Referral
Suspected extraocular muscle or soft-tissue entrapment requires urgent specialist assessment.
The combination of restricted eye movement with nausea, vomiting, or bradycardia is particularly concerning because it may represent the oculocardiac reflex.
This situation should not simply be observed for several days while awaiting resolution of swelling.
Pediatric Considerations
Children can sustain a characteristic trapdoor orbital floor fracture. Because pediatric bone is relatively elastic, the fractured bone may temporarily displace and then recoil toward its original position, trapping extraocular muscle or orbital soft tissue.
External bruising and swelling may be surprisingly mild, producing the so-called white-eyed blowout fracture.
A child with orbital trauma, marked motility restriction, diplopia, nausea, vomiting, or bradycardia should therefore be considered to have possible entrapment even when external signs appear minor.
Confirmed or strongly suspected pediatric entrapment generally requires urgent surgical evaluation and early release of the entrapped tissue.
Surgical Treatment
Many orbital floor fractures can be managed conservatively, particularly when diplopia is improving, ocular motility is recovering, and clinically significant enophthalmos is absent.
Surgery is considered when there is persistent functionally significant diplopia with restrictive motility, clinically important enophthalmos or hypoglobus, a sufficiently large defect likely to produce significant late globe displacement, or confirmed tissue entrapment.
Historically, involvement of approximately 50% or more of the orbital floor has been used as one factor suggesting an increased risk of late enophthalmos. However, fracture size alone should not determine management.
Similarly, enophthalmos greater than approximately 2 mm may support repair when it is clinically or cosmetically significant.
For fractures requiring nonurgent reconstruction, surgery is commonly performed after initial swelling has improved but before fibrosis becomes established, often within approximately 1–2 weeks. The timing should be individualized.
Entrapment associated with an oculocardiac reflex or a pediatric trapdoor fracture may require substantially earlier intervention.
Surgical Procedure
The goals of surgery are to release entrapped orbital tissue, restore orbital anatomy and volume, and support the orbital contents.
Entrapped tissues are carefully freed from the fracture site. An orbital implant or other reconstructive material may then be positioned over the bony defect to separate the orbital contents from the maxillary sinus and restore the contour of the orbital floor.
Follow-Up
Patients should be monitored for changes in visual acuity, pupils, ocular motility, diplopia, globe position, and infraorbital sensation.
Follow-up with ophthalmology is appropriate, with involvement of oculoplastic surgery, otolaryngology, or oral and maxillofacial surgery according to the fracture pattern and local treatment approach.
Persistent or worsening visual loss, increasing pain, proptosis, severe motility restriction, fever, or new neurologic symptoms requires prompt reassessment.
Patient Education
Patients should understand that the fracture itself is only one component of orbital trauma and that associated ocular injuries may determine the ultimate visual outcome.
They should avoid nose blowing and activities that markedly increase sinonasal pressure during the early healing period.
New or worsening vision loss, severe pain, increasing swelling, fever, worsening diplopia, nausea or vomiting associated with eye movement, or other significant changes should prompt urgent medical evaluation.
Prognosis
The prognosis is generally favorable in uncomplicated orbital floor fractures.
Final outcome depends largely on the severity of the initial trauma, associated ocular injuries, degree of soft-tissue damage, presence of entrapment, and development of late enophthalmos or persistent diplopia.
Early recognition of muscle entrapment is particularly important because prolonged ischemia and fibrosis can result in persistent motility dysfunction.
Complications
Important complications include persistent diplopia, restrictive strabismus, enophthalmos, hypoglobus, and persistent infraorbital nerve hypesthesia.
Visual loss may occur because of associated globe, retinal, or optic nerve injury rather than from the floor fracture itself.
Less commonly, infectious complications such as orbital cellulitis may develop, particularly when infection spreads from an adjacent paranasal sinus.
- Published on
Ophthalmology – Foveal Hypoplasia
Basics
Description
Foveal hypoplasia is a congenital developmental abnormality in which the fovea fails to develop normally. Because the fovea is responsible for high-resolution central vision, incomplete foveal specialization can result in reduced visual acuity and nystagmus.
Funduscopic examination typically demonstrates an absent or poorly developed foveal pit and foveal light reflex. The normal foveal avascular zone may be absent, allowing retinal vessels to pass unusually close to or directly across the expected center of the fovea.
The remainder of the retina and the optic nerves may appear normal, particularly in isolated foveal hypoplasia.
