- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – Issues with Futures Contracts
1. Absence of Countervalues at Contract Stage
2. Short Selling (Selling Without Ownership)
3. Lack of Actual Possession Before Resale
4. Sale of Debt for Debt (Prohibited)
5. Speculation, Gambling, and Uncertainty
Overall Conclusion
- General view:
- Muslim scholars have differing opinions
- Many argue futures contracts do not fully comply with Shari’ah principles
1. Absence of Countervalues at Contract Stage
- No immediate payment and no delivery of goods/services
- Transaction exists only on paper (speculative intent)
- Shari’ah requirement:
- At least one countervalue must be present for validity
- Comparison with Salam:
- Buyer pays in advance
- Seller delivers later
- Issue:
- Futures defer both payment and delivery, which is not permitted
2. Short Selling (Selling Without Ownership)
- Seller sells commodities not owned or possessed
- Violates principle:
- Sale must involve transfer of ownership
- Ownership cannot transfer if seller does not own the asset
3. Lack of Actual Possession Before Resale
- Many futures trades occur without physical delivery
- Shari’ah requires:
- Ownership and possession before resale
- This condition is often not fulfilled
4. Sale of Debt for Debt (Prohibited)
- Both payment and delivery are deferred
- Results in:
- Bai al-kali bil-kali
- This type of transaction is prohibited in Shari’ah
5. Speculation, Gambling, and Uncertainty
- High level of speculation in futures markets
- Linked to:
- Maisir (gambling)
- Gharar (uncertainty)
- Both are strictly prohibited
- Can lead to:
- Price volatility in real markets
Overall Conclusion
- Key concerns:
- Lack of ownership
- Deferred countervalues
- Speculative nature
- These issues make conventional futures contracts problematic under Islamic law
- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – Bai al-Kali bil-Kali (Debt for Debt)
Key takeaway:
- Definition:
- Bai al-kali bil-kali refers to:
- A transaction where both countervalues are deferred
- In simple terms: exchanging one debt for another debt
- Bai al-kali bil-kali refers to:
- How it works:
- Buyer promises to pay later
- Seller promises to deliver later
- At the time of contract:
- No money is paid
- No goods are delivered
- Result → both sides hold future obligations (debts)
- Why it is prohibited in Islam:
- No real exchange at the time of agreement
- Leads to:
- Uncertainty (gharar)
- Higher risk of default or dispute
- Goes against Shari’ah requirement:
- At least one countervalue must be immediate
- Key Shari’ah concern:
- Contracts should involve certainty and fairness
- Debt-for-debt creates:
- Weak contractual foundation
- Potential for speculation and exploitation
- Simple example:
- A sells goods to B:
- Payment: after 3 months
- Delivery: after 3 months
- → Nothing exchanged now → both are debts → prohibited
- A sells goods to B:
- Contrast with permissible contracts:
- Salam:
- Payment made upfront
- Delivery later
- Only one side deferred → allowed
- Murabaha:
- Goods are owned and sold with known cost and profit
- Clear structure → permissible
- Salam:
Key takeaway:
- Bai al-kali bil-kali = both sides deferred
- Considered invalid in Shari’ah
- One of the main reasons why conventional futures contracts are problematic in Islamic finance
- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – What is “Debt” in Islam?
Simple takeaway:
- Basic meaning:
- Debt (Arabic: dayn) = an obligation owed by one party to another
- It can be:
- Money owed
- Goods or services owed (to be delivered later)
- Key characteristics of debt in Islam:
- It is a binding responsibility that must be fulfilled
- Created when:
- Payment is delayed, or
- Delivery of goods/services is postponed
- Recognized and regulated under Islamic commercial law (fiqh al-muamalat)
- Examples:
- Borrowing money → you must repay later
- Buying goods now, paying later → price becomes a debt
- Paying now, receiving goods later (like Salam) → goods become a debt on the seller
- Important rules in Islam:
- Debt must be:
- Clearly defined (amount, time, terms)
- Free from injustice or exploitation
- Charging interest (riba) on debt is strictly prohibited
- Debts should be:
- Repaid on time
- Written/documented (encouraged in the Qur’an)
- Debt must be:
- Connection to futures contracts:
- In cases like Bai al-kali bil-kali:
- Both sides (payment & delivery) become debts
- This is problematic because:
- Islam discourages exchanging one debt for another
- In cases like Bai al-kali bil-kali:
Simple takeaway:
- A debt in Islam is anything owed and deferred
- It is taken seriously, must be fair, and should not involve interest or excessive uncertainty
- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – What is Short Selling?
