- Published on
Orthopaedic Surgery - Pronator Syndrome
Basics
Pronator syndrome is a compressive neuropathy of the:
Median nerve in the proximal forearm.
It typically presents with:
Vague aching pain in the proximal volar forearm
Paresthesia in the median nerve distribution
and sometimes:
Mild weakness of median nerve–innervated muscles.
The disorder is considerably less common than:
Carpal tunnel syndrome.
Anatomy
The median nerve enters the proximal forearm and passes through or beneath several structures that may potentially compress it.
Important sites include:
Ligament of Struthers
Lacertus fibrosus
Between the humeral and ulnar heads of pronator teres
Fibrous arch of flexor digitorum superficialis
The anterior interosseous nerve branches from the median nerve distal to the proximal forearm region.
Pathophysiology
Compression of the median nerve proximal to its major motor and sensory branches may affect:
Motor fibers
and
Sensory fibers.
This explains why pronator syndrome can produce sensory symptoms involving both:
The radial digits
and
The palm.
Palmar Cutaneous Branch
The palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve arises proximal to the carpal tunnel.
Therefore, proximal median nerve compression can produce sensory symptoms in the:
Thenar eminence or central palm.
This helps distinguish pronator syndrome from:
Carpal tunnel syndrome, in which palmar cutaneous sensation is usually preserved.
Prevention
There is no specific established preventive strategy.
Reducing excessive repetitive forearm loading may be helpful in individuals whose symptoms are clearly activity related.
Epidemiology
Pronator syndrome is:
Rare.
It most commonly presents in:
Middle-aged adults, often around the fifth decade of life.
Sex
Historical series have reported a female predominance, with women affected approximately:
Four times more often than men.
Because the disorder is uncommon, precise incidence and prevalence remain poorly defined.
Risk Factors
Potential anatomic or mechanical risk factors include:
Supracondylar process of the humerus
Repetitive pronation and supination
Repetitive elbow or wrist flexion
Hypertrophied forearm musculature
Supracondylar Process
A supracondylar process is an uncommon bony projection from the distal humerus.
It may be connected to the medial epicondyle by the:
Ligament of Struthers.
The median nerve can occasionally be compressed beneath this structure.
Genetics
There is no known Mendelian inheritance pattern.
Etiology
The exact cause is often:
Poorly defined.
The syndrome is believed to result from mechanical compression of the:
Median nerve in the proximal forearm.
In many patients, no single compressive structure can be definitively identified clinically.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is based mainly on:
History
Physical examination
and exclusion of other median nerve disorders.
Electrodiagnostic studies are often more useful for excluding alternative diagnoses than for confirming pronator syndrome itself.
Signs and Symptoms
The characteristic clinical picture includes:
Proximal forearm pain
Median-distribution paresthesia
and sometimes
Mild motor weakness.
Sensory Symptoms
Paresthesias may involve the median nerve distribution, including:
Thumb
Index finger
Middle finger
Radial half of the ring finger
Unlike carpal tunnel syndrome, symptoms may also involve:
The palm or thenar eminence.
Pain
Pain is usually located in the:
Proximal volar forearm.
It may become worse with:
Forearm pronation and supination
or repetitive upper-extremity activity.
Night Symptoms
Pronator syndrome generally produces:
Few or minimal nocturnal symptoms.
Prominent nighttime numbness or awakening is more characteristic of:
Carpal tunnel syndrome.
Motor Weakness
Weakness may involve median nerve–innervated muscles such as:
Pronator teres
Flexor carpi radialis
Palmaris longus
Flexor pollicis longus
Flexor digitorum superficialis
Flexor digitorum profundus to the index and middle fingers
Thenar muscles
Radial two lumbricals
However, objective weakness is often:
Mild or absent.
Physical Examination
A complete neurologic and vascular examination of the upper extremity should be performed.
Sensory Examination
Assess sensation in:
Thumb
Index finger
Middle finger
Radial half of the ring finger
and
Palm over the thenar eminence.
Sensory change in the palm supports a lesion proximal to the:
Carpal tunnel.
Motor Examination
Assess strength of:
Forearm pronation
Wrist flexion
Thumb flexion
Index and middle finger flexion
Thumb opposition and abduction
Provocative Testing
Different provocative maneuvers may help localize the suspected level of compression.
A test is considered suggestive when it reproduces the patient’s:
Typical pain or paresthesia.
Lacertus Fibrosus Compression
Compression beneath the lacertus fibrosus may be provoked by:
Resisted elbow flexion with the forearm supinated.
This tensions the bicipital aponeurosis over the median nerve.
Pronator Teres Compression
Compression between the heads of pronator teres may be provoked by:
Resisted forearm pronation with the elbow extended.
Reproduction of the patient’s symptoms supports this site.
Flexor Digitorum Superficialis Arch
Compression at the FDS arch may be suggested when symptoms are reproduced by:
Resisted PIP joint flexion, particularly of the middle finger.
Tinel Sign
Percussion over the proximal course of the median nerve may produce:
Tingling or radiating paresthesia.
A positive Tinel sign can support the diagnosis but is not specific.
Scratch-Collapse Test
The scratch-collapse test has been described for proximal median nerve compression.
Its diagnostic accuracy is variable, so it should be interpreted only as part of the:
Overall clinical examination.
Laboratory Tests
No routine laboratory tests are useful for diagnosing isolated pronator syndrome.
Laboratory studies may be obtained only when there is concern for:
Inflammatory disease
Metabolic neuropathy
or another systemic disorder.
Imaging
Plain Radiographs
Radiographs are not routinely required.
They may be useful when there is concern for:
Supracondylar process
Bony deformity
Previous fracture
or another structural abnormality.
