- Published on
Legal Terms – Audit Exemption
Audit exemption refers to the exemption granted to some companies from the requirement to undergo an audit of their financial statements.
Every company is obligated to designate auditors, unless they are exempted (as stated in section 475 of the Companies Act 2006). Microscopic and quiescent enterprises are companies that are excluded (according to sections 477 and 480) if the directors provide a declaration on the company's balance sheet confirming this. Nevertheless, a firm that is exempt is obligated to conduct an audit if a member or members who possess a minimum of 10% of any class of shares request it (as stated in section 476). An exempt company is defined as a small company if it satisfies at least two of the following conditions: (1) the firm's annual turnover is £10.2 million or less; (2) the total assets of the company are £5.1 million or less; (3) the company employs 50 or fewer individuals. It is not mandatory for a firm to hire an auditor if the board determine that audited accounts are unlikely to be necessary (as per section 485 and section 489).
Audit exemption refers to the exemption granted to some companies from the requirement to undergo an audit of their financial statements.
Every company is obligated to designate auditors, unless they are exempted (as stated in section 475 of the Companies Act 2006). Microscopic and quiescent enterprises are companies that are excluded (according to sections 477 and 480) if the directors provide a declaration on the company's balance sheet confirming this. Nevertheless, a firm that is exempt is obligated to conduct an audit if a member or members who possess a minimum of 10% of any class of shares request it (as stated in section 476). An exempt company is defined as a small company if it satisfies at least two of the following conditions: (1) the firm's annual turnover is £10.2 million or less; (2) the total assets of the company are £5.1 million or less; (3) the company employs 50 or fewer individuals. It is not mandatory for a firm to hire an auditor if the board determine that audited accounts are unlikely to be necessary (as per section 485 and section 489).
- Published on
Legal Terms - Auditor
An auditor is an individual or company that is appointed to scrutinize the financial records and accounts
and to examine the financial records of a legally established corporation and provide a detailed report to the company's shareholders. The auditor's report must explicitly indicate whether or not, in the auditor's professional judgment, the financial statements have been accurately compiled and provide an accurate and unbiased representation of the company's financial status. The Companies Act 2006 outlines the necessary credentials for auditors and grants them certain powers to carry out their duties efficiently.
An auditor is an individual or company that is appointed to scrutinize the financial records and accounts
and to examine the financial records of a legally established corporation and provide a detailed report to the company's shareholders. The auditor's report must explicitly indicate whether or not, in the auditor's professional judgment, the financial statements have been accurately compiled and provide an accurate and unbiased representation of the company's financial status. The Companies Act 2006 outlines the necessary credentials for auditors and grants them certain powers to carry out their duties efficiently.
- Published on
Legal Terms - Authentication
Authentication is a specific procedural process that occurs at the end of a treaty, during which the final version of the treaty is confirmed as accurate, genuine, and not open to additional changes.
Authentication is a specific procedural process that occurs at the end of a treaty, during which the final version of the treaty is confirmed as accurate, genuine, and not open to additional changes.
- Published on
Legal Terms -Assumpsit
Assumpsit is a legal term derived from Latin, meaning "he has undertaken". Traditionally, a legal recourse for seeking compensation for harm caused by someone's negligence in fulfilling their obligations.
something he had committed to doing (whether explicitly or tacitly). Therefore, it can be considered as a first version of a legal action taken for the violation of a contractual agreement.
Assumpsit is a legal term derived from Latin, meaning "he has undertaken". Traditionally, a legal recourse for seeking compensation for harm caused by someone's negligence in fulfilling their obligations.
something he had committed to doing (whether explicitly or tacitly). Therefore, it can be considered as a first version of a legal action taken for the violation of a contractual agreement.
- Published on
Legal Terms -Assured agricultural tenancy
An assured tenancy that specifically applies to agricultural workers residing in a linked cottage. This type of the tenancy replaced *protected occupancies starting from January 15, 1989.
An assured tenancy that specifically applies to agricultural workers residing in a linked cottage. This type of the tenancy replaced *protected occupancies starting from January 15, 1989.
- Published on
Legal Terms -Assured shorthold tenancy
An assured tenancy that allows the landlord to regain possession without the need to provide evidence at the end of the tenancy.
