- Published on
KembaraXtra - Case Law - Grainger v Hill (1838)
Court: English Court (pre-November 1874)
Key Areas: Tort Law (Conversion, Trespass to Person), Criminal Law (Arrest), Sheriffs & Bailiffs (Execution of Process)
I. Conversion (Wrongful Interference with Goods)
- A. Wrongful Taking as Conversion:
- A wrongful taking of a chattel constitutes conversion.
- No prior demand is required to bring an action for conversion when a wrongful taking has occurred.
- A wrongful taking is sufficient to support a count in trover.
- B. Demand and Refusal:
- Demand and refusal are unnecessary where the act itself amounts to conversion (i.e., actual taking of goods).
- A. What Constitutes Arrest:
- Placing a party under the restraint of a sheriff’s officer holding a writ of capias constitutes an arrest.
- Actual physical contact is NOT necessary for an arrest to occur.
- B. Restraint as Imprisonment:
- This falls under False or Illegal Imprisonment.
- A. Trespass to the Person:
- False or Illegal Imprisonment
- B. Wrongful Interference with Goods:
- Conversion
- A. Abuse of Process:
- Abusing process of law to effect an improper object
- Proceedings must terminate in the plaintiff's favour
0 Comments