- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Capnocytophaga Species
Overview
Capnocytophaga species are microaerophilic Gram-negative bacilli that can cause infections after exposure to dogs or cats and can also arise from the normal human oral flora. Some species, especially Capnocytophaga canimorsus, are important because they can cause rapidly progressive sepsis in susceptible patients.
Important species include C. canimorsus, C. cynodegmi, C. gingivalis, C. granulosa, C. haemolytica, C. leadbetteri, C. ochracea, and C. sputigena.
Microbiologic Characteristics
Capnocytophaga organisms are slender Gram-negative bacilli that prefer reduced oxygen conditions. Some species colonize the mouths of dogs and cats, whereas others are part of the normal human oral microbiota.
The organism may sometimes be seen within neutrophils on Gram-stained specimens, which can provide a useful diagnostic clue.
Incubation Period
After animal-associated inoculation, symptoms usually develop within approximately:
1–5 days
Epidemiology and Transmission
Human infection may follow:
• Dog bites
• Cat bites
• Scratches
• Licking of broken skin or wounds
Not all infections require an obvious bite. Saliva contacting damaged skin may be enough to transmit the organism.
Other Capnocytophaga species live normally in the human mouth and may cause oral or systemic infection when host defenses are impaired.
Major Risk Factors
Severe Capnocytophaga infection is especially associated with:
• Asplenia or prior splenectomy
• Alcohol use disorder
• Chronic pulmonary disease
• Neutropenia
• Immunosuppression
Asplenic patients are particularly vulnerable to fulminant bacteremia and septic shock.
Wound Infection
After a dog or cat bite, patients may develop:
• Local pain
• Erythema
• Swelling
• Purulent drainage
• Cellulitis
The infection can remain localized or progress into the bloodstream.
Severe Sepsis
C. canimorsus is particularly notorious for causing rapidly progressive sepsis, sometimes after a seemingly minor dog exposure.
Severe manifestations can include:
• High fever
• Hypotension
• Septic shock
• Disseminated intravascular coagulation
• Purpura
• Multiorgan failure
This presentation is especially important in patients who have undergone splenectomy.
Meningitis
Capnocytophaga can occasionally cause purulent meningitis.
Possible findings include:
• Fever
• Severe headache
• Neck stiffness
• Altered mental status
• CSF pleocytosis
A history of recent animal exposure can be an important clue.
Endocarditis
Rare cases of infective endocarditis may occur, particularly in patients with bacteremia or preexisting cardiac abnormalities.
Possible manifestations include prolonged fever, a new murmur, embolic events, or persistent positive blood cultures.
Septic Arthritis
Joint infection can occur after bacteremia or local inoculation.
Patients may present with:
• Painful swollen joint
• Reduced range of motion
• Fever
• Joint effusion
Oral and Periodontal Disease
Species that are part of normal human oral flora, including C. gingivalis, C. ochracea, and C. sputigena, may contribute to:
• Periodontitis
• Gingival inflammation
• Oral mucositis
These infections are particularly important in neutropenic or immunocompromised patients.
Diagnosis
The main diagnostic method is culture from blood, wound material, cerebrospinal fluid, synovial fluid, or another involved site.
Because these organisms can be fastidious and slow growing, the microbiology laboratory should be alerted when Capnocytophaga is suspected.
A useful microscopy finding is:
Gram-negative bacilli within neutrophils
This may support the diagnosis in a compatible clinical setting.
Treatment
A beta-lactam combined with a beta-lactamase inhibitor is a common treatment approach.
Examples include:
Amoxicillin-clavulanate
or, for more serious infections,
Ampicillin-sulbactam
Third-generation cephalosporins such as ceftriaxone may also be effective.
Severe Infection
For severe bacteremia, meningitis, septic shock, or other invasive disease, options may include:
• Third-generation cephalosporin
• Carbapenem
• Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination
Therapy should be guided by susceptibility testing whenever possible.
Additional Treatment Options
For milder infections, alternatives may include:
• Clindamycin
• Doxycycline
• Fluoroquinolone
However, treatment should be individualized because resistance patterns vary among species.
Resistance
Some species, particularly C. granulosa and C. haemolytica, may show resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics.
For this reason, susceptibility testing is especially important in invasive infection or when clinical response is poor.
Prevention After Animal Bites
Careful wound cleansing is essential after dog or cat bites.
In patients at very high risk, especially those without a functioning spleen, prophylactic antibiotics may be appropriate.
A commonly used preventive option is:
Amoxicillin-clavulanate
This is particularly relevant after a dog bite in an asplenic patient.
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
Dog bite or dog saliva exposure
- ●
Asplenic patient
- ●
Rapid septic shock and DIC
→ Think Capnocytophaga canimorsus
High-Yield Oral Pattern
Neutropenic patient
- ●
Periodontal or oral mucosal disease
- ●
Gram-negative bacillus from oral flora
→ Consider Capnocytophaga species
Exam Essentials
Genus: Capnocytophaga
Microbiology: Microaerophilic Gram-negative bacillus
Classic species: C. canimorsus
Major exposure: Dog or cat bite, scratch, or lick
Incubation: About 1–5 days
Major risk factors: Asplenia, alcoholism, chronic lung disease, neutropenia
Severe complication: Septic shock with DIC
Other infections: Meningitis, endocarditis, septic arthritis, oral infections
Diagnosis: Culture; Gram-negative bacilli may be seen inside neutrophils
Treatment: Beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor or third-generation cephalosporin
Other options: Carbapenems, doxycycline, clindamycin, fluoroquinolones
Prevention in high-risk dog bites: Consider amoxicillin-clavulanate
Key clinical pearl: A splenectomized patient who becomes critically ill after a dog bite or even a dog lick to broken skin should immediately raise concern for Capnocytophaga canimorsus.
- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Capillaria Species
Overview
Capillaria species are nematode helminths that can infect different human organ systems depending on the species involved. The three clinically important species are Capillaria philippinensis, Capillaria hepatica, and Capillaria aerophila.
They are associated respectively with intestinal, hepatic, and pulmonary capillariasis.
Microbiologic Characteristics
Capillaria species are parasitic roundworms (nematodes).
Human disease varies according to the tissue tropism of the species:
• C. philippinensis → intestine
• C. hepatica → liver
• C. aerophila → respiratory tract
Epidemiology
Capillaria philippinensis
This species is most strongly associated with:
• The Philippines
• Thailand
Cases outside these endemic regions are uncommon.
Capillaria hepatica
Human infection is rare but has been reported sporadically in multiple countries around the world.
Capillaria aerophila
Human pulmonary infection is very uncommon, with historical cases reported from regions including the former Soviet Union.
Transmission
The route of acquisition depends on the species.
For C. philippinensis, infection is particularly associated with consumption of raw or inadequately cooked fish containing infective larvae.
This dietary exposure is one of the most important clues to intestinal capillariasis.
