- Published on
Equity and Trust – Difference Between Specific Performance and Mandatory (Positive) Injunctions
Case Scenario
Olivia enters into a contract to purchase a rare historic property from Daniel. After exchanging contracts, Daniel refuses to complete the transfer because another buyer offers a higher price.
At the same time, trustees of a family trust refuse to provide beneficiaries with important trust documents and fail to distribute trust assets properly.
Separately, a construction company unlawfully blocks a private access road belonging to neighbouring landowners. The landowners apply to court seeking an order requiring the company to remove the obstruction.
The issue is whether the court should grant specific performance or a mandatory injunction.
Specific Performance
Definition
Specific performance is an equitable remedy ordering a party to perform an existing contractual or trust obligation.
The court compels the defendant to carry out the exact duty they previously agreed to perform.
It commonly arises in:
Key Features
Practical Application
In the scenario, Olivia seeks specific performance because:
Specific Performance in Trusts
Courts may use specific performance to compel trustees to perform trust duties.
Examples include:
However, courts generally will not interfere with trustees’ discretionary powers where trustees are entitled to choose beneficiaries or decide distributions properly.
This limitation is illustrated in Re Blake.
Mandatory (Positive) Injunction
Definition
A mandatory injunction is an equitable remedy ordering a party to carry out a positive act.
Unlike specific performance, it is not limited to enforcing contractual obligations.
The purpose is usually to:
Key Features
Practical Application
In the scenario, the construction company unlawfully blocks the road.
The neighbouring landowners are not seeking enforcement of a contract.
Instead, they want the company ordered to remove the obstruction.
The court would therefore grant a mandatory injunction compelling positive action.
Main Difference Between the Remedies
The central distinction is the purpose of the order.
Specific performance:
Why the Remedies Are Often Confused
The remedies are similar because both:
Specific performance arises from an existing duty under a contract or trust.
Mandatory injunctions arise where the court needs to compel action to achieve justice.
Solving the Scenario
Sale of the Historic Property
The correct remedy is specific performance because:
Trustees Refusing Documents
The court may order specific performance compelling trustees to fulfil their trust obligations and provide documents to beneficiaries.
Obstruction of the Access Road
The appropriate remedy is a mandatory injunction because the company must take positive steps to remove the obstruction and stop the continuing interference.
Conclusion
Specific performance and mandatory injunctions are both equitable remedies compelling action, but they serve different purposes.
Specific performance enforces obligations already existing under contracts or trusts.
Mandatory injunctions compel positive conduct to prevent or remedy wrongdoing more generally.
Both remedies are discretionary and breach of either order may result in contempt of court proceedings.
Case Scenario
Olivia enters into a contract to purchase a rare historic property from Daniel. After exchanging contracts, Daniel refuses to complete the transfer because another buyer offers a higher price.
At the same time, trustees of a family trust refuse to provide beneficiaries with important trust documents and fail to distribute trust assets properly.
Separately, a construction company unlawfully blocks a private access road belonging to neighbouring landowners. The landowners apply to court seeking an order requiring the company to remove the obstruction.
The issue is whether the court should grant specific performance or a mandatory injunction.
Specific Performance
Definition
Specific performance is an equitable remedy ordering a party to perform an existing contractual or trust obligation.
The court compels the defendant to carry out the exact duty they previously agreed to perform.
It commonly arises in:
- contracts for the sale of land;
- trust administration;
- transfer of unique property.
Key Features
- Used where damages are inadequate.
- Most common in land contracts because land is unique.
- Enforces obligations already owed under a contract or trust.
- Discretionary remedy.
- Breach amounts to contempt of court.
Practical Application
In the scenario, Olivia seeks specific performance because:
- there is a valid contract for sale of land;
- Daniel refuses to complete the transfer;
- the property is unique;
- monetary damages may not adequately compensate Olivia.
Specific Performance in Trusts
Courts may use specific performance to compel trustees to perform trust duties.
Examples include:
- transferring trust property;
- distributing trust funds;
- handing over trust documents.
However, courts generally will not interfere with trustees’ discretionary powers where trustees are entitled to choose beneficiaries or decide distributions properly.
This limitation is illustrated in Re Blake.
Mandatory (Positive) Injunction
Definition
A mandatory injunction is an equitable remedy ordering a party to carry out a positive act.
Unlike specific performance, it is not limited to enforcing contractual obligations.
The purpose is usually to:
- remedy wrongdoing;
- restore a previous position;
- prevent continuing harm.
Key Features
- Orders positive action.
- Broader than specific performance.
- Used to correct injustice or unlawful conduct.
- Discretionary remedy.
- Breach amounts to contempt of court.
Practical Application
In the scenario, the construction company unlawfully blocks the road.
The neighbouring landowners are not seeking enforcement of a contract.
Instead, they want the company ordered to remove the obstruction.
The court would therefore grant a mandatory injunction compelling positive action.
Main Difference Between the Remedies
The central distinction is the purpose of the order.
Specific performance:
- enforces an existing contractual or trust obligation;
- requires the defendant to perform what was originally promised.
- compels positive action more generally;
- aims to prevent or correct wrongdoing.
Why the Remedies Are Often Confused
The remedies are similar because both:
- are equitable remedies;
- are discretionary;
- compel action rather than payment of damages;
- are enforced through contempt proceedings.
Specific performance arises from an existing duty under a contract or trust.
Mandatory injunctions arise where the court needs to compel action to achieve justice.
Solving the Scenario
Sale of the Historic Property
The correct remedy is specific performance because:
- Daniel entered into a valid contract;
- Olivia seeks enforcement of that agreement;
- land is unique;
- damages are inadequate.
Trustees Refusing Documents
The court may order specific performance compelling trustees to fulfil their trust obligations and provide documents to beneficiaries.
Obstruction of the Access Road
The appropriate remedy is a mandatory injunction because the company must take positive steps to remove the obstruction and stop the continuing interference.
Conclusion
Specific performance and mandatory injunctions are both equitable remedies compelling action, but they serve different purposes.
Specific performance enforces obligations already existing under contracts or trusts.
Mandatory injunctions compel positive conduct to prevent or remedy wrongdoing more generally.
Both remedies are discretionary and breach of either order may result in contempt of court proceedings.
0 Comments