One of the typical reasons for having possession of a guaranteed tenancy. This type of tenancy was implemented under the Housing Act 1988, as a replacement for protected shorthold tenancies. Pursuant to the 1988 Act, the landlord had a legal obligation to provide the tenant with prior notice that the lease being granted was an assured shorthold tenancy. According to the Housing Act 1996, starting from 28 February 1997, landlords are no longer need to serve a notice. All new tenancies are automatically considered assured shortholds, unless there is a different agreement in place. If a landlord wishes to provide the tenant with security in the form of an assured tenancy, they must explicitly establish this. Failure to do so will result in the tenancy being an assured shorthold without the guarantee of tenure.
The landlord has the right to take possession of the property at any time if they are contractually entitled to do so. They must give a notice of two months and clearly state that the tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. An order for possession cannot be issued within the initial six months of the tenancy.
An assured tenancy that allows the landlord to regain possession without the need to provide evidence at the end of the tenancy.
One of the typical reasons for having possession of a guaranteed tenancy. This type of tenancy was implemented under the Housing Act 1988, as a replacement for protected shorthold tenancies. Pursuant to the 1988 Act, the landlord had a legal obligation to provide the tenant with prior notice that the lease being granted was an assured shorthold tenancy. According to the Housing Act 1996, starting from 28 February 1997, landlords are no longer need to serve a notice. All new tenancies are automatically considered assured shortholds, unless there is a different agreement in place. If a landlord wishes to provide the tenant with security in the form of an assured tenancy, they must explicitly establish this. Failure to do so will result in the tenancy being an assured shorthold without the guarantee of tenure.
The landlord has the right to take possession of the property at any time if they are contractually entitled to do so. They must give a notice of two months and clearly state that the tenancy is an assured shorthold tenancy. An order for possession cannot be issued within the initial six months of the tenancy.
- Published on
Legal Terms - Assured Tenancy
A type of tenancy established by the Housing Act 1988, where the tenant pays a rent that is determined by the market, but is also granted the right to remain in the property for an extended period of time. The premises could potentially be
Available in either a furnished or unfurnished state. This type of tenancy supersedes all protected tenancies, with the exception of those that were established before to the implementation of the Housing Act 1988.
In order to be considered a guaranteed tenancy, the premises must be rented out as a distinct and independent living space, and must fall under specific limits of rateable value. There are specific exemptions, such as when the landlord resides in a different section of the same property. According to the Housing Act 1996, starting from 28 February 1997, all new residential tenancies are considered guaranteed shorthold tenancies without security of tenure, unless a notice is specifically given to indicate that the parties are establishing an assured tenancy.
The landlord can only reclaim ownership based on specific legal grounds.
The grounds for eviction include: failure to pay rent; the landlord's need to reclaim the dwelling for personal use after previously residing there; the tenant being a disruptive neighbor or having the potential to become one; and the availability of alternative housing options (the court has the authority to exercise discretion in this last scenario).
Upon the death of a tenant with an assured tenancy, their spouse, civil partner, or cohabitee may, under specific conditions, inherit the tenancy as the successor to the deceased tenant. A tenant with a guaranteed tenancy agreement typically cannot transfer the tenancy to someone else without obtaining the landlord's permission.
A type of tenancy established by the Housing Act 1988, where the tenant pays a rent that is determined by the market, but is also granted the right to remain in the property for an extended period of time. The premises could potentially be
Available in either a furnished or unfurnished state. This type of tenancy supersedes all protected tenancies, with the exception of those that were established before to the implementation of the Housing Act 1988.
In order to be considered a guaranteed tenancy, the premises must be rented out as a distinct and independent living space, and must fall under specific limits of rateable value. There are specific exemptions, such as when the landlord resides in a different section of the same property. According to the Housing Act 1996, starting from 28 February 1997, all new residential tenancies are considered guaranteed shorthold tenancies without security of tenure, unless a notice is specifically given to indicate that the parties are establishing an assured tenancy.
The landlord can only reclaim ownership based on specific legal grounds.
The grounds for eviction include: failure to pay rent; the landlord's need to reclaim the dwelling for personal use after previously residing there; the tenant being a disruptive neighbor or having the potential to become one; and the availability of alternative housing options (the court has the authority to exercise discretion in this last scenario).
Upon the death of a tenant with an assured tenancy, their spouse, civil partner, or cohabitee may, under specific conditions, inherit the tenancy as the successor to the deceased tenant. A tenant with a guaranteed tenancy agreement typically cannot transfer the tenancy to someone else without obtaining the landlord's permission.