Visual acuity is variable and depends on the severity of the developmental abnormality and associated ocular conditions. Historically, acuities around 20/100 to 20/200 have been described in more significant cases, although milder forms can have substantially better vision.
Epidemiology
The true incidence and prevalence of foveal hypoplasia are unknown. The condition is uncommon and may occur either as an isolated ocular abnormality or as part of a genetic or developmental syndrome.
Risk Factors
Foveal hypoplasia is strongly associated with albinism and aniridia. A positive family history of foveal hypoplasia or an associated inherited disorder increases the likelihood of the diagnosis.
Genetics
The genetic basis depends on whether foveal hypoplasia occurs in isolation or as part of another disorder.
When associated with aniridia or albinism, the inheritance pattern generally follows that of the underlying condition.
Mutations involving PAX6, located on chromosome 11p13, can cause aniridia-associated foveal hypoplasia and some forms of isolated foveal hypoplasia.
Autosomal recessive forms have also been described, including foveal hypoplasia associated with anterior segment dysgenesis.
Foveal hypoplasia has additionally been reported in association with Axenfeld–Rieger spectrum disorders and other genetic conditions.
Prevention
Because foveal hypoplasia results from abnormal development of the fovea, there is no method for preventing the ocular abnormality after development has occurred.
When a causative mutation or inherited syndrome is identified, genetic counseling can help affected individuals and families understand inheritance patterns and recurrence risks. Prenatal or other genetic testing may be available for selected known mutations.
Pathophysiology
Foveal hypoplasia results from incomplete differentiation and specialization of the central retina during development.
Normal foveal development involves displacement of the inner retinal layers away from the center of the macula, formation of the foveal pit, specialization and elongation of the photoreceptors, and development of a foveal avascular zone.
In foveal hypoplasia, these developmental events are incomplete. Consequently, the inner retinal layers may persist across the foveal center, the foveal pit may be shallow or absent, and retinal vessels may cross the area where the normal foveal avascular zone should be located.
In albinism, deficient melanin within the retinal pigment epithelium is associated with abnormal foveal development.
In PAX6-related disorders, including aniridia, disruption of developmental gene regulation interferes with normal macular differentiation.
Etiology
The condition is believed to result from incomplete embryologic and postnatal development of the fovea.
Normal foveal maturation progresses from an initially indistinct central retinal area toward formation of the annular reflex, development of the foveal pit, and finally appearance of the mature foveal reflex.
Interruption or failure of these developmental processes produces varying degrees of foveal hypoplasia.
Associated Conditions
Important associated disorders include albinism, aniridia, achromatopsia, and congenital nystagmus.
Less commonly, foveal hypoplasia may occur with Axenfeld–Rieger spectrum abnormalities and other developmental or genetic ocular disorders.
Reduced visual acuity is common. Strabismus and amblyopia may develop, particularly when visual function is asymmetric between the two eyes.
Diagnosis
History
Patients usually present with reduced vision beginning in infancy or childhood. Parents may first notice abnormal visual behavior or involuntary eye movements.
Infantile nystagmus is a frequent presenting feature.
Some patients are diagnosed during evaluation for an associated disorder such as albinism or aniridia. Mild isolated foveal hypoplasia may remain undetected until later childhood or adulthood.
A family history of poor vision, nystagmus, albinism, aniridia, or similar ocular abnormalities should be obtained.
Physical Examination
A complete ophthalmologic examination should be performed, with particular attention to the macula.
Funduscopic examination may reveal absence or reduction of the normal foveal light reflex and foveal pit.
The normal foveal avascular zone may be poorly developed or absent. Retinal vessels may extend unusually close to or directly across the presumed foveal center.
The examiner should assess visual acuity, fixation behavior, refractive error, ocular alignment, and nystagmus.
The iris, anterior segment, optic nerves, and peripheral retina should also be examined carefully for evidence of an associated condition such as aniridia or albinism.
Diagnostic Testing
Optical Coherence Tomography
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the most useful imaging technique for confirming and grading foveal hypoplasia.
OCT can demonstrate characteristic persistence of the inner retinal layers through the foveal center and absence or reduction of the normal foveal depression.
Other findings can include abnormal retinal thickness, reduced or absent widening of the outer nuclear layer, and incomplete specialization or elongation of the photoreceptor outer segments.
Modern OCT-based grading systems can classify the severity of foveal hypoplasia according to the degree of structural development. In general, more severe structural abnormalities are associated with poorer visual acuity.
Laboratory and Genetic Evaluation
Routine laboratory investigations are generally not required for isolated foveal hypoplasia.
