- Published on
Psychology Terms - Affirming the consequent
. In conditional reasoning, the fallacious argument that asserts, from a hypothetical premise of the form If p then q, that because q is true, p must also be true. For instance, considering the proposition If the thieves accessed the premises through the front entrance, they must have forced the lock; nonetheless, it is erroneous to deduce that their act of forcing the lock necessitates their entry by the front door.
. In conditional reasoning, the fallacious argument that asserts, from a hypothetical premise of the form If p then q, that because q is true, p must also be true. For instance, considering the proposition If the thieves accessed the premises through the front entrance, they must have forced the lock; nonetheless, it is erroneous to deduce that their act of forcing the lock necessitates their entry by the front door.
0 Comments