- Published on
Legal Terms - Assignment
An assignment is the act of transferring a responsibility in action from one person (the assignor) to another (the assignee). According to the principles of common law, this was not allowed. If, for instance, A was due a contractual amount by B, he
He was unable to assign his legal entitlement to C in a manner that would allow C to take legal action against B for the outstanding debt. Statutes currently authorize and govern the assignment of some choses in action. As an illustration, the Companies Act permits the transfer of shares in a company to be carried out according to the specific instructions stated in the firm's articles of association. However, these are exceptional situations. In general, choses in action, which can be legal (such as the benefit of a contract) or equitable (such as a right under a trust), can be transferred through either equitable assignment or statutory assignment, as defined by the Law of Property Act 1925. No formalities are necessary for an equitable assignment. The assignor must clearly demonstrate a desire to transfer ownership of their right to the assignee, which is sufficient. However, if the assignment is a legal choice, the assignor must be included as a party in any legal procedures initiated by the assignee to enforce the right. In the aforementioned case, C has the legal right to file a lawsuit against B to recover the debt. However, C is required to include A as a co-plaintiff in the lawsuit, or if A declines to participate, C must include A as a co-defendant.
A statutory assignment, as defined by the Law of Property Act 1925, is commonly known as a legal assignment. However, it should be noted that this term is not entirely true, as it can apply to both equitable and legal choses in action. The assignee is empowered to enforce the assigned right in their own name, without needing to involve the assignor in the legal procedures, even if there is a legal chose. For it to be considered legitimate, there are three prerequisites: it must be absolute, written, and notice of it must be sent to the person against whom the right might be enforced. An absolute assignment refers to the transfer of the assignor's complete interest to the assignee without any conditions. If a transfer of less than the complete interest, such as a portion of a debt, occurs or if any condition is imposed on the transfer, such as the requirement to gain approval from a third party, then the assignment is not considered absolute. An assignment does not have to be permanent in order to be absolute, as demonstrated by the mortgage of a chose in action. If individual A, who has a debt to individual C, transfers a debt owed to them by individual B to individual C as collateral for that debt, with the condition that individual C would transfer the debt back if individual A settles their own debt, the transfer is considered complete and final, even though there is a provision for the debt to be transferred back.
The transfer of contractual rights (which should be differentiated from novation) is subject to limitations. In order to uphold public policy, it is imperative that a public office holder refrains from transferring their salary or allowing their spouse to transfer their entitlement to receive maintenance payments granted in marital proceedings. Personal service rights, such as those found in employment contracts, cannot be transferred or assigned.Intellectual property rights must be transferred through a written document that is signed by the person assigning the rights.Stamp duty land tax must be paid when property assignments exceed the specified threshold.
The complete transfer of the remaining duration of a lease. A tenant has the right to transfer his lease to someone else, unless there is a specific agreement prohibiting it. It is common for such agreements to include a clause that requires the landlord's approval for any lease transfer. The landlord is not allowed to impose a price for granting his approval, unless the lease explicitly allows for it. Additionally, the landlord cannot unreasonably refuse to give his consent. Occasionally, a lease may include a covenant that completely forbids any form of assignment. When a lease includes a provision that prohibits the tenant from assigning the lease without the landlord's permission, with the condition that the landlord cannot unreasonably withhold approval, the landlord has legal obligations. According to the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, the landlord is required to inform the tenant of their decision in a timely manner after the tenant requests consent. The notice must include the reasons for refusing consent, if applicable, and any conditions that are imposed on acceptance. These conditions must be reasonable.
An assignment is the act of transferring a responsibility in action from one person (the assignor) to another (the assignee). According to the principles of common law, this was not allowed. If, for instance, A was due a contractual amount by B, he
He was unable to assign his legal entitlement to C in a manner that would allow C to take legal action against B for the outstanding debt. Statutes currently authorize and govern the assignment of some choses in action. As an illustration, the Companies Act permits the transfer of shares in a company to be carried out according to the specific instructions stated in the firm's articles of association. However, these are exceptional situations. In general, choses in action, which can be legal (such as the benefit of a contract) or equitable (such as a right under a trust), can be transferred through either equitable assignment or statutory assignment, as defined by the Law of Property Act 1925. No formalities are necessary for an equitable assignment. The assignor must clearly demonstrate a desire to transfer ownership of their right to the assignee, which is sufficient. However, if the assignment is a legal choice, the assignor must be included as a party in any legal procedures initiated by the assignee to enforce the right. In the aforementioned case, C has the legal right to file a lawsuit against B to recover the debt. However, C is required to include A as a co-plaintiff in the lawsuit, or if A declines to participate, C must include A as a co-defendant.
