- Published on
KembaraXtra - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - Section 156 - Public Servant Voluntarily Allowing Prisoner of State or War to Escape
Introduction
Section 156 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, deals with the criminal responsibility of a public servant who voluntarily allows a State prisoner or prisoner of war to escape from confinement.
The provision applies when a public servant entrusted with the custody of such a prisoner deliberately permits the prisoner to escape.
It prescribes imprisonment for life or imprisonment extending up to ten years, together with liability to a fine.
Meaning of Section 156
Under Section 156, a public servant commits an offence if, while having custody of a State prisoner or prisoner of war, they voluntarily allow that prisoner to escape from the place where the prisoner is confined.
The provision focuses on the voluntary nature of the public servant’s conduct.
It therefore concerns deliberate permission to escape rather than an escape resulting merely from negligence.
Essential Ingredients of Section 156
1. The Accused Must Be a Public Servant
The person accused must be a public servant.
The provision specifically applies to public servants responsible for the custody of State prisoners or prisoners of war.
2. The Public Servant Must Have Custody of the Prisoner
The accused must have custody of the prisoner concerned.
This establishes the public servant’s responsibility for keeping the prisoner confined.
3. The Prisoner Must Be a State Prisoner or Prisoner of War
The prisoner must belong to one of the two categories expressly mentioned in the provision:
- A State prisoner.
- A prisoner of war.
4. The Prisoner Must Be Confined
The prisoner must be held in a place of confinement.
Section 156 concerns escape from a place where the prisoner is confined.
5. The Public Servant Must Voluntarily Allow the Escape
The public servant must voluntarily permit the prisoner to escape.
This is the principal requirement distinguishing Section 156 from the offence of negligently allowing escape under Section 157.
6. The Prisoner Must Actually Escape
The provision concerns a prisoner who is voluntarily allowed to escape from confinement.
Accordingly, the escape must actually occur.
Meaning of State Prisoner
According to the supplied commentary, a State prisoner is a person whose confinement is considered necessary to preserve the security of India against foreign hostility or internal commotion.
The prisoner is confined under an order of the Government of India.
The explanation therefore identifies two important characteristics: the confinement is connected with the security of India, and it takes place under an order of the Government of India.
Meaning of Prisoner of War
According to the supplied commentary, a prisoner of war refers to a person captured in connection with war.
The commentary describes persons taken in arms during war and refers to the treatment of persons who are not in arms or who submit and surrender.
It states that such persons are to be taken as prisoners rather than killed.
The final portion of the supplied commentary is incomplete. Therefore, no further explanation is added beyond the available text.
Punishment Under Section 156
A person convicted under Section 156 may be punished with:
- Imprisonment for life; or
- Imprisonment of either description for a term extending up to ten years.
The offender is also liable to a fine.
The provision does not specify a numerical maximum amount for the fine in the supplied text.
Classification of the Offence
Nature of Offence: Cognizable.
Bail: Non-Bailable.
Triable By: Court of Session.
Distinction Between Sections 156 and 157
Section 156 deals with a public servant who voluntarily allows a State prisoner or prisoner of war to escape.
The punishment is imprisonment for life or imprisonment extending up to ten years, together with liability to a fine.
Section 157 deals with a public servant who negligently allows such a prisoner to escape.
The punishment under Section 157 is simple imprisonment extending up to three years, together with liability to a fine.
The principal distinction is therefore between voluntary permission and negligence.
Commentary
Section 156 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, corresponds to Section 128 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
According to the supplied commentary, the language of the provision remains unchanged.
The provision has been retained in the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita in the same form as its corresponding provision under the Indian Penal Code.
Key Takeaway
Section 156 makes a public servant criminally liable for voluntarily allowing a State prisoner or prisoner of war in their custody to escape from confinement.
The essential requirements are the accused’s status as a public servant, custody of the specified prisoner, voluntary permission to escape and the actual escape of that prisoner.
The punishment may be imprisonment for life or imprisonment extending up to ten years, together with liability to a fine.
The offence is cognizable, non-bailable and triable by a Court of Session.
IPC Equivalent: Section 128 IPC.
Legislative Position: The language remains unchanged, and the provision has been retained as it was.
Final Memory Formula
SECTION 156 = PUBLIC SERVANT + CUSTODY OF STATE PRISONER OR PRISONER OF WAR + VOLUNTARILY ALLOWING ESCAPE FROM CONFINEMENT = LIFE IMPRISONMENT OR UP TO TEN YEARS’ IMPRISONMENT, WITH LIABILITY TO FINE.
IMPORTANT DISTINCTION: SECTION 156 — VOLUNTARY ESCAPE; SECTION 157 — NEGLIGENT ESCAPE.
