LAW

Published on
Malaysian Banking Law — Trustee vs Agent vs Fiduciary Duties
Introduction
In banking law, students often confuse:
  • trustee relationships;
  • agency relationships;
  • fiduciary duties.
Although these concepts are closely related, they are NOT identical.
A person may:
  • be a fiduciary without being a trustee;
  • be an agent without being a trustee;
  • owe fiduciary duties without holding property on trust.
Understanding the differences is extremely important because:
✔ different legal duties arise under each relationship;
✔ different remedies apply;
✔ banks may owe one duty but not another.


1. Trustee Relationship
Meaning
A trustee is a person who:
holds and manages property or money for the benefit of another person (the beneficiary).
The trustee has legal ownership of the property but must use it:
✔ solely for the beneficiary’s benefit.


Main Characteristics of a Trustee
A trustee:
  • holds trust property;
  • must not misuse the property;
  • must avoid conflicts of interest;
  • must not make secret profits;
  • owes strict fiduciary obligations.
The trustee must always:
✔ prioritise the beneficiary’s interests.


Nature of Ownership
In a trust:
  • trustee = legal owner;
  • beneficiary = beneficial owner.
Example:
A trustee managing inheritance money for a child.


Banking Example
Normally:
✔ banks are NOT trustees of customer deposits.
This was established in:
Foley v Hill
The court held:
deposited money becomes part of the bank’s assets.
Thus:
✔ the bank is debtor, not trustee.


Exception
A bank MAY become a trustee:
  • if money is specifically segregated;
  • if the bank knowingly handles trust money improperly;
  • if constructive trust principles arise.
Example:
A solicitor’s client account held specifically on trust.


2. Agency Relationship
Meaning
An agent is a person:
authorised to act on behalf of another person (the principal).
The agent creates legal relations between:
  • the principal;
  • third parties.


Main Characteristics of an Agent
An agent:
  • acts on instructions;
  • represents another person;
  • may enter contracts on behalf of the principal.
The agent owes duties such as:
✔ obedience;
✔ loyalty;
✔ reasonable care.


Examples of Agency
Examples include:
  • lawyers acting for clients;
  • real estate agents;
  • company directors;
  • stockbrokers.


Banking Example
A bank may act as agent when:
  • transferring funds;
  • collecting cheques;
  • paying bills;
  • disbursing money according to customer instructions.
Example:
A customer instructs the bank to transfer RM50,000.
The bank acts:
✔ as agent carrying out instructions.


Case Illustration
Joachimson v Swiss Bank Corporation
The case recognised that:
✔ banks undertake obligations to honour customer instructions.


Agency Does NOT Mean Trustee
An agent:
  • does not necessarily own property;
  • may simply carry out instructions.
Thus:
✔ an agent is not automatically a trustee.


3. Fiduciary Duty
Meaning
A fiduciary duty arises where:
one party places trust and confidence in another.
The fiduciary must:
✔ act loyally;
✔ act honestly;
✔ avoid conflicts of interest.


Main Characteristics of Fiduciary Duties
A fiduciary must:
  • act in good faith;
  • avoid secret profits;
  • avoid conflicts;
  • disclose important information honestly.


Fiduciary Relationship Involves
Usually:
  • trust;
  • confidence;
  • reliance;
  • vulnerability;
  • advisory responsibility.


Banking Context
Ordinary banker–customer relationships are usually:
✔ contractual only;
✔ debtor–creditor only.
They are NOT automatically fiduciary.
This principle was recognised in:
Kian Lup Construction v Hong Kong Bank Malaysia Bhd
and
Aseambankers Malaysia Bhd v Shencourt Sdn Bhd


When Fiduciary Duties May Arise in Banking
Fiduciary duties may arise where:
  • the bank gives investment advice;
  • the customer heavily relies on the advice;
  • the bank manages investments;
  • the bank acts as financial adviser.


Leading Authority
Hedley Byrne v Heller
This case recognised that:
✔ special advisory relationships may create fiduciary-like obligations.


Important Banking Principle
Banks generally:
✔ owe duties of care;
✔ do NOT owe general fiduciary duties.
This was reinforced in:
Lee Cheong Chee v HSBC Bank Malaysia Bhd
The court held:
banks are not generally required to advise customers on investment risks unless special advisory relationships exist.


Comparison Between Trustee, Agent and Fiduciary
A. Main Role
Trustee
Holds and manages property for another.
Agent
Acts on behalf of another.
Fiduciary
Must act loyally in another’s interests.


B. Ownership of Property
Trustee
✔ holds legal ownership.
Agent
✘ usually does not own property.
Fiduciary
May or may not hold property.


C. Main Obligation
Trustee
Protect trust property for beneficiaries.
Agent
Follow instructions of principal.
Fiduciary
Act loyally and avoid conflicts.


D. Level of Duty
Trustee
Very strict.
Agent
Moderate.
Fiduciary
High duty of loyalty.


E. Banking Example
Trustee
Bank holding segregated trust account.
Agent
Bank transferring funds for customer.
Fiduciary
Bank acting as investment adviser.


Simple Illustration
Trustee Example
A father leaves RM1 million in trust for his child.
The trustee:
✔ manages the money solely for the child.
The trustee cannot:
  • use the money personally;
  • profit secretly.


Agent Example
Ali instructs his lawyer to buy land for him.
The lawyer:
✔ acts on Ali’s behalf.


Fiduciary Example
A financial adviser recommends investments while secretly earning commissions.
If the adviser hides this conflict:
✔ fiduciary duties may be breached.


Banking Case Scenario
Scenario 1 — Trustee
A bank holds money in a solicitor’s client account specifically separated from general bank assets.
The bank knowingly misuses the trust funds.
Result:
✔ the bank may become liable as trustee or constructive trustee.


Scenario 2 — Agent
A customer instructs the bank to transfer RM100,000 to a supplier.
The bank accidentally transfers the money to the wrong account.
Result:
✔ bank may breach agency duties and duty of care.


Scenario 3 — Fiduciary
A bank investment adviser persuades a retiree to buy risky investments without disclosing hidden commissions.
Result:
✔ fiduciary duties may arise because trust and reliance exist.


Practical Importance in Banking Law
Understanding these distinctions is important because:
  • different legal remedies apply;
  • liability differs significantly;
  • duties owed by banks vary according to the relationship.


Modern Malaysian Position
Malaysian courts generally hold that:
Ordinary Banking Relationship
✔ contractual;
✔ debtor–creditor;
✔ no general fiduciary duty.


Special Banking Relationship
Fiduciary duties may arise where:
  • investment advice is given;
  • trust and reliance exist;
  • the bank assumes advisory responsibilities.


Critical Analysis
Modern banking relationships are increasingly complex because banks now provide:
  • investment services;
  • wealth management;
  • financial planning;
  • digital financial products.
This creates tension between:
✔ traditional debtor–creditor principles;
and
✔ modern expectations of customer protection.
Courts therefore try to balance:
  • commercial practicality;
  • customer protection;
  • banking efficiency.


Final Examination Rule
A trustee holds and manages property for another and owes strict fiduciary duties. An agent acts on behalf of another person and must follow instructions with reasonable care. A fiduciary is someone who must act loyally and avoid conflicts of interest because trust and confidence have been placed in him. In banking law, ordinary banker–customer relationships are generally debtor–creditor and contractual, not fiduciary, unless special advisory or trust relationships arise.

​
Picture
0 Comments