- Published on
Indian Evidence Law – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 –
Section 168 vis-à-vis Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)
Full Form / Full Terms of BNSS
BNSS stands for Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
It is the criminal procedural law of India which has replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The BNSS governs the procedure for investigation, inquiry, trial, summoning and examination of witnesses, and delivery of criminal justice.
Case Scenario
Assume a criminal trial where the prosecution examines several witnesses, but during their testimony it becomes clear that an important person who witnessed the incident was never summoned. Further, some documents referred to by the witnesses were not produced. The prosecution overlooks these gaps, and the defence remains silent to exploit them. In such a situation, the trial court must decide whether it can intervene on its own to uncover the truth.
This is where Section 168 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) operate together.
Section 168 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 – Explained
Nature of Power
Section 168 empowers the presiding judge to:
The purpose of this power is to discover relevant facts necessary for a just decision.
Key Feature
Section 348 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Explained
Nature of Power
Section 348 of BNSS authorizes the court to:
This power can be exercised at any stage of the trial if the court believes that such evidence is essential for a just decision.
Combined Practical Application
In real trial practice, Sections 168 BSA and 348 BNSS are often used together:
Together, they ensure:
Judicial Discretion and Its Importance
The powers under these Sections are discretionary, not mandatory. However:
Critical Analysis
Strengths
Concerns
Despite these concerns, judicial passivity is far more harmful than careful intervention.
10 Illustrative Case Scenarios
Comparative Understanding of Section 168 BSA and Section 348 BNSS (Note Form)
Full Form
1. Nature of the Provisions
2. Object and Purpose
3. Powers Conferred on the Court
4. Stage of Application
5. Scope of Judicial Discretion
6. Role in Trial Process
7. Relationship Between the Two Sections
8. Judicial Role Emphasized
9. Limitations
10. Practical Significance
11. Overall Impact on Fair Trial
Section 168 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) together form a powerful judicial mechanism to ensure that truth, fairness, and justice prevail in criminal trials. While Section 168 empowers the judge to extract relevant facts and order document production, Section 348 provides the procedural authority to summon and re-examine witnesses.
When used harmoniously and with restraint, these provisions reinforce the court’s duty to conduct a fair, complete, and meaningful trial—ensuring that justice is not sacrificed due to procedural lapses or party negligence.
Section 168 vis-à-vis Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS)
Full Form / Full Terms of BNSS
BNSS stands for Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
It is the criminal procedural law of India which has replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). The BNSS governs the procedure for investigation, inquiry, trial, summoning and examination of witnesses, and delivery of criminal justice.
Case Scenario
Assume a criminal trial where the prosecution examines several witnesses, but during their testimony it becomes clear that an important person who witnessed the incident was never summoned. Further, some documents referred to by the witnesses were not produced. The prosecution overlooks these gaps, and the defence remains silent to exploit them. In such a situation, the trial court must decide whether it can intervene on its own to uncover the truth.
This is where Section 168 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) operate together.
Section 168 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 – Explained
Nature of Power
Section 168 empowers the presiding judge to:
- Put any question to any witness
- At any stage of the trial
- In any form
- Order the production of any document or thing
The purpose of this power is to discover relevant facts necessary for a just decision.
Key Feature
- This power is independent of the prosecution and defence
- The judge may exercise it even if parties fail to act
Section 348 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 – Explained
Nature of Power
Section 348 of BNSS authorizes the court to:
- Summon any person as a witness
- Examine any person not previously examined
- Recall and re-examine any witness already examined
This power can be exercised at any stage of the trial if the court believes that such evidence is essential for a just decision.
