- Published on
KembaraXtra-Case Law-R v Adomako (1994) - Gross Negligence Manslaughter
Core Principle: A medical professional (e.g., a doctor) can be held liable for manslaughter if their negligence directly results in the death of a patient.
Case Facts:
Core Principle: A medical professional (e.g., a doctor) can be held liable for manslaughter if their negligence directly results in the death of a patient.
Case Facts:
- Defendant: Dr. Adomako, an anaesthetist.
- Incident: Oxygen tube disconnected during an operation; Dr. Adomako failed to notice.
- Consequence: Patient suffered a fatal heart attack due to lack of oxygen.
- Charge: Manslaughter by gross negligence.
- Appeal dismissed; Dr. Adomako was found guilty of manslaughter by gross negligence.
- The critical question for the jury: "Whether, having regard to the risk of death involved, the conduct of the defendant was so bad in all the circumstances as to amount in their judgment to a criminal act or omission."
- Negligence must transcend civil compensation.
- It must demonstrate such a disregard for the life and safety of others.
- The negligence must be severe enough to constitute "a crime against the State and conduct deserving punishment."
- Gross Negligence Threshold: The negligence must be gross, meaning significantly beyond ordinary negligence. It's not enough for a doctor to simply make a mistake.
- Risk of Death: The negligence must occur in a context where there is a significant risk of death.
- Jury Question: Ultimately, it is up to the jury to decide if the negligence meets the high threshold for criminal liability, and whether it's actually a crime.
0 Comments