LAW

Published on
​Malaysian Banking Law – Definition of Banker, Customer and the Contractual Banker–Customer Relationship
Introduction
The banker-customer relationship is one of the most fundamental legal relationships in banking law because it determines the rights, duties and obligations existing between banks and customers.
In Malaysian banking law:
  • banking relationships are contractual in nature;
  • rights and obligations arise through agreements between banks and customers;
  • both parties owe reciprocal legal duties to one another.
The law governing banker-customer relationships derives from:
  • common law principles;
  • banking practice;
  • judicial decisions;
  • statutory regulation under the Financial Services Act 2013.
The banker-customer relationship governs banking activities such as:
  • deposits;
  • withdrawals;
  • remittances;
  • standing orders;
  • cheques;
  • banker’s drafts;
  • letters of credit;
  • loans and financing;
  • foreign currency transactions;
  • Islamic banking facilities.


Definition of a Banker
General Meaning
A banker generally refers to:
A person, corporation or financial institution carrying on the business of banking.
Traditionally, banking business involves:
  1. accepting deposits;
  2. maintaining current accounts;
  3. paying cheques;
  4. collecting cheques;
  5. providing financing facilities.
These functions distinguish banks from ordinary commercial lenders or finance companies.


Absence of Exhaustive Definition
At common law, there is no complete or universal definition of “bank” or “banker”.
The meaning of banking changes according to:
  • commercial practice;
  • economic development;
  • financial systems;
  • technological advancement.


Bank of Chettinad Ltd of Colombo v Commissioner of Income Tax
The Privy Council recognised that the meaning of “banking” may differ across countries and historical periods because banking practices evolve according to economic and social conditions.
This demonstrates that banking law adopts a flexible and functional approach to defining bankers.


Bank of New South Wales v Commonwealth
Dixon J explained that banking should be given a broad meaning because banking forms part of the commercial and economic organisation of society.
The court further recognised that it is impossible to formulate a completely exhaustive definition of banking.


Essential Characteristics of a Banker
United Dominions Trust Ltd v Kirkwood
This is one of the leading authorities concerning the definition of banker.
The court identified several essential banking functions:
  1. conducting current accounts;
  2. paying cheques;
  3. collecting cheques.
These functions remain central indicators of banking business.


Lord Denning’s Explanation
Lord Denning famously observed:
“A banker is easier to recognise than to define.”
The courts may therefore consider factors such as:
  • commercial reputation;
  • soundness;
  • stability;
  • public recognition;
  • overall banking character.


Paget’s Law of Banking
According to Paget’s Law of Banking:
No institution can properly be regarded as a banker unless it:
  1. takes current accounts;
  2. pays cheques;
  3. collects cheques.
This traditional formulation remains highly influential.


Malaysian Statutory Position
Under the Financial Services Act 2013, a bank refers to a person carrying on banking business under a licence issued by Bank Negara Malaysia.
Banking business generally includes:
  • accepting deposits;
  • paying and collecting cheques;
  • providing financing;
  • prescribed financial activities.
Malaysia therefore adopts:
  • statutory regulation;
  • licensing requirements;
  • central bank supervision.


Core Banking Functions
1. Acceptance of Deposits
One of the most important characteristics of a banker is accepting deposits into:
  • savings accounts;
  • current accounts;
  • deposit accounts.
Once money is deposited:
  • ownership passes to the bank;
  • the bank becomes debtor;
  • the customer becomes creditor.
This principle was recognised in:
  • Joachimson v Swiss Bank Corporation.


2. Maintaining Current Accounts
Banks maintain accounts through which customers conduct banking transactions such as:
  • deposits;
  • withdrawals;
  • cheque issuance;
  • transfers.


3. Paying Cheques
Banks honour cheques drawn by customers against available funds.
This function is one of the traditional indicators of banking business.


4. Collecting Cheques
Banks collect cheques deposited by customers through clearing systems.


5. Providing Financing
Banks commonly provide:
  • loans;
  • overdrafts;
  • trade financing;
  • Islamic financing;
  • credit facilities.
However:
Financing alone does not automatically amount to banking business.


Light Style Sdn Bhd v KFH Ijarah House (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
The court recognised that financing activities alone are insufficient to constitute banking business.


