- Published on
Indian Evidence Law – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 –
Giving, as Evidence, of a Document Called for and Produced on Notice (Section 166)
Case Scenario (Beginning as Required)
In a civil suit over financial transactions, the defendant believes that the plaintiff’s account books contain entries favourable to the defence. The defendant serves a notice on the plaintiff to produce those account books. During trial, the plaintiff produces the books, and the defendant inspects them. Later, when the defendant hesitates to place those books on record because some entries appear unfavourable, the plaintiff insists that the documents be given in evidence.
The question arises: Can the party who called for and inspected the document now refuse to put it in evidence?
Section 166 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 squarely governs this situation.
Section 166 – Giving as Evidence a Document Called for and Produced on Notice
Statutory Rule (Paraphrased in Simple English)
When:
then:
In other words, once a party inspects a document obtained on notice, he cannot later refuse to rely on it as evidence if the producing party insists.
Rationale Behind Section 166
The rationale of this provision is based on fairness and procedural discipline:
The law does not permit
Scope of Section 166
Essentials for the Application of Section 166
Three essential conditions must be satisfied:
Evidentiary Value of a Document Produced Under Section 166
Does the Document Automatically Become Proof?
No. A document produced under Section 166:
The court must still examine:
Document Must Be Considered as a Whole
Once a document is admitted:
A party cannot:
Leading Case: Rajagopal Ayyangar v. Ramanuja Ayyangar
Facts (Simplified)
Held
The court held:
👉 The document becomes evidence only when produced before the court, and:
Key Legal Principles Emanating from Section 166
Strengths
Limitations
10 Illustrative Case Scenarios
Section 166 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 embodies the principle that a party who calls for and inspects a document must accept the legal consequences of that inspection. If the producing party so demands, the document must be given in evidence.
At the same time, the section carefully preserves judicial scrutiny by requiring that the document’s relevancy, admissibility, and truth be independently examined. By discouraging selective reliance and ensuring openness, Section 166 strengthens fairness and integrity in judicial proceedings.
Giving, as Evidence, of a Document Called for and Produced on Notice (Section 166)
Case Scenario (Beginning as Required)
In a civil suit over financial transactions, the defendant believes that the plaintiff’s account books contain entries favourable to the defence. The defendant serves a notice on the plaintiff to produce those account books. During trial, the plaintiff produces the books, and the defendant inspects them. Later, when the defendant hesitates to place those books on record because some entries appear unfavourable, the plaintiff insists that the documents be given in evidence.
The question arises: Can the party who called for and inspected the document now refuse to put it in evidence?
Section 166 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 squarely governs this situation.
Section 166 – Giving as Evidence a Document Called for and Produced on Notice
Statutory Rule (Paraphrased in Simple English)
When:
- One party gives notice to the other party to produce a document, and
- The document is produced and inspected by the party who called for it,
then:
- The party who called for and inspected the document must give it in evidence
- If the party producing the document demands that it be so given
In other words, once a party inspects a document obtained on notice, he cannot later refuse to rely on it as evidence if the producing party insists.
Rationale Behind Section 166
The rationale of this provision is based on fairness and procedural discipline:
- A party who compels production of a document must:
- Take the risk of its contents
- Accept that the document may operate against him
The law does not permit
- Selective use of documents
- Tactical inspection followed by suppression
- Civil proceedings
- Criminal trials
Scope of Section 166
- Applies when documents are produced at the instance of the opposite party
- Prevents misuse of the right to call for documents
- Ensures transparency in judicial proceedings
- If the document has already been produced before the court by any party,
👉 Section 166 does not apply.
Essentials for the Application of Section 166
Three essential conditions must be satisfied:
- Notice to Produce
- One party must require the other party to produce a document
- Actual Production and Inspection
- The document must be produced and inspected by the party who sought it
- Demand by Producing Party
- The party producing the document must demand that it be given in evidence
Evidentiary Value of a Document Produced Under Section 166
Does the Document Automatically Become Proof?
No. A document produced under Section 166:
- Does not automatically prove its contents
- Does not become conclusive evidence
The court must still examine:
- Relevancy
- Admissibility
- Proof of genuineness and truth
Document Must Be Considered as a Whole
Once a document is admitted:
- It becomes evidence against both parties
- It must be read as a whole, not selectively
A party cannot:
- Rely on favourable portions
- Reject unfavourable portions
Leading Case: Rajagopal Ayyangar v. Ramanuja Ayyangar
Facts (Simplified)
- Plaintiff sued on the basis of entries in his account books
- Defendants summoned those account books under this provision
- Defendants inspected the books and found relevant entries
- Defendants sought to cross-examine the plaintiff on genuineness
- Plaintiff objected
Held
The court held:
- Plaintiff had no right to object
- The mere production of the document does not mean its contents are true
- Cross-examination is necessary to test genuineness
👉 The document becomes evidence only when produced before the court, and:
- The court decides relevancy and admissibility
- The burden of proof lies on the party asserting its truth
Key Legal Principles Emanating from Section 166
- A party calling for a document:
- Cannot inspect and then suppress it
- Truth of the document:
- Can be challenged
- Can be disproved by cross-examination
- Court retains control over:
- Admission
- Proof
- Evaluation of evidence
Strengths
- Prevents selective and unfair use of documents
- Encourages procedural fairness
- Discourages fishing expeditions
- Maintains integrity of evidence
- Promotes transparency in trials
Limitations
- May operate harshly if inspection reveals unexpected prejudice
- Depends on proper judicial supervision
- Does not dispense with need for proof, causing delay
10 Illustrative Case Scenarios
- Party inspects contract and must produce it
- Inspection reveals unfavourable clause – cannot suppress
- Producing party insists on admission – court allows
- Document already on record – Section 166 inapplicable
- Cross-examination allowed on genuineness
- Document read as a whole
- Partial reliance rejected by court
- Burden of proof examined independently
- Fair trial ensured by transparency
- Tactical misuse prevented
Section 166 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 embodies the principle that a party who calls for and inspects a document must accept the legal consequences of that inspection. If the producing party so demands, the document must be given in evidence.
At the same time, the section carefully preserves judicial scrutiny by requiring that the document’s relevancy, admissibility, and truth be independently examined. By discouraging selective reliance and ensuring openness, Section 166 strengthens fairness and integrity in judicial proceedings.
0 Comments