Shari’ah Perspective
Key takeaway:
- Definition:
- Short selling = selling an asset you do not own with the intention of buying it later at a lower price
- How it works (simple steps):
- A trader sells a commodity/asset at the current market price
- The trader does not actually own the asset at that time
- Later, the trader buys it back at a lower price
- Profit = difference between selling price and buying price
- Example:
- Sell a stock at $100 (without owning it)
- Later buy it at $80
- Profit = $20
- Why people do it:
- To profit from falling prices
- Common in financial markets like stocks and futures
Shari’ah Perspective
- Main issue:
- Selling something not owned or possessed
- Violates key Islamic principle:
- “Do not sell what you do not own”
- Related concerns:
- Involves uncertainty (Gharar)
- May include speculation similar to Maisir
- Ownership transfer is not valid at time of sale
Key takeaway:
- Short selling = selling first, owning later
- Generally considered not permissible in Islamic finance because:
- No ownership
- High uncertainty
- Speculative nature
- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – Options Contracts
Basic Concept of Options
Types of Options
1. Call Option (Right to Buy)
2. Put Option (Right to Sell)
Example – Call Option (A)
Example – Put Option (B)
Key Takeaways
Basic Concept of Options
- An option contract gives the buyer:
- Right (not obligation) to buy or sell an asset
- At a fixed price
- On or before a future date
- Buyer must pay a premium:
- Fee paid to seller for this right
- Loss is limited to this premium amount
Types of Options
1. Call Option (Right to Buy)
- Gives buyer the right to purchase an asset
- Price is fixed in advance
- Used when expecting price increase
- If price rises → buyer profits
- If price falls → buyer lets option expire (loss = premium only)
2. Put Option (Right to Sell)
- Gives buyer the right to sell an asset
- Price is fixed in advance
- Used when expecting price decrease
- If price falls → buyer sells at higher fixed price → profit
- If price rises → buyer lets option expire (loss = premium only)
Example – Call Option (A)
- A expects stock price to increase
- Choices:
- Buy stock fully, or
- Pay premium for call option
- If price rises:
- A benefits
- If price falls:
- A does not exercise option
- Loss = premium only
Example – Put Option (B)
- B expects stock price to decrease
- Choices:
- Sell stock now, or
- Buy put option
- If price falls:
- B sells at fixed higher price → profit
- If price rises:
- B lets option expire
- Loss = premium only
Key Takeaways
- Options = right without obligation
- Premium = cost of flexibility
- Helps manage risk and speculation
- Widely used in financial markets, but raises Shari’ah concerns (ownership, uncertainty, speculation)
- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – Combined Options
Use of Combined Options
What is a Combined Option?
Corrected Example (C and USD Fluctuation)
Outcomes
1. If USD value increases
2. If USD value decreases
Key Idea
Important Insight
Shari’ah Note
Final Takeaway
Use of Combined Options
- Businesses use:
- Call + Put options together
- Purpose:
- Hedge risk from:
- Currency fluctuations (e.g. USD)
- Commodity price changes
- Hedge risk from:
What is a Combined Option?
