Islamic Contract – Arguments Supporting the Use of Tawarruq in the Banking System

Islamic Contract – Arguments Supporting the Use of Tawarruq in the Banking System
Q1: Why do some scholars and Islamic finance practitioners support tawarruq?
Answer
Scholars who permit tawarruq in the banking system argue that:
tawarruq is a lawful trade-based mechanism that provides liquidity without directly engaging in ribā.
They rely on:
✅ Qur’ānic principles;
✅ Prophetic traditions;
✅ general permissibility of trade;
✅ commercial necessity;
✅ practical financial needs.


1. Tawarruq Falls Under the General Permissibility of Trade
Argument
Supporters argue that Allah (SWT) states:
“Allah has permitted trade and prohibited ribā.”
(Qur’ān 2:275)
Thus:

• all forms of trade are generally permissible,
  unless:
  ❌ clear Sharī‘ah evidence specifically prohibits them.

Application to Tawarruq
Tawarruq:
✅ involves sale contracts;
✅ contains identifiable commodities;
✅ fulfils legal contractual requirements.
Therefore:

• supporters argue:

tawarruq remains lawful unless explicit proof prohibits it.


Case Scenario 1 – Personal Liquidity Financing
A customer requires:

• RM50,000 cash.

Step 1
Islamic bank sells commodity:

• RM60,000 deferred.

Step 2
Customer sells commodity:

• RM50,000 cash to third party.

Difference
60{,}000 - 50{,}000 = 10{,}000
60{,}000 - 50{,}000 = 10{,}000


Supporters’ Analysis
Supporters argue:

• this arrangement remains:
  ✅ sale-based;
  ✅ contractually valid;
  ✅ distinct from direct interest lending.

Critical Analysis
Critics respond:

• although legally structured as sales,
  the economic substance may still resemble:

conventional lending.
Thus:

• debate centres on:

form versus substance.


2. Hadith of Dates Exchange Supports Restructuring Into Sharī‘ah-Compliant Form
Argument
Supporters rely on the famous hadith narrated by:

• Abu Sa’id al-Khudri
  and
• Abu Hurairah.

Hadith Summary
A man exchanged:

• lower-quality dates
  for:
• better-quality dates
  unequally.

The Prophet (SAW) prohibited this because:

• it involved ribā.

Instead, the Prophet instructed:

1. sell lower-quality dates for cash;
2. use cash to buy better-quality dates.

Supporters’ Reasoning
Supporters argue:
an unlawful structure may become permissible if reorganised into Sharī‘ah-compliant sale contracts.
Thus:

• tawarruq restructures liquidity needs into:
  ✅ lawful sale arrangements.

Case Scenario 2 – Restructured Financing
Instead of:
❌ borrowing RM100,000 with interest,
the customer:

1. buys commodity on deferred basis;
2. sells commodity for cash.

Supporters’ View
The financing becomes:
✅ trade-based;
✅ contractually Sharī‘ah-compliant.


Critical Analysis
Critics argue:

• unlike the hadith case,
  modern organised tawarruq may:
  • lack genuine trading intention;
  • merely replicate cash financing.

3. Original Rule in Transactions Is Permissibility
Argument
Supporters invoke the legal maxim:
“The original rule in commercial transactions is permissibility.”
Thus:

• unless there is:
  ❌ clear prohibition,
  transactions remain lawful.

Burden of Proof Argument
Supporters argue:
those prohibiting tawarruq bear burden of proof.
Because:

• they seek exception from general permissibility.

Critical Analysis
Critics counter that:

• organised tawarruq may violate:
  • anti-ribā objectives;
  • maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah;
    even if no explicit textual prohibition exists.

4. Traders Aim to Increase Wealth Through Commodities
Argument
Supporters argue:
profit-making itself is not prohibited.
In ordinary trade:

• traders buy and sell commodities to:
  • increase wealth.

Similarly:

• tawarruq uses commodities as:

intermediaries for liquidity generation.


Distinction Made by Supporters
Ordinary Trader
Aims:

• profit through trade.

Mutawarriq
Aims:

• obtain liquidity/cash.

But:

• both use lawful sale contracts.

Case Scenario 3 – Commodity Intermediary
A business purchases:

• metal commodity on deferred basis.

The business immediately resells:

• commodity for spot cash
  to finance operations.

Supporters’ Analysis
The commodity:
✅ lawfully intermediates liquidity generation.


Critical Analysis
Critics argue:

• commodity may merely serve symbolic role;
• no real economic trade objective exists.

5. Necessity and Public Need Support Tawarruq
Argument
Supporters argue:
not everyone can access benevolent loans (qard hasan).
Thus:

• tawarruq provides:
  ✅ lawful liquidity alternative.

Case Scenario 4 – Financial Hardship
A family urgently needs:

• RM30,000 for medical expenses.

No interest-free loan available.
Islamic bank offers:

• tawarruq financing.

Supporters’ View
Tawarruq:
✅ prevents resort to conventional ribā loans.


Critical Analysis
This argument is based on:

• necessity (ḥājah);
• public need;
• financial practicality.

6. Tawarruq Solves Liquidity Problems
Argument
Supporters argue:
tawarruq effectively addresses liquidity shortages.
It benefits:
✅ individuals;
✅ corporations;
✅ banks;
✅ governments.


Practical Applications
Tawarruq is used for:

• treasury operations;
• liquidity management;
• trade deficit financing;
• short-term funding.

Case Scenario 5 – Interbank Liquidity
An Islamic bank faces:

• short-term liquidity shortage.

Another Islamic bank enters:

• tawarruq liquidity arrangement
  to provide funding.

Supporters’ Analysis
Tawarruq:
✅ stabilises Islamic financial markets;
✅ enhances operational continuity.


Critical Analysis
Critics worry:

• overreliance on tawarruq may:
  • excessively financialise Islamic banking;
  • weaken real-sector linkage.

7. Islamic Banks Must Remain Competitive
Argument
Supporters argue:
Islamic banks must remain commercially competitive with conventional banks.
Therefore:

• practical financing alternatives are necessary.

Case Scenario 6 – Banking Competition
Customers require:

• immediate liquidity;
• fast financing products.

Without tawarruq:

• Islamic banks may struggle to:
  • compete commercially;
  • retain customers.

Supporters’ View
Tawarruq:
✅ allows Islamic banking growth;
✅ expands financial inclusion;
✅ offers Sharī‘ah-based alternatives.


Critical Analysis
Critics caution:

• excessive focus on competitiveness may:

dilute Sharī‘ah authenticity.
Thus:

• balance between:
  • practicality;
  • maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah
    remains crucial.

Overall Critical Analysis of Supporters’ Arguments
Main Supporting Themes
Supporters emphasise:
✅ general permissibility of trade;
✅ legal validity of contracts;
✅ public need and necessity;
✅ financial practicality;
✅ banking competitiveness.


Main Counterarguments
Critics emphasise:
❌ substance-over-form concerns;
❌ synthetic liquidity generation;
❌ resemblance to conventional lending;
❌ weakening of genuine trade-based finance.


Core Sharī‘ah Debate
The fundamental issue remains:
Does organised tawarruq represent:

• genuine Sharī‘ah-compliant trade,
  or
• merely a legal mechanism replicating interest financing?

Contemporary Regulatory Trend
Modern regulators increasingly seek:
✅ reduction of excessive tawarruq dependency;
✅ diversification of Sharī‘ah contracts;
✅ stronger real-economy linkage;
✅ value-based Islamic finance development.

​