THE ULTIMATE

Kembara XTRA 

Published on
Islamic Contract – Bay’ al-Istijrār (Supply or Wholesale Sale)
1. Definition of Bay’ al-Istijrār
Literal Meaning
The word istijrār is derived from the Arabic verb:
istajarra
which means:
  • to pull;
  • to drag;
  • to draw along.
It may also carry the meaning of:
deferral,
particularly in relation to deferred debt or payment.


2. Technical Definition of Bay’ al-Istijrār
Technically, Bay’ al-Istijrār (hereinafter, istijrār) refers to:
a sale arrangement in which the buyer continuously takes merchandise from the seller in instalments or on a regular basis, while payment may be made either later or in advance.


Earlier Definition
Some jurists earlier defined istijrār as:
taking goods continuously from a vendor and paying later.
This definition focused mainly on:
  • deferred payment arrangements.


More Accurate Definition
However, some scholars argue:
this definition is incomplete,
because:
  • payment in istijrār may be:
    • deferred; or
    • upfront.
Thus:
  • the concept is broader than merely deferred payment.


Definition by al-Ashqar
Al-Ashqar defines istijrār as:
taking merchandise from the vendor in instalments on a regular basis while payment may be made in advance or deferred.


Definition by Securities Commission Malaysia
The Securities Commission Malaysia defines istijrār as:
“a contract whereby the supplier agrees to supply a particular product on an ongoing basis, e.g., monthly, at an agreed price and an agreed mode of payment.”


Main Features of Istijrār
1. Continuous Supply Relationship
Goods are supplied:
  • continuously;
  • periodically;
  • regularly.
Examples:
  • daily;
  • weekly;
  • monthly.


2. Goods Taken in Stages
The buyer:
  • does not necessarily take all goods at once.
Instead:
  • goods are withdrawn progressively.


3. Payment Flexibility
Payment may be:
✅ upfront;
✅ deferred;
✅ periodic;
✅ instalment-based.


4. Common in Commercial Supply Chains
Istijrār is commonly used in:
  • wholesale trade;
  • supermarkets;
  • restaurants;
  • manufacturing supply chains;
  • trade finance.


Example 1 – Istijrār With Deferred Payment
A restaurant regularly purchases:
  • chicken supplies from wholesaler.


Supply Arrangement
Week 1
100 kg chicken
Week 2
120 kg chicken
Week 3
90 kg chicken
The restaurant:
  • takes goods continuously;
  • pays supplier at month-end.


Analysis
The goods are:
  • supplied regularly;
  • taken in stages;
  • paid later.
Result
✅ Istijrār with deferred payment.


Example 2 – Istijrār With Upfront Payment
A factory prepays:
  • RM500,000
    to steel supplier.
The supplier then:
  • delivers steel monthly over one year.


Analysis
Payment:
✅ made upfront.
Goods:
✅ supplied gradually.
Result
✅ Istijrār with upfront payment.


Example 3 – Modern Commercial Example
A supermarket signs agreement with beverage company.
The beverage company agrees:
  • to supply drinks weekly.
The supermarket agrees:
  • to pay every 30 days.


Features Present
✅ continuous supply
✅ repeated withdrawals
✅ agreed payment mechanism
Result
✅ Contemporary istijrār arrangement.


Importance of Istijrār in Islamic Finance
Istijrār is important because:
  • modern businesses require continuous supply arrangements;
  • repeated contracting for every transaction may be impractical;
  • it facilitates trade and commercial efficiency.


Application in Islamic Finance
Istijrār may be used in:
  • Islamic trade finance;
  • import financing;
  • wholesale supply arrangements;
  • Islamic letter of credit facilities.
It serves as:
an alternative to murābahah or tawarruq-based trade financing.


Sharī‘ah Issues in Istijrār
The major Sharī‘ah issues concern:
  • certainty of price;
  • contractual formation;
  • deferred payment;
  • ownership and possession;
  • uncertainty (gharar).
Jurists therefore differ regarding:
  • pricing methods;
  • sale by conduct (bay‘ al-mu‘āṭāh);
  • unknown pricing structures.


Important Sharī‘ah Principle
Istijrār is generally permissible because:
the original rule in commercial transactions is permissibility,
provided:
✅ mutual consent exists;
✅ contractual obligations are clear;
✅ excessive uncertainty is avoided;
✅ Sharī‘ah requirements of sale are fulfilled.

​
Picture
Published on
Islamic Contract – Legality of Bay’ al-Istijrār
1. General Legality of Istijrār
Explanation
In general:
Muslim jurists agree on the permissibility of istijrār,
based on:
  • the general permissibility of sale contracts in Islamic law.
This permissibility applies particularly when:
✅ the price is known to both contracting parties.


What Is Istijrār?
Istijrār refers to:
a continuous supply arrangement where a buyer repeatedly takes goods from a seller over time with periodic settlement of payment.
It is commonly used in:
  • wholesale supply;
  • retail supply;
  • trade financing;
  • import-export transactions.