- Combination of:
- Call option → right to buy
- Put option → right to sell
- Designed so that:
- One option offsets the loss of the other
Corrected Example (C and USD Fluctuation)
- C is worried that USD value may change and affect a contract
- To reduce risk, C buys a combined option (call + put)
Outcomes
1. If USD value increases
- ✅ Call option is exercised
- C can buy at lower fixed price
- → Gains profit / saves cost
- ❌ Put option is not used
- ✔️ Profit from call helps offset premium cost
2. If USD value decreases
- ✅ Put option is exercised
- C can sell at higher fixed price
- → Gains profit
- ❌ Call option is not used
- ✔️ Profit from put helps offset premium cost
Key Idea
- Combined options provide:
- Protection in both directions (price up or down)
- A form of risk management (hedging)
Important Insight
- Only one option is useful at a time:
- Call → when prices rise
- Put → when prices fall
Shari’ah Note
- Despite hedging benefits, concerns remain:
- Gharar
- Maisir
- Therefore, permissibility is debated among scholars
Final Takeaway
- ✔️ The corrected logic:
- Call = benefit when price rises
- Put = benefit when price falls
- ✔️ Combined options = balanced risk protection, not contradiction
- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – Stand-alone vs Embedded Options
A. Basic Concept of Options
B. Types of Options
C. Stand-alone Options
Definition
Key Features
Examples
Scenario
Nature
D. Embedded Options
Definition
Key Features
Examples
Scenario
Nature
E. Key Differences (in points)
F. Similarity
G. Shari’ah Perspective
H. Final Takeaway
A. Basic Concept of Options
- Option = right (not obligation) to:
- Buy or sell an asset
- At a fixed price
- On or before a future date
- Buyer pays a premium for this right
B. Types of Options
- Call option:
- Right to buy
- Used when expecting price increase
- Put option:
- Right to sell
- Used when expecting price decrease
C. Stand-alone Options
Definition
- Options that are:
- Separate and independent contracts
- Bought and sold individually in markets
Key Features
- Require separate premium payment
- Can be traded freely (stocks, currencies, commodities)
- Often used for:
- Speculation
- Risk hedging
Examples
- Buying a call option on shares:
- Pay premium → right to buy shares later
- Buying a put option on USD:
- Pay premium → right to sell currency at fixed rate
Scenario
- Pay RM500 for option to buy gold at RM10,000
- If price rises → exercise → profit
- If price falls → do nothing → lose premium only
Nature
- Pure financial instrument
- Not tied to a real transaction
- Exists on its own
D. Embedded Options
Definition
- Options that are:
- Built into another contract
- Not sold separately
Key Features
- No separate premium:
- Cost included in overall contract price
- Not traded independently
- Provide flexibility in real business transactions
Examples
- Cancellation option:
- Buyer/seller can cancel contract before execution
- Lease (Ijarah) with purchase option:
- Customer may choose to buy asset at end
- Early settlement option:
- Buyer can repay financing earlier
- Callable sukuk:
- Issuer can redeem earlier than maturity
Scenario
- Contract to buy goods at RM10,000
- Clause allows cancellation before delivery
- If price drops → cancel contract
- If price rises → continue contract
Nature
- Part of a real economic transaction
- Provides practical flexibility, not speculation
E. Key Differences (in points)
- Stand-alone options are separate contracts; embedded options are part of another contract
- Stand-alone options require separate premium; embedded options have cost included in price
- Stand-alone options are actively traded; embedded options are not tradable separately
- Stand-alone options are often used for speculation; embedded options are for contract flexibility
F. Similarity
- Both provide:
- Right without obligation
G. Shari’ah Perspective
- Stand-alone options:
- Involve:
- Gharar
- Maisir
- Generally questionable or not permissible
- Involve:
- Embedded options:
- More acceptable when:
- Linked to real contracts and assets
- Not purely speculative
- More acceptable when:
H. Final Takeaway
- Stand-alone options = independent, tradable, speculative
- Embedded options = built-in rights within real contracts
- Main difference = purpose and structure, not just the “right” itself
- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – Minority View & Warrants
A. Minority View on Options
B. Role of Shari’ah Boards
C. Warrants (Basic Concept)
Definition
Key Features of Warrants
Investor Perspective
D. Difference Between Warrants and Call Options
1. Issuance
2. When Exercised
3. Effect on Company
E. Shari’ah Insight
F. Final Takeaway
A. Minority View on Options
- Some scholars (minority opinion):
- Believe options can be approved
- Reason:
- Useful for:
- Risk management (hedging)
- Business needs
- Useful for:
B. Role of Shari’ah Boards
- Shari’ah boards in Islamic Financial Institutions (IFIs):
- Adopt minority opinions
- Aim:
- Develop Shari’ah-compliant alternatives to conventional options
- Approach:
- Modify structure to:
- Avoid Maisir
- Avoid Gharar
- Link to real assets and transactions
- Modify structure to:
C. Warrants (Basic Concept)
Definition
- Warrant = corporate security similar to a call option
- Gives holder:
- Right (not obligation) to buy company shares
- At a fixed price
- Within a specific time period
Key Features of Warrants
- Specify:
- Number of shares
- Exercise price
- Expiry date
- Often:
- Attached to bonds when issued
- Buyer:
- Can choose whether to exercise or not
Investor Perspective
- Warrants are similar to:
- Call options on shares
- Benefit:
- Buy shares at fixed (possibly lower) price
D. Difference Between Warrants and Call Options
1. Issuance
- Call option:
- Issued by individual investors/traders
- Warrant:
- Issued by the company itself
2. When Exercised
- Call option:
- Buyer purchases shares from another investor
- Company is not directly involved
- Warrant:
- Buyer purchases shares directly from company
- Company:
- Receives money
- Issues new shares
3. Effect on Company
- Call option:
- No change in company shares
- Warrant:
- Increases number of shares outstanding
E. Shari’ah Insight
- Warrants may be viewed more favorably than options if:
- Linked to real shares (underlying asset)
- Not purely speculative
- Still debated depending on:
- Structure and usage
F. Final Takeaway
- Minority scholars support developing Islamic alternatives
- Warrants:
- Function like call options
- But differ in:
- Issuer (company vs investor)
