- Published on
Islamic Contract Law – Express vs Implied Contracts (Comparison with English & Malaysian Law)
1. Recognition of Contracts
2. Express Contracts
Definition
Examples (All Systems)
Key Point
3. Implied Contracts
Islamic Contract Law
English Law
Malaysian Law
4. Formation (Offer & Acceptance)
5. Key Requirement for Validity
6. Role of Custom (Important Difference)
7. Freedom of Contract
Final Summary
One-Line Comparison
1. Recognition of Contracts
- Islamic Contract Law
- Recognises:
- Express contracts
- Implied contracts (by conduct and custom – ʿurf)
- Recognises:
- English Law
- Recognises:
- Express contracts
- Implied contracts (by conduct, facts, or law)
- Recognises:
- Malaysian Law
- Based on Contracts Act 1950
- Also recognises:
- Express contracts
- Implied contracts (similar to English law)
2. Express Contracts
Definition
- Terms are clearly stated
Examples (All Systems)
- Oral:
- “I sell you this for RM500”
- Written:
- Signing a lease agreement
Key Point
- All three systems:
- ✅ Fully recognise express contracts
3. Implied Contracts
Islamic Contract Law
- Based on:
- Conduct (actions)
- Custom (ʿurf)
- Example:
- Taking goods in a shop → paying at counter
English Law
- Implied through:
- Conduct
- Circumstances
- Court implication
- Example:
- Boarding a bus → obligation to pay fare
Malaysian Law
- Follows English law approach
- Implied from:
- Conduct and surrounding facts
4. Formation (Offer & Acceptance)
- Islamic Contract Law
- Can be:
- Oral
- Written
- By conduct
- Can be:
- English Law
- Same:
- Offer + acceptance may be implied
- Same:
- Malaysian Law
- Same principle applies
5. Key Requirement for Validity
- Islamic Contract Law
- Requires:
- Legal capacity (ahliyyah)
- Consent
- Requires:
- English Law
- Requires:
- Capacity
- Consideration
- Intention
- Requires:
- Malaysian Law
- Requires:
- Capacity
- Consideration
- Intention
- Requires:
6. Role of Custom (Important Difference)
- Islamic Contract Law
- Custom (ʿurf) plays a major role
- Can determine:
- Terms of contract
- English Law
- Custom plays:
- Limited role
- Custom plays:
- Malaysian Law
- Custom recognised but:
- Less central than Islamic law
- Custom recognised but:
7. Freedom of Contract
- Islamic Contract Law
- Allows freedom:
- BUT limited by Shariah
- Allows freedom:
- English Law
- Strong freedom of contract
- Malaysian Law
- Similar to English law
Final Summary
- All three systems recognise:
- Express contracts
- Implied contracts
- Key differences:
- Islamic law emphasises:
- Custom (ʿurf) and moral framework
- English & Malaysian law emphasise:
- Consideration and legal structure
- Islamic law emphasises:
One-Line Comparison
- Islamic law = flexible (words, conduct, custom)
- English & Malaysian law = similar structure, but more legal-technical
0 Comments