- Published on
KembaraXtra - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - Defamation under Section 356(1): Meaning, Ingredients, Explanations and Illustrations
Q1. What is defamation under Section 356(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita?
Answer:
Section 356(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) defines defamation as making or publishing, in any manner, any imputation concerning a person with:
- The intention to harm that person's reputation;
- Knowledge that the imputation will harm the person's reputation; or
- Reason to believe that the imputation will harm the person's reputation.
The imputation may be made by:
- Spoken words;
- Written words or words intended to be read;
- Signs; or
- Visible representations.
However, no offence is committed if the case falls within any of the ten statutory Exceptions provided under Section 356.
Example / Application:
A person knowingly posts false allegations on social media accusing a neighbour of theft, intending to damage the neighbour's reputation. The publication amounts to defamation unless protected by one of the statutory Exceptions.
Q2. What are the essential ingredients of the offence of defamation under Section 356(1)?
Answer:
The offence of defamation consists of the following essential ingredients:
- Making or publishing an imputation concerning another person.
- The imputation must be communicated:
- By spoken words;
- By written words or words intended to be read;
- By signs; or
- By visible representations.
- The accused must act:
- With the intention to harm reputation;
- With knowledge that reputation will be harmed; or
- Having reason to believe that reputation will be harmed.
- The imputation must actually be capable of harming the person's reputation as explained in Explanation 4.
- The case must not fall within any of the ten statutory Exceptions.
Example / Application:
A person circulates false posters accusing a business owner of cheating customers. Since the posters are visible representations intended to damage reputation, the essential ingredients of defamation are satisfied.
Q3. What forms of communication can amount to defamation?
Answer:
Section 356(1) recognises several modes through which defamation may be committed.
These include:
- Words spoken.
- Words intended to be read, such as letters, books, newspapers, emails, text messages, or social media posts.
- Signs, including gestures capable of conveying defamatory meaning.
- Visible representations, such as photographs, drawings, caricatures, cartoons, paintings, videos, memes, or digital images.
The inclusion of the words "in any manner" broadens the scope of the provision to include modern methods of communication.
Example / Application:
A person creates an edited video falsely portraying another individual as committing a crime and uploads it online. The video is a visible representation capable of constituting defamation.
Q4. What is the mental element (mens rea) required for defamation?
Answer:
Section 356(1) expressly requires the presence of mens rea.
The accused must have:
- Intended to harm another person's reputation;
- Known that the imputation would probably harm the person's reputation; or
- Had reason to believe that such harm would result.
Mere publication without the required mental element may not constitute criminal defamation.
Example / Application:
A journalist carefully verifies information before publication but unknowingly relies upon forged documents. The absence of intention, knowledge, or reason to believe may be relevant in determining criminal liability.
Explanation 1
Q5. Can defamation be committed against a deceased person?
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation 1 provides that an imputation concerning a deceased person may amount to defamation if:
- The imputation would have harmed the person's reputation had the person been alive; and
- The imputation is intended to hurt the feelings of the deceased person's family or other near relatives.
Thus, the law protects not only reputation but also the emotional interests of surviving family members.
Example / Application:
A person falsely accuses a recently deceased respected judge of accepting bribes, intending to insult and distress the judge's family. Such conduct may amount to defamation.
Explanation 2
Q6. Can a company or association be defamed?
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation 2 states that defamation may be committed against:
- A company;
- An association; or
- A collection of persons as such.
The law recognises that organisations also possess reputations capable of being harmed.
Example / Application:
A person falsely publishes that a charitable organisation is misappropriating donations without any evidence. The organisation may claim that it has been defamed.
Explanation 3
Q7. Can an indirect or sarcastic statement amount to defamation?
Answer:
Yes.
Explanation 3 provides that an imputation may amount to defamation even when expressed:
- In the form of an alternative; or
- Ironically.
The law looks beyond the literal words and examines the meaning conveyed to ordinary readers or listeners.
Example / Application:
A person remarks sarcastically, "Of course, he is the most honest contractor in town," intending others to believe the contractor is dishonest. The sarcastic statement may amount to defamation.
Explanation 4
Q8. When is a person's reputation considered to be harmed?
Answer:
According to Explanation 4, an imputation harms a person's reputation when it directly or indirectly lowers that person in the estimation of others by:
- Lowering the person's moral character;
- Lowering the person's intellectual character;
- Lowering the person's character in respect of caste;
- Lowering the person's character in respect of profession, occupation, or calling;
- Lowering the person's credit or financial reputation; or
- Causing others to believe that the person's body is in a loathsome or generally disgraceful condition.
The emphasis is on how the imputation affects the person's standing in society.
Example / Application:
A false statement alleging that a doctor habitually performs surgeries while intoxicated lowers the doctor's professional reputation and may amount to defamation.
Q9. What do the statutory illustrations explain?
Answer:
The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita provides three illustrations demonstrating different forms in which defamation may occur.
Illustration (a) – Defamation by Irony
A says:
"Z is an honest man; he never stole B's watch."
The statement is made ironically, intending people to believe that Z actually stole the watch.
This amounts to defamation unless protected by one of the statutory Exceptions.
Illustration (b) – Defamation by Signs
When asked who stole B's watch, A simply points towards Z, intending others to believe that Z is the thief.
Although no words are spoken, the gesture conveys a defamatory imputation and amounts to defamation.
Illustration (c) – Defamation by Visible Representation
A draws a picture showing Z running away with B's watch, intending others to believe that Z committed theft.
The drawing constitutes a visible representation capable of amounting to defamation.
Example / Application:
Posting a manipulated image online falsely depicting someone accepting a bribe is comparable to Illustration (c) and may constitute defamation.
Q10. Why is Section 356(1) important?
Answer:
Section 356(1) provides the foundation of the law of criminal defamation under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
It:
- Defines the offence.
- Recognises multiple forms of communication.
- Requires proof of mens rea.
- Protects the reputation of individuals, deceased persons, companies, and associations.
- Clarifies when reputation is legally harmed.
- Provides ten statutory Exceptions that safeguard legitimate freedom of speech.
The provision therefore balances the constitutional right to freedom of expression with the equally important right to reputation, which forms part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Example / Application:
A newspaper publishes a carefully verified report exposing corruption by a public official. If the publication satisfies one of the statutory Exceptions, it will not amount to criminal defamation despite affecting the official's reputation.
Key Provisions (Study Notes)
Section 356(1)
A person commits defamation by making or publishing an imputation:
- By spoken words.
- By written words.
- By signs.
- By visible representations.
- In any manner.
- With:
- Intention;
- Knowledge; or
- Reason to believe that reputation will be harmed.
Explanation 1
Defamation may be committed against a deceased person if:
- The statement would have harmed the person's reputation if living; and
- It is intended to hurt the feelings of family or near relatives.
Explanation 2
Defamation may also relate to:
- Companies.
- Associations.
- Collections of persons.
Explanation 3
Defamation may arise through:
- Alternative expressions.
- Ironical statements.
- Indirect imputations.
Explanation 4
Reputation is harmed where an imputation lowers:
- Moral character.
- Intellectual character.
- Character regarding caste.
- Professional or occupational character.
- Creditworthiness.
- Physical condition by portraying the person as loathsome or disgraceful.
Statutory Illustrations
- (a) Ironical statement implying theft.
- (b) Pointing towards a person as the thief.
- (c) Drawing a picture falsely depicting theft.
All three constitute defamation unless protected by one of the statutory Exceptions.
Key Takeaway
Section 356(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita defines criminal defamation as making or publishing, in any manner, an imputation concerning another person with the intention, knowledge, or reason to believe that it will harm the person's reputation. The provision recognises defamation through spoken words, written words, signs, and visible representations, and is supplemented by four Explanations that extend protection to deceased persons, companies, associations, indirect or ironical imputations, and clarify when reputation is legally harmed. The accompanying illustrations demonstrate that defamation may be committed verbally, by gesture, or through visual representation, unless the case falls within one of the ten statutory Exceptions.