Combined Practical Application
In real trial practice, Sections 168 BSA and 348 BNSS are often used together:
- The court may use Section 168 to:
- Ask clarifying questions
- Order production of missing documents
- The court may then invoke Section 348 BNSS to:
- Summon new witnesses
- Recall or re-examine existing witnesses
Together, they ensure:
- No vital evidence is omitted
- No decision is based on incomplete material
- Justice is not defeated by technical lapses
Judicial Discretion and Its Importance
The powers under these Sections are discretionary, not mandatory. However:
- Discretion must be exercised judiciously
- Courts must avoid acting mechanically or passively
- Powers must be used only to advance justice, not to fill prosecution loopholes unfairly
Critical Analysis
Strengths
- Ensures discovery of truth
- Prevents miscarriage of justice
- Strengthens active judicial role
- Protects fair trial rights
- Enhances credibility of verdicts
Concerns
- Risk of judicial overreach
- Possible delay in proceedings
- Danger of appearing partisan if misused
- Requires judicial maturity and restraint
Despite these concerns, judicial passivity is far more harmful than careful intervention.
10 Illustrative Case Scenarios
- Judge asks missing questions under Section 168
- Court summons omitted eyewitness under Section 348
- Document ordered to be produced mid-trial
- Witness recalled for clarification
- Prosecution oversight cured by court intervention
- Defence benefits from complete fact-finding
- Passive court leads to acquittal on appeal
- Balanced use results in conviction upheld
- Overuse leads to bias allegation
- Proper use ensures justice
Comparative Understanding of Section 168 BSA and Section 348 BNSS (Note Form)
Full Form
- BSA: Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023
- BNSS: Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
1. Nature of the Provisions
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Evidentiary provision
- Deals with powers of the judge during examination of witnesses
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Procedural provision
- Deals with summoning, recalling, and re-examining witnesses
2. Object and Purpose
- Section 168 (BSA)
- To enable the judge to discover the truth
- To ensure that relevant facts are brought on record
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- To ensure that essential witnesses are examined
- To complete the evidentiary chain for a just decision
3. Powers Conferred on the Court
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Power to ask any question to any witness
- Power to order production of documents or things
- Power exercisable at any stage of the trial
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Power to summon any person as a witness
- Power to examine persons not earlier examined
- Power to recall and re-examine witnesses
4. Stage of Application
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Can be exercised at any stage of trial
- During examination, cross-examination, or re-examination
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Can be exercised at any stage before conclusion of trial
- Generally invoked when evidence is found incomplete
5. Scope of Judicial Discretion
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Wide discretion to ask relevant or even irrelevant questions
- Subject to safeguards against self-incrimination
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Discretion to decide necessity of summoning or recalling witnesses
- Must be exercised judiciously and not arbitrarily
6. Role in Trial Process
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Helps in clarification of testimony
- Assists in removing ambiguity in evidence
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Helps in filling gaps in witness testimony
- Ensures all vital witnesses are examined
7. Relationship Between the Two Sections
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Operates internally within the evidence already on record
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Operates externally by bringing new or recalled witnesses
- Combined Use
- Section 168 extracts truth from witnesses
- Section 348 ensures presence of necessary witnesses
8. Judicial Role Emphasized
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Active participation of judge in questioning
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Active participation of judge in managing witness examination
9. Limitations
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Judge must remain impartial
- Cannot compel self-incriminating answers
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Cannot be used to unfairly assist prosecution
- Cannot reopen trial after conclusion of evidence
10. Practical Significance
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Prevents miscarriage of justice due to unclear testimony
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Prevents miscarriage of justice due to absence of crucial witnesses
11. Overall Impact on Fair Trial
- Section 168 (BSA)
- Strengthens truth-finding function of the court
- Section 348 (BNSS)
- Strengthens completeness and reliability of evidence
- Conclusion
Section 168 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, and Section 348 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) together form a powerful judicial mechanism to ensure that truth, fairness, and justice prevail in criminal trials. While Section 168 empowers the judge to extract relevant facts and order document production, Section 348 provides the procedural authority to summon and re-examine witnesses.
When used harmoniously and with restraint, these provisions reinforce the court’s duty to conduct a fair, complete, and meaningful trial—ensuring that justice is not sacrificed due to procedural lapses or party negligence.
0 Comments