Molecular genetic testing should be considered when there is suspicion of an inherited disorder, particularly in patients with aniridia, albinism, anterior segment dysgenesis, achromatopsia, a positive family history, or apparently isolated congenital foveal hypoplasia.
Referral to ocular genetics may help determine the most appropriate testing strategy.
Additional Testing
Visual-field testing may occasionally be useful in cooperative patients, particularly when another optic nerve or retinal disorder is being considered.
Additional electrophysiologic or retinal testing may be appropriate when a retinal or cone dystrophy is part of the differential diagnosis.
Pathological and Structural Findings
The principal structural abnormality is failure of normal foveal differentiation.
The ganglion cell and other inner retinal layers may continue across the macular center rather than being displaced centrifugally as they are in a normally developed fovea.
The normal foveal avascular zone may be absent.
Developmental abnormalities of the visual system beyond the retina have also been reported, including changes involving the optic pathways and visual cortex, particularly in syndromic conditions.
Differential Diagnosis
Foveal hypoplasia should be differentiated from other disorders that alter the appearance or position of the macula.
Important considerations include epiretinal membrane, macular dragging from retinopathy of prematurity or familial exudative vitreoretinopathy, high myopia, retinal vascular anomalies, and retinal or macular dystrophies.
A lightly pigmented or blonde fundus can make identification of the fovea difficult but does not necessarily indicate foveal hypoplasia.
Optic nerve hypoplasia and optic atrophy can also produce reduced vision and nystagmus but have different structural findings.
OCT is particularly valuable in distinguishing true developmental foveal hypoplasia from these conditions.
Treatment
There is no medical or surgical treatment capable of creating a normally developed fovea once foveal development is complete.
Management therefore focuses on maximizing the patient’s existing visual potential and treating associated ocular abnormalities.
Optical Correction
Refractive errors should be corrected accurately with spectacles or contact lenses.
Even when central vision is limited by foveal hypoplasia, correction of refractive error can produce meaningful functional improvement.
Amblyopia Treatment
If visual acuity is asymmetric and amblyopia is suspected, appropriate amblyopia therapy should be instituted during the period of visual development.
Early treatment is important because amblyopia represents an additional potentially preventable source of visual loss.
Photophobia
Patients with albinism, aniridia, or other conditions associated with significant photophobia may benefit from tinted or light-filtering lenses.
Low-Vision Rehabilitation
Patients with significant permanent reduction in central vision should be referred for low-vision evaluation and rehabilitation.
Depending on age and functional requirements, magnification devices, electronic aids, educational accommodations, and other assistive technologies can improve reading and daily functioning.
Surgical Treatment
There is no surgical procedure for foveal hypoplasia itself.
Associated strabismus may be treated surgically when appropriate.
Selected patients with significant nystagmus and an abnormal head posture may undergo nystagmus-related surgery. Such procedures may improve head position or certain functional aspects of vision, but they generally do not restore normal foveal visual acuity.
Follow-Up
Follow-up depends on the patient’s age, visual function, and associated disorders.
Children require monitoring of visual development, refractive error, amblyopia, strabismus, and nystagmus.
Patients with associated aniridia or albinism require continued surveillance for complications related to those underlying disorders.
Low-vision needs should be reassessed as educational, occupational, and daily visual demands change.
Patient Monitoring
Particular attention should be given to asymmetric visual acuity because amblyopia can coexist with structural foveal abnormalities and should not automatically be attributed to the foveal hypoplasia.
Ocular alignment and refractive error should also be monitored throughout childhood.
Prognosis
Visual prognosis depends primarily on the degree of foveal development and the presence of associated ocular or systemic abnormalities.
Mild foveal hypoplasia may permit relatively good functional vision, whereas severe developmental abnormalities can produce substantial lifelong reduction in central visual acuity.
Extensive abnormal macular vascularization, including vessels extending close to or across the presumed foveal center, has historically been associated with more severe hypoplasia and poorer visual function.
Because the structural abnormality is congenital, vision lost directly from severe foveal hypoplasia generally cannot be restored. However, maximizing refractive correction and treating amblyopia and strabismus can substantially improve the patient’s usable visual potential.
Complications
The major consequences are low vision and nystagmus.
Patients may also develop amblyopia and strabismus, particularly when the two eyes are affected unequally.
Associated disorders such as albinism and aniridia may produce additional ocular complications that require separate long-term surveillance and treatment.
