- Published on
KembaraXtra – Indian Evidence Law –Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam-Difference between Admission and Confession
1. Definition
2. By Whom Made
3. Nature (Genus vs Species)
4. Nature of Evidence
5. Proceedings Where Used
6. Use in Favour of Maker
7. Co-Accused Situation
8. Effect of Voluntary Statement
Quick Memory Tip👉 All confessions are admissions, but not all admissions are confessions.
1. Definition
- Admission: Statement (oral, written, or electronic) suggesting an inference about liability or relevant fact.
- Confession: Statement (oral or written) that is a direct admission of guilt.
2. By Whom Made
- Admission: Made by persons under Sections 16–18 (parties, agents, etc.), including the accused.
- Confession: Made generally by the accused or co-accused.
3. Nature (Genus vs Species)
- Admission: Genus (broader concept).
- Confession: Species of admission (narrower, specific to guilt).
4. Nature of Evidence
- Admission:
- Substantive evidence
- Not conclusive proof (Section 25)
- Confession:
- Judicial confession = strong substantive evidence
- Extra-judicial confession = weak, needs caution
- Usually requires corroboration
5. Proceedings Where Used
- Admission: Used in both civil and criminal cases
- Confession: Used mainly in criminal cases
6. Use in Favour of Maker
- Admission:
- Can be used in favour of maker in exceptional cases (Section 19)
- Confession:
- Cannot be used in favour of the accused
7. Co-Accused Situation
- Admission:
- Admissible only against maker
- Not against co-accused
- Confession:
- May be considered against co-accused if jointly tried (Section 24)
- Still weak evidence
8. Effect of Voluntary Statement
- Admission:
- May operate as estoppel
- Confession:
- Voluntary confession can lead to conviction
Quick Memory Tip👉 All confessions are admissions, but not all admissions are confessions.
0 Comments