LAW

Published on
KembaraXtra – Indian Evidence Law – Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam – Proof of Admissions (Section 19)
1. General Rule
  • Admissions are relevant and can be proved AGAINST the maker
  • But they cannot be proved BY or ON BEHALF of the maker
👉 Meaning:
  • A person’s admission can be used against him
  • But generally, he cannot use his own admission in his favour

2. Exceptions (When Admission Can Be Used in Favour of Maker)(1) When Maker is Dead (Section 26 Principle)
  • Admission can be proved if it would be relevant when the maker is dead
  • Based on necessity and unavailability
📌 Example:
  • Entries made in business records by deceased person → admissible

(2) Statement as to State of Mind or Body
  • Must satisfy:
    • Relates to state of mind/body (e.g., intention, knowledge)
    • Made at or about the time
    • Supported by conduct making falsehood unlikely
👉 Reason: Helps prove mental condition or intention

(3) Relevant Otherwise Than as Admission
  • If statement is independently relevant under Sections 4–11, it can be used
  • Even if it is also an admission
📌 Example:
  • Statement explaining conduct or possession can be admitted

3. Key Illustrative Principles
  • A cannot prove his own statement to support his case
  • But opponent can use it against him
📌 Example:
  • A says deed is genuine → B can use it
  • But A cannot rely on his own statement

4. Self-Serving Statements (Exception Cases)Self-serving statements are allowed only in 3 cases:
  1. When admissible under Section 26 (dead person rule)
  2. When showing state of mind/body
  3. When independently relevant under other provisions

5. Core Principle👉 Admissions are evidence against the maker, not in his favour — unless special exceptions apply.

Quick Revision Line👉 You cannot use your own admission to help yourself, except in limited situations (dead person, state of mind, or independent relevance).
Picture
0 Comments