Supracondylar Process and Ligament of Struthers
When a supracondylar process is present, the median nerve may be compressed beneath a fibrous band extending to the medial epicondyle known as the:
Ligament of Struthers.
MRI or Ultrasound
Advanced imaging may be useful when a:
Mass
Ganglion
Tumor
or other space-occupying lesion is suspected.
Ultrasound may also demonstrate:
Dynamic nerve compression
or local nerve enlargement in selected cases.
Electrodiagnostic Studies
Electromyography and nerve-conduction studies may be obtained to:
Exclude carpal tunnel syndrome
Exclude cervical radiculopathy
Exclude anterior interosseous neuropathy
Identify more proximal median nerve injury
Limitations of Electrodiagnostic Testing
Electrodiagnostic studies are often:
Normal or nondiagnostic
in pronator syndrome.
Only a minority of patients demonstrate clear evidence of proximal median nerve compression.
Therefore, a normal study does not completely exclude the diagnosis.
Differential Diagnosis
Important alternatives include:
Carpal tunnel syndrome
Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome
Cervical radiculopathy
Median nerve lesion at another level
Flexor-pronator muscle strain
Anterior Interosseous Nerve Syndrome
Anterior interosseous nerve syndrome is primarily a:
Motor neuropathy.
It causes weakness of muscles such as:
Flexor pollicis longus
Index flexor digitorum profundus
Pronator quadratus
but does:
Not produce sensory loss.
This distinguishes it from pronator syndrome.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal tunnel syndrome usually causes:
Median-distribution paresthesia
with prominent:
Night symptoms.
The:
Palmar cutaneous branch is spared
because it passes superficial to the carpal tunnel.
Thus, numbness over the thenar eminence or palm favors a more proximal median nerve lesion.
Treatment
General Principles
Initial treatment is nearly always:
Nonoperative.
Management focuses on reducing mechanical irritation and allowing the nerve to recover.
Rest
Temporary rest from aggravating activity is often recommended.
Activity Modification
Patients should reduce activities involving:
Repeated pronation-supination
Forceful gripping
Repeated elbow flexion
Heavy wrist-flexor strengthening
if these reproduce symptoms.
Splinting
Temporary rotational or forearm immobilization may be used in selected patients to reduce repetitive nerve irritation.
Prolonged immobilization should be avoided because of the risk of:
Stiffness
and
Weakness.
Physical and Occupational Therapy
Therapy may include:
Stretching of the flexor-pronator musculature
Median nerve-gliding exercises
Range-of-motion exercises
Soft-tissue mobilization
Activity and ergonomic modification
Nerve Gliding
Median nerve–gliding exercises aim to improve:
Neural mobility
and reduce mechanical irritation during forearm motion.
Exercises should not provoke persistent:
Pain or paresthesia.
Medication
NSAIDs may be used for:
Short-term pain relief
when appropriate.
Medication does not correct fixed mechanical compression.
Surgery
Surgical decompression may be considered when there is:
Failure of prolonged conservative treatment
Progressive motor weakness
Significant functional loss
or a clear structural compressive lesion.
Timing of Surgery
A trial of approximately:
3–6 months of conservative management
is often appropriate before surgery when weakness is not progressive.
Earlier intervention may be considered for:
Progressive motor deficit
or definite structural compression.
Surgical Decompression
Surgery involves exploration of the median nerve through the proximal forearm and release of all potential compression sites.
Structures Released
Potential sites include:
Ligament of Struthers
Lacertus fibrosus
Pronator teres
Fibrous arch of flexor digitorum superficialis
Ligament of Struthers
If present and compressive, the ligament is:
Released or excised.
Lacertus Fibrosus
The bicipital aponeurosis may be released when it is contributing to:
Median nerve compression.
Pronator Teres
The median nerve may be decompressed between the:
Humeral
and
Ulnar heads
of pronator teres.
FDS Arch
A distinct fibrous arch at the origin of:
Flexor digitorum superficialis
may form an important distal site of compression.
When encountered during surgery, it should be:
Adequately released.
Referral
Referral to a hand or peripheral nerve specialist is appropriate for:
Progressive weakness
Significant motor deficit
Failure of conservative treatment
Diagnostic uncertainty
Follow-Up
Patients undergoing nonoperative treatment should be reviewed periodically to monitor:
Pain
Paresthesia
Motor strength
Response to activity modification
Prognosis
The overall prognosis is generally:
Good.
Historical series suggest that approximately:
90% of patients
may improve with either conservative or operative management, although persistent symptoms can occur.
Surgical Outcomes
No single operative technique has been conclusively shown to be superior.
Successful surgery depends primarily on:
Correct diagnosis
and
Complete release of the relevant compression sites.
Complications
The main complication is:
Persistent or recurrent symptoms.
Potential surgical complications include:
Scar sensitivity
Incomplete decompression
Iatrogenic nerve injury
although major nerve injury is uncommon.
Patient Monitoring
Patients should be followed regularly during conservative treatment to evaluate:
Median nerve sensation
Forearm pain
Motor function
Thenar strength
Progression or resolution of symptoms.
Key Principle
Pronator syndrome is a proximal median nerve entrapment syndrome characterized by proximal forearm pain, median-distribution paresthesia including the palm, and usually little or no motor weakness.
It differs from carpal tunnel syndrome because:
The palmar cutaneous branch may be involved and nocturnal symptoms are less prominent.
Initial treatment consists of:
Activity modification, therapy, nerve-gliding exercises, and temporary splinting, while persistent symptoms or progressive motor weakness may require:
Surgical decompression of the median nerve at all potential proximal forearm compression sites.