- Published on
Ophthalmology – Intraorbital Foreign Body
Basics
Description
An intraorbital foreign body (IOFB) is an object that penetrates and becomes retained within the orbit. It most commonly results from a high-velocity penetrating injury or direct impalement by a sharp object.
Foreign bodies may enter through the eyelid or conjunctiva and can damage the globe, extraocular muscles, optic nerve, orbital vessels, orbital walls, or even extend intracranially. The severity depends greatly on the composition, size, velocity, and location of the object and the associated injuries produced at the time of penetration.
Epidemiology
Most patients with intraorbital foreign bodies are young males, commonly younger than 30 years of age. This pattern reflects greater exposure to occupational, recreational, projectile, and traumatic injuries.
Prevention
The most important preventive measures are education and appropriate protective eyewear during high-risk occupational and recreational activities.
Eye protection is particularly important when working with machinery, metal, wood, construction materials, firearms, or other sources of high-velocity projectiles.
Pathophysiology
An IOFB develops when an object penetrates the periocular tissues and enters the orbit through the eyelid, conjunctiva, or adjacent structures.
The foreign body can cause immediate mechanical damage to orbital structures. Subsequent complications depend heavily on the material retained.
Organic materials, particularly wood and plant matter, provoke substantial inflammation and can introduce microorganisms into the orbit. They therefore carry a high risk of infection, abscess formation, and chronic granulomatous inflammation.
Many inert inorganic materials, such as certain metals, glass, or plastic, may remain relatively well tolerated when deeply located and not causing functional problems.
Etiology
Projectile injuries are an important cause. Metallic foreign bodies may result from BB or pellet injuries, firearms, industrial accidents, or fragments produced during metalworking.
Nonmetallic objects may also penetrate the orbit. These can be organic, such as tree branches or wooden fragments, or inorganic, such as glass, plastic, and stone.
The nature of the material is clinically important because organic material generally produces a much greater inflammatory and infectious response than inert inorganic material.
Diagnosis
History
A history of periocular or orbital trauma is usually present, but the original injury may appear deceptively minor.
Delayed presentation is not uncommon. This is particularly important in children or in patients who were intoxicated or otherwise unable to provide an accurate history at the time of injury.
A retained foreign body should therefore be considered in a patient with otherwise unexplained recurrent orbital inflammation, orbital cellulitis, draining sinus, abscess, proptosis, or ocular motility disturbance, particularly when there is a remote history of trauma.
The mechanism of injury should be established whenever possible because it provides information about the likely material, trajectory, velocity, and risk of intracranial penetration.
Physical Examination
Visual acuity should be assessed as soon as safely possible. Vision may range from completely normal to profound or complete visual loss depending on associated globe, optic nerve, or orbital injury.
An afferent pupillary defect may indicate significant optic nerve or retinal involvement.
Extraocular movements should be assessed carefully. Limitation of movement may result from direct extraocular muscle injury, mechanical restriction, inflammation, or nerve injury.
Other possible findings include blepharoptosis, proptosis, orbital swelling, and inflammation.
A foreign body located near the orbital apex may occasionally produce gaze-evoked visual loss, suggesting compression or compromise of the optic nerve or its blood supply with certain eye positions.
The periocular skin and conjunctiva should be examined carefully for an entry wound. The conjunctival fornices deserve particular attention because a small penetration site may easily be overlooked.
The examination must also determine whether there is an associated open-globe injury, which substantially changes subsequent management.
Laboratory Investigation
If infection is suspected, material from the wound or foreign body should be submitted for appropriate aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal cultures.
A complete blood count may demonstrate leukocytosis in patients with significant acute or chronic orbital infection or inflammation, although normal laboratory findings do not exclude a retained foreign body.
Imaging
CT Scan
Orbital CT is generally the key initial imaging study in penetrating orbital trauma. It is particularly effective at identifying and localizing metallic and glass foreign bodies and evaluating associated orbital fractures.
Thin-section images in appropriate planes help determine the foreign body’s location and relationship to the globe, optic nerve, extraocular muscles, and orbital walls.
Wooden foreign bodies can be challenging because their CT appearance changes depending on their water content and duration within the orbit. Dry wood may have very low attenuation and can resemble air, while retained wood may later become more conspicuous as it absorbs fluid and induces inflammation.
MRI
MRI can be useful when CT is unrevealing but there remains strong clinical suspicion for an organic or other radiolucent nonmetallic foreign body.
However, MRI should not be performed until a ferromagnetic metallic foreign body has been reliably excluded, because movement of ferromagnetic material within the magnetic field can cause additional tissue injury.