- Impact on shares
- Seen as a possible bridge toward Shari’ah-compliant option-like instruments
- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – How Warrants Work
A. Basic Idea of a Warrant
B. Does a Warrant Have Call or Put?
C. Is There a Premium?
D. How It Works (Step-by-Step)
E. Key Difference from Call Option
F. Simple Comparison
G. Shari’ah Insight
H. Final Takeaway
A. Basic Idea of a Warrant
- Warrant = right (not obligation) to buy shares
- Very similar to a call option only
- Issued by the company, not traders
B. Does a Warrant Have Call or Put?
- ✔️ Warrant = like a CALL option
- Right to buy shares at fixed price
- ❌ No “put warrant” in the usual sense
- It does not give right to sell
C. Is There a Premium?
- ✔️ Yes, but different from options:
- You pay to get the warrant
- Cost may be:
- Paid directly, or
- Included in another product (e.g. bond)
- It behaves like a premium, but:
- Not always shown separately
- Sometimes embedded in price
D. How It Works (Step-by-Step)
- You receive or buy a warrant
- Example: Right to buy shares at RM10
- Wait until future date
- Two outcomes:
- If market price = RM15:
- ✔️ Exercise warrant
- Buy at RM10 → profit
- If market price = RM8:
- ❌ Do not exercise
- Let it expire → loss limited to cost of warrant
E. Key Difference from Call Option
- Call option:
- Buy shares from another investor
- Warrant:
- Buy shares directly from the company
- Company issues new shares
F. Simple Comparison
- Warrant:
- ✔️ Right to buy
- ✔️ Issued by company
- ✔️ May have implicit premium
- ❌ No selling right
G. Shari’ah Insight
- More acceptable (in some views) because:
- Linked to real shares
- But still debated due to:
- Gharar
- Maisir
H. Final Takeaway
- Warrant = company-issued call option (only buy right)
- Has cost like premium, but may be embedded
- Used to buy shares in future at fixed price
- Published on
Islamic Derivatives – Why Warrants Are Linked to Real Assets but Options Are Not
A. Warrants → Direct Link to Real Asset
B. Options → Often Not Linked in Practice
C. Nature of Trading
Warrants
Options
D. Shari’ah Concern
E. Key Conceptual Difference
F. Important Clarification
Final Takeaway
I
A. Warrants → Direct Link to Real Asset
- Warrant gives:
- Right to buy actual company shares
- When exercised:
- ✔️ You receive real shares
- ✔️ Company issues new shares
- So:
- There is a clear underlying asset (equity/shares)
- Leads to real ownership
- Warrant → ends in actual asset transfer
B. Options → Often Not Linked in Practice
- Option gives:
- Right to buy or sell
- BUT in reality:
- Most options are:
- Traded repeatedly
- Closed before expiry
- Settled in cash (no delivery)
- Most options are:
- ❌ No actual asset exchanged
- ❌ No real ownership happens
C. Nature of Trading
Warrants
- Usually:
- Held until exercised
- Purpose:
- Investment in company shares
Options
- Commonly used for:
- Speculation
- Price betting
- Traders:
- Rarely intend to own the asset
D. Shari’ah Concern
- Options involve:
- Gharar
- Maisir
- Because:
- Focus is on price movement, not ownership
E. Key Conceptual Difference
- Warrant:
- Right tied to real shares issued by company
- Leads to actual ownership
- Option:
- Right often treated as a tradable financial claim
- May never lead to real asset transfer
F. Important Clarification
- It’s not that options cannot involve real assets
- The issue is:
- How they are used in practice
- Heavy speculation + no delivery
Final Takeaway
- ✔️ Warrants = closer to real asset-based transaction
- ❗ Options = often detached from real assets in practice
- 👉 That’s why warrants are sometimes viewed as more acceptable (relatively) in Islamic finance
I