- Published on
Sukuk: What Are the General Features of Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) in Malaysia?
Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) in Malaysia provide independent assessments of the creditworthiness and default risks of issuers in both the conventional and Islamic capital markets. Malaysia has two major CRAs:
Both institutions play a vital role in guiding investors—especially in the Islamic Capital Market (ICM)—by evaluating sukuk issuances, corporate credit risks, and financial institution strength.
Paraphrased and Expanded General Features of CRAs in Malaysia
1. Incorporation Dates
2. Rating Portfolio
RAM Ratings
RAM assesses a wide range of entities and instruments, including:
MARC
MARC focuses on:
3. Types of Services Offered
RAM Ratings Services
MARC Services
4. Long-Term Rating Scales
RAM Ratings
MARC Ratings
5. Short-Term Rating Scales
RAM
MARC
6. Rating Outlook
Meaning of Outlook
An outlook indicates the expected direction of the rating over the coming 6–24 months.
RAM Outlook Categories
MARC Outlook Categories
CRITICAL ANALYSIS: Effectiveness of Malaysian CRAs in the Islamic Capital Market
1. Transparency and Consistency
Both RAM and MARC employ structured methodologies, but subtle differences in rating scales can lead to inconsistent interpretation by foreign investors unfamiliar with Malaysia’s system.
2. Islamic Finance Expertise
Malaysia’s CRAs excel in sukuk assessment due to:
3. Over-Reliance Concerns
Investors may depend too heavily on ratings without performing independent due diligence, increasing systemic vulnerability, particularly during economic stress.
4. Enhancements & Support
Suffixes such as (bg), (cg), (s) help clarify support mechanisms. Yet, they can mask an issuer’s genuine credit weakness when guarantees dominate the rating.
5. Shariah Compliance Oversight
The presence of Shariah Councils strengthens credibility, but variations in interpretation of Shariah risk factors may create rating disparities across different sukuk structures.
10 CASE SCENARIOS WITH SOLUTIONS
Scenario 1
A company issues sukuk with a bank guarantee. RAM assigns the rating AA2(bg).
Solution:
The (bg) shows the rating benefits significantly from bank support. Investors should analyze both the issuer’s and guarantor’s stability.
Scenario 2
An issuer’s sukuk is rated MARC-3ID for the short term.
Solution:
This is a lower-tier investment grade, indicating moderate capacity to meet short-term obligations. The issuer must improve liquidity and cash flow management.
Scenario 3
A sukuk shows Negative Outlook from RAM.
Solution:
The issuer should review financial leverage and restructure near-term debts to avoid future downgrades.
Scenario 4
A project-finance sukuk receives BBB from RAM with subscript 3.
Solution:
A BBB3 rating means the issue is at the lower end of medium grade. Investors should demand higher profit rates or additional collateral.
Scenario 5
MARC assigns AAID- to an Islamic infrastructure sukuk.
Solution:
The minus sign indicates slightly weaker positioning within the same category. Enhancing revenue stability may lift the rating.
Scenario 6
A corporate sukuk receives Developing Outlook from MARC.
Solution:
The rating may move in any direction. Investors should monitor upcoming financial reports closely.
Scenario 7
RAM rates a short-term Islamic note P1.
Solution:
This is the highest short-term rating, showing excellent capacity for timely repayment—suitable for conservative investors.
Scenario 8
An issuer’s Islamic ABS (asset-backed security) is rated BBID by MARC.
Solution:
This is non-investment grade, suggesting high vulnerability. Additional credit enhancement is recommended.
Scenario 9
A sukuk issuer’s rating changes from A1 to A3 within 18 months.
Solution:
Although the letter grade remains A, dropping from 1 to 3 shows declining credit quality. Management should address operational inefficiencies causing deterioration.
Scenario 10
MARC issues a Stable Outlook for a BBBID sukuk.
Solution:
Despite being borderline investment grade, the stable outlook signals expected stability. Issuers should maintain discipline in debt and liquidity ratios to avoid downgrades.
Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) in Malaysia provide independent assessments of the creditworthiness and default risks of issuers in both the conventional and Islamic capital markets. Malaysia has two major CRAs:
- RAM Rating Services Berhad (RAM Ratings) – originally established as Rating Agency Malaysia Berhad in November 1990.
- Malaysian Rating Corporation Berhad (MARC) – incorporated in October 1995.
Both institutions play a vital role in guiding investors—especially in the Islamic Capital Market (ICM)—by evaluating sukuk issuances, corporate credit risks, and financial institution strength.
Paraphrased and Expanded General Features of CRAs in Malaysia
1. Incorporation Dates
- RAM Ratings: Founded in November 1990.
- MARC: Established in 1995 as the second national credit rating agency.