Ultrasonography
Ultrasound can occasionally assist in localization, particularly for more anterior lesions, but it is less reliable for evaluating the orbital apex.
Ultrasonography also requires particular caution when an open-globe injury is suspected, because pressure on a potentially ruptured globe should be avoided.
Intracranial Extension
Any penetrating injury with a trajectory toward the orbital roof, superior orbital fissure, or orbital apex should raise concern for orbitocranial penetration.
This is especially important in children because their orbital bones are relatively thin. Appropriate CT imaging should evaluate the orbit, brain, and suspected trajectory of the penetrating object.
Additional Diagnostic Testing
When an iron- or copper-containing foreign body lies close to the sclera or globe, electroretinography (ERG) may occasionally be useful to evaluate retinal toxicity.
The need for additional testing depends on the composition and location of the foreign body and associated ocular injury.
Pathological Findings
Retained organic foreign bodies commonly produce chronic inflammation. Histopathology may demonstrate a foreign-body granulomatous reaction, fibrosis, inflammatory cellular infiltration, and occasionally abscess formation.
This strong inflammatory response explains why retained wood and other organic materials generally require removal.
Differential Diagnosis
A retained IOFB should be distinguished from conditions producing similar orbital inflammation or mass effect, particularly orbital cellulitis, idiopathic orbital inflammation, and orbital neoplasms.
In a child with unexplained orbital inflammation or an apparent orbital mass, an occult penetrating injury and retained foreign body should remain in the differential diagnosis.
Treatment
Management depends on the material, location, accessibility, associated injuries, infection, ocular motility, neurologic status, and visual function.
The presence of a foreign body does not automatically mean that every object should be surgically removed. Attempted removal of a deeply located inert object can sometimes cause more damage than leaving it undisturbed.
Medical Treatment
Patients with contaminated penetrating injuries require appropriate tetanus prophylaxis according to their immunization status and wound characteristics.
When orbital cellulitis or another infection is present, broad-spectrum antimicrobial treatment is required. Coverage should reflect the mechanism of injury and suspected organisms, with appropriate anaerobic coverage for contaminated wounds.
Organic foreign bodies have a particularly high risk of polymicrobial and fungal infection and require aggressive evaluation and management.
Surgical Treatment
Surgical removal is generally indicated when the foreign body causes neurologic compromise, significant ocular motility restriction, infection, abscess formation, optic nerve compromise, or other orbital complications.
Organic foreign bodies should generally be removed because of their high risk of infection and chronic inflammatory reactions.
Accessible foreign bodies in the anterior orbit are also more likely to be removed because surgery can often be performed with relatively limited risk.
In contrast, a deeply located inert inorganic foreign body in the posterior orbit may sometimes be observed when it is not causing infection, visual dysfunction, motility disturbance, or other complications. Attempting to retrieve an object adjacent to the orbital apex or optic nerve may itself threaten vision.
Intraoperative imaging or localization techniques, including ultrasound or fluoroscopy, may occasionally assist in identifying difficult-to-localize foreign bodies.
Associated globe injuries should be addressed appropriately as part of the overall surgical plan.
Referral and Multidisciplinary Management
Patients require urgent ophthalmologic assessment, particularly when there is decreased vision, suspected open-globe injury, optic neuropathy, significant motility disturbance, or orbital infection.
An oculoplastic or orbital surgeon may be required for removal of complex foreign bodies.
If imaging demonstrates or strongly suggests intracranial penetration, neurosurgical involvement is essential.
Follow-Up
Follow-up should assess visual acuity, pupillary responses, ocular motility, globe integrity, optic nerve function, orbital inflammation, and signs of infection.
Patients in whom an inorganic foreign body is intentionally retained require ongoing observation for delayed complications.
Organic foreign bodies require particularly careful follow-up because infection or inflammatory complications may develop even after an initially quiet period.
Prognosis
Visual prognosis depends primarily on the severity of the initial injury, particularly damage to the globe, retina, optic nerve, or orbital apex.
Many retained inert metallic foreign bodies are well tolerated and may have a good prognosis when they do not directly damage important orbital structures.
The composition of the metal matters. Copper-containing foreign bodies can provoke severe chronic inflammatory or suppurative reactions.
Organic materials have a less favorable prognosis because they carry a substantially greater risk of orbital infection, abscess formation, chronic inflammation, and intracranial infection.