Intestinal Capillariasis
Capillaria philippinensis causes intestinal capillariasis.
Patients may develop:
• Chronic diarrhea
• Abdominal pain
• Weight loss
• Malabsorption
• Weakness
• Protein loss
Heavy infection can become severe because repeated autoinfection may increase the intestinal parasite burden.
Advanced disease can cause marked nutritional depletion and electrolyte abnormalities.
Hepatic Capillariasis
Capillaria hepatica causes infection of the liver.
Possible manifestations include:
• Fever
• Hepatomegaly
• Abdominal discomfort
• Eosinophilia
• Inflammatory liver disease
The parasite lays eggs within hepatic tissue rather than releasing them normally into the intestinal lumen, so stool testing is generally not useful for this form.
Pulmonary Capillariasis
Capillaria aerophila can infect the respiratory tract.
Possible manifestations include:
• Cough
• Fever
• Dyspnea
• Bronchitic symptoms
• Pulmonary inflammation
Because pulmonary infection is rare and nonspecific, diagnosis may be difficult without parasitologic evidence.
Diagnosis
Intestinal Capillariasis
Diagnosis is made by identifying:
• Eggs
• Larvae
• Occasionally adult parasitic forms
in stool specimens.
Repeated stool examinations may improve diagnostic sensitivity.
Hepatic Capillariasis
Diagnosis generally requires histopathologic examination of liver tissue.
Liver biopsy may demonstrate:
• Characteristic eggs
• Larval or adult worm structures
• Associated inflammatory reaction
Pulmonary Capillariasis
Diagnosis may rely on demonstrating parasitic material in respiratory specimens or tissue, together with an appropriate clinical and epidemiologic setting.
Treatment
Intestinal Capillariasis
The source regimen lists:
Mebendazole 200 mg orally every 12 hours for 20 days
An alternative is:
Albendazole 200 mg orally every 12 hours for 10 days
Treatment should be combined with correction of dehydration, electrolyte disturbance, and nutritional deficiencies when present.
Hepatic Capillariasis
Historically, thiabendazole has been used.
Albendazole is another treatment option.
Because hepatic disease is uncommon, therapy is often individualized according to disease severity and specialist guidance.
Pulmonary Capillariasis
Potential treatment options include:
• Mebendazole
• Albendazole
Clinical response should be monitored carefully because cases are rare and treatment data are limited.
Prevention
Prevention is particularly important for C. philippinensis.
The main measure is:
Avoid eating raw or inadequately cooked fish in endemic areas.
Additional precautions include:
• Thoroughly cooking freshwater fish
• Safe food preparation
• Good sanitation
• Avoiding fecal contamination of food and water
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
Person from the Philippines or Thailand
- ●
Raw fish consumption
- ●
Chronic diarrhea
- ●
Weight loss and malabsorption
→ Think intestinal capillariasis due to Capillaria philippinensis
High-Yield Species Distinction
C. philippinensis
→ Intestinal disease
C. hepatica
→ Hepatic disease
C. aerophila
→ Pulmonary disease
Exam Essentials
Genus: Capillaria
Organism type: Nematode helminth
Important species: C. philippinensis, C. hepatica, C. aerophila
Major geographic clue for C. philippinensis: Philippines and Thailand
Major exposure: Raw or undercooked fish
Intestinal disease: Chronic diarrhea and malabsorption
Hepatic disease: Hepatomegaly and eosinophilic liver inflammation
Pulmonary disease: Respiratory symptoms
Diagnosis of intestinal disease: Eggs or larvae in stool
Diagnosis of hepatic disease: Liver biopsy
Treatment of intestinal disease: Mebendazole or albendazole
Prevention: Avoid raw fish in endemic areas
Key clinical pearl: Capillaria philippinensis should be considered in patients from endemic Asian regions who develop persistent diarrhea and severe malabsorption after eating raw fish.
- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Caliciviruses and Calici-like Viruses
Overview
Human caliciviruses are important causes of acute viral gastroenteritis. The two major genera that infect humans are Norovirus and Sapovirus. Norovirus is especially important because it is one of the most common causes of outbreaks of vomiting and diarrhea in both children and adults.
These viruses spread easily and can produce large outbreaks in households, schools, hospitals, nursing homes, cruise ships, and other crowded settings.
Microbiologic Characteristics
Caliciviruses are:
• Small viruses
• Nonenveloped
• Single-stranded, positive-sense RNA viruses
• Icosahedral in symmetry
Because they are nonenveloped, they are relatively resistant to environmental conditions compared with many enveloped viruses.
Important Human Genera
The two major human calicivirus genera are:
Norovirus
and
Sapovirus
Norovirus is by far the more important cause of widespread gastroenteritis outbreaks.
Sapovirus also causes gastroenteritis, particularly in children, but outbreaks may occur in adults as well.
Incubation Period
Symptoms generally begin within:
12 hours to 4 days
For norovirus, onset is often relatively rapid, frequently within about 1–2 days after exposure.
Epidemiology
Norovirus infection is extremely common worldwide.
Transmission occurs through several routes:
• Fecal–oral spread
• Contaminated food
• Contaminated water
• Contaminated surfaces and fomites
• Direct person-to-person contact
Vomiting can also generate droplets and contaminated environmental material, which may contribute to spread during outbreaks.
A very small infectious dose is sufficient to cause illness, which helps explain the high transmissibility.
Common Outbreak Settings
Norovirus is especially associated with outbreaks in:
• Cruise ships
• Nursing homes
• Hospitals
• Schools
• Daycare centers
• Restaurants
• Military or institutional settings
• Households
Closed or semi-closed environments make rapid person-to-person spread especially likely.
Clinical Infection
Caliciviruses cause acute gastroenteritis in children and adults.
Typical symptoms include:
• Sudden nausea
• Vomiting
• Watery diarrhea
• Abdominal cramps
• Malaise
• Low-grade fever in some patients
• Headache or myalgias in some cases
Vomiting is often particularly prominent with norovirus.
Clinical Course
The illness is usually self-limited.
Symptoms commonly last:
1–3 days
Some patients, particularly young children, older adults, and immunocompromised individuals, may experience a more prolonged course.
The main clinical risk is dehydration.
Dehydration
Patients with significant fluid loss may develop:
• Dry mucous membranes
• Tachycardia
• Reduced urine output
• Orthostatic dizziness or hypotension
• Weakness
• Lethargy in severe cases
Infants, older adults, and medically fragile patients are at greatest risk.
Diagnosis
In most uncomplicated cases, a specific viral diagnosis is not required because treatment is supportive.
Diagnosis is often based on:
Acute vomiting and watery diarrhea
- ●
Compatible outbreak or exposure history
- ●
Short duration of illness
RT-PCR
The most useful laboratory method for confirming norovirus or sapovirus is:
Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
This detects viral RNA in stool and is especially useful during outbreak investigations.
