LAW

Published on
KembaraXtra-Case Law-Crossman v. Stewart (1977)
Key Principle:
  • Liability for negligence can be reduced if the plaintiff contributed to the damage through their own negligence (contributory negligence).
Facts:
  • Plaintiff: Suffered from a skin disorder and was prescribed chloroquine by the defendant (doctor).
  • Defendant: Doctor who prescribed chloroquine.
  • Plaintiff, a medical receptionist, obtained chloroquine without a prescription from a salesman after her initial supply ran out. The defendant was unaware.
  • Defendant later learned of evidence suggesting long-term chloroquine use could cause blindness.
  • Defendant referred Plaintiff to an eye specialist, who diagnosed possible chloroquine-related eye damage.
  • Plaintiff was incorrectly informed that the specialist's report was negative and continued taking the drug without Defendant's knowledge.
  • Defendant continued to prescribe the treatment for a further six months.
  • Plaintiff's sight progressively deteriorated over six years, leading to a lawsuit against the defendant.
Decision (Supreme Court of British Columbia):
  • Defendant was liable for negligence for failing to properly consider the eye specialist's report.
  • Plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence by obtaining prescription drugs without the Defendant's knowledge.
  • Apportionment of Liability: Plaintiff was deemed two-thirds responsible for her damages, and could only recover one-third of the damages from the Defendant.
Significance/Commentary:
  • This case exemplifies the application of contributory negligence.
  • The Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 (UK) provides a statutory basis for contributory negligence, and similar statutes exist in other jurisdictions.
  • Section 1 of the Act (paraphrased): A claim is not defeated by the plaintiff's fault, but damages are reduced to the extent the court deems "just and equitable" based on the claimant's share of responsibility.
Key Takeaways for Studying:
  • Contributory Negligence: Understand the concept and its impact on damage recovery.
  • Causation: Note how the plaintiff's actions (self-medication) contributed to the harm.
  • Apportionment: Understand how courts divide responsibility and reduce damages accordingly.
  • Statutory Basis: Be aware of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 (or its equivalent in your jurisdiction) and its role in codifying the defense.
Picture
0 Comments