- Published on
KembaraXtra - Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita - Section 287: Negligent Conduct with Respect to Fire or Combustible Matter
Introduction
Section 287 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) deals with rash or negligent conduct involving fire or combustible matter.
The provision applies in two broad situations:
1. A person does an act with fire or combustible matter so rashly or negligently that it endangers human life or is likely to cause hurt or injury to another person; or
2. A person knowingly or negligently fails to take sufficient precautions with fire or combustible matter in his possession to guard against probable danger to human life.
The section is preventive in nature. It does not require that a fire must actually spread, that property must actually burn, or that someone must actually be injured.
Basic Formula
Fire/combustible matter + rash/negligent act OR knowing/negligent failure to safeguard + danger to human life/injury = Section 287
Q1. What does Section 287 provide?
Answer:
Section 287 punishes whoever:
- Does any act with:
- Fire; or
- Combustible matter,
so rashly or negligently as to:
- Endanger human life; or
- Be likely to cause hurt or injury to another person;
or
- Knowingly or negligently omits to take sufficient precautions with:
- Fire; or
- Combustible matter
in his possession, so as to guard against probable danger to human life.
The punishment is:
- Imprisonment of either description up to six months; or
- Fine up to ₹2,000; or
- Both.
Q2. What is the object of Section 287?
Answer:
The object is to protect human life and bodily safety from dangers created by careless handling of fire or combustible substances.
Fire and combustible materials can become dangerous very quickly if:
- Used carelessly;
- Stored improperly;
- Left unattended;
- Exposed to ignition sources;
- Handled without adequate safeguards.
The section therefore imposes a duty of care on persons dealing with such hazards.
Q3. Which IPC provision corresponds to Section 287 BNS?
Answer:
According to the supplied comments:
Section 287 BNS → Section 285 IPC
The language remains unchanged.
The main change identified is the increase in the maximum fine.
Q4. What change has been made to the fine?
Answer:
According to the supplied comments:
Under IPC Section 285
Maximum fine = ₹1,000
Under BNS Section 287
Maximum fine = ₹2,000
Memory Formula
₹1,000 → ₹2,000
Q5. What is combustible matter?
Answer:
According to the supplied comments, combustible matter refers to substances capable of catching fire and burning when exposed to sufficient:
- Heat;
- Oxygen; and
- An ignition source.
Such materials undergo a chemical process known as combustion.
Q6. What happens during combustion?
Answer:
The supplied comments explain that combustion is a chemical reaction in which combustible material burns and releases byproducts such as:
- Heat;
- Light; and
- Gases.
Thus, combustible matter is dangerous because it can ignite and sustain burning.
Q7. Is every combustible substance automatically unlawful?
Answer:
No.
The offence is not based merely on possession or use of combustible matter.
The section applies only where there is:
- Rashness;
- Negligence; or
- Knowing/negligent failure to take sufficient precautions.
Memory Point
Combustible material alone ≠ Section 287
Dangerous handling or failure of precaution = Section 287
Q8. What are the two branches of liability under Section 287?
Answer:
Section 287 can be divided into two branches.
Branch 1 — Rash or Negligent Act
A person does an act with fire or combustible matter so rashly or negligently that it:
- Endangers human life; or
- Is likely to cause hurt or injury to another person.
Branch 2 — Knowing or Negligent Omission
A person has fire or combustible matter in his possession and knowingly or negligently fails to take sufficient precautions against probable danger to human life.
Memory
HANDLE IT DANGEROUSLY
or
FAIL TO SAFEGUARD IT
Q9. What are the essential ingredients of the first branch?
Answer:
The prosecution must broadly establish:
1. Fire or combustible matter was involved.
2. The accused did an act with it.
3. The act was:
o Rash; or
o Negligent.
4. The act:
o Endangered human life; or
o Was likely to cause hurt or injury to another person.
Formula
FIRE/COMBUSTIBLE MATTER + RASH/NEGLIGENT ACT + DANGER/LIKELY INJURY = SECTION 287
Q10. What are the essential ingredients of the second branch?
Answer:
The second branch requires:
1. Fire or combustible matter.
2. It must be in the accused's possession.
3. There must be probable danger to human life from it.
4. The accused must fail to take sufficient precautions.
5. That omission must be:
o Knowing; or
o Negligent.
Formula
FIRE/COMBUSTIBLE MATTER IN POSSESSION + PROBABLE DANGER + FAILURE OF PRECAUTION + KNOWLEDGE/NEGLIGENCE = SECTION 287
Q11. What does “rashly” mean in this context?
Answer:
Rash conduct broadly involves taking an unjustified risk despite the danger involved.
In Section 287, rashness may arise where a person uses fire or combustible matter in an obviously dangerous manner without sufficient regard for the possible consequences.
