- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Sphingobacterium Species
Overview
Sphingobacterium species are uncommon aerobic Gram-negative bacilli that are widely distributed in the environment but only rarely cause human disease. Important species include Sphingobacterium multivorum and Sphingobacterium spiritivorum.
Human infections are usually opportunistic and healthcare-associated, particularly in patients with significant underlying disease, immunocompromise, prolonged hospitalization, or invasive medical devices. Reported infections include bacteremia, peritonitis, pneumonia and other respiratory infections, urinary tract infections, and skin and soft-tissue infections.
Classification
Genus: Sphingobacterium
Important species include:
• Sphingobacterium multivorum
• Sphingobacterium spiritivorum
• Other Sphingobacterium species
Microbiologic Characteristics
Sphingobacterium species are:
• Aerobic Gram-negative bacilli
• Nonfermenting organisms
• Generally nonmotile
• Environmental bacteria
• Uncommon human pathogens
A distinctive feature of the genus is the presence of:
Sphingolipids within the bacterial cell membrane
which contributed to the name:
Sphingobacterium
High-Yield Microbiology Pattern
Aerobic Gram-negative bacillus
- ●
Nonfermenting environmental organism
- ●
Sphingolipids in cell membrane
- ●
Rare healthcare-associated infection
→ Think Sphingobacterium
Incubation Period
The incubation period is:
Unknown
Because most infections are opportunistic or healthcare-associated, there is no characteristic incubation period.
Epidemiology
Sphingobacterium species have a:
Worldwide distribution
However, human infections are:
Rare
The organisms can be encountered in environmental reservoirs, including:
• Soil
• Water
• Plants
• Moist environmental sites
Nosocomial Infection
The source emphasizes that Sphingobacterium species usually cause:
NOSOCOMIAL INFECTIONS
Healthcare-associated disease may be facilitated by:
• Prolonged hospitalization
• Critical illness
• Immunosuppression
• Invasive medical procedures
• Indwelling catheters
• Significant underlying disease
• Previous broad-spectrum antimicrobial exposure
High-Yield Epidemiologic Pattern
Hospitalized or medically complex patient
- ●
Unusual nonfermenting Gram-negative bacillus
- ●
Bacteremia, respiratory infection, or device-associated infection
→ Consider Sphingobacterium
Opportunistic Pathogenicity
Sphingobacterium is generally considered a:
Low-virulence opportunistic pathogen
Disease is therefore more likely when normal host defenses have been compromised.
Recovery from a clinical specimen should be interpreted according to:
Clinical syndrome + specimen source + host factors + repeated isolation
because environmental Gram-negative organisms may occasionally represent colonization or contamination.
Clinical Infections
Reported infections include:
• Peritonitis
• Bacteremia
• Skin and soft-tissue infection
• Respiratory tract infection
• Urinary tract infection
The severity ranges from localized disease to systemic infection.
Bacteremia
Sphingobacterium can cause:
Bloodstream infection
particularly in hospitalized or immunocompromised patients.
Potential sources may include:
• Intravascular devices
• Respiratory infection
• Urinary infection
• Soft-tissue infection
• Other healthcare-associated sources
High-Yield Bacteremia Pattern
Hospitalized patient
- ●
Fever or sepsis
- ●
Blood culture grows an unusual nonfermenting GNB
- ●
Sphingobacterium
→ Evaluate for true opportunistic bacteremia and a device-related source
Peritonitis
The organism can cause:
Peritonitis
This is particularly important when an invasive abdominal or dialysis-associated route provides access to the peritoneal cavity.
Diagnosis depends on compatible clinical findings and recovery of the organism from:
Peritoneal fluid
Respiratory Tract Infection
Sphingobacterium species have been associated with:
Respiratory tract infections
including lower respiratory disease in susceptible patients.
Potential manifestations include:
• Fever
• Cough
• Dyspnea
• Increased respiratory secretions
• Pulmonary infiltrates
Colonization vs. Respiratory Infection
Because unusual environmental Gram-negative organisms may colonize respiratory secretions, isolation from sputum alone does not always establish:
Pneumonia
Evidence supporting true infection includes:
Compatible symptoms
- ●
New pulmonary infiltrates
- ●
Inflammatory findings
- ●
Repeated or significant microbiologic isolation
Urinary Tract Infection
Sphingobacterium may cause:
Urinary tract infection
particularly in patients with:
• Urinary catheters
• Structural urinary abnormalities
• Repeated instrumentation
• Prolonged hospitalization
Clinical disease can range from:
Cystitis
to:
Complicated UTI or urosepsis
Skin and Soft-Tissue Infection
The organism can occasionally cause:
Skin and soft-tissue infections
particularly when normal skin barriers are disrupted by:
• Trauma
• Surgery
• Chronic wounds
• Medical procedures
Diagnosis
The principal diagnostic method is:
CULTURE
Appropriate specimens depend on the suspected site of infection.
