- Published on
KembaraXtra-Case Law-Millward (1994) - Procuring an Offence
Case Name: Millward (1994)
Key Legal Concept: Procuring an Offence
Facts of the Case:
Case Name: Millward (1994)
Key Legal Concept: Procuring an Offence
Facts of the Case:
- The Defendant (D) instructed an employee to operate a tractor.
- This tractor was attached to a defective trailer.
- This instruction and the defective equipment directly led to an accident.
- The accident resulted in the death of another motorist.
- The Defendant (D) was found guilty of procuring the offence of causing death by reckless driving.
- The judge explicitly stated that D "caused [the employee] to drive that vehicle in that condition."
- This statement draws a direct parallel to the case of Leak and Cogan, where Leak was found to have caused Cogan to engage in a specific act.
- The emphasis is on the Defendant's direct involvement in creating the circumstances that led to the offence.
- Procuring an offence means to obtain, bring about, or instigate the commission of a crime by another person.
- It does not require the procurer to be physically present at the time of the offence or to directly commit the act themselves.
- The central element is that the Defendant's actions or instructions led to or brought about the offence committed by another.
- In Millward, D's instruction to drive a vehicle with a known defect was deemed to have caused the subsequent reckless driving and death.
0 Comments