- Published on
KembaraXtra-Case Law-Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 1994) (1998)
Core Principle
A fetus is not a legal person under English Law.
Case Facts
Act: A pregnant woman was stabbed.
Result: The child was born alive but premature due to the stabbing.
Outcome: The child died from prematurity, not directly from the stab wounds.
House of Lords Decision
Even though the fetus is not a legal person, harming a pregnant woman, leading to harm of the child after birth, can establish mens rea (guilty mind).
Public policy grounds: Defendant can be held accountable.
Key Quote (Lord Mustill)
"It is established beyond doubt for the criminal law, as for the civil law...that the child en ventre sa mère does not have a distinct human personality whose extinguishment gives rise to any penalties or liabilities at common law."
En ventre sa mère = "In its mother's womb"
Meaning: A fetus does not have a separate legal identity; therefore, its "extinguishment" (death) doesn't automatically create criminal/civil liability.
Related Cases & Commentary
St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v S; R v Collins and Others ex p S (1998):
An unborn child is human and protected by law but is not a separate person from its mother.
Mother's rights prevail over the fetus's need for medical assistance.
Paton v British Pregnancy Advisory Service Trustees (1979):
(Sir George Baker): A fetus does not have its own rights until birth and separate existence from the mother.
Key Takeaways
Fetus Status: English law views a fetus as part of the mother, not a separate legal entity with independent rights.
Criminal Liability: Hurting a fetus can create liability if the harm extends after birth.
Mother's Rights: The pregnant woman's rights are paramount.
Core Principle
A fetus is not a legal person under English Law.
Case Facts
Act: A pregnant woman was stabbed.
Result: The child was born alive but premature due to the stabbing.
Outcome: The child died from prematurity, not directly from the stab wounds.
House of Lords Decision
Even though the fetus is not a legal person, harming a pregnant woman, leading to harm of the child after birth, can establish mens rea (guilty mind).
Public policy grounds: Defendant can be held accountable.
Key Quote (Lord Mustill)
"It is established beyond doubt for the criminal law, as for the civil law...that the child en ventre sa mère does not have a distinct human personality whose extinguishment gives rise to any penalties or liabilities at common law."
En ventre sa mère = "In its mother's womb"
Meaning: A fetus does not have a separate legal identity; therefore, its "extinguishment" (death) doesn't automatically create criminal/civil liability.
Related Cases & Commentary
St George's Healthcare NHS Trust v S; R v Collins and Others ex p S (1998):
An unborn child is human and protected by law but is not a separate person from its mother.
Mother's rights prevail over the fetus's need for medical assistance.
Paton v British Pregnancy Advisory Service Trustees (1979):
(Sir George Baker): A fetus does not have its own rights until birth and separate existence from the mother.
Key Takeaways
Fetus Status: English law views a fetus as part of the mother, not a separate legal entity with independent rights.
Criminal Liability: Hurting a fetus can create liability if the harm extends after birth.
Mother's Rights: The pregnant woman's rights are paramount.
0 Comments