- Published on
KembaraXtra- Case Law-Hunter v Mann (1974): Notes on Disclosure During Court Proceedings
Core Principle: No breach of confidence occurs if confidential information is requested during court proceedings.
Facts: (Implicitly, the case deals with a situation where confidential information was sought during court).
Decision: (Implicitly, the court ruled that disclosing information under compulsion of court proceedings does not constitute a breach of confidence).
Commentary & Key Takeaways:
Core Principle: No breach of confidence occurs if confidential information is requested during court proceedings.
Facts: (Implicitly, the case deals with a situation where confidential information was sought during court).
Decision: (Implicitly, the court ruled that disclosing information under compulsion of court proceedings does not constitute a breach of confidence).
Commentary & Key Takeaways:
- Lord Widgery CJ's Guidance for Doctors:
- A doctor must answer questions posed in court.
- However, if a question requires divulging information the doctor considers confidential, the doctor can:
- Seek the judge's protection.
- Ask the judge if answering is truly necessary.
- The judge has the discretion to decide whether the doctor must answer.
- The judge's decision hinges on the importance of the potential answer to the case at hand.
- Absolute Immunity of Witnesses:
- Doctors (and other witnesses) are protected from breach of confidence liability due to the absolute immunity afforded to witnesses in court. (Citing Watson v M’Ewan (1905) HL)
- This immunity protects witnesses from liability for what they say during court testimony.
- Important Limitation:
- The witness immunity does not extend to requests for information from a solicitor outside of the formal court setting.
- Solicitor requests for information outside of court are not protected by this immunity.
- Breach of Confidence: The unauthorized disclosure of confidential information.
- Absolute Immunity (of Witnesses): Legal protection shielding witnesses from liability for statements made during court proceedings.
- Judicial Discretion: The power of a judge to make decisions based on their own judgment, within the bounds of the law.
- Duty of a Doctor (in court): The obligation to answer questions truthfully, but with the ability to seek the judge's guidance on confidential matters. """
0 Comments