Example of Permissible Istijrār
A restaurant regularly purchases:
  • rice from supplier.
Every week:
  • quantity and price are specified.
At month-end:
  • payment is settled collectively.


Example With Figures
Week 1
50 bags rice at RM80 each
50 \times 80 = 4{,}000
50 \times 80 = 4{,}000


Week 2
60 bags rice at RM82 each
60 \times 82 = 4{,}920
60 \times 82 = 4{,}920


Total Month-End Payment
4{,}000 + 4{,}920 = 8{,}920
4{,}000 + 4{,}920 = 8{,}920


Result
✅ Permissible because:
  • goods known;
  • prices known;
  • obligations clear.


2. Position of the Shāfi‘ī School
Majority Shāfi‘ī View
The majority of the Shāfi‘ī School:
❌ do not generally recognise:
sale by conduct (bay‘ al-mu‘āṭāh)
without:
  • explicit offer (ijāb);
  • explicit acceptance (qabūl).


What Does This Mean?
According to the majority Shāfi‘īs:
  • every sale transaction should contain:
    • expressed offer;
    • expressed acceptance.
Thus:
  • merely taking goods and paying later without verbal/formal contract may be insufficient.


Example
A customer enters grocery shop:
  • takes bread daily;
  • no formal agreement;
  • pays at month-end.


Majority Shāfi‘ī Concern
Because:
  • no explicit sale contract formed each time,
    they may regard:
    ❌ the transaction as problematic.


Some Shāfi‘ī Scholars Were More Flexible
Certain Shāfi‘ī scholars such as:
  • al-Ghazālī;
  • Ibn Surayj
were more accepting of:
sale by conduct (bay‘ al-mu‘āṭāh).
Especially where:
  • customary practice clearly indicates mutual consent.


3. Position of the Mālikī School
Mālikī View
The Mālikī School generally:
✅ allows istijrār.
However:
  • the contract begins:
once the buyer takes the commodity from seller.
Thus:
  • taking possession itself signifies contractual consent.


Example
A bakery regularly takes:
  • flour supplies from wholesaler.
The bakery:
  • simply collects flour;
  • records quantities;
  • pays later.


Mālikī Analysis
The act of:
  • taking the flour
itself constitutes:
✅ contractual formation.


4. Unknown Price Issue in Istijrār
Main Sharī‘ah Concern
Jurists differ regarding:
permissibility of istijrār when the price is unknown at the time goods are taken.


Why Is This Important?
Islamic commercial law generally requires:
✅ certainty of price (thaman).
Uncertainty regarding price may create:
❌ gharar (excessive uncertainty).


Example of Problematic Situation
A retailer continuously takes:
  • beverages from supplier.
No:
  • exact price;
  • pricing formula;
  • market benchmark
is agreed upon initially.
Only later:
  • parties negotiate total amount.


Juristic Concern
At the time goods are taken:
❌ price remains uncertain.
This may lead to:
  • disputes;
  • unfairness;
  • unlawful consumption of wealth.


Majority Position
Most jurists:
❌ do not allow sales with unknown prices.
They rely on:
  • Qur’ānic prohibition against unlawful appropriation of wealth;
  • prohibition of gharar;
  • requirement of certainty in contracts.


Minority Position
Some Hanafi and Hanbali jurists:
✅ allow reliance on:
  • prevailing market price;
  • commercial custom (‘urf);
  • public need.
Especially where:
  • market prices are stable and commonly known.


Example of Permissible Market-Based Practice
A petrol station continuously receives:
  • fuel supply.
Daily market price:
  • publicly displayed;
  • commercially standardised.
Thus:
  • some jurists tolerate deferred reconciliation using prevailing market rates.


5. Important Sharī‘ah Principles in Istijrār
Principle 1
Sale Contracts Are Generally Permissible
Based on:
  • general permissibility of trade in Islam.


Principle 2
Mutual Consent Is Required
Contracting parties must genuinely consent.


Principle 3
Price Certainty Is Important
Islamic law generally requires:
✅ known price;
✅ known obligations.


Principle 4
Excessive Uncertainty (
Gharar
) Must Be Avoided
Unknown prices may invalidate sales.


Principle 5
Commercial Custom (
‘Urf
) May Be Considered
Some jurists allow flexibility where:
  • stable market practices exist;
  • public need is widespread.


Overall Conclusion
Istijrār is generally:
✅ permissible in Islamic law,
particularly when:
  • goods are known;
  • prices are known;
  • contractual obligations are clear.
However:
  • jurists differ regarding:
    • sale by conduct (bay‘ al-mu‘āṭāh);
    • unknown pricing;
    • deferred settlement structures.
The major Sharī‘ah concern remains:
avoiding uncertainty and ensuring fairness in commercial transactions.

