- Published on
Malaysian Banking Law: Meaning of “Customer” — Absence of Statutory Definition
Case Scenario
Daniel maintains an account with a bank in Malaysia, while Lina does not have an account but uses the bank to collect payments on her behalf. A dispute arises as to whether both individuals can be considered “customers” under banking law.
Paraphrased Explanation (Q&A Format – Rewritten Clearly)
Q1: Is the term “customer” defined under Malaysian and English statutes?
👉 English statutes (No definition):
There is no statutory definition of “customer” in both Malaysian and English law.
Q2: Why is there no statutory definition? (Simple explanation)
The law deliberately leaves the term undefined because banking relationships are diverse and constantly evolving. A fixed definition might exclude certain types of relationships that should be legally recognised.
Q3: How is “customer” defined in the United States?
Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a customer is:
👉 A person who:
Q4: What does the US definition tell us? (Simple understanding)
It shows that the concept of a customer is based on the relationship with the bank, not just deposit-taking.
✔ Includes:
Application (Note Form)
✔ English law:
Customer = relationship-based concept (not limited to depositors)
Critical Analysis (Simple Understanding)
The absence of a statutory definition allows courts to interpret “customer” flexibly. This is important because modern banking includes many services beyond deposits, such as loans, payment processing, and advisory services. A rigid definition would fail to capture these evolving relationships.
Resolution of the Case Scenario
Both qualify as customers, even without a statutory definition.
Final Exam Rule (Very Important)
The term “customer” is not defined under Malaysian or English statutes; it is interpreted broadly based on the existence of a banking relationship, which may include account holders as well as persons who use banking services such as payment collection.
Case Scenario
Daniel maintains an account with a bank in Malaysia, while Lina does not have an account but uses the bank to collect payments on her behalf. A dispute arises as to whether both individuals can be considered “customers” under banking law.
Paraphrased Explanation (Q&A Format – Rewritten Clearly)
Q1: Is the term “customer” defined under Malaysian and English statutes?
👉 English statutes (No definition):
- Bills of Exchange Act 1882
- Cheques Act 1957 (note: often referenced in Commonwealth context)
- Bills of Exchange Act 1949
- Financial Services Act 2013
There is no statutory definition of “customer” in both Malaysian and English law.
Q2: Why is there no statutory definition? (Simple explanation)
The law deliberately leaves the term undefined because banking relationships are diverse and constantly evolving. A fixed definition might exclude certain types of relationships that should be legally recognised.
Q3: How is “customer” defined in the United States?
Under the Uniform Commercial Code, a customer is:
👉 A person who:
- Has an account with a bank, OR
- Uses the bank to collect payments
Q4: What does the US definition tell us? (Simple understanding)
It shows that the concept of a customer is based on the relationship with the bank, not just deposit-taking.
✔ Includes:
- Account holders
- Persons using banking services
- Even banks dealing with other banks
Application (Note Form)
✔ English law:
- No statutory definition
- Relies on case law
- No statutory definition
- Uses related terms like “depositor”
- Provides a broader functional definition
Customer = relationship-based concept (not limited to depositors)
Critical Analysis (Simple Understanding)
The absence of a statutory definition allows courts to interpret “customer” flexibly. This is important because modern banking includes many services beyond deposits, such as loans, payment processing, and advisory services. A rigid definition would fail to capture these evolving relationships.
Resolution of the Case Scenario
- Daniel (account holder) → ✔ Customer
- Lina (uses bank services) → ✔ Customer
Both qualify as customers, even without a statutory definition.
Final Exam Rule (Very Important)
The term “customer” is not defined under Malaysian or English statutes; it is interpreted broadly based on the existence of a banking relationship, which may include account holders as well as persons who use banking services such as payment collection.
0 Comments