A statutory assignment, as defined by the Law of Property Act 1925, is commonly known as a legal assignment. However, it should be noted that this term is not entirely true, as it can apply to both equitable and legal choses in action. The assignee is empowered to enforce the assigned right in their own name, without needing to involve the assignor in the legal procedures, even if there is a legal chose. For it to be considered legitimate, there are three prerequisites: it must be absolute, written, and notice of it must be sent to the person against whom the right might be enforced. An absolute assignment refers to the transfer of the assignor's complete interest to the assignee without any conditions. If a transfer of less than the complete interest, such as a portion of a debt, occurs or if any condition is imposed on the transfer, such as the requirement to gain approval from a third party, then the assignment is not considered absolute. An assignment does not have to be permanent in order to be absolute, as demonstrated by the mortgage of a chose in action. If individual A, who has a debt to individual C, transfers a debt owed to them by individual B to individual C as collateral for that debt, with the condition that individual C would transfer the debt back if individual A settles their own debt, the transfer is considered complete and final, even though there is a provision for the debt to be transferred back.
The transfer of contractual rights (which should be differentiated from novation) is subject to limitations. In order to uphold public policy, it is imperative that a public office holder refrains from transferring their salary or allowing their spouse to transfer their entitlement to receive maintenance payments granted in marital proceedings. Personal service rights, such as those found in employment contracts, cannot be transferred or assigned.Intellectual property rights must be transferred through a written document that is signed by the person assigning the rights.Stamp duty land tax must be paid when property assignments exceed the specified threshold.
The complete transfer of the remaining duration of a lease. A tenant has the right to transfer his lease to someone else, unless there is a specific agreement prohibiting it. It is common for such agreements to include a clause that requires the landlord's approval for any lease transfer. The landlord is not allowed to impose a price for granting his approval, unless the lease explicitly allows for it. Additionally, the landlord cannot unreasonably refuse to give his consent. Occasionally, a lease may include a covenant that completely forbids any form of assignment. When a lease includes a provision that prohibits the tenant from assigning the lease without the landlord's permission, with the condition that the landlord cannot unreasonably withhold approval, the landlord has legal obligations. According to the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, the landlord is required to inform the tenant of their decision in a timely manner after the tenant requests consent. The notice must include the reasons for refusing consent, if applicable, and any conditions that are imposed on acceptance. These conditions must be reasonable.
- Published on
Legal Terms - Assisted Reproduction
Assisted reproduction refers to the use of techniques that facilitate the conception and birth of a child without relying on sexual intercourse between the individuals involved. It
Encompasses procedures such as artificial insemination by the husband (AIH) or by a donor (DI), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and the donation of eggs and embryos. These approaches have made it impossible to establish legal parenthood merely based on genetic connections.
According to section 33 of the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act 2008, the woman who gives birth to a child is always considered the legal mother, regardless of whether she is genetically related to the child. Unless a parental order or an adoption order is obtained for the child, this is not possible.
In cases when a woman is married or in a civil partnership with a male, her husband or civil partner will be considered the legal father of the child, unless he did not give consent to the fertility therapy (section 35). If the mother is in a same-sex marriage or civil partnership, her spouse or civil partner will be considered the other "parent" according to the 2008 Act. In this situation, the term "mother" is not used, as stated in section 42. In cases when a couple is not married or in a civil partnership, the partner of the mother will generally be recognized as the father or "parent" as long as specific circumstances are fulfilled (sections 36-37, 43-44). Essentially, both parties agree that the partner will be recognized as the child's parent. The individual who provides the sperm for permitted treatment is not considered the biological father of the child (as per section 41).
Using female germ cells from an embryo or fetus, or utilizing embryos derived from these germ cells, for the aim of offering a fertility service is considered a violation of the law. This practice has already been prohibited by the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority. The offense can only be tried by indictment and carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment.
Assisted reproduction refers to the use of techniques that facilitate the conception and birth of a child without relying on sexual intercourse between the individuals involved. It
Encompasses procedures such as artificial insemination by the husband (AIH) or by a donor (DI), in vitro fertilization (IVF), and the donation of eggs and embryos. These approaches have made it impossible to establish legal parenthood merely based on genetic connections.