​
Picture
Published on
​Islamic Contract – Bay’ al-Istijrār: Istijrār With Deferred Payment
1. Definition of Istijrār With Deferred Payment
Explanation
Istijrār with deferred payment refers to:
a continuous supply arrangement where the buyer takes goods gradually over time and payment is deferred until a later date or settlement period.
Instead of:
  • paying immediately upon each withdrawal,
the buyer:
  • receives goods continuously;
  • settles payment later.
Scholars differ regarding:
  • the permissibility of various forms of this arrangement,
    particularly:
  • price determination.


2. Types of Istijrār With Deferred Payment
Scholars discuss several forms of deferred-payment istijrār.


A. Price Specified in Every Transaction
Structure
In this form:
  • every time goods are taken,
  • the price is clearly specified.
Although payment is deferred,
the parties know:
✅ exact quantity
✅ exact price
during each transaction.


Scholarly View
This form is generally:
✅ permissible.
It is accepted by scholars who allow:
sale by conduct (bay‘ al-mu‘āṭāh).


Schools Allowing It
✅ Hanafis
✅ Mālikis
✅ Hanbalis
✅ Some Shāfi‘ī scholars
(such as al-Ghazālī and Ibn Surayj)


Majority Shāfi‘ī Position
The majority of Shāfi‘ī jurists:
❌ do not allow it.


Example
A restaurant regularly purchases:
  • chicken supplies from wholesaler.


Week 1
  • 100 kg chicken
  • RM15 per kg
Price
100 \times 15 = 1{,}500
100 \times 15 = 1{,}500


Week 2
  • 120 kg chicken
  • RM16 per kg
Price
120 \times 16 = 1{,}920
120 \times 16 = 1{,}920


End of Month
Restaurant pays:
1{,}500 + 1{,}920 = 3{,}420
1{,}500 + 1{,}920 = 3{,}420


Analysis
Every withdrawal:
  • has known price;
  • has known quantity.
Only payment is deferred.
Result
✅ Generally permissible according to majority non-Shāfi‘ī schools.


B. Price Not Specified Each Time But Determined by Market Price on Day Goods Are Taken
Structure
In this form:
  • goods are taken continuously;
  • price not expressly stated during each withdrawal.
However:
  • parties initially agree that:
price shall follow prevailing market price on the day goods are taken.


Majority Juristic View
The famous opinion among the four schools:
❌ generally does NOT allow this arrangement.
Why?
Because:
  • price is unknown during contract session;
  • uncertainty (gharar) exists.


Basis of Prohibition
The jurists rely upon:
  • Qur’ānic prohibition against unlawful consumption of wealth;
  • prohibition of uncertainty in contracts;
  • scholarly consensus requiring known price.


Example
A supermarket continuously takes:
  • vegetables from supplier.
No exact price stated during each withdrawal.
Parties merely agree:
“Price will follow market price each day.”


Problem
At the moment goods are taken:
❌ exact price unknown.
This may lead to:
  • disputes;
  • uncertainty.
Result
❌ Invalid according to majority view.


Minority Hanafi and Hanbali View
Some Hanafi and Hanbali jurists:
✅ allow this arrangement
if:
  • market price is stable and commonly known.


Basis of Their Opinion
They rely on:
  • customary market practice (‘urf);
  • prevailing market value (thaman al-mithl);
  • practical commercial necessity.


Example
A petrol station regularly takes:
  • fuel supplies.
Daily market price:
  • publicly known and stable.
Thus:
  • parties rely on prevailing market rate.
Result
✅ Permissible according to some Hanafi and Hanbali jurists.


C. Price Not Specified and No Agreed Pricing Mechanism
Structure
In this form:
  • goods are continuously taken;
  • no exact price stated;
  • no agreed pricing formula;
  • final payment determined only during later account reconciliation.


Majority Juristic View
Most jurists:
❌ prohibit this arrangement.
Why?
Because:
  • contract lacks certainty regarding price;
  • excessive gharar exists.


Example
A retailer continuously takes:
  • beverages from supplier.
No:
  • price;
  • pricing formula;
  • market benchmark
is agreed initially.
At month-end:
  • parties negotiate final amount.


Problem
At time goods are taken:
❌ no binding sale price exists.
Thus:
  • contract remains incomplete.
Result
❌ Invalid according to majority.


Later Hanafi Position
Some later Hanafi scholars:
✅ allowed this arrangement
if:
  • parties finally agree on price during reconciliation stage.
They based this on:
  • juristic preference (istihsān);
  • commercial custom (‘urf);
  • widespread public need (‘umūm al-balwā).


Example
A grocery store continuously receives:
  • bread supplies daily.
No exact price fixed initially.
At month-end:
  • parties reconcile account using accepted market rates.
Because this practice:
  • became widespread commercial custom,
later Hanafi scholars:
✅ tolerated it.