Simple Memory
Rashness = consciously taking a dangerous risk
Q12. What does “negligently” mean?
Answer:
Negligence refers to failure to exercise the reasonable care expected in the circumstances.
A person may not intend to cause harm but may still act carelessly enough to create the danger prohibited by Section 287.
Simple Memory
Negligence = failure to take reasonable care
Q13. Is intention to cause a fire necessary?
Answer:
No.
The section does not require an intention to cause a fire or spread flames.
Rash or negligent conduct is sufficient if the other statutory ingredients are present.
Q14. Is intention to injure another person necessary?
Answer:
No.
The section is concerned with dangerous conduct rather than deliberate injury.
The prosecution does not need to prove an intention to:
- Hurt;
- Injure; or
- Kill.
Q15. Must an actual fire accident occur?
Answer:
No.
The section focuses on the creation of danger.
The act need only:
- Endanger human life; or
- Be likely to cause hurt or injury.
Memory Rule
Danger is enough — actual disaster is not required.
Q16. Must actual injury occur?
Answer:
No.
The first branch expressly covers conduct that is merely likely to cause hurt or injury.
Actual injury is therefore not essential.
Q17. Must actual death occur?
Answer:
No.
The section refers to danger to human life, not actual loss of life.
This confirms its preventive character.
Q18. What does “endanger human life” mean?
Answer:
It means exposing human life to a real and serious risk because of rash or negligent use of fire or combustible matter.
The law is designed to intervene before death actually occurs.
Q19. What does “likely to cause hurt or injury to any other person” mean?
Answer:
This means the act creates a reasonable likelihood of physical harm to another person.
The danger need not reach the level of possible death.
Likelihood of hurt or injury can also bring the act within the provision.
Q20. Is the first branch broader than the second branch?
Answer:
In terms of the wording supplied, yes.
First Branch
Covers:
- Danger to human life; or
- Likely hurt or injury to another person.
Second Branch
Focuses on:
- Probable danger to human life.
Exam Point
Keep the exact statutory wording of the two branches separate.
Q21. What is the significance of possession in the second branch?
Answer:
The second branch specifically refers to fire or combustible matter:
“in his possession.”
This means the duty to take sufficient precautions is attached to the person who possesses the dangerous matter.
Q22. Is legal ownership necessary?
Answer:
No.
The provision speaks of possession, not ownership.
A person can therefore potentially incur liability even if the combustible matter legally belongs to someone else.
Memory Point
Possession matters, not title.
Q23. What does “knowingly omits” mean?
Answer:
A knowing omission occurs where the person is aware that precautions are required but nevertheless fails to take them.
For example, if A knows that combustible material is stored dangerously near an ignition source but does nothing to reduce the danger, the omission may be knowing.
Q24. What does “negligently omits” mean?
Answer:
A negligent omission occurs where the person fails to exercise reasonable care in storing, controlling or handling fire or combustible matter.
The failure need not be deliberate.
Carelessness may be enough.
Q25. What does “sufficient to guard against” mean?
Answer:
It means that the precautions taken must be adequate to prevent the probable danger.
Token or obviously inadequate precautions would not necessarily satisfy the requirement.
The measures must be sufficient in light of the actual risk.
Q26. What precautions may be relevant?
Answer:
Depending on the circumstances, relevant precautions may include:
- Safe storage;
- Keeping combustible matter away from ignition sources;
- Restricting access;
- Supervising fire;
- Maintaining safe distances;
- Using proper containers;
- Keeping appropriate fire-control measures available.
The exact precautions depend on the nature of the risk.
Q27. Must every conceivable precaution be taken?
Answer:
No.
The section focuses on precautions sufficient to guard against probable danger.
The law requires adequate and reasonable safeguards, not protection against every remote possibility.
Q28. Give a simple example of rash use of fire.
Answer:
A lights a large fire in a crowded area and handles it in an obviously dangerous way despite people being close by.
If the conduct endangers human life or is likely to cause injury, Section 287 may apply.
Q29. Give an example involving combustible matter.
Answer:
A handles easily combustible material near an ignition source without proper precautions.
If this conduct is negligent and creates the required danger, Section 287 may apply.
Q30. Give an example of knowing omission.
Answer:
A possesses combustible material and knows that it is stored in circumstances creating a probable danger to human life.
A fails to take sufficient steps to make the situation safe.
This may fall within the second branch of Section 287.
Q31. Give an example of negligent omission.
Answer:
A possesses combustible material but carelessly fails to store it in a reasonably safe manner.
If that omission creates probable danger to human life, Section 287 may apply.
Q32. Is mere possession of combustible matter enough?
Answer:
No.
Possession alone does not satisfy the provision.
There must additionally be:
- Rash or negligent conduct; or
- Knowing/negligent omission to take sufficient precautions.
