- Published on
KembaraXtra-Case Law-Large v Mainprize (1989) - Recklessness in Furnishing False Information
- Case Overview: A fisherman (D) was accused of recklessly furnishing false information about his catch weight.
- Fisherman's Obligation: D was required to submit a sales note detailing the weight of his catch to authorities.
- Under-reporting: His sales note under-reported his catch by approximately 50%.
- Explanation: D claimed the error was due to a miscalculation during conversion to kilograms using a calculator.
- Charge: D was charged under EC regulations with recklessly furnishing false information regarding his catch.
- Initial Outcome: D was not convicted.
- What constitutes recklessness in the context of furnishing false information?
- Appeal Outcome: The prosecution's appeal failed.
- Definition of Recklessness:
- Relied on the Cunningham definition.
- Recklessness means conscious indifference to truth or falsity.
- OR, foresight of the risk that the catch weight would be checked against documentation and indifference to, or willingness to run the risk.
- Justices' Discretion: The justices were entitled to find that the fisherman made a simple error.
- Lack of Recklessness: The Justices did not see that the fisherman acted recklessly as to the mistake.
0 Comments