3. Comparative Summary
Type A
Price Specified in Every Transaction
Majority View
✅ Permissible.
Reason
Price known at every withdrawal.


Type B
Market Price Used But Not Expressly Stated
Majority View
❌ Not permissible.
Minority Hanafi/Hanbali View
✅ Permissible if market price stable.


Type C
No Price and No Pricing Mechanism Initially
Majority View
❌ Not permissible.
Later Hanafi View
✅ Permissible after reconciliation based on custom.


4. Important Sharī‘ah Principle
The major concern in deferred-payment istijrār is:
uncertainty regarding price (jahālah al-thaman).
Islamic commercial law generally requires:
✅ certainty of price;
✅ certainty of obligations;
✅ avoidance of excessive gharar.
However:
  • some jurists allow flexibility where:
    • strong commercial custom exists;
    • public need is widespread;
    • market prices are stable and commonly known.

Picture
Published on
Islamic Contract – Bay’ al-Istijrār: Istijrār With Upfront Payment
1. Definition of Istijrār With Upfront Payment
Explanation
This type of istijrār involves:
the buyer paying money upfront to the seller for a specified quantity of goods that will be supplied gradually in stages over time.
Instead of:
  • immediate full delivery,
the goods are:
  • withdrawn progressively according to need.


Simple Example
A restaurant pays:
  • RM100,000 upfront
    to a food supplier for:
  • monthly supply of chicken over 1 year.
The supplier then:
  • delivers portions gradually every month.
Result
✅ Istijrār with upfront payment.


2. Scholarly Views on Istijrār With Upfront Payment
Majority of Scholars
The majority of scholars:
✅ permit this arrangement,
although they differ regarding:
the fiqh characterization (takyīf fiqhī) of the contract.
Some classify it as:
  • salam-like arrangement;
  • continuous supply sale;
  • hybrid contractual structure.


Shāfi‘ī School
The Shāfi‘ī jurists:
❌ do not permit this form of istijrār.
Why?
Because:
  • payment occurs upfront;
  • goods are delivered gradually later;
  • uncertainty may arise regarding staged delivery.


3. SAC-BNM Approval on Istijrār Trade Financing
SAC-BNM Resolution
The:
Shariah Advisory Council of Bank Negara Malaysia (SAC-BNM)
at its:
194th meeting on 25 June 2019
approved:
a proposed import financing structure based on bay’ al-istijrār.
This approval was specifically for:
  • Islamic trade finance facilities;
  • Islamic letter of credit financing.


4. Structure of Istijrār Import Financing
The structure generally involves:
  • Islamic Financial Institution (IFI);
  • importer/customer;
  • exporter/supplier.


Chronological Flow of Istijrār Import Financing
STEP 1 — Customer Wants to Import Goods
A Malaysian importer wishes to import:
  • industrial machinery from Germany.
Import Value
RM2,000,000
The customer requests:
  • Islamic trade financing facility.


STEP 2 — Customer Appointed as Agent
The Islamic bank appoints:
the importer/customer as purchasing agent (wakīl).
The customer now acts:
  • on behalf of the Islamic bank
    to purchase goods.


SAC-BNM Requirement
The facility agreement must clearly specify:
the importer’s responsibility as purchasing agent.


STEP 3 — Customer Purchases Goods for Bank
As agent:
  • the importer executes purchase transaction with exporter
    on behalf of:
  • Islamic bank.
At this stage:
✅ goods are purchased for the bank,
not yet for customer personally.


STEP 4 — Islamic Bank Becomes Owner of Goods
Once purchase completed:
✅ ownership transfers to Islamic bank.
Thus:
  • the bank bears ownership risk at this stage.


STEP 5 — Exporter Ships Goods
The exporter ships:
  • industrial machinery.
Shipping documents are issued.


STEP 6 — Customer Receives Goods/Documents
The imported goods and/or shipping documents arrive.


STEP 7 — Customer Purchases Goods From Islamic Bank
After agency role completed,
the customer now enters:
separate purchase transaction with the Islamic bank.
This is important because:
  • agency role must finish first;
  • customer cannot simultaneously act as:
    • purchasing agent;
    • purchaser.


SAC-BNM Requirement
The IFI must ensure:
proper sequencing of transactions.
Meaning:
  1. agency purchase first;
  2. customer purchase from bank second.


STEP 8 — Customer Pays Bank
The customer pays:
  • agreed financing price;
  • either deferred or instalment basis.


Example With Figures
Import Cost Paid by Islamic Bank
RM2,000,000
Selling Price to Customer
RM2,300,000


Bank’s Profit
2{,}300{,}000 - 2{,}000{,}000 = 300{,}000
2{,}300{,}000 - 2{,}000{,}000 = 300{,}000


5. Why Proper Sequencing Is Important
Incorrect Structure
If customer:
  • purchases goods before agency role completed,
then:
  • contracts may overlap improperly;
  • ownership transfer becomes unclear;
  • Sharī‘ah issues may arise.


