LAW

Published on
KembaraXtra- Case Law-R v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers ex p Datafin (1987)
Case Summary: This case concerns the judicial review of the Panel on Takeovers and Mergers (Panel), a self-regulating body governing takeovers of public companies in the City of London. The applicants challenged a Panel decision, seeking judicial review via certiorari, prohibition, mandamus, and injunction. The Panel argued it was beyond the court's jurisdiction because its power wasn't derived from legislation or prerogative.
Key Issue: Does the court have jurisdiction to review the decisions of a self-regulating body performing public functions, even if its power isn't explicitly derived from statute or prerogative?
Facts:
  • The Panel: A self-regulating, unincorporated association with no explicit legal basis. It operated a code of conduct for takeovers.
  • The Dispute: Applicants challenged a Panel decision regarding a takeover bid.
  • Panel's Argument: Claimed immunity from judicial review because its power wasn't statutory or prerogative-based.
  • Applicants' Argument: Argued the Panel's functions were public in nature and therefore subject to judicial review.
Decision:
  • Outcome: The Court of Appeal upheld the Panel's decision on the merits of the case, meaning the specific complaint wasn't successful. However, crucially, it found the Panel was subject to judicial review.
  • Lord Donaldson MR's Reasoning: He rejected the notion that a body must derive its power solely from legislation or prerogative to be subject to judicial review. He emphasized two key elements:
    • Public Element: The Panel's activities had a public element, even without a statutory basis. This "public element" can manifest in various ways, and isn't strictly defined.
    • Exclusion of Consensual Jurisdiction: Bodies whose power stems solely from consensual submission to their jurisdiction are excluded from judicial review. This safeguards private arbitration, etc.
Lord Donaldson highlighted that the Panel's power stemmed not just from its source but also from its function within a system that was inherently public. The government's reliance on the Panel in the field of takeovers and mergers solidified this public character. Its self-regulating nature didn't preclude judicial review; rather, it made it more appropriate.
Key Legal Principles:
  • Source vs. Nature of Power: The source of a body's power is not the sole determinant of whether it is subject to judicial review. The nature of the power and the functions performed are crucial. This aligns with the principles established in GCHQ.
  • Public Element Test: The presence of a "public element" is a critical factor in determining jurisdiction. This element is flexible and can be demonstrated in various ways (e.g., performing functions that affect the public interest, acting as a central component of government policy).
  • Consensual Jurisdiction Exception: Private bodies deriving their power solely from consensual agreements are generally excluded from judicial review.
Subsequent Developments: While the case established a broad principle, later cases have applied a more restrictive interpretation of what constitutes a "public" function, although the core principle that the nature of the power is paramount remains.
Study Questions:
  1. Explain the difference between the source and the nature of a body's power in the context of judicial review.
  2. What constitutes a "public element" in determining the jurisdiction of the court to review a body's decision? Give examples.
  3. Why was the Panel's self-regulating nature deemed not to exclude it from judicial review?
  4. How does Datafin relate to the GCHQ case?
  5. Discuss the limitations and subsequent interpretations of the "public element" test established in Datafin.
  6. Explain the significance of the "consensual jurisdiction" exception.
This study guide provides a framework for understanding the complexities of Datafin. Remember to consult the full case judgment for a complete understanding.




Picture
0 Comments

Author

Learn the fact about law