Antigen and Serologic Testing
Enzyme immunoassays can detect viral antigen in stool or antibodies in serum, but these methods are generally less sensitive or less useful than molecular testing.
Electron Microscopy
Direct visualization of viral particles in stool by electron microscopy has historically been used, but this is not routinely performed in most clinical laboratories.
Differential Diagnosis
Calicivirus gastroenteritis may resemble:
• Rotavirus
• Adenovirus gastroenteritis
• Astrovirus
• Food poisoning from preformed toxins
• Enterotoxigenic bacterial diarrhea
• Other acute viral gastroenteritis
A classic epidemiologic clue is:
Sudden vomiting and diarrhea affecting many people in a closed setting
→ Think norovirus.
Treatment
Supportive Care
There is no routinely effective specific antiviral therapy.
Treatment is therefore primarily supportive.
The cornerstone is:
Fluid and electrolyte replacement
Patients with mild disease can usually be managed with oral fluids.
Oral rehydration solutions are particularly useful in children and patients with significant fluid losses.
Severe Dehydration
Intravenous fluids may be necessary when there is:
• Inability to tolerate oral fluids
• Persistent vomiting
• Severe dehydration
• Hypotension
• Significant electrolyte disturbance
Symptom Control
Antiemetics may be used in selected patients when vomiting interferes with oral hydration.
Antibiotics are not useful because the disease is viral.
Prevention
Prevention requires careful infection-control practices.
Important measures include:
• Frequent hand washing with soap and water
• Careful cleaning of contaminated surfaces
• Safe food preparation
• Avoidance of food handling while symptomatic
• Appropriate disposal of vomitus and stool
• Contact precautions in healthcare settings when indicated
Soap-and-water hand washing is particularly important because alcohol-based hand sanitizers may be less reliable against norovirus than they are against many other pathogens.
Contact Precautions
For diapered or incontinent children, contact precautions should be used during the illness.
In healthcare outbreaks, isolation or cohorting of affected patients may help reduce transmission.
Food Handlers
People with active vomiting or diarrhea should not prepare food for others.
Because viral shedding may continue after symptoms resolve, local public-health or workplace guidance should be followed regarding return to food-handling duties.
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
Cruise ship or nursing-home outbreak
- ●
Sudden vomiting
- ●
Watery diarrhea
- ●
Illness lasting 1–3 days
→ Think norovirus
Exam Essentials
Virus group: Caliciviruses
Major human genera: Norovirus and Sapovirus
Genome: Positive-sense single-stranded RNA
Envelope: None
Symmetry: Icosahedral
Incubation: Approximately 12 hours to 4 days
Major disease: Acute gastroenteritis
Classic norovirus clue: Prominent vomiting with outbreak in a closed setting
Transmission: Fecal–oral, contaminated food/water, fomites, direct contact
Best confirmatory test: Stool RT-PCR
Routine diagnosis required? Usually no
Treatment: Supportive care and rehydration
Specific antiviral therapy: None routinely available
Prevention: Hand washing, environmental cleaning, food hygiene, and contact precautions when appropriate
Key clinical pearl: A short, explosive outbreak of vomiting and watery diarrhea affecting many people at once is highly characteristic of norovirus.
- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Burkholderia Species
Overview
Burkholderia species are aerobic Gram-negative bacilli that can cause opportunistic and healthcare-associated infections. Among the most clinically important organisms are members of the Burkholderia cepacia complex, particularly because of their association with chronic respiratory infection in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Other clinically relevant species include Burkholderia gladioli and organisms historically referred to as B. pickettii.
Important Species
The B. cepacia complex contains several closely related species, including:
• B. cenocepacia
• B. multivorans
• B. dolosa
• B. cepacia
• Several additional species
B. gladioli can also produce respiratory and opportunistic infections.
The organism formerly called Burkholderia pickettii is now generally classified as Ralstonia pickettii.
Microbiology
These organisms are aerobic, nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli. They are environmentally hardy and can survive under conditions that inhibit many other bacteria.
An important clinical characteristic of the B. cepacia complex is its substantial intrinsic antimicrobial resistance, which can make treatment difficult.
Epidemiology
Burkholderia organisms are widely distributed in the environment, particularly in soil and water.
The B. cepacia complex has special importance in patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). Certain strains can spread from one patient to another, making infection-control measures particularly important in CF clinics and other settings where patients with cystic fibrosis interact.
Healthcare-associated transmission can also occur through contaminated medical products, solutions, or equipment.
Respiratory Infection in Cystic Fibrosis
The B. cepacia complex is best known for causing persistent respiratory colonization and infection in patients with cystic fibrosis.
Clinical manifestations range from relatively stable chronic airway colonization to:
• Bronchitis
• Recurrent pulmonary exacerbations
• Progressive decline in pulmonary function
• Pneumonia
• Bacteremia and sepsis
B. gladioli can produce a similar respiratory infection in susceptible patients.
Cepacia Syndrome
A particularly severe manifestation is sometimes called cepacia syndrome.
This is characterized by rapid clinical deterioration with:
• High fever
• Severe necrotizing pneumonia
• Respiratory failure
• Bacteremia
• Sepsis
The syndrome is especially associated with certain members of the B. cepacia complex and can be life-threatening.
Other Infections
Outside cystic fibrosis, Burkholderia species may cause opportunistic infections such as:
• Wound infections
• Catheter-associated infections
• Bacteremia
• Sepsis
These infections occur particularly in immunocompromised or severely ill hospitalized patients.
Contaminated Medical Products
Organisms historically identified as B. pickettii, now generally classified as Ralstonia pickettii, have been associated with outbreaks of bloodstream infection resulting from contaminated intravenous fluids or other medical products.
Their ability to persist in aqueous environments contributes to their importance in healthcare-associated outbreaks.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is established primarily through culture of appropriate clinical specimens.
Depending on the clinical syndrome, specimens may include:
• Sputum or other respiratory secretions
• Blood
• Wound material
• Catheter-related specimens
Accurate species identification is particularly important in patients with cystic fibrosis because different members of the B. cepacia complex may differ in epidemiology, transmissibility, resistance, and clinical significance.
Treatment
Treatment can be challenging because B. cepacia complex organisms frequently demonstrate multidrug resistance.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing should therefore guide definitive treatment whenever possible.
Potentially active agents include:
Ceftazidime
Cefepime
Meropenem
Imipenem
Piperacillin-tazobactam
Ciprofloxacin
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole
Susceptibility varies substantially among isolates.
Combination Therapy
For severe infection, particularly pneumonia, bacteremia, or rapidly progressive disease, combination antimicrobial therapy may be considered based on susceptibility results and specialist guidance.
Isolates recovered from patients with cystic fibrosis may have higher minimum inhibitory concentrations and greater resistance than environmental strains, making individualized susceptibility testing particularly important.