Complications
Potential complications include orbital cellulitis, orbital abscess, chronic suppurative inflammation, sterile abscess formation, orbitocutaneous fistula, orbital wall osteomyelitis, ocular motility abnormalities, optic nerve injury, and permanent visual loss.
Penetrating injuries extending beyond the orbit may produce intracranial infection, cerebral injury, meningitis, or brain abscess, making recognition of orbitocranial extension particularly important.
- Published on
Pharmacology - Writing a Prescription
Q1. What should be done before writing a prescription?
A: Before prescribing a medicine, review the patient’s current drug therapy carefully. This should also be done when rewriting an existing hospital drug chart.
Q2. What should you consider about the new medicine in relation to the patient’s existing treatment?
A: Ask how the new medicine will contribute to the current management of the disease. Consider whether it will:
- Improve or relieve symptoms.
- Modify the underlying pathophysiology of the disease.
- Prevent the disease or slow its progression.
Q3. Why should other medical conditions be considered before prescribing?
A: A medicine prescribed for one condition may worsen another disease.
For example:
- Diuretics used for heart failure may worsen gout.
- Beta-blockers may trigger or worsen asthma.
Q4. Why is it important to check for drug interactions?
A: A newly prescribed medicine may interact with other medicines the patient is already taking, which can reduce effectiveness or increase adverse effects.
Q5. Which medicines should be considered when checking for interactions?
A: Consider all medicines the patient uses, including:
- Medicines prescribed by other doctors, nurses, or pharmacists.
- Over-the-counter medicines.
- Herbal remedies.
- Other non-prescribed medicines or substances.
Practical Prescription Writing
Q6. Which drug names should generally be used when writing prescriptions?
A: Prescribers are encouraged to use the recommended International Non-proprietary Name (rINN) rather than brand or proprietary names, because brand names may cause confusion.
Q7. Should abbreviations or acronyms be used for drug names?
A: No. Drug names should be written clearly and in full whenever possible.
For example, write glyceryl trinitrate instead of using the abbreviation GTN.
Q8. How should the dose of a medicine be written?
A: The dose should be stated clearly using appropriate units. Commonly accepted units include:
- mg for milligrams.
- mL for millilitres.
Q9. How should microgram doses be written?
A: The word “micrograms” should be written in full.
The symbol μg should be avoided because it may be misread as mg, potentially causing a serious dosing error.
Q10. How should drug doses expressed in units be written?
A: Write the word “units” in full.
Avoid abbreviations or symbols such as U, because they may be misread as a zero and result in an incorrect dose.
Q11. Why should decimal points be avoided when writing doses?
A: Decimal points may be overlooked or misread, which can lead to significant dosing errors.
For example, .5 mL could mistakenly be read as 5 mL.
Q12. How should a decimal dose be written when it is necessary?
A: Always place a zero before the decimal point.
For example:
- Correct: 0.5 mL
- Incorrect: .5 mL
Route of Administration
Q13. What routes of administration should be stated on a prescription?
A: The route by which the medicine should be administered must be clearly documented.
Commonly recognised abbreviations include:
- po – by mouth.
- im – intramuscularly.
- iv – intravenously.
- sc – subcutaneously.
Frequency of Administration
Q14. What does “od” mean on a prescription?
A: od means the medicine should be taken once daily.
Q15. What does “bd” mean?
A: bd means the medicine should be taken twice daily.
Q16. What does “tds” mean?
A: tds means the medicine should be taken three times daily.
Q17. What does “qds” mean?
A: qds means the medicine should be taken four times daily.
Q18. What does “prn” mean?
A: prn means the medicine should be given or taken when required.
When prescribing a medicine on a PRN basis, the maximum permitted daily dose should also be stated.
Q19. What does “stat” mean?
A: stat means the medicine should be administered immediately.
Special Instructions
Q20. What special instructions may need to be included on a prescription?
A: Additional instructions may be required to ensure that the medicine is taken correctly.
Examples include:
- Dietary instructions, such as “take with food.”
- Timing instructions, such as “take at night.”
Q21. Why are special instructions important?
A: They help ensure safe and effective medicine use and may improve absorption, reduce adverse effects, or ensure that the medicine is taken at the most appropriate time.
Completing the Prescription
Q22. What must be done after completing a prescription?
A: The prescription should be:
- Signed by the prescriber.
- Dated clearly.
This confirms who prescribed the medicine and when it was prescribed.
Q23. Are there additional requirements for controlled drugs?
A: Yes. Prescriptions for controlled drugs are subject to additional legal and documentation requirements, so the relevant prescribing regulations must be followed carefully.