2. Rating Portfolio
RAM Ratings
RAM assesses a wide range of entities and instruments, including:
- Domestic and international corporates
- Multinational companies
- Banks and insurance providers
- Government-linked entities
- Public-funded institutions
- Complex investment structures
- Ringgit-denominated bonds
- Structured-finance instruments supported by assets or receivables
- Islamic securities, including various sukuk structures
MARC
MARC focuses on:
- Corporate and commercial debt instruments
- Islamic capital market instruments (sukuk)
- Asset-backed securities
- Financial strength evaluations for insurance firms and financial institutions
3. Types of Services Offered
RAM Ratings Services
- Corporate ratings
- Project and structured-finance ratings
- Sukuk ratings
- Financial institution and insurer ratings
- Short- and long-term Islamic instrument ratings
MARC Services
- Corporate debt and issuer ratings
- Islamic capital market instrument ratings
- Asset-backed and ABS ratings
- Insurer financial strength ratings
- Corporate governance ratings for Islamic financial institutions
- Sovereign issuer ratings
4. Long-Term Rating Scales
RAM Ratings
- Letter grades: AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, C, D
- Subscript indicators:
- 1 = upper tier of the category
- 2 = middle tier
- 3 = lower tier
- Additional suffixes:
- (bg) = bank-guaranteed
- (s) = enhanced through support
MARC Ratings
- Investment grade: AAAID, AAID, AID, BBBID
- Non-investment grade: BBID, BID, CID, DID
- Modifiers:
- + / − to show relative strength
- (bg) for bank guarantee
- (cg) for corporate guarantee
- (s) for third-party support
- Subscript “ID” marks Islamic Private Debt Securities
5. Short-Term Rating Scales
RAM
- Short-term grades: P1, P2, P3, NP, D
MARC
- Short-term grades: MARC-1ID, MARC-2ID, MARC-3ID
6. Rating Outlook
Meaning of Outlook
An outlook indicates the expected direction of the rating over the coming 6–24 months.
RAM Outlook Categories
- Positive – possible rating upgrade
- Negative – potential downgrade
- Stable – rating unlikely to change
MARC Outlook Categories
- Positive – chance of improvement
- Negative – risk of weakening
- Stable – rating expected to hold
- Developing – rating could rise, fall, or remain unchanged
CRITICAL ANALYSIS: Effectiveness of Malaysian CRAs in the Islamic Capital Market
1. Transparency and Consistency
Both RAM and MARC employ structured methodologies, but subtle differences in rating scales can lead to inconsistent interpretation by foreign investors unfamiliar with Malaysia’s system.
2. Islamic Finance Expertise
Malaysia’s CRAs excel in sukuk assessment due to:
- Deep Shariah governance frameworks
- Long experience with Islamic hybrid structures
3. Over-Reliance Concerns
Investors may depend too heavily on ratings without performing independent due diligence, increasing systemic vulnerability, particularly during economic stress.
4. Enhancements & Support
Suffixes such as (bg), (cg), (s) help clarify support mechanisms. Yet, they can mask an issuer’s genuine credit weakness when guarantees dominate the rating.
5. Shariah Compliance Oversight
The presence of Shariah Councils strengthens credibility, but variations in interpretation of Shariah risk factors may create rating disparities across different sukuk structures.
10 CASE SCENARIOS WITH SOLUTIONS
Scenario 1
A company issues sukuk with a bank guarantee. RAM assigns the rating AA2(bg).
Solution:
The (bg) shows the rating benefits significantly from bank support. Investors should analyze both the issuer’s and guarantor’s stability.
Scenario 2
An issuer’s sukuk is rated MARC-3ID for the short term.
Solution:
This is a lower-tier investment grade, indicating moderate capacity to meet short-term obligations. The issuer must improve liquidity and cash flow management.
Scenario 3
A sukuk shows Negative Outlook from RAM.
Solution:
The issuer should review financial leverage and restructure near-term debts to avoid future downgrades.
Scenario 4
A project-finance sukuk receives BBB from RAM with subscript 3.
Solution:
A BBB3 rating means the issue is at the lower end of medium grade. Investors should demand higher profit rates or additional collateral.
Scenario 5
MARC assigns AAID- to an Islamic infrastructure sukuk.
Solution:
The minus sign indicates slightly weaker positioning within the same category. Enhancing revenue stability may lift the rating.
Scenario 6
A corporate sukuk receives Developing Outlook from MARC.
Solution:
The rating may move in any direction. Investors should monitor upcoming financial reports closely.
Scenario 7
RAM rates a short-term Islamic note P1.
Solution:
This is the highest short-term rating, showing excellent capacity for timely repayment—suitable for conservative investors.
Scenario 8
An issuer’s Islamic ABS (asset-backed security) is rated BBID by MARC.
Solution:
This is non-investment grade, suggesting high vulnerability. Additional credit enhancement is recommended.
Scenario 9
A sukuk issuer’s rating changes from A1 to A3 within 18 months.
Solution:
Although the letter grade remains A, dropping from 1 to 3 shows declining credit quality. Management should address operational inefficiencies causing deterioration.
Scenario 10
MARC issues a Stable Outlook for a BBBID sukuk.
Solution:
Despite being borderline investment grade, the stable outlook signals expected stability. Issuers should maintain discipline in debt and liquidity ratios to avoid downgrades.
0 Comments