- Published on
KembaraXtra – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA) – Relevant Facts [Section 2(1)(k)]
Introduction
Section 2(1)(k) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam explains the concept of “relevant facts.” The law of evidence is primarily concerned with determining which facts may properly be considered by a Court while deciding a dispute. Every fact cannot be proved before a Court; only facts in issue and facts declared relevant under the Act are admissible. Therefore, the concept of relevancy forms the foundation of the entire law of evidence.
Meaning of Relevant Facts
Section 2(1)(k) provides that a fact is said to be relevant to another fact when it is connected with the other in any of the ways referred to in the provisions of the Adhiniyam relating to the relevancy of facts.
The Act does not directly define the term “relevant.” Instead, it explains the manner in which one fact becomes connected with another. According to Sir James Fitz James Stephen, facts are relevant when they are so related to each other that, according to the common course of events, one fact either by itself or in connection with other facts renders the existence or non-existence of another fact probable or improbable.
The provisions dealing with relevancy are mainly contained in Sections 3 to 50 of the BSA.
Nature of Relevant Facts
Relevant facts are those facts which are logically connected with the fact in issue and help the Court in arriving at a proper conclusion. They may not themselves be directly in dispute, but they assist the Court in proving or disproving the matters in issue.
Such facts are regarded as probative facts because they throw light upon the controversy before the Court. The law recognizes only those facts as relevant which have a reasonable connection with the fact in issue.
The basic principle of evidence law is that evidence can be given only regarding facts in issue and relevant facts. Therefore, relevancy determines the scope of admissible evidence in judicial proceedings.
Relevant Facts and Facts in Issue
A distinction exists between facts in issue and relevant facts.
Facts in issue are the principal facts which are directly disputed between the parties and which the Court must determine. Relevant facts, however, are secondary or supporting facts connected with the facts in issue in such a manner that they help in proving or disproving them.
Relevant facts therefore form the foundation of inferences regarding the existence or non-existence of facts in issue.
Example
Suppose A is accused of murdering B at a particular time and place. The facts in issue are whether A caused the death of B and whether he intended to cause such death.
If A pleads alibi and claims that he was present at another place at the relevant time, then facts relating to his location, the distance between the two places, and the possibility of his presence at the scene of occurrence become relevant facts. These facts are not directly in issue, but they help the Court determine whether A could have committed the offence.
Importance of Relevant Facts
Relevant facts are important because they enable the Court to discover the truth. Direct evidence regarding facts in issue may not always be available, and therefore the Court often relies upon relevant facts to draw reasonable inferences.
These facts assist in establishing probability, motive, intention, preparation, conduct, identity, opportunity, and other surrounding circumstances connected with the dispute. Without the concept of relevancy, the Court would be burdened with unnecessary and unrelated evidence.
Conclusion
The concept of relevant facts under Section 2(1)(k) is one of the most essential principles of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. Relevant facts are those facts which are connected with the facts in issue in a legally recognized manner and which help the Court in arriving at the truth. Though they may not themselves be directly in dispute, they play a crucial role in proving or disproving the matters before the Court. Thus, relevancy acts as the foundation upon which the entire law of evidence is built.
Introduction
Section 2(1)(k) of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam explains the concept of “relevant facts.” The law of evidence is primarily concerned with determining which facts may properly be considered by a Court while deciding a dispute. Every fact cannot be proved before a Court; only facts in issue and facts declared relevant under the Act are admissible. Therefore, the concept of relevancy forms the foundation of the entire law of evidence.
Meaning of Relevant Facts
Section 2(1)(k) provides that a fact is said to be relevant to another fact when it is connected with the other in any of the ways referred to in the provisions of the Adhiniyam relating to the relevancy of facts.
The Act does not directly define the term “relevant.” Instead, it explains the manner in which one fact becomes connected with another. According to Sir James Fitz James Stephen, facts are relevant when they are so related to each other that, according to the common course of events, one fact either by itself or in connection with other facts renders the existence or non-existence of another fact probable or improbable.
The provisions dealing with relevancy are mainly contained in Sections 3 to 50 of the BSA.
Nature of Relevant Facts
Relevant facts are those facts which are logically connected with the fact in issue and help the Court in arriving at a proper conclusion. They may not themselves be directly in dispute, but they assist the Court in proving or disproving the matters in issue.
Such facts are regarded as probative facts because they throw light upon the controversy before the Court. The law recognizes only those facts as relevant which have a reasonable connection with the fact in issue.
The basic principle of evidence law is that evidence can be given only regarding facts in issue and relevant facts. Therefore, relevancy determines the scope of admissible evidence in judicial proceedings.
Relevant Facts and Facts in Issue
A distinction exists between facts in issue and relevant facts.
Facts in issue are the principal facts which are directly disputed between the parties and which the Court must determine. Relevant facts, however, are secondary or supporting facts connected with the facts in issue in such a manner that they help in proving or disproving them.
Relevant facts therefore form the foundation of inferences regarding the existence or non-existence of facts in issue.
Example
Suppose A is accused of murdering B at a particular time and place. The facts in issue are whether A caused the death of B and whether he intended to cause such death.
If A pleads alibi and claims that he was present at another place at the relevant time, then facts relating to his location, the distance between the two places, and the possibility of his presence at the scene of occurrence become relevant facts. These facts are not directly in issue, but they help the Court determine whether A could have committed the offence.
Importance of Relevant Facts
Relevant facts are important because they enable the Court to discover the truth. Direct evidence regarding facts in issue may not always be available, and therefore the Court often relies upon relevant facts to draw reasonable inferences.
These facts assist in establishing probability, motive, intention, preparation, conduct, identity, opportunity, and other surrounding circumstances connected with the dispute. Without the concept of relevancy, the Court would be burdened with unnecessary and unrelated evidence.
Conclusion
The concept of relevant facts under Section 2(1)(k) is one of the most essential principles of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam. Relevant facts are those facts which are connected with the facts in issue in a legally recognized manner and which help the Court in arriving at the truth. Though they may not themselves be directly in dispute, they play a crucial role in proving or disproving the matters before the Court. Thus, relevancy acts as the foundation upon which the entire law of evidence is built.
0 Comments