Correct Structure
Sequence Must Be:
  1. Customer acts as agent for bank.
  2. Bank acquires ownership.
  3. Customer later buys goods from bank.


6. Risks and Liabilities
The agreement must clearly determine:
  • who bears ownership risk;
  • liabilities at each stage.


Example
Before Customer Purchases From Bank
✅ Bank bears ownership risk.


After Customer Purchases From Bank
✅ Customer bears ownership risk.


7. Why SAC-BNM Allowed This Structure
SAC-BNM approved this structure because:
  • modern trade finance requires practical import financing solutions;
  • continuous supply financing is commercially needed;
  • the structure facilitates Sharī‘ah-compliant international trade.
However:
the approval is confined specifically to the proposed trade finance structure.


Important Sharī‘ah Principle
Istijrār financing is permissible only if:
✅ proper ownership transfer occurs;
✅ agency and sale contracts are separated;
✅ sequencing is properly maintained;
✅ ownership risks are genuinely borne by the correct party.
Otherwise:
❌ the arrangement may resemble conventional interest-based financing.

​
Picture
Published on
​Islamic Contract – Application of Istijrār in Islamic Finance
Q1: What is istijrār?
Answer
Istijrār refers to:
a contractual arrangement where a buyer continuously purchases goods from a seller over a period of time, usually with periodic settlement of payment.
Instead of:
  • concluding a separate contract for every individual purchase,
the parties:
  • establish an ongoing supply arrangement.
Istijrār is commonly suitable for:
  • repetitive supply transactions;
  • trade financing;
  • import-export businesses.


Q2: How is istijrār applied in Islamic finance?
Answer
In contemporary Islamic finance, istijrār can be used to structure:
Islamic trade financing facilities,
particularly:
  • import financing under a letter of credit (LC).
Under this arrangement:
  • the importer obtains financing from an Islamic bank;
  • goods are purchased from exporter/supplier;
  • financing is arranged through continuous supply mechanism.
Istijrār serves as an alternative to:
  • murābahah financing;
  • tawarruq financing.


Q3: What is the role of the Islamic bank in istijrār import financing?
Answer
The Islamic bank facilitates:
  • payment to exporter;
  • issuance of letter of credit;
  • trade financing for importer.
The arrangement may involve:
  • bank controlling goods; or
  • direct delivery to importer.


Two Types of Delivery Arrangement in Istijrār
1. Bill of Lading Controlled by the Bank
Explanation
The Islamic bank:
  • retains control over shipping documents;
  • controls ownership/title of goods during shipment.
The bill of lading is issued:
  • in the bank’s name.
Thus:
  • the bank has constructive possession (qabd hukmī) over goods.


Case Study 1: Bank Controls Goods
A Malaysian importer wishes to import:
  • electronic equipment from Japan.


Transaction Structure
Step 1
Islamic bank issues:
  • letter of credit to Japanese exporter.


Step 2
Exporter ships goods.
The:
  • bill of lading is issued in bank’s name.
Thus:
  • the bank controls goods during shipment.


Step 3
Bank finances importer through istijrār arrangement.
Importer gradually purchases goods from bank.


Financing Amount
  • Import cost = RM2,000,000
  • Selling price to importer = RM2,300,000


Bank’s Profit
2{,}300{,}000 - 2{,}000{,}000 = 300{,}000
2{,}300{,}000 - 2{,}000{,}000 = 300{,}000


Analysis
The bank:
  • obtains constructive possession through bill of lading;
  • assumes ownership risk during shipment.
Result
✅ Sharī‘ah-compliant istijrār trade financing.


2. Bill of Lading Not Controlled by the Bank
Explanation
In this structure:
  • goods are shipped directly to importer;
  • the bank does not control shipping documents.
The importer:
  • receives goods directly from exporter.
The bank:
  • still finances the trade arrangement through agreed istijrār facility.


Case Study 2: Direct Delivery to Importer
A food importer purchases:
  • frozen meat products from Australia.


Transaction Structure
Step 1
Islamic bank issues:
  • letter of credit.


Step 2
Exporter ships goods directly to importer.
The:
  • bill of lading names importer directly.
Thus:
  • bank does not physically or constructively control goods.


Step 3
Importer settles financing progressively with bank under istijrār arrangement.


Financing Details
  • Import value = RM1,500,000
  • Payment by importer over 12 months = RM1,700,000


Bank’s Profit
1{,}700{,}000 - 1{,}500{,}000 = 200{,}000
1{,}700{,}000 - 1{,}500{,}000 = 200{,}000


Analysis
  • Goods move directly to importer.
  • Bank provides financing facility.
  • Continuous supply relationship exists.
Result
✅ Permissible istijrār-based financing arrangement.