Memory
Possession alone ≠ offence
Q33. Is every fire accident automatically an offence under Section 287?
Answer:
No.
An accident by itself does not automatically prove criminal liability.
The relevant rashness, negligence or failure of precaution must still be established.
If reasonable precautions were taken and the incident was genuinely unavoidable, Section 287 would not automatically apply.
Q34. Why is Section 287 described as preventive?
Answer:
Because the section does not require:
- Actual burning;
- Actual injury;
- Actual death.
It penalises the dangerous conduct or omission itself when the prescribed risk is created.
Q35. What must the prosecution prove under the active-conduct branch?
Answer:
Ask:
1. Was fire or combustible matter involved?
2. Did the accused perform an act with it?
3. Was the act rash or negligent?
4. Did it:
o Endanger human life; or
o Make hurt or injury likely?
If yes, the first branch may apply.
Q36. What must be proved under the omission branch?
Answer:
Ask:
1. Was fire or combustible matter in the accused's possession?
2. Was there probable danger to human life?
3. Were precautions required?
4. Did the accused fail to take sufficient precautions?
5. Was the failure knowing or negligent?
If yes, the second branch may apply.
Q37. What is the punishment under Section 287?
Answer:
The punishment is:
- Imprisonment of either description up to six months; or
- Fine up to ₹2,000; or
- Both.
Punishment Formula
6 months / ₹2,000 / both
Q38. What does “imprisonment of either description” mean?
Answer:
It means imprisonment may be:
- Simple; or
- Rigorous.
The maximum period is six months.
Q39. What is the classification of Section 287?
Answer:
According to the supplied classification, Section 287 is:
- Cognizable
- Bailable
- Triable by any Magistrate
Classification Formula
Cognizable + Bailable + Any Magistrate
Q40. How does Section 287 differ from Section 288?
Answer:
The basic difference is the source of danger.
Section 287
Deals with:
- Fire; or
- Combustible matter.
Section 288
Deals with:
- Explosive substance.
Both sections punish rash or negligent acts and knowing or negligent failure to take sufficient precautions.
Memory
287 = FIRE
288 = EXPLOSIVE
Q41. How does Section 287 fit with Sections 288–291?
Answer:
These provisions form a useful sequence of specific negligence offences involving dangerous things or activities:
287
Fire or combustible matter
288
Explosive substance
289
Machinery
290
Building work
291
Animal
Shared Principle
Dangerous source + rashness/negligence or failure of precaution = criminal liability
Q42. What is the main difference between Section 287 and Section 288 regarding punishment?
Answer:
Both provisions allow imprisonment up to six months.
However:
Section 287
Maximum fine = ₹2,000
Section 288
Maximum fine = ₹5,000
Memory
287 Fire = ₹2,000
288 Explosive = ₹5,000
Q43. What is the central distinction between an act and an omission under Section 287?
Answer:
Section 287 punishes both:
Active misconduct
Doing something rashly or negligently with fire or combustible matter.
Passive misconduct
Failing to take sufficient precautions with fire or combustible matter in one's possession.
Memory Rule
ACT DANGEROUSLY
or
FAIL TO PREVENT DANGER
Q44. How should Section 287 be approached in an examination problem?
Answer:
First determine whether the facts involve:
Active use
Rash or negligent conduct with fire or combustible matter.
or
Failure to safeguard
Knowing or negligent omission while possessing fire or combustible matter.
Then identify:
- The relevant source of danger;
- The required risk;
- The accused's rashness or negligence;
- Whether actual injury occurred, remembering that actual injury is not essential.
Key Provisions (Study Notes)
1. Subject Matter
Section 287 covers:
Fire
and
Combustible matter
Combustible matter refers to material capable of catching fire and burning when suitable heat, oxygen and ignition conditions exist.
2. First Mode of Liability — Rash or Negligent Act
The accused:
- Does an act with fire or combustible matter;
- Acts rashly or negligently;
- Endangers human life or creates likelihood of hurt/injury.
Formula
FIRE/COMBUSTIBLE MATTER + DANGEROUS ACT = SECTION 287
3. Second Mode of Liability — Failure to Take Precautions
The accused:
- Has fire or combustible matter in his possession;
- Faces probable danger to human life;
- Knowingly or negligently fails to take sufficient safeguards.
Formula
FIRE/COMBUSTIBLE MATTER + POSSESSION + FAILURE TO SAFEGUARD = SECTION 287
Mental Element
Section 287 recognises:
- Rashness;
- Negligence;
- Knowing omission;
- Negligent omission.
An intention to cause injury or death is not required.
Nature of the Danger
First Branch
The act must:
Endanger human life
or
Be likely to cause hurt or injury to another person.
Second Branch
There must be:
Probable danger to human life
from the fire or combustible matter.
Actual Harm Is Not Essential
Section 287 does not require:
- Actual spread of fire;
- Actual hurt;
- Actual injury;
- Actual death.
The creation of the required danger may itself be sufficient.
IPC Equivalent and BNS Change
IPC Equivalent
Section 287 BNS = Section 285 IPC
Language
According to the supplied comments:
Unchanged
Fine
₹1,000 → ₹2,000
Punishment Study Note
Imprisonment
Either description up to 6 months
Fine
Up to ₹2,000
Alternative
Both may be imposed.
Classification Study Note
Section 287 is:
Cognizable
Bailable
Any Magistrate
Sections 287–291: Rapid Note-Form Revision
Section 287 — Fire or Combustible Matter
Subject
Fire or combustible matter.
Wrong
Rash/negligent act or knowing/negligent failure to safeguard.
Punishment
Up to 6 months / ₹2,000 / both.
Classification
Cognizable, bailable, any Magistrate.
Section 288 — Explosive Substance
Subject
Explosive substance.
Wrong
Rash/negligent act or knowing/negligent failure to safeguard.
Punishment
Up to 6 months / ₹5,000 / both.
Classification
Cognizable, bailable, any Magistrate.
Section 289 — Machinery
Subject
Machinery.
Wrong
Rash/negligent use or failure to take adequate precautions.
Punishment
Up to 6 months / ₹5,000 / both.
Classification
Non-cognizable, bailable, any Magistrate.
Section 290 — Building Work
Subject
Pulling down, repairing or constructing buildings.
Wrong
Knowing/negligent omission to guard against dangerous collapse.
Punishment
Up to 6 months / ₹5,000 / both.
Classification
Non-cognizable, bailable, any Magistrate.
Section 291 — Animal
Subject
Animal in possession.
Wrong
Knowing/negligent failure to guard against danger.
Punishment
Up to 6 months / ₹5,000 / both.
Classification
Cognizable, bailable, any Magistrate.
Quick Revision Notes
Section
287 BNS
Title
Negligent conduct with respect to fire or combustible matter
IPC Equivalent
285 IPC
Subject
Fire / combustible matter
First Route
Rash/negligent act
Risk
Danger to human life or likelihood of hurt/injury
Second Route
Knowing/negligent failure to take precautions
Possession Relevant?
Yes, for the omission branch
Actual Injury Required?
No
Actual Fire Disaster Required?
No
Punishment
Up to 6 months, or fine up to ₹2,000, or both
Classification
Cognizable + Bailable + Any Magistrate
BNS Change
Fine increased:
₹1,000 → ₹2,000
Exam Traps
Trap 1 — Assuming actual burning or injury is necessary
Incorrect.
The creation of danger may be enough.
Trap 2 — Looking only for reckless use of fire
The section also covers failure to take adequate precautions with fire or combustible matter in one's possession.
Trap 3 — Assuming intention to cause harm is required
Incorrect.
Rashness or negligence is sufficient.
Trap 4 — Assuming possession alone is enough
Incorrect.
There must be the relevant dangerous omission.
Trap 5 — Confusing combustible matter with explosive substance
Remember:
287 = FIRE / COMBUSTIBLE MATTER
288 = EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCE
Trap 6 — Mixing up the fines
287 = ₹2,000
288 = ₹5,000
Ultimate Memory Formula
SECTION 287
ROUTE 1
FIRE / COMBUSTIBLE MATTER
+
RASH / NEGLIGENT ACT
+
DANGER TO HUMAN LIFE / LIKELY HURT OR INJURY
OR
ROUTE 2
FIRE / COMBUSTIBLE MATTER IN POSSESSION
+
PROBABLE DANGER TO HUMAN LIFE
+
KNOWING / NEGLIGENT FAILURE TO TAKE SUFFICIENT PRECAUTIONS
=
NEGLIGENT CONDUCT WITH RESPECT TO FIRE OR COMBUSTIBLE MATTER
Five-Section Memory Chain
287 = FIRE
288 = EXPLOSIVE
289 = MACHINE
290 = BUILDING
291 = ANIMAL
The common theme is:
Dangerous source + rashness/negligence or inadequate precautions = criminal liability
Key Takeaway
Section 287 BNS protects human life and bodily safety from dangerous conduct involving fire or combustible matter.
It covers both:
Rash or negligent active conduct
and
Knowing or negligent failure to take sufficient precautions.
The section does not require actual fire damage, injury or death. The prescribed danger itself may be sufficient.
It corresponds to Section 285 IPC, with the supplied comments identifying the principal BNS change as the increase of the maximum fine:
₹1,000 → ₹2,000
For rapid revision:
287 = FIRE / COMBUSTIBLE MATTER + RASHNESS/NEGLIGENCE
Punishment = Up to 6 months / ₹2,000 / both
Classification = Cognizable + Bailable + Any Magistrate