Continuous Banking Operations
Banking generally involves:
  • systematic activities;
  • continuous operations;
  • regular customer dealings.
A single isolated transaction is usually insufficient.


Banque Nationale De Paris v Wuan Swee May & Anor
The court held that isolated transactions alone do not necessarily amount to carrying on banking business.


Debt Recovery Alone Is Not Banking
Bank of China v Lee Kee Pin
Debt recovery alone does not constitute banking business.


Taking Security Alone Is Not Banking
Koh Kim Chai v Asia Commercial Banking Corporation Limited
Taking security alone does not amount to carrying on banking business.


Development Finance Institutions
Development finance institutions may provide financing without necessarily being banks.
Examples include:
  • industrial financing;
  • agricultural financing;
  • economic development financing.


Sabah Development Bank Bhd v Skbs (Sabah) Sdn Bhd & Ors
The court recognised that development finance institutions are not automatically banks merely because they provide financing.


Definition of Customer
A customer generally refers to:
A person accepted by a bank for the purpose of carrying out banking transactions.
A customer may:
  • maintain an account;
  • deposit money;
  • withdraw funds;
  • obtain financing;
  • use remittance services;
  • purchase bank drafts;
  • issue cheques.
Customer status may arise once:
  • an account is opened;
  • money is accepted;
  • banking instructions are accepted;
  • a banking relationship is established.
The duration of the relationship is not decisive.


Judicial Development of Customer Status
Great Western Railway Co v London and County Banking Co Ltd
Casual banking services alone are insufficient to establish customer status.
A recognised banking relationship is generally necessary.


Robinson v Midland Bank Ltd
The existence of an account relationship is the main indicator of customer status.


Commissioners of Taxation v English, Scottish and Australian Bank Ltd
Customer status may arise immediately once an account is opened and money is accepted.


Ladbroke & Co v Todd
A person may become a customer even before a cheque clears if the bank has accepted the account relationship.


Barclays Bank Ltd v Okenarhe
Casual services alone do not create customer status.


Tate v Wilts and Dorset Bank
Mere intention to open an account is insufficient.
The relationship must actually materialise.


Woods v Martins Bank Ltd
Accepted banking instructions and contractual dealings may establish customer status even before formal account opening.


Oriental Bank of Malaya v Rubber Industry (Replanting Board)
Even a fraudster became a customer once the account was opened and cheques were accepted for collection.


Importers Co Ltd v Westminster Bank Ltd
One bank may become the customer of another bank.


Kehar Singh a/l Jasa Singh v The Standard Chartered Bank
A walk-in customer purchasing a bank draft may still be owed a duty of care.


Nature of the Banker–Customer Relationship
The banker-customer relationship is fundamentally contractual in nature.
All banking transactions are based upon:
  • general contract law;
  • special banking contracts;
  • express contractual terms;
  • implied contractual terms.
The most cited judicial explanation is found in:
Joachimson v Swiss Bank Corporation
Atkin LJ explained that:
  • the bank receives money and collects bills for the customer;
  • the money is not held on trust;
  • the bank borrows the money and undertakes repayment;
  • repayment occurs upon demand;
  • the bank undertakes to honour written payment instructions;
  • the bank must provide reasonable notice before terminating the relationship.
The customer also undertakes:
  • to exercise reasonable care when issuing instructions;
  • not to facilitate forgery or fraud.
The relationship therefore creates reciprocal obligations between banker and customer.


Bank Pertanian Malaysia v Mohd Gazzali Mohd Ismail
Bank Pertanian Malaysia v Mohd Gazzali Mohd Ismail
Facts
The case involved an application for an order for sale of charged land securing a housing loan.
The charge agreement provided that repayment was to be made “on demand”.
The issue was whether the bank’s claim was barred by limitation.
The defendant argued that limitation began running from the first default in instalment payment.
The bank argued that limitation only began once formal demand was issued because the agreement expressly required demand.


Held
The High Court held that where the banker-customer contract expressly provides for repayment “on demand”, demand becomes an essential contractual requirement.
Time only begins to run after:
  • demand is issued; and
  • repayment is refused.
The court therefore held that the twelve-year limitation period applied.


