- Published on
KembaraXtra-Case Law- Navvabi (1986)
Citation: Navvabi (1986) CA
Area of Law: Appropriation (Theft Act)
Facts:
Citation: Navvabi (1986) CA
Area of Law: Appropriation (Theft Act)
Facts:
- Defendant (D) opened bank accounts using false names.
- D drew 12 cheques, supported by a banker's card, at a casino in exchange for gaming chips.
- Insufficient funds were present in the accounts to cover the cheques.
- D was charged with theft.
- D appealed, arguing a lack of appropriation.
- Whether the use of a banker's card to guarantee a cheque drawn on an account with insufficient funds constitutes appropriation for the purposes of theft.
- No. The Court of Appeal held that using a banker's card to guarantee a cheque drawn on an account with insufficient funds does not constitute appropriation.
- The banker's card supporting the cheque only provided the casino (payee) with a contractual right against the bank to receive the specified sum.
- D did not assume the rights of the bank to the bank's funds, neither when he gave the cheque to the payee nor when the payee presented the cheque to the bank and it was honoured.
- Therefore, there was no appropriation.
- This case clarifies that merely using a banker's card to guarantee a cheque does not amount to appropriation of the bank's funds by the drawer of the cheque, even when funds are insufficient. Appropriation requires assuming the rights of the owner (in this case, the bank). The card only conferred contractual rights.
0 Comments