Q4: Why is istijrār useful in Islamic trade finance?
Answer
Istijrār is beneficial because:
  • it facilitates repeated trade transactions;
  • reduces need for repeated separate contracts;
  • supports import-export financing;
  • simplifies ongoing commercial supply arrangements.
It is especially useful for:
  • wholesalers;
  • importers;
  • manufacturers;
  • commodity traders.


Q5: How does istijrār differ from murābahah and tawarruq?
Istijrār
  • Continuous supply arrangement.
  • Suitable for repetitive transactions.
  • Trade-oriented structure.


Murābahah
  • Single cost-plus sale transaction.
  • Common in asset financing.


Tawarruq
  • Cash liquidity arrangement through commodity trading.
  • Mainly financing-oriented rather than supply-oriented.


Important Principle
Istijrār supports:
  • genuine commercial activity;
  • trade financing;
  • continuous supply relationships.
It provides:
  • a Sharī‘ah-compliant alternative to conventional trade financing,
    while avoiding:
  • ribā-based lending structures.

Picture
Published on
Islamic Trade Finance – Chronology Where Bill of Lading Is Sent Directly to Customer (Bank Has No Control)
Example Scenario
A Malaysian importer/customer wants to import:
  • industrial equipment from Germany.
Equipment Price
RM1,000,000
The customer obtains:
  • Islamic trade financing facility.
In this structure:
the Bill of Lading (B/L) is sent directly to the customer,
so:
❌ the Islamic bank does NOT control the goods through the B/L.
This is one of the arrangements mentioned in:
  • istijrār;
  • certain import financing facilities.


STEP 1 — Customer Wants to Import Goods
The customer contacts:
  • German exporter/supplier.
The customer agrees to buy:
  • industrial equipment.


STEP 2 — Customer Requests Financing From Islamic Bank
The customer asks:
  • Islamic bank for import financing facility.
The Islamic bank agrees:
  • subject to financing terms.


STEP 3 — Islamic Bank Issues Letter of Credit (LC)
The Islamic bank issues:
a Letter of Credit (LC)
to the exporter.
The LC guarantees:
✅ payment to exporter
if:
  • exporter ships goods properly;
  • exporter submits required documents.


IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE IN THIS STRUCTURE
The LC instructions provide that:
the Bill of Lading will be issued directly to customer/importer,
NOT:
  • to the bank;
  • not “to the order of the bank.”
Thus:
❌ bank does not control shipment documents.


STEP 4 — Exporter Ships Goods
The exporter loads:
  • industrial equipment onto ship.
The shipping company then issues:
Bill of Lading (B/L).


STEP 5 — Bill of Lading Names Customer
The B/L states:
Consignee
➡ Customer/importer directly.
NOT:
  • Islamic bank.
Thus:
✅ customer directly controls release of goods.


IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCE
Because customer is consignee:
  • customer can directly claim goods from shipping company.
The bank:
❌ does not possess constructive control over goods through B/L.


STEP 6 — Exporter Receives Original B/L
The exporter physically receives:
  • original shipping documents.


STEP 7 — Exporter Submits Documents to Bank
The exporter still submits:
  • invoice;
  • B/L copy/original;
  • shipping documents
to bank for payment under LC.
Why?
Because:
  • bank promised payment through LC.


STEP 8 — Islamic Bank Pays Exporter
After checking documents:
✅ bank pays exporter.


STEP 9 — Ship Arrives in Malaysia
The ship reaches:
  • Malaysian port.
Since:
  • customer already named consignee in B/L,
the customer:
✅ can directly collect goods from port.


STEP 10 — Customer Repays Bank
The customer later settles:
  • financing obligation with Islamic bank,
    according to financing arrangement.


IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE FROM BANK-CONTROLLED B/L
In Bank-Controlled Structure
B/L Names
➡ bank.
Result
✅ bank controls goods.


In Direct-to-Customer Structure
B/L Names
➡ customer.
Result
❌ bank does not control goods through B/L.


Ownership and Control in This Structure
During Shipment
Usually:
✅ customer may already have direct control rights through B/L.
The bank’s role mainly becomes:
  • payment financier;
  • LC issuer.


Why Would This Structure Be Used?
It may be used:
  • for commercial convenience;
  • where importer has strong creditworthiness;
  • where bank accepts lower documentary control.


Islamic Finance Perspective
This structure creates:
  • less direct ownership/control by bank.
Therefore:
  • Sharī‘ah structuring becomes more sensitive.
Islamic banks must ensure:
  • financing does not become merely cash lending with profit.
This is why:
  • bank-controlled B/L structures are often preferred in murābahah trade financing.


Chronological Summary
Step 1
Customer wants to import goods.
⬇
Step 2
Customer requests Islamic financing.
⬇
Step 3
Islamic bank issues LC.
⬇
Step 4
Exporter ships goods.
⬇
Step 5
Shipping company issues B/L directly to customer.
⬇
Step 6
Exporter submits documents to bank.
⬇
Step 7
Bank pays exporter.
⬇
Step 8
Ship arrives Malaysia.
⬇
Step 9
Customer directly collects goods.
⬇
Step 10
Customer repays financing to bank.


Important Principle
If B/L Names Bank
➡ bank controls goods.
If B/L Names Customer
➡ customer controls goods directly.
The:
Bill of Lading determines practical control and right to claim the shipment from the carrier.

​
Picture
Published on
Islamic Trade Finance – What Happens to Ownership When a Letter of Credit (LC) Is Issued?
Short Answer
Issuing a Letter of Credit (LC) alone:
does NOT automatically transfer ownership of the goods to the bank.
Ownership depends on:
  • the underlying sale contract;
  • when ownership transfer occurs;
  • who purchased the goods.
The LC itself is mainly:
a payment undertaking by the bank.


Important Principle
Letter of Credit (LC)
➡️ payment mechanism.
Bill of Lading (B/L)
➡️ control/possession document.
Sale Contract
➡️ determines ownership.


Chronological Ownership Explanation
Example Scenario
A Malaysian customer wants to import:
  • a Toyota car from Japan.
Car Price
RM200,000
The customer requests:
  • Islamic bank financing through murābahah.


STEP 1 — Customer Requests Financing
Customer asks:
“Please finance the import of this car.”
At this point:
❌ nobody new owns the car yet.
The exporter still owns the car.


STEP 2 — Islamic Bank Issues Letter of Credit
The Islamic bank issues:
a Letter of Credit (LC)
to exporter.


IMPORTANT POINT
At this stage:
❌ ownership still does NOT transfer to bank merely because LC is issued.
Why?
Because:
  • LC is only a promise to pay;
  • not a sale contract by itself.
Thus:
✅ exporter still owns the car.


STEP 3 — Exporter Ships the Car
Exporter loads car onto ship.
The shipping company issues:
  • Bill of Lading (B/L).
The B/L names:
  • Islamic bank;
    or
  • “to the order of Islamic bank.”


Does B/L Automatically Transfer Ownership?
Not necessarily.
The B/L mainly gives:
✅ control over delivery/access to goods.
Ownership depends on:
  • underlying purchase contract;
  • commercial terms.


STEP 4 — Bank Pays Exporter
After exporter submits compliant documents:
  • Islamic bank pays exporter.
Now we ask:
Did the bank purchase the car from exporter?


IF YES → Ownership Transfers to Bank
In Islamic murābahah financing:
usually:
✅ the bank purchases the goods from exporter first.
Thus:
  • ownership transfers to bank;
  • bank bears ownership risk;
  • bank controls B/L.
Now:
✅ bank owns the car during shipment.


STEP 5 — Bank Sells Car to Customer
The bank later sells:
  • the car to customer through murābahah.
Example:
  • Bank cost = RM200,000
  • Murābahah price = RM230,000
Profit
230,000 - 200,000 = 30,000



STEP 6 — Ownership Transfers to Customer
After murābahah sale:
✅ ownership transfers to customer.
The bank then:
  • endorses/releases B/L to customer.
The customer:
  • collects car at port.


VERY IMPORTANT DISTINCTION
LC Alone Does NOT Create Ownership
Issuing LC only means:
“The bank promises to pay.”
It does NOT automatically mean:
“The bank owns the goods.”


Ownership Comes From Sale Contract
Ownership usually transfers when:
  • bank actually purchases goods from exporter.


Role of B/L
The B/L helps establish:
✅ constructive possession (qabd hukmī)
and
✅ control over delivery.
But:
  • B/L itself is not always the sole determinant of ownership.


Simplified Ownership Timeline
Before LC
Exporter owns car.
⬇
After LC Issued
Exporter STILL owns car.
⬇
After Bank Purchases Goods
Bank becomes owner.
⬇
During Shipment
Bank usually owns and controls goods through B/L.
⬇
After Murābahah Sale
Customer becomes owner.
⬇
After B/L Endorsed
Customer collects car.


Islamic Finance Perspective
This distinction is crucial because:
  • Islamic banks cannot merely:
    • lend money with profit.
Instead:
✅ bank must genuinely:
  • purchase goods;
  • own goods;
  • bear ownership risk;
  • then resell goods.
Otherwise:
❌ transaction may resemble ribā-based financing.


Important Principle
LC
➡️ payment guarantee.
B/L
➡️ control and constructive possession.
Ownership
➡️ determined by actual sale contract and transfer of ownership rights.

Picture
Published on
​Islamic  Contract – Chronological Flow of Letter of Credit (LC) and Bill of Lading (B/L)
Example Scenario
A Malaysian customer wants to import:
  • a Toyota car from Japan.
Car Price
RM200,000
The customer asks:
  • an Islamic bank to finance the import transaction.
The Islamic bank uses:
  • a Letter of Credit (LC).


STEP 1 — Customer Requests Financing
The customer approaches the Islamic bank and says:
“I want to import a car from Japan but I need financing.”
The Islamic bank agrees to finance the transaction.


STEP 2 — Islamic Bank Issues Letter of Credit (LC)
The Islamic bank sends:
a Letter of Credit (LC)
to the Japanese exporter.


What Is the LC?
The LC is:
the bank’s promise to pay the exporter
provided:
  • exporter ships the goods properly;
  • exporter submits required shipping documents.


Important LC Instruction
The LC states:
the Bill of Lading (B/L) must be issued:
  • “to the order of the Islamic bank”
    or
  • naming the bank as consignee.


Why Does the Bank Want This?
Because:
  • the bank is paying first;
  • the bank wants control over the goods;
  • the bank must establish ownership/control for Sharī‘ah compliance.


STEP 3 — Exporter Ships the Car
The Japanese exporter:
  • loads the car onto the ship.
Now:
  • the shipping company receives the car for transportation.


STEP 4 — Shipping Company Issues Bill of Lading (B/L)
After receiving the car,
the shipping company prepares:
the Bill of Lading.


What Is the Bill of Lading?
The B/L is:
  1. receipt of goods;
  2. shipping contract;
  3. document of title/control over goods.


IMPORTANT PART
The B/L says:
Consignee
➡ Islamic bank
or
➡ “to the order of Islamic bank.”
Meaning:
the shipping company will only release the car to whoever lawfully holds the endorsed original B/L.


Why Does the B/L Give Control Over Goods?
Because:
  • the port/shipping company refuses to release goods without the original B/L.
Thus:
whoever controls the original B/L effectively controls access to the goods.


STEP 5 — Exporter Receives Original B/L
The shipping company physically gives:
  • the original B/L documents
    to the exporter.


Important Clarification
Although:
  • exporter physically receives the B/L first,
the B/L legally names:
  • the Islamic bank as consignee/controller.
Thus:
  • exporter cannot simply release goods himself.
The exporter’s purpose now is:
to submit documents to the bank and obtain payment.


STEP 6 — Exporter Submits Documents to Bank
The exporter sends:
  • original B/L;
  • commercial invoice;
  • insurance documents;
  • packing list
to the Islamic bank.
This happens:
  • while the ship is still travelling.


STEP 7 — Bank Checks Documents
The Islamic bank examines whether:
  • shipment complied with LC terms;
  • documents are correct.
If everything complies:
✅ bank pays exporter.


STEP 8 — Bank Now Controls the Goods
Now the bank possesses:
  • the original B/L.
Thus:
✅ the bank controls release of the car.
Why?
Because:
  • the shipping company only releases goods to:
    • lawful holder of original endorsed B/L.


STEP 9 — Ship Arrives in Malaysia
The ship reaches:
  • Port Klang.
BUT:
❌ customer still cannot collect the car yet.
Why?
Because customer still does not possess:
  • endorsed original B/L.


STEP 10 — Bank Releases/Endorses B/L to Customer
After:
  • financing documents signed;
  • murābahah completed;
  • customer obligations fulfilled,
the bank:
  • endorses/releases the B/L to customer.
This endorsement means:
the bank transfers the right to claim the goods.


STEP 11 — Customer Presents B/L at Port
The customer now presents:
  • original endorsed B/L
    to shipping company/port authority.
The port verifies:
  • authenticity;
  • endorsement chain.


STEP 12 — Shipping Company Releases the Car
Once verification completed:
✅ shipping company releases the car to customer.
Now:
✅ customer obtains possession of the car.


Overall Timeline Summary
Step 1
Customer requests financing.
⬇
Step 2
Islamic bank issues LC.
⬇
Step 3
Exporter ships car.
⬇
Step 4
Shipping company issues B/L naming bank.
⬇
Step 5
Exporter receives B/L physically.
⬇
Step 6
Exporter submits B/L to bank.
⬇
Step 7
Bank checks documents and pays exporter.
⬇
Step 8
Bank now controls goods through B/L.
⬇
Step 9
Ship arrives Malaysia.
⬇
Step 10
Bank endorses/releases B/L to customer.
⬇
Step 11
Customer presents B/L at port.
⬇
Step 12
Shipping company releases car.


Islamic Finance Perspective
This structure is important because:
  • Islamic bank must genuinely:
    • own/control goods;
    • bear ownership risk.
The B/L helps establish:
constructive possession (qabd hukmī)
which supports:
  • murābahah financing;
  • istijrār financing;
  • Sharī‘ah-compliant trade finance.
Without such ownership/control:
  • the arrangement may resemble:
    ❌ conventional interest-based lending.


Important Principle
The:
original endorsed Bill of Lading represents legal control and right to claim the goods.
Therefore:
  • whoever lawfully possesses the endorsed B/L generally controls:
    • release;
    • access;
    • practical possession of the shipment.




Picture

Author

A writer who is passionate about knowledge 

Author

Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.