- Published on
KembaraXtra-Case Law-Paton v British Pregnancy Advisory Service Trustees (1979)
Core Principle: A father has no legal right to prevent a woman from obtaining an abortion.
Facts:
Husband (plaintiff) sought an injunction to stop his wife from terminating her pregnancy.
Wife had obtained the required medical certificates for the abortion.
Husband claimed the wife was acting in "bad faith" (reason unspecified in this summary).
Decision:
The High Court denied the husband's request for an injunction.
Significance & Implications:
Paternal Rights: This case establishes a clear precedent against paternal rights in the context of abortion decisions in the UK (and Scotland).
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): Paton v UK (1980) at the European Commission level confirmed that denying the father the right to prevent the abortion did not violate his right to family life under Article 8 of the ECHR.
Scottish Law: The lack of paternal rights regarding abortion is also upheld in Scotland (Kelly v Kelly (1997)).
Core Principle: A father has no legal right to prevent a woman from obtaining an abortion.
Facts:
Husband (plaintiff) sought an injunction to stop his wife from terminating her pregnancy.
Wife had obtained the required medical certificates for the abortion.
Husband claimed the wife was acting in "bad faith" (reason unspecified in this summary).
Decision:
The High Court denied the husband's request for an injunction.
Significance & Implications:
Paternal Rights: This case establishes a clear precedent against paternal rights in the context of abortion decisions in the UK (and Scotland).
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR): Paton v UK (1980) at the European Commission level confirmed that denying the father the right to prevent the abortion did not violate his right to family life under Article 8 of the ECHR.
Scottish Law: The lack of paternal rights regarding abortion is also upheld in Scotland (Kelly v Kelly (1997)).
0 Comments