According to section 33 of the Human Fertilization and Embryology Act 2008, the woman who gives birth to a child is always considered the legal mother, regardless of whether she is genetically related to the child. Unless a parental order or an adoption order is obtained for the child, this is not possible.
In cases when a woman is married or in a civil partnership with a male, her husband or civil partner will be considered the legal father of the child, unless he did not give consent to the fertility therapy (section 35). If the mother is in a same-sex marriage or civil partnership, her spouse or civil partner will be considered the other "parent" according to the 2008 Act. In this situation, the term "mother" is not used, as stated in section 42. In cases when a couple is not married or in a civil partnership, the partner of the mother will generally be recognized as the father or "parent" as long as specific circumstances are fulfilled (sections 36-37, 43-44). Essentially, both parties agree that the partner will be recognized as the child's parent. The individual who provides the sperm for permitted treatment is not considered the biological father of the child (as per section 41).
Using female germ cells from an embryo or fetus, or utilizing embryos derived from these germ cells, for the aim of offering a fertility service is considered a violation of the law. This practice has already been prohibited by the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority. The offense can only be tried by indictment and carries a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment.
- Published on
Legal Terms - Assisted Suicide
Assisting someone in the act of intentionally ending their own life. According to Section 2 of the Suicide Act, a person commits a criminal offense if they knowingly engage in an act of self-harm.
An act that has the ability to promote or aid another person in committing, or attempting to commit, suicide. This encompasses a range of actions, spanning from administering a fatal amount of medication to facilitating someone's travel to a foreign nation where assisted suicide is permitted by law. The Director of Public Prosecutions possesses the authority to exercise discretion about whether to initiate legal proceedings (as per section 2(4)). In numerous instances, the Director has opted not to pursue prosecution. In response to the highly publicized Purdy v Director of Public Prosecutions [2009] UKHL 45 case, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) released a document outlining the specific situations in which a prosecution is probable. The offense of aiding suicide can also be committed when an individual establishes a website or distributes materials that advocate for suicide. It is crucial to acknowledge that honoring the autonomy of a capable patient to decline life-saving medical intervention is not considered a legal act of assisting in their death (refer to advance decision). Case: R (Pretty) v DPP [2001] UKHL 61, [2002] 1 AC 800.
It is now widely accepted that prohibiting assisted suicide violates the European Convention on Human Rights. However, it is argued that such a prohibition can be justified on the grounds that it is important to safeguard individuals who are frail and susceptible. Nevertheless, a recent ruling by the Supreme Court (R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent) [2014] UKSC 38, [2014] All ER (D) 195 (Jun)) has suggested that there is a need for legislative changes in this field. Otherwise, the court may be compelled to declare that section 2 of the Suicide Act is inconsistent with the United Kingdom's obligations under the Convention.
Assisting someone in the act of intentionally ending their own life. According to Section 2 of the Suicide Act, a person commits a criminal offense if they knowingly engage in an act of self-harm.
An act that has the ability to promote or aid another person in committing, or attempting to commit, suicide. This encompasses a range of actions, spanning from administering a fatal amount of medication to facilitating someone's travel to a foreign nation where assisted suicide is permitted by law. The Director of Public Prosecutions possesses the authority to exercise discretion about whether to initiate legal proceedings (as per section 2(4)). In numerous instances, the Director has opted not to pursue prosecution. In response to the highly publicized Purdy v Director of Public Prosecutions [2009] UKHL 45 case, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) released a document outlining the specific situations in which a prosecution is probable. The offense of aiding suicide can also be committed when an individual establishes a website or distributes materials that advocate for suicide. It is crucial to acknowledge that honoring the autonomy of a capable patient to decline life-saving medical intervention is not considered a legal act of assisting in their death (refer to advance decision). Case: R (Pretty) v DPP [2001] UKHL 61, [2002] 1 AC 800.
It is now widely accepted that prohibiting assisted suicide violates the European Convention on Human Rights. However, it is argued that such a prohibition can be justified on the grounds that it is important to safeguard individuals who are frail and susceptible. Nevertheless, a recent ruling by the Supreme Court (R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent) [2014] UKSC 38, [2014] All ER (D) 195 (Jun)) has suggested that there is a need for legislative changes in this field. Otherwise, the court may be compelled to declare that section 2 of the Suicide Act is inconsistent with the United Kingdom's obligations under the Convention.