Aminoglycosides
Although aminoglycosides have historically been considered among possible treatment options, members of the B. cepacia complex commonly demonstrate substantial intrinsic resistance. They should therefore not be assumed to be active without susceptibility evidence.
Inhaled Antimicrobial Therapy
In selected patients with chronic pulmonary infection, particularly those with cystic fibrosis, inhaled antimicrobial therapy may sometimes be incorporated into a broader treatment strategy.
Nebulized agents such as tobramycin or meropenem have been studied or used in selected circumstances, although effectiveness depends heavily on the infecting species and its susceptibility pattern.
Prevention
Preventing transmission is especially important in the cystic fibrosis population.
Patients with CF who are not colonized with the B. cepacia complex should avoid close contact with individuals known to be infected or colonized.
Healthcare facilities caring for patients with cystic fibrosis use strict infection-prevention practices and patient segregation measures to reduce person-to-person transmission.
Appropriate handling and quality control of intravenous solutions, medications, and medical equipment are also important for preventing healthcare-associated outbreaks.
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
A patient with cystic fibrosis who develops chronic or rapidly worsening pulmonary infection with a multidrug-resistant Gram-negative nonfermenting bacillus should raise suspicion for the Burkholderia cepacia complex.
Rapid deterioration accompanied by necrotizing pneumonia, bacteremia, and sepsis suggests the severe form known as cepacia syndrome.
Exam Essentials
Genus: Burkholderia
Microbiology: Aerobic, nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli
Important group: B. cepacia complex
Important species: B. cenocepacia, B. multivorans, B. dolosa, B. cepacia, and B. gladioli
Major association: Cystic fibrosis
Major infection: Chronic respiratory infection and pneumonia
Severe manifestation: Cepacia syndrome
Other infections: Wound infection, catheter-associated bacteremia, and sepsis
Diagnosis: Culture with accurate species identification and susceptibility testing
Treatment: Individualized according to antimicrobial susceptibility; potentially active drugs include TMP-SMX, ceftazidime, meropenem, and other selected agents
Major treatment problem: Multidrug resistance
Prevention: Strict infection-control measures and avoidance of transmission between patients with cystic fibrosis
Important classification pearl: B. pickettii is an older designation; the organism is now generally known as Ralstonia pickettii.
- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Burkholderia pseudomallei
Overview
Burkholderia pseudomallei is an aerobic Gram-negative bacillus that causes melioidosis, an infection that may remain localized or progress to pneumonia, bacteremia, sepsis, and multiple internal abscesses. The organism is closely associated with soil and surface water in endemic tropical regions.
Melioidosis is especially important because it can present either shortly after exposure or after a prolonged latent period.
Microbiologic Characteristics
B. pseudomallei is:
• Gram negative
• Bacillary
• Aerobic
• An environmental saprophyte
It can survive in soil and water and is well adapted to tropical environments.
Incubation Period
The incubation period is highly variable.
Some patients develop symptoms within only:
2–3 days
However, infection can also remain latent, with disease emerging:
Months or even years later
This delayed presentation is a classic feature of melioidosis.
Epidemiology
B. pseudomallei is found naturally in:
• Soil
• Mud
• Surface water
• Ponds
• Contaminated environmental material
Melioidosis is especially important in Southeast Asia and northern Australia, with Thailand historically representing one of the major endemic regions.
In highly endemic areas, it can account for a substantial proportion of community-acquired sepsis.
Transmission
Humans most commonly acquire infection through environmental exposure.
Important routes include:
• Inoculation of contaminated soil or water into cuts and abrasions
• Inhalation of contaminated dust or aerosols
• Aspiration or ingestion of contaminated water
Direct person-to-person transmission is extremely uncommon.
Risk Factors
Severe melioidosis is particularly associated with:
• Diabetes mellitus
• Chronic kidney disease
• Heavy alcohol use
• Chronic lung disease
• Immunosuppression
• Older age
Diabetes is one of the strongest recognized risk factors.
Clinical Manifestations
Melioidosis has a remarkably broad clinical spectrum.
It may present as:
• Localized skin infection
• Lymphadenitis
• Pneumonia
• Bacteremia
• Sepsis
• Disseminated infection with multiple abscesses
Localized Skin Disease
Inoculation through broken skin may produce:
• Papules
• Pustules
• Ulcers
• Abscesses
• Regional lymphadenitis
Localized infection can remain limited or progress hematogenously.
Pneumonia
Pneumonia is one of the most important forms of melioidosis.
Symptoms may include:
• Fever
• Cough
• Sputum production
• Dyspnea
• Pleuritic chest pain
• Hemoptysis in severe disease
Radiographic appearances can resemble bacterial pneumonia, tuberculosis, or lung abscess.
Bacteremia and Sepsis
Severe disease can produce:
• High fever
• Hypotension
• Septic shock
• Multiorgan dysfunction
• High mortality if treatment is delayed
Melioidosis should be considered in a patient from an endemic region with community-acquired sepsis and no obvious source.
Disseminated Abscesses
One of the classic features of systemic melioidosis is the formation of abscesses in multiple organs.
Potential sites include:
• Liver
• Spleen
• Prostate
• Kidney
• Bone
• Brain
• Soft tissues
A characteristic radiologic pattern of multiple small abscesses in the liver and spleen is sometimes described as a “honeycomb” appearance.
Neurologic Disease
Neurologic melioidosis is less common but serious.
Possible manifestations include:
• Brainstem encephalitis
• Cranial nerve abnormalities
• Weakness
• Ataxia
• Meningitis
• Brain abscess
These cases require prolonged therapy and careful specialist management.
Bone and Joint Disease
Melioidosis may cause:
• Osteomyelitis
• Septic arthritis
Persistent focal pain or swelling should prompt imaging and assessment for deep infection.
Diagnosis
Culture
The definitive diagnosis is usually made by culture of B. pseudomallei from:
• Blood
• Sputum
• Pus
• Urine
• Abscess fluid
• Other sterile-site specimens
Because the organism has important laboratory biosafety implications, the microbiology laboratory should be informed when melioidosis is suspected.
Serology
Serologic testing may provide supportive information in endemic areas, but its specificity can be limited because background antibody positivity may occur.
A positive antibody test alone does not establish active disease.
Molecular and Antigen Detection
In endemic regions, locally developed molecular or antigen-detection methods may support diagnosis.
PCR can be useful where available, particularly in difficult or rapidly progressive cases.
Treatment
Management has two distinct phases:
1. Intensive therapy
followed by
2. Eradication therapy
Both phases are essential because relapse can occur if treatment is stopped too early.
Intensive Phase
For severe melioidosis, the source lists:
Ceftazidime 2 g IV every 6 hours
or
Meropenem 1 g IV every 8 hours
or
Imipenem 1 g IV every 6 hours
for at least:
10–14 days
Longer intensive treatment may be required for deep-seated or complicated disease.