Principle
Where express contractual terms exist between banker and customer, the courts will generally enforce those terms according to the intention of the parties.


Rights and Duties in the Banker–Customer Relationship
Duties Owed by Banks
Banks owe customers duties including:
  • duty of confidentiality;
  • duty to honour valid payment instructions;
  • duty to exercise reasonable care and skill;
  • duty to comply with contractual obligations;
  • duty to comply with banking regulations.


Duties Owed by Customers
Customers owe obligations including:
  • repayment of loans;
  • payment of interest;
  • compliance with banking agreements;
  • fulfilment of contractual conditions;
  • reasonable care in issuing instructions.
Where customers breach these obligations, banks may:
  • suspend facilities;
  • withhold further drawdowns;
  • recall loans;
  • enforce securities.


Bekalan Sains P & C Sdn Bhd v Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd
Bekalan Sains P & C Sdn Bhd v Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd
Facts
The company operated a cattle business and obtained various banking facilities including:
  • overdrafts;
  • letters of credit;
  • trust receipts;
  • banker’s guarantees.
After suffering losses, the company sought restructuring of the facilities.
The bank initially agreed but later imposed additional conditions including:
  • a 1:1 deposit requirement;
  • monthly interest payments.
The company argued that the bank breached the restructuring agreement.
The bank argued that the borrower failed to comply with the conditions precedent and repayment obligations.


Held
The Court of Appeal held that:
  • the restructuring agreement remained subject to conditions precedent;
  • the borrower failed to pay agreed interest;
  • the bank was entitled to suspend further facilities.


Principle
A bank may lawfully withhold further drawdowns where the borrower breaches repayment obligations or fails to comply with restructuring conditions.


Practical Application
Suppose a borrower fails to pay interest required under a restructuring agreement.
Where the agreement expressly provides that continued facilities depend on compliance with repayment conditions, the bank may suspend further facilities until the borrower complies.
Similarly, where a customer issues valid payment instructions, the bank must generally honour those instructions unless lawful reasons justify refusal.


Critical Analysis
The banker-customer relationship is unique because it combines:
  • contract law;
  • banking regulation;
  • commercial practice;
  • fiduciary-like responsibilities.
Earlier cases focused mainly on identifying who qualifies as a customer.
Modern authorities increasingly emphasise reciprocal obligations:
  • banks must act carefully and honour contractual obligations;
  • customers must comply with repayment obligations and banking conditions.
Modern banking also creates new challenges involving:
  • online banking;
  • digital payment systems;
  • cyber fraud;
  • AI-driven banking;
  • electronic banking platforms.
Traditional contractual principles therefore continue evolving to accommodate modern banking systems.


Solutions to Banker–Customer Disputes
Several measures may reduce banking disputes:
1. Clear Contractual Documentation
Banks should clearly explain:
  • repayment obligations;
  • default consequences;
  • restructuring terms.


2. Transparent Communication
Customers should fully understand:
  • interest obligations;
  • conditions precedent;
  • suspension rights.


3. Strong Credit Monitoring
Banks should monitor borrower compliance continuously.


4. Consumer Education
Customers should understand:
  • repayment responsibilities;
  • legal consequences of default;
  • banking obligations.


5. Regulatory Reform
Malaysia may consider clearer statutory provisions governing banker-customer obligations in modern digital banking environments.


Conclusion
The banker-customer relationship forms the legal foundation of Malaysian banking law.
The definition of banker depends upon:
  • deposit-taking;
  • current account operations;
  • cheque payment and collection;
  • continuous banking activities;
  • statutory licensing.
Customer status depends upon the existence of a genuine banking relationship.
The banker-customer relationship is contractual in nature and creates reciprocal rights and obligations between banks and customers.
Authorities such as:
  • Joachimson v Swiss Bank Corporation;
  • United Dominions Trust Ltd v Kirkwood;
  • Bank Pertanian Malaysia v Mohd Gazzali Mohd Ismail;
  • Bekalan Sains P & C Sdn Bhd v Bank Bumiputra Malaysia Bhd;
continue to shape Malaysian banking law today.
Modern banking law now balances:
  • contractual rights;
  • banking stability;
  • customer protection;
  • financial regulation;
  • digital banking developments.

Picture
0 Comments