- Published on
KembaraXtra-Case Law-R (Mellor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2001)
Key Principle: No Absolute Right to Assisted Reproduction
Key Principle: No Absolute Right to Assisted Reproduction
- The case establishes that there is no absolute right to access assisted reproductive services, particularly within the context of imprisonment.
- Parties: A prisoner (serving a life sentence, eligible for release at 35) and his wife (31).
- Request: The couple sought permission to undergo artificial insemination to start a family.
- Secretary of State's Refusal:
- No medical necessity.
- Concerns about the long-term stability of the marriage.
- Initial Legal Action: The applicant sought judicial review, which was initially refused.
- Appeal Dismissed: The Court of Appeal upheld the Secretary of State's decision.
- Reasoning:
- Purpose of Imprisonment: Incarceration inherently involves the deprivation of certain freedoms, including the freedom to found a family in the conventional sense.
- Article 12 of the HRA 1998 (Right to Marry and Found a Family): This right does not automatically grant prisoners access to assisted reproductive services.
- Exceptional Circumstances: The court acknowledged that there might be exceptions to this rule in extraordinary situations (though not present in this case).
0 Comments