These may include:
• Blood
• Urine
• Respiratory specimens
• Peritoneal fluid
• Wound or soft-tissue specimens
Laboratory Identification
Identification of uncommon nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli can occasionally be challenging.
Modern laboratory techniques may assist in distinguishing Sphingobacterium from other environmental Gram-negative organisms.
For clinically significant isolates, accurate identification is important because:
Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns can be unpredictable.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
Treatment should ideally be based on:
Culture + antimicrobial susceptibility testing
because susceptibility may vary among species and individual isolates.
This is particularly important for:
Serious bloodstream or other invasive infections.
Treatment
The source lists:
Ampicillin
as the primary treatment.
However, because Sphingobacterium species can demonstrate variable antimicrobial susceptibility, a fixed empiric assumption of ampicillin susceptibility should be avoided.
Definitive therapy should be based on:
Individual susceptibility results.
Additional Treatment Options
The source lists the following potential agents:
• Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole
• Fluoroquinolones
• Third-generation cephalosporins
• Carbapenems
These should be considered:
Only when the clinical isolate is susceptible.
Resistance Considerations
Sphingobacterium species may possess resistance mechanisms affecting several antimicrobial classes.
Therefore:
Species identification alone does not reliably predict susceptibility.
This makes laboratory susceptibility testing particularly valuable when treating invasive disease.
High-Yield Treatment Principle
Sphingobacterium infection
→ Obtain appropriate culture
- ●
Perform susceptibility testing
- ●
Select an active antimicrobial
- ●
Control any infected device or anatomical source
Source Control
As with other opportunistic healthcare-associated Gram-negative infections, management should include evaluation for an:
Infected catheter, device, wound, or other persistent source
Examples include:
Bacteremia + central line
→ Evaluate the line as a possible source
UTI + urinary catheter
→ Remove or replace unnecessary catheter when appropriate
Peritonitis + indwelling device
→ Evaluate the device and associated source
Soft-tissue infection
→ Drain or debride infected collections when necessary
Sphingobacterium vs. Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Both may appear as:
Nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli
and can cause healthcare-associated infections.
However:
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
→ Much more common human pathogen
→ Motile
→ Oxidase positive
→ Characteristic pigments may occur
→ Major cause of severe nosocomial infection
Sphingobacterium
→ Rare opportunistic pathogen
→ Generally nonmotile
→ Environmental organism
→ Characteristically contains sphingolipids
Sphingobacterium vs. Acinetobacter
Both can cause:
Healthcare-associated opportunistic infections
and may infect critically ill patients.
Acinetobacter
→ Gram-negative coccobacillus
→ Nonmotile
→ Important multidrug-resistant nosocomial pathogen
Sphingobacterium
→ Gram-negative bacillus
→ Rare human pathogen
→ Environmental organism with membrane sphingolipids
Prevention
There is no specific vaccine.
Prevention focuses on general healthcare infection-control practices, including:
• Hand hygiene
• Appropriate catheter care
• Limiting unnecessary invasive devices
• Proper respiratory equipment management
• Environmental cleaning
• Appropriate wound care
• Antimicrobial stewardship
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
Hospitalized/immunocompromised patient
- ●
Bacteremia, peritonitis, pneumonia, UTI, or soft-tissue infection
- ●
Rare aerobic nonfermenting Gram-negative bacillus
- ●
Environmental organism containing sphingolipids
→ Think SPHINGOBACTERIUM
Exam Essentials
Genus: Sphingobacterium
Important species: S. multivorum and S. spiritivorum
Organism: Aerobic Gram-negative bacillus
Metabolism: Generally nonfermenting
Motility: Generally nonmotile
Distinctive feature: Sphingolipids in the cell membrane
Distribution: Worldwide
Frequency: Rare human pathogen
Major epidemiologic setting: Nosocomial/healthcare-associated infection
Major infections: Bacteremia, peritonitis, respiratory infection, UTI, and skin/soft-tissue infection
Diagnosis: Culture
Important laboratory principle: Perform antimicrobial susceptibility testing
Source-listed treatment: Ampicillin
Additional source-listed agents: TMP-SMX, fluoroquinolones, third-generation cephalosporins, and carbapenems
Modern treatment principle: Use susceptibility-guided therapy because resistance patterns can vary
Management principle: Antimicrobial treatment plus source control when a device or localized focus is involved
Key clinical pearl: Sphingobacterium species are rare environmental, nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli characterized by sphingolipids in their cell membranes. They primarily behave as opportunistic healthcare-associated pathogens, causing bacteremia, peritonitis, respiratory infection, UTI, and skin or soft-tissue disease. Because antimicrobial susceptibility can be variable, a clinically significant isolate should be treated according to culture and susceptibility results rather than assuming that a particular antibiotic will be active.