- Published on
Islamic Contract Law – Murābaḥah and the Issue of Risk (Notes)
1. Basic Structure of Murābaḥah
2. Core Requirement: Bank Must Bear Risk
3. Types of Risk the Bank Should Bear
4. The Practical Problem (Modern Practice)
How this happens
5. Why This is a Problem (Substance Issue)
6. Example (Clear Illustration)
7. Key Criticism
8. Key Principle to Remember
Final Summary
One-Line Understanding
1. Basic Structure of Murābaḥah
- A cost-plus sale contract
- Steps:
- Bank buys an asset
- Bank sells it to customer at:
- Cost + profit (markup)
- Customer pays later (deferred payment)
- Must be a genuine sale, not a loan
2. Core Requirement: Bank Must Bear Risk
- In Islamic law:
- Profit is justified only if risk is borne
- Bank must:
- Take ownership of the asset
- Bear ownership risk (even if briefly)
3. Types of Risk the Bank Should Bear
- Asset Risk
- Damage or loss before sale
- Ownership Risk
- Liability as owner
- Market Risk
- Price fluctuation before resale
- The bank’s profit (markup)
4. The Practical Problem (Modern Practice)
- In many cases:
- Bank tries to avoid all risk
How this happens
- Asset is:
- Never physically held by bank
- Customer:
- Acts as agent to buy asset
- Ownership:
- Exists only on paper
- Bank bears:
- Little or no real risk
5. Why This is a Problem (Substance Issue)
- If bank does NOT bear risk:
- Profit becomes:
- Unjustified in Islamic law
- Profit becomes:
- It resembles:
- Interest (riba)
6. Example (Clear Illustration)
- Proper Murābaḥah
- Bank buys a car
- Car is damaged before sale
- Bank bears loss
- Risk → Profit justified
- Problematic Murābaḥah
- Customer selects car
- Bank never truly owns it
- Customer bears all risk
- Looks like:
- Loan with fixed return
7. Key Criticism
- Critics argue:
- Many murābaḥah transactions:
- Only comply in form
- Not in substance
- Many murābaḥah transactions:
8. Key Principle to Remember
- Islamic law rule:
- “Al-ghunm bil-ghurm”
- (Profit comes with risk)
Final Summary
- Murābaḥah is valid only if:
- Bank genuinely owns and bears risk
- If risk is eliminated:
- Contract may:
- Become formally valid but substantively problematic
- Contract may:
One-Line Understanding
- No real risk → no real sale → possible riba in disguise
0 Comments