Role of TMP-SMX
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole may be added, especially when there is:
• Neurologic disease
• Cutaneous disease
• Bone infection
• Prostatic infection
This is particularly important because tissue penetration and eradication of residual organisms are critical in these sites.
Eradication Phase
After the intensive phase, prolonged oral therapy is required.
The classic regimen is:
TMP-SMX orally for at least 3 months
This phase reduces the risk of relapse.
Older regimens sometimes combined TMP-SMX with doxycycline, though current practice often favors TMP-SMX alone when tolerated and active.
Abscess Drainage
Large abscesses may require:
• Percutaneous drainage
• Surgical drainage
• Debridement when necessary
Source control is particularly important for large or poorly responding collections.
Additional Treatment Options
Amoxicillin-clavulanate can sometimes be used as an alternative when first-line oral eradication therapy cannot be used.
Fluoroquinolones have historically been considered, but they are generally less reliable and are not preferred when more effective agents are available.
Antimicrobial Resistance
Susceptibility patterns vary.
A notable concern is resistance to TMP-SMX in some isolates, particularly in regions where resistance has historically been reported.
For this reason, serious infections should be managed according to current susceptibility testing whenever possible.
Prevention
There is no widely available human vaccine.
Risk reduction includes:
• Avoiding direct contact with soil or muddy water when skin is broken
• Wearing protective footwear and gloves in endemic areas
• Covering cuts and abrasions
• Avoiding exposure to contaminated surface water, particularly in high-risk individuals
• Using safe water practices during severe weather and flooding
People with diabetes or other major risk factors should be particularly cautious in endemic areas.
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
Endemic-area exposure
- ●
Diabetes
- ●
Community-acquired pneumonia or sepsis
- ●
Multiple internal abscesses
→ Think melioidosis due to Burkholderia pseudomallei
High-Yield Treatment Pattern
Severe melioidosis:
→ Ceftazidime or a carbapenem
then
→ Prolonged TMP-SMX eradication therapy
Exam Essentials
Organism:
→ Burkholderia pseudomallei
Microbiology:
→ Aerobic Gram-negative bacillus
Disease:
→ Melioidosis
Reservoir:
→ Soil and surface water
Major geographic association:
→ Southeast Asia and northern Australia
Incubation:
→ Days to years
Important risk factor:
→ Diabetes mellitus
Major clinical forms:
→ Skin infection, pneumonia, bacteremia, sepsis, disseminated abscesses
Diagnosis:
→ Culture
Initial intensive treatment:
→ Ceftazidime, meropenem, or imipenem
Eradication treatment:
→ Prolonged TMP-SMX
Important additional management:
→ Drain large abscesses
Major clinical pearl:
→ Melioidosis can relapse or present long after the initial environmental exposure, so both adequate intensive therapy and prolonged eradication therapy are essential.
- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Burkholderia mallei
Overview
Burkholderia mallei is an aerobic Gram-negative bacillus that causes glanders, an uncommon zoonotic infection primarily affecting horses, donkeys, and mules. Human disease is rare and usually follows close occupational or environmental exposure to infected equine animals. Infection can range from localized skin disease to severe pneumonia and life-threatening sepsis.
Microbiology
B. mallei is a small Gram-negative bacillus belonging to the genus Burkholderia. It is closely related to Burkholderia pseudomallei, the organism responsible for melioidosis.
The two organisms cannot reliably be distinguished by routine microscopic examination alone, so definitive identification requires specialized laboratory methods.
Incubation Period
The incubation period is generally short, with symptoms commonly developing approximately 1–5 days after exposure, although the clinical timing can vary according to the route and intensity of exposure.
Epidemiology
B. mallei primarily causes disease in equine animals, particularly horses, donkeys, and mules. Humans are accidental hosts and usually acquire infection through direct contact with infected animals or their contaminated secretions.
Historically, human glanders has been reported in parts of Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Central and South America. Human cases are now uncommon because of improved veterinary surveillance and control of glanders among equine populations.
People with frequent occupational contact with horses and other equids are at greatest risk, including veterinarians, animal handlers, farmers, and laboratory personnel working with the organism.
Transmission and Pathogenesis
Human infection generally occurs when contaminated animal secretions enter through broken skin or mucous membranes. Infection may also occur through inhalation of contaminated droplets or aerosols.
Following entry into the body, the organism can produce localized infection or spread through the lymphatic and bloodstream systems. Dissemination can lead to multiple abscesses, pneumonia, bacteremia, and septic illness.
Clinical Infections
The characteristic disease caused by B. mallei is glanders. Clinical presentation depends partly on the route of infection.
Cutaneous glanders may begin with papules, pustules, or ulcerative lesions at the inoculation site. Regional lymphatic involvement can produce lymphangitis and suppurative lymphadenitis.
Pulmonary glanders can develop after inhalation or hematogenous dissemination. Patients may experience fever, cough, chest pain, dyspnea, and pneumonia.
Septicemic or disseminated glanders represents severe systemic infection and may cause high fever, hypotension, multiple organ involvement, abscess formation, and sepsis.
Diagnosis
Direct microscopic examination of wound or lesion exudates is generally insensitive, and the organism may not be readily identified.
Furthermore, microscopic morphology cannot reliably differentiate B. mallei from the closely related B. pseudomallei.
Definitive diagnosis is primarily based on culture and specific laboratory identification of the organism. Serologic testing has also been used as supportive evidence in appropriate epidemiologic settings.
Because B. mallei poses an important laboratory-acquired infection risk, the laboratory should be informed promptly when glanders is suspected so that appropriate biosafety procedures can be followed.
Treatment
Clinical evidence regarding the optimal antimicrobial regimen for glanders is limited because human infection is exceptionally rare.
Historically, combinations involving imipenem and doxycycline have been used. Other agents with laboratory activity against B. mallei include ceftazidime and certain other antimicrobials.
Management of suspected or confirmed glanders should involve infectious disease and public health specialists because treatment generally requires prolonged antimicrobial therapy and careful assessment for disseminated infection.
Surgical Management
Antibiotic therapy may need to be combined with surgical treatment when localized collections of infection develop.
In particular, suppurative lymphadenitis or abscesses may require drainage or other appropriate surgical management in addition to systemic antimicrobial therapy.
Prevention
The most effective preventive strategy is control and eradication of glanders in equine animals. Individuals handling potentially infected horses, donkeys, or mules should use appropriate protective measures and avoid direct exposure to animal secretions.
Suspected human infection also requires appropriate infection-control and public health precautions. Although person-to-person transmission is uncommon, exposure to infected secretions should be minimized.
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
Consider glanders when a patient with significant horse, donkey, or mule exposure develops an acute febrile illness accompanied by ulcerative skin lesions, lymphadenitis, pneumonia, or sepsis.
The key organism is Burkholderia mallei, and definitive diagnosis requires specialized culture or laboratory identification rather than microscopy alone.
Exam Essentials
Organism: Burkholderia mallei
Microbiology: Aerobic Gram-negative bacillus
Major disease: Glanders
Primary reservoir: Horses, donkeys, and mules
Transmission: Contact with infected animals or their secretions; inhalational exposure may occur
Typical incubation: Approximately 1–5 days
Clinical forms: Cutaneous/lymphatic, pulmonary, and septicemic or disseminated disease
Diagnosis: Culture with specific organism identification; serology may provide supportive evidence
Important distinction: Microscopy alone cannot reliably distinguish B. mallei from B. pseudomallei
Treatment: Requires specialist-guided antimicrobial therapy; regimens may include agents such as ceftazidime or a carbapenem followed by appropriate eradication therapy
Surgery: May be necessary for abscesses or suppurative lymphadenitis
Prevention: Control of glanders in equine animals and appropriate precautions during animal and laboratory exposure.
- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Brugia Species
Overview
Brugia species are filarial nematodes (roundworms) that infect the human lymphatic system. The two principal human pathogens are Brugia malayi and Brugia timori. Infection can produce lymphatic filariasis, characterized by recurrent lymphatic inflammation, progressive lymphedema, and, in advanced disease, elephantiasis.
Microbiology
Brugia species are tissue-dwelling nematode helminths. Adult worms reside primarily within the lymphatic vessels, where they produce microscopic larvae known as microfilariae.
The microfilariae circulate in peripheral blood and can be detected microscopically. Their circulation may demonstrate periodicity, with higher concentrations in the bloodstream during particular times of the day or night.
Important Species
Brugia malayi is the most widely distributed human Brugia species and is an important cause of lymphatic filariasis in parts of Asia.
Brugia timori has a more geographically restricted distribution and is primarily associated with infection in Indonesia.
Epidemiology
B. malayi occurs predominantly in South and Southeast Asia and parts of the western Pacific, including areas of India, China, Malaysia, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, and several Pacific islands.
B. timori is mainly found in Indonesia, particularly in parts of the Lesser Sunda Islands.
Transmission occurs through the bite of infected mosquito vectors, which introduce infective larvae into humans during feeding.
Pathogenesis
After transmission by a mosquito, infective larvae migrate to the lymphatic system and mature into adult worms. Their presence within lymphatic vessels causes inflammation and progressive disruption of normal lymphatic drainage.
Repeated episodes of lymphangitis and chronic lymphatic obstruction can eventually result in persistent swelling and marked tissue enlargement.
Clinical Infections
The major manifestation is lymphatic filariasis. Some infected individuals remain asymptomatic despite having circulating microfilariae.
Symptomatic disease may include recurrent fever, lymphangitis, lymphadenitis, and painful swelling of affected areas.
Chronic lymphatic damage can lead to persistent lymphedema. Severe longstanding disease may progress to elephantiasis, in which affected tissues become markedly enlarged and thickened.
Secondary bacterial infections and abscess formation may further aggravate lymphatic damage and swelling.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis traditionally relies on demonstrating microfilariae in peripheral blood. Fresh blood, concentrated specimens, or filtration techniques can increase the likelihood of detecting the parasites.
Thick blood smears stained with Giemsa or hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) can help visualize the microfilariae and distinguish Brugia from other filarial species based on their morphologic characteristics.
Because microfilariae may demonstrate nocturnal periodicity, the timing of blood collection should correspond to the expected period of maximum peripheral circulation in the geographic strain involved.
Serologic testing for antifilarial antibodies may provide supportive evidence, although antibody positivity does not necessarily distinguish active from previous infection.
Treatment
Diethylcarbamazine (DEC) has traditionally been the principal treatment for brugian lymphatic filariasis.
The source regimen lists diethylcarbamazine 2 mg/kg orally every 8 hours for 12 days. In patients with significant microfilaremia, treatment may be introduced gradually with lower initial doses before increasing to the full therapeutic dose.
The gradual regimen described begins with 50 mg on day 1, followed by increasing doses over the subsequent days until the therapeutic regimen is reached and treatment is completed over 12 days.
Treatment should be individualized according to current regional recommendations, coinfections, contraindications, and the patient’s clinical condition.
Treatment Reactions
Patients can develop inflammatory or allergic-type reactions, particularly during the first several days of treatment. These reactions occur largely because of the host inflammatory response to dying microfilariae.
Manifestations can include fever, headache, myalgias, rash, lymph node tenderness, and worsening lymphatic inflammation. Patients with substantial microfilaremia may experience more prominent reactions.
Additional Treatment
Alternative regimens described for filarial infection include a single dose of diethylcarbamazine 6 mg/kg.
Ivermectin 150 micrograms/kg as a single dose can reduce circulating microfilariae, although its effect on adult worms and chronic lymphatic disease is limited. Treatment strategies may differ substantially among endemic regions and elimination programs.
Management of Chronic Lymphatic Disease
Antiparasitic therapy does not necessarily reverse established lymphatic damage. Patients with chronic lymphedema therefore require careful skin hygiene, limb care, treatment of secondary bacterial infections, exercise, and measures that improve lymphatic drainage.
These interventions are important for preventing repeated inflammatory episodes and limiting progression of lymphedema and elephantiasis.
Prevention
Prevention centers on reducing transmission by mosquito vectors. Measures include insecticide-treated bed nets, mosquito control, protective clothing, and repellents where appropriate.
In endemic regions, population-based treatment programs can substantially reduce circulating microfilariae and interrupt community transmission.
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
Consider Brugia infection in a person from an endemic region of South or Southeast Asia who develops recurrent lymphangitis followed by chronic lymphedema or elephantiasis.
The diagnosis is supported by finding characteristic microfilariae on a properly timed peripheral blood smear.
Exam Essentials
Genus: Brugia
Species: B. malayi and B. timori
Organism: Filarial nematode
Transmission: Mosquito bite
Major disease: Lymphatic filariasis
Chronic manifestation: Lymphedema and elephantiasis
B. malayi distribution: Primarily South and Southeast Asia and parts of the western Pacific
B. timori distribution: Primarily Indonesia
Diagnosis: Peripheral blood examination for microfilariae
Stain: Giemsa or H&E on thick blood smear
Important diagnostic point: Blood collection may need to be timed according to microfilarial periodicity
Traditional treatment: Diethylcarbamazine
Additional microfilaricidal therapy: Ivermectin
Important treatment issue: Inflammatory reactions may occur as microfilariae die.
- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Borrelia Species
Overview
Borrelia species are spirochetal bacteria responsible for several vector-borne infections. The species B. recurrentis, B. hispanica, B. mazzottii, and B. venezuelensis are particularly associated with relapsing fever, an illness characterized by recurrent episodes of high fever separated by periods of clinical improvement.
Microbiology
Borrelia organisms are long, thin, helically shaped spirochetes rather than typical rod-shaped bacilli. They possess an outer membrane with structural features resembling those of Gram-negative bacteria, although they are not reliably visualized with a routine Gram stain.
Because of their relatively large size among spirochetes, organisms causing relapsing fever may be visible directly in peripheral blood during periods of high spirochetemia.
Important Species
Several Borrelia species are associated with relapsing fever, including B. recurrentis, B. hispanica, B. mazzottii, and B. venezuelensis. Other species can produce similar tick-borne infections in different geographic regions.
B. recurrentis is particularly important because it causes louse-borne relapsing fever, whereas several other Borrelia species are transmitted by ticks.
Incubation Period
Symptoms generally develop 4–18 days after exposure, with an average incubation period of approximately 7 days.
Epidemiology and Transmission
Relapsing-fever Borrelia infections occur in different regions worldwide. Transmission depends on the particular species.
Louse-borne relapsing fever is primarily caused by B. recurrentis and is transmitted by the human body louse.
Tick-borne relapsing fever is transmitted primarily by infected soft ticks, particularly Ornithodoros species. Rodents and other small mammals frequently serve as reservoirs for tick-borne organisms.
Crowding, poor hygienic conditions, and situations that promote body-louse infestation increase the risk of louse-borne disease.
Clinical Infection
The principal clinical syndrome is relapsing fever. Patients typically develop an abrupt episode of high fever accompanied by chills, severe headache, myalgias, arthralgias, and generalized weakness.
The initial febrile episode resolves, but fever subsequently returns. These alternating periods of fever and improvement result from changes in the organism’s surface antigens, allowing Borrelia to temporarily escape the host immune response.
Multiple relapses are particularly characteristic of tick-borne disease.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is most useful during a febrile episode, when large numbers of spirochetes may circulate in the bloodstream.
Peripheral blood smears stained with Giemsa or Wright stain may demonstrate the characteristic spirochetes. Dark-field microscopy can also visualize the organisms, although this technique is not routinely available in many laboratories.
PCR provides another method for detecting and identifying Borrelia and may be especially useful when microscopy is negative or species identification is required.
Serologic testing can be performed, but its usefulness is limited by imperfect sensitivity and specificity.
Treatment
Treatment differs somewhat between louse-borne and tick-borne relapsing fever.
For louse-borne relapsing fever, the traditional source regimen includes a single oral dose of tetracycline 500 mg or doxycycline 100 mg.
For tick-borne relapsing fever, treatment generally requires a longer course. The source regimen lists tetracycline 500 mg orally every 6 hours or doxycycline 100 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days.
Current antibiotic choice and duration should be individualized according to the specific Borrelia infection, patient characteristics, disease severity, and contemporary guidelines.
Additional Treatment
Erythromycin may be used as an alternative in selected circumstances.
When infection is complicated by meningitis or encephalitis, an antibiotic with reliable central nervous system penetration is required. Intravenous penicillin G or ceftriaxone may be used.
Important Treatment Reaction
A major clinical consideration is the Jarisch–Herxheimer reaction, which may develop shortly after antibiotic therapy is started.
Rapid destruction of spirochetes can trigger an acute inflammatory response characterized by fever, chills, rigors, headache, myalgias, tachycardia, and hypotension. Patients, particularly those with severe infection, should therefore be monitored after the first antimicrobial dose.
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
Think of relapsing-fever Borrelia when a patient has repeated episodes of abrupt high fever separated by afebrile periods, particularly when there is a history of body-louse exposure or soft-tick exposure.
Demonstration of spirochetes on a peripheral blood smear obtained during a febrile episode strongly supports the diagnosis.
Exam Essentials
Genus: Borrelia
Organism type: Spirochete
Major infection: Relapsing fever
Important species: B. recurrentis
Incubation: Approximately 4–18 days
Louse-borne disease: Primarily B. recurrentis
Tick-borne disease: Several Borrelia species transmitted by soft ticks
Diagnosis: Giemsa/Wright-stained peripheral blood smear, PCR; serology has limitations
Treatment: Usually doxycycline or tetracycline
CNS disease: Penicillin G or ceftriaxone may be required
Classic treatment complication: Jarisch–Herxheimer reaction
Key clue: Recurrent febrile episodes separated by periods of improvement.
- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology – Bordetella Species
Overview
Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis are aerobic Gram-negative bacilli that cause respiratory tract infection, most notably whooping cough (pertussis). The organisms occur worldwide and can infect individuals who have previously been immunized, particularly adults, because protection against pertussis decreases over time.
Microbiology
Bordetella species are small, aerobic Gram-negative bacilli with a particular tropism for the respiratory tract. B. pertussis is the major cause of classic whooping cough, whereas B. parapertussis can produce a similar, often somewhat milder, pertussis-like respiratory illness.
Epidemiology
Pertussis has a worldwide distribution. Infection can occur even in previously vaccinated individuals because vaccine-induced immunity is not lifelong. Consequently, adolescents and adults may develop infection and can serve as sources of transmission to susceptible individuals, especially young infants.
Clinical Infection
The characteristic disease is whooping cough, a highly contagious respiratory infection. Illness typically begins with nonspecific upper respiratory symptoms and subsequently progresses to episodes of severe, repetitive coughing.
The classic paroxysmal stage is characterized by repeated coughing fits that may be followed by the characteristic inspiratory “whoop.” Post-tussive vomiting can occur. Infants may not develop the classic whoop and can instead present with apnea, cyanosis, or respiratory distress.
Diagnosis
Diagnosis can be established using a nasopharyngeal specimen. PCR provides rapid detection of Bordetella DNA and is commonly useful for confirming infection.
Culture may also be performed using specialized media, classically Bordet–Gengou medium. Culture is highly specific but becomes less sensitive as the illness progresses or after antibiotic therapy has begun.
Serologic testing may provide additional diagnostic information in selected patients, particularly later in the course of illness. Antigen detection from nasopharyngeal secretions has also been described, although molecular testing is generally more useful.
Treatment
Macrolide antibiotics are the principal antimicrobial therapy for pertussis. Treatment is most effective when started early and is particularly important for reducing transmission.
Traditional regimens include erythromycin, while azithromycin and clarithromycin are commonly used alternatives because they allow shorter treatment courses and are generally better tolerated.
The source regimen lists:
Erythromycin: 2 g/day orally in four divided doses for 14 days.
Azithromycin: 500 mg orally on day 1, followed by 250 mg once daily on days 2–5.
Clarithromycin: 500 mg orally every 12 hours for 7 days.
Antibiotics given after the paroxysmal cough has become established may have limited ability to shorten the cough itself, although treatment remains valuable for decreasing bacterial transmission.
Alternative Treatment
Trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) may be used when macrolides cannot be given. The listed adult regimen is one double-strength tablet orally every 12 hours for 7 days.
Antibiotic selection and dosing should be adjusted for age, pregnancy, contraindications, and current treatment guidelines.
Symptomatic Management
The cough associated with pertussis can persist for weeks despite appropriate antimicrobial treatment. Conventional cough suppressants, including codeine, are generally ineffective and are not routinely useful for controlling the characteristic paroxysmal cough.
Supportive management is particularly important in infants and patients with severe disease, who may require monitoring for apnea, hypoxemia, dehydration, or feeding difficulties.
Prevention and Infection Control
Pertussis is highly transmissible through respiratory droplets. Appropriate respiratory/droplet isolation precautions are therefore important during the infectious period.
Vaccination remains the major preventive strategy. Because immunity decreases with time, booster immunization is important for maintaining population protection and reducing transmission to vulnerable infants.
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
A patient with an initial mild upper respiratory illness followed by recurrent paroxysms of severe cough, inspiratory whooping, and post-tussive vomiting should raise strong suspicion for pertussis.
The diagnosis is supported by nasopharyngeal PCR or culture, and treatment is generally with a macrolide antibiotic.
Exam Essentials
Organisms: Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis
Microbiology: Aerobic Gram-negative bacilli
Distribution: Worldwide
Major disease: Whooping cough (pertussis)
Transmission: Respiratory droplets
Classic symptom: Paroxysmal cough with inspiratory whoop
Diagnosis: PCR or specialized culture; serology may assist in selected cases
Classic culture medium: Bordet–Gengou medium
Treatment: Macrolides, especially azithromycin, clarithromycin, or erythromycin
Alternative: TMP-SMX
Cough suppressants: Usually ineffective
Prevention: Vaccination and appropriate respiratory/droplet precautions
Important pearl: Previous vaccination does not completely exclude pertussis, particularly in adolescents and adults whose immunity has waned.
- Published on
Infectious Disease and Microbiology - Bordetella bronchiseptica
Basics
Bordetella bronchiseptica is an aerobic Gram-negative bacillus that primarily colonizes and infects the respiratory tracts of animals. Human infection is uncommon, but when it occurs it most often involves the respiratory system and may be more severe in immunocompromised patients or those with chronic lung disease.
Unlike Bordetella pertussis, which is a major human respiratory pathogen, B. bronchiseptica is principally a zoonotic organism.
Microbiologic Characteristics
Bordetella bronchiseptica is:
• Gram negative
• Bacillary in shape
• Aerobic
It belongs to the genus Bordetella, but its antimicrobial susceptibility pattern differs importantly from that of B. pertussis.
Epidemiology
The organism has a worldwide distribution.
It is commonly associated with animals, particularly mammals with respiratory tract colonization or infection. Human disease is rare and usually sporadic.
Exposure to infected or colonized animals may be relevant in some cases.
Risk Factors
Human infection is more likely in patients with:
• Immunosuppression
• Chronic pulmonary disease
• Structural lung abnormalities
• Frequent animal exposure
• Severe underlying illness
Although healthy individuals can occasionally be infected, clinically significant disease is more often reported in vulnerable hosts.
Clinical Infections
Pneumonia
Pneumonia is one of the most important manifestations of B. bronchiseptica infection.
Possible symptoms include:
• Fever
• Cough
• Sputum production
• Dyspnea
• Pleuritic discomfort
• Hypoxemia in severe disease
The infection may resemble other bacterial pneumonias and therefore requires microbiologic confirmation.
Tracheobronchitis
The organism may also cause tracheobronchial infection.
Patients may develop:
• Persistent cough
• Increased respiratory secretions
• Wheezing
• Chest discomfort
• Fever
This may be especially important in patients with preexisting respiratory disease.
Bacteremia
Although uncommon, B. bronchiseptica can invade the bloodstream.
Bacteremia is more likely in:
• Immunocompromised patients
• Patients with severe pulmonary infection
• Patients with major underlying disease
Clinical findings may include:
• Fever
• Chills
• Hypotension
• Sepsis in severe cases
Diagnosis
Diagnosis is primarily established by:
Culture
Depending on the clinical syndrome, specimens may include:
• Sputum
• Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
• Tracheal secretions
• Blood cultures
Because the organism is unusual in humans, laboratory identification is important to distinguish it from other Bordetella species and from other Gram-negative respiratory pathogens.
Treatment
A key therapeutic point is that B. bronchiseptica differs from B. pertussis.
Macrolide Resistance
In contrast to B. pertussis, B. bronchiseptica is often resistant to macrolides.
Therefore, agents such as:
• Azithromycin
• Clarithromycin
• Erythromycin
should not automatically be assumed to be effective.
Antipseudomonal Beta-Lactams
Antipseudomonal beta-lactam agents are often active.
Potential options may include agents with activity against resistant Gram-negative bacilli, depending on susceptibility results.
Definitive therapy should ideally be guided by antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
Additional Treatment Options
Other potentially active agents include:
• Aminoglycosides
• Imipenem
• Doxycycline
The choice depends on the severity of infection, site involved, renal function, and susceptibility profile.
Severe Infection
For pneumonia with bacteremia or other invasive disease, intravenous therapy is generally appropriate initially.
Management should also include:
• Oxygen support when needed
• Fluid management
• Treatment of sepsis
• Evaluation of underlying immunosuppression
• Repeat cultures if bacteremia persists
Differential Diagnosis
Respiratory infection due to B. bronchiseptica may resemble:
• Bordetella pertussis
• Pseudomonas aeruginosa
• Haemophilus influenzae
• Enteric Gram-negative pneumonia
• Other bacterial causes of tracheobronchitis
A zoonotic exposure history and culture identification help distinguish the organism.
Prevention
Because human infection is uncommon, there are no routine human vaccination recommendations specifically for B. bronchiseptica.
General preventive measures include:
• Careful hygiene after animal contact
• Avoiding close exposure to sick animals when severely immunocompromised
• Appropriate veterinary care for infected animals
• Standard infection-control practices in healthcare environments
High-Yield Clinical Pattern
Immunocompromised patient
- ●
Animal exposure
- ●
Pneumonia or tracheobronchitis
- ●
Gram-negative Bordetella isolated in culture
→ Consider Bordetella bronchiseptica
High-Yield Treatment Distinction
B. pertussis
→ Macrolides commonly used
B. bronchiseptica
→ Often macrolide resistant
→ Antipseudomonal beta-lactams, imipenem, doxycycline, or aminoglycosides may be active
Exam Essentials
Organism:
→ Bordetella bronchiseptica
Microbiology:
→ Aerobic Gram-negative bacillus
Distribution:
→ Worldwide
Major infections:
→ Pneumonia, tracheobronchitis, bacteremia
Important host:
→ Often immunocompromised or chronically ill patients
Diagnosis:
→ Culture
Key antimicrobial distinction:
→ Often resistant to macrolides
Commonly active therapy:
→ Antipseudomonal beta-lactam
Other possible agents:
→ Aminoglycosides, imipenem, doxycycline
Key clinical pearl: Unlike B. pertussis, B. bronchiseptica should not be assumed to respond to macrolides; susceptibility-guided therapy is important.