- Published on
KembaraXtra - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - Section 150 - Concealing with Intent to Facilitate Design to Wage War
Introduction
Section 150 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, deals with the concealment of a plan or design to wage war against the Government of India.
The provision applies when a person conceals the existence of such a design through an act or illegal omission, intending to facilitate the waging of war or knowing that the concealment is likely to facilitate it.
The section therefore addresses conduct that assists a design to wage war by deliberately keeping its existence concealed.
The punishment may extend to ten years’ imprisonment, together with liability to a fine.
Meaning of Section 150
Under Section 150, a person commits an offence if they conceal the existence of a design to wage war against the Government of India through an act or illegal omission.
However, concealment alone is not sufficient.
The accused must intend that the concealment will facilitate the waging of war or know that it is likely to facilitate such war.
Accordingly, the provision requires a connection between the concealment and the accused’s intention or knowledge concerning the facilitation of war against the Government of India.
Essential Ingredients of Section 150
1. There Must Be a Design to Wage War Against the Government of India
The first requirement is the existence of a design or plan to wage war against the Government of India.
The provision specifically concerns a design directed against the Government of India.
2. The Accused Must Know About the Design
The accused must have knowledge of the existence of the design.
This requirement is identified in the supplied commentary as an essential element of the offence.
A person cannot knowingly conceal the existence of a design without being aware of it.
3. The Accused Must Conceal the Existence of the Design
The accused must conceal the existence of the design to wage war.
The provision is concerned with hiding the existence of the plan, rather than merely being aware that such a plan exists.
4. Concealment May Occur Through an Act or Illegal Omission
Section 150 expressly recognises two methods of concealment:
- Concealment through an act.
- Concealment through an illegal omission.
Accordingly, the offence is not confined to positive acts of concealment.
An illegal omission may also constitute the prohibited conduct when the other requirements of the section are satisfied.
5. The Accused Must Intend to Facilitate the Waging of War or Know That Facilitation Is Likely
The accused must either intend that the concealment will facilitate the waging of war or know that the concealment is likely to facilitate it.
These are alternative mental elements under Section 150.
The prosecution must therefore establish the required intention or knowledge in connection with the concealment.
Concealment Through an Act
The first method concerns concealment carried out through an act.
This refers to conduct by which a person hides the existence of a design to wage war against the Government of India.
The act must be accompanied by the intention to facilitate the waging of war or knowledge that the concealment is likely to facilitate it.
Concealment Through an Illegal Omission
The second method concerns concealment through an illegal omission.
The statutory wording expressly includes an illegal failure to act as a possible means of concealment.
However, the omission must be illegal, and the other requirements of Section 150 must also be satisfied.
The provision therefore does not treat every failure to disclose information as automatically constituting an offence.
The accused’s knowledge of the design and the required intention or knowledge concerning facilitation remain essential.
Importance of Intention or Knowledge
The supplied commentary explains that liability under Section 150 is not absolute.
The offence requires more than the mere existence of a design to wage war and the accused’s awareness of it.
The accused must conceal the design with the intention of facilitating the waging of war or with knowledge that the concealment is likely to facilitate it.
This requirement distinguishes the offence from mere awareness of another person’s unlawful plan.
The provision therefore focuses on concealment accompanied by the specified intention or knowledge.
Is Actual Waging of War Necessary?
Section 150 concerns concealment of a design to wage war against the Government of India.
Its wording does not expressly require that war must actually be waged.
The offence is directed at concealment intended or known to be likely to facilitate the waging of war.
Accordingly, the statutory focus is on the existence of the design, its concealment and the required intention or knowledge.
Punishment Under Section 150
A person who commits the offence under Section 150 may be punished with:
- Imprisonment extending up to ten years; and
- Liability to a fine.
The punishment clause in the supplied extract is partially corrupted. However, the maximum term of ten years and liability to a fine are identifiable.
The supplied text does not specify a numerical maximum amount for the fine.
Classification of the Offence
According to the classification provided in the supplied text:
Nature of Offence: Cognizable.
Bail: Non-Bailable.
Triable By: Court of Session.
Judicial Decision Mentioned in the Commentary
Shaukat Hussain Guru v. State (NCT of Delhi), AIR 2008 SC 2419
The supplied commentary refers to this Supreme Court decision in connection with the duty to report information concerning certain serious offences.
The commentary explains that Section 39 of the former Code of Criminal Procedure imposed a duty on persons aware of the commission of, or another person’s intention to commit, offences punishable under Sections 121 to 126 of the Indian Penal Code.
According to the supplied extract, such information was required to be communicated promptly to the nearest Magistrate or police officer, subject to the qualification mentioned in that provision.
The final part of the supplied case commentary is incomplete. Therefore, the full qualification and any further observations are not reproduced here.
The decision is relevant to the discussion because it concerns the legal duty to disclose information about serious offences, including offences connected with waging war.
However, the statutory requirements of Section 150 must still be established independently.
Commentary
Section 150 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, corresponds to Section 123 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
According to the supplied commentary, the wording of the provision remains unchanged.
The provision has been retained in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in the same form as its corresponding provision under the Indian Penal Code.
The commentary identifies four essential conditions for liability:
- There must be a design to wage war against the Government of India.
- The accused must know of that design.
- The accused must conceal its existence.
- The accused must intend to facilitate the waging of war or know that the concealment is likely to facilitate it.
These requirements demonstrate that the offence depends on concealment accompanied by the specified intention or knowledge.
Key Takeaway
Section 150 makes it an offence to conceal the existence of a design to wage war against the Government of India through an act or illegal omission, where the accused intends to facilitate such war or knows that the concealment is likely to facilitate it.
The essential requirements are the existence of a design to wage war, knowledge of that design, concealment through an act or illegal omission, and the required intention or knowledge concerning facilitation.
The provision does not expressly require the war to have been actually waged.
The punishment may extend to ten years’ imprisonment, together with liability to a fine.
The offence is cognizable, non-bailable and triable by a Court of Session.
IPC Equivalent: Section 123 IPC.
Legislative Position: The language remains unchanged, and the provision has been retained as it was.
Final Memory Formula
SECTION 150 = DESIGN TO WAGE WAR AGAINST GOVERNMENT OF INDIA + KNOWLEDGE OF DESIGN + CONCEALMENT THROUGH ACT OR ILLEGAL OMISSION + INTENTION TO FACILITATE WAR OR KNOWLEDGE THAT FACILITATION IS LIKELY = UP TO TEN YEARS’ IMPRISONMENT AND LIABILITY TO FINE.
IMPORTANT DISTINCTION: MERE KNOWLEDGE OF A DESIGN TO WAGE WAR IS NOT ENOUGH. SECTION 150 REQUIRES CONCEALMENT ACCOMPANIED BY THE SPECIFIED INTENTION OR KNOWLEDGE.
