- Published on
KembaraXtra – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Disproved [Section 2(1)(c)]
Meaning of Disproved
Section 2(1)(c) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam defines the term “disproved.” A fact is said to be disproved when, after considering all the matters before it, the court either believes that the fact does not exist or considers its non-existence so probable that a prudent person would act on the assumption that it does not exist.
Thus, disproved is the opposite of proved. The court reaches a conclusion that the asserted fact is either false or highly improbable.
Basis of Disproving a Fact
The court may disprove a fact in two ways:
1. By Direct Evidence
A fact may be disproved through direct evidence showing that it does not exist.
For example, if an accused claims that he was present at a particular place during the commission of a crime, but CCTV footage clearly shows that he was elsewhere, the alleged fact may be disproved through direct evidence.
2. By Circumstantial Evidence
A fact may also be disproved indirectly through surrounding circumstances that make its existence highly improbable.
For instance, if a person claims ownership over stolen property but surrounding circumstances clearly indicate that the property belonged to someone else, the court may infer that the claim is false.
Standard Applied by the Court
The section applies the standard of a “prudent man.” The court does not require absolute certainty. It is enough if the non-existence of the fact appears so probable that a reasonable and prudent person would rely upon that assumption in ordinary life.
Therefore, disproving a fact depends upon probability, reason, and judicial evaluation of the materials placed before the court.
Difference between Disproved and Not Proved
A disproved fact is one that the court believes does not exist or is highly improbable. In contrast, a fact is “not proved” when the court is unable to conclude either way.
Thus:
Illustration
Suppose A is accused of committing theft at Delhi on a particular date. A claims that he was in Mumbai at the relevant time. If railway records, CCTV footage, and witness testimony conclusively show that A was actually present in Delhi, then A’s plea of alibi becomes disproved.
Similarly, if a person claims that a signature on a document is genuine, but expert examination proves that the signature was forged, the alleged fact stands disproved.
Conclusion
Under Section 2(1)(c) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, a fact is said to be disproved when the court concludes that it does not exist or considers its non-existence highly probable. The determination is based on judicial assessment of all matters before the court and the standard of a prudent person. Disproving a fact may occur through direct evidence or through circumstantial evidence that makes the existence of the fact improbable.
Meaning of Disproved
Section 2(1)(c) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam defines the term “disproved.” A fact is said to be disproved when, after considering all the matters before it, the court either believes that the fact does not exist or considers its non-existence so probable that a prudent person would act on the assumption that it does not exist.
Thus, disproved is the opposite of proved. The court reaches a conclusion that the asserted fact is either false or highly improbable.
Basis of Disproving a Fact
The court may disprove a fact in two ways:
1. By Direct Evidence
A fact may be disproved through direct evidence showing that it does not exist.
For example, if an accused claims that he was present at a particular place during the commission of a crime, but CCTV footage clearly shows that he was elsewhere, the alleged fact may be disproved through direct evidence.
2. By Circumstantial Evidence
A fact may also be disproved indirectly through surrounding circumstances that make its existence highly improbable.
For instance, if a person claims ownership over stolen property but surrounding circumstances clearly indicate that the property belonged to someone else, the court may infer that the claim is false.
Standard Applied by the Court
The section applies the standard of a “prudent man.” The court does not require absolute certainty. It is enough if the non-existence of the fact appears so probable that a reasonable and prudent person would rely upon that assumption in ordinary life.
Therefore, disproving a fact depends upon probability, reason, and judicial evaluation of the materials placed before the court.
Difference between Disproved and Not Proved
A disproved fact is one that the court believes does not exist or is highly improbable. In contrast, a fact is “not proved” when the court is unable to conclude either way.
Thus:
- Proved → Court believes the fact exists.
- Disproved → Court believes the fact does not exist.
- Not proved → Court remains uncertain about the existence or non-existence of the fact.
Illustration
Suppose A is accused of committing theft at Delhi on a particular date. A claims that he was in Mumbai at the relevant time. If railway records, CCTV footage, and witness testimony conclusively show that A was actually present in Delhi, then A’s plea of alibi becomes disproved.
Similarly, if a person claims that a signature on a document is genuine, but expert examination proves that the signature was forged, the alleged fact stands disproved.
Conclusion
Under Section 2(1)(c) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, a fact is said to be disproved when the court concludes that it does not exist or considers its non-existence highly probable. The determination is based on judicial assessment of all matters before the court and the standard of a prudent person. Disproving a fact may occur through direct evidence or through circumstantial evidence that makes